Board 8 > Nationalist politics topic 16: Zealots accidentally bring us to historical truth

(+) Yeah! (+)

Vlado posted...

Meanwhile, official Assassin's Creed twitter account for Spain tweets pedo defence:
https://archive.fo/ySVBr

I'm beginning to think Vlado is a pedophile because when someone reads that and defaults to "omg they mean children" and not "oh they could mean a 50 year old with a 25 year old" is pretty sick in the head.
---

Erm, "age doesn't matter in love" is literally a staple of pedophilia defenders.
---

Within the context of the quote ("age, gender, and race") it's pretty obvious what they mean, and it certainly isn't about pedophilia. Like explain to me why Ubisoft would be even promoting pedophilia? Or if they believed in it why don't they actually put it in the games?

Or, and bear with me a moment, that in their latest game where you can fuck 70 year old ladies, is probably what they're referring to.
---

How is a relationship between a 50-year-old and a 25-year-old, or fucking 70-year-olds, even in the context of "Pride month"? It's pretty obviously about pedophilia.

That said, it's still just the Spanish account, and some employee was likely just "improvising." But let's not pretend this isn't one of the next steps of the movement, if allowed.
---

Vlado posted...

some employee was likely just "improvising."

wut?

was this part of a slam poetry performance?
---

Vlado posted...

How is a relationship between a 50-year-old and a 25-year-old, or fucking 70-year-olds, even in the context of "Pride month"?

Uh, because there are 70 year old, 50 year old, and 25 year old gay and lesbian people? Is this a real thought process? You are projecting harder than "conservative who wants to ban abortions while his mistress has a secret abortion" levels here.
---

lmfao, imagine reaching that far. Why include age at all then? Defending gay people is enough.

TheRock1525 posted...

in their latest game where you can fuck 70 year old ladies, is probably what they're referring to.

So, is the main character a woman?
---

Yeah. There are two characters you can choose to be. A man and a woman
---

Vlado posted...

lmfao, imagine reaching that far. Why include age at all then?

Same reason they included race.

Vlado posted...

So, is the main character a woman?

Main character can be either gender.
---

Vlado posted...

lmfao, imagine reaching that far. Why include age at all then? Defending gay people is enough.

TheRock1525 posted...

in their latest game where you can fuck 70 year old ladies, is probably what they're referring to.

So, is the main character a woman?

yes hes reaching

not you who believes a major video game account is casually promoting pedophilia
---

TheRock1525 posted...

Same reason they included race.

So they're just stupid?

TheRock1525 posted...

either gender.

*either sex
---

I mean, Vlado regularly defends pedophilia and is obsessed with a 12-year-old drag queen, so it's easy to see where his head is at.

Also explains why he was so vehement about Nintendo not "censoring" the sexualization of visibly-underage girls.
---

Vlado posted...

So they're just stupid?

I mean if you're that cynical I guess. Responding to the concept of "love is blind" with "lol that's stupid" is honestly the saddest thing I've heard from you.
---

A general "Love is blind" statement has no and shouldn't have any relation whatsoever with "pride month."

Anyway, Putin pointed out liberalism was dead before G20, and globalist outlets quickly started foaming at the mouth :)

So, the liberal idea has become obsolete. It has come into conflict with the interests of the overwhelming majority of the population.

https://www.rt.com/news/462846-putin-interview-ft-g20/
https://www.rt.com/news/462934-putin-questioning-liberalism-shock/
---

Id argued that conservatism is dead in a globalized (not globalism, since you cant tell the difference) society, yet people like Putin are trying their damnedest to fight the will of the people and maintain the power and control of the wealthy elite.
---

Conservatism is, in short, family and Christian values, loving your country and people, and support for small business.
---

Vlado posted...

A general "Love is blind" statement has no and shouldn't have any relation whatsoever with "pride month."

I mean, it absolutely should. We have people who think gay and lesbian love is lesser than heterosexual love and therefore deserving of less rights and more scorn.

Vlado posted...

Conservatism is, in short, family and Christian values, loving your country and people, and support for small business.

I have an agnostic conservative friend so I'm pretty sure "Christian Values" isn't a requirement. Nor is loving your country and people exclusive to conservatism.
---

Telling how Vlado immediately associates conservative ideology with Christianity.
---

Vlado posted...

Conservatism is, in short, family and Christian values, loving your country and people, and support for small business.

lol. maybe in an ideal world it would be, but in the real world, conservatism is about blind adoration for mega-corporations. look at muffin's posts or sephyg's posts if you want proof.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Vlado posted...

Conservatism is, in short, family and Christian values, loving your country and people, and support for small business.

lol. maybe in an ideal world it would be, but in the real world, conservatism is about blind adoration for mega-corporations. look at muffin's posts or sephyg's posts if you want proof.

If Vlado gave a shit about small businesses, he wouldnt support nationalism and the tremendous benefits it offers to multi-billion dollar corporations.
---

Vlado posted...

A general "Love is blind" statement has no and shouldn't have any relation whatsoever with "pride month."

Anyway, Putin pointed out liberalism was dead before G20, and globalist outlets quickly started foaming at the mouth :)

So, the liberal idea has become obsolete. It has come into conflict with the interests of the overwhelming majority of the population.

https://www.rt.com/news/462846-putin-interview-ft-g20/
https://www.rt.com/news/462934-putin-questioning-liberalism-shock/

that second article is super weird. The title is like woah everyone is shocked and then theres no actual example of anyone being shocked. Its all just stuff the author is imagining.
---

also worth noting that putin doesn't even fully hate liberalism, according to those RT articles.

That does not mean the liberal ideas or any others should be outlawed or suppressed, Putin concluded.

Even the failed liberal idea, he said, has the right to exist and it should even be supported in some things.

gee, i wonder why vlado didn't quote this part of the first article.
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Vlado posted...

Conservatism is, in short, family and Christian values, loving your country and people, and support for small business.

lol. maybe in an ideal world it would be, but in the real world, conservatism is about blind adoration for mega-corporations. look at muffin's posts or sephyg's posts if you want proof.

And yet those corporations are pushing "liberal" causes on the peoples of the world in their quest for globalism.

Also, pretty sure Muffin at least is not keen on google censoring anyone who isn't at least centre-left. Or the globalist-controlled media attacking them.

MoogleKupo141 posted...

that second article is super weird. The title is like woah everyone is shocked and then theres no actual example of anyone being shocked. Its all just stuff the author is imagining.

The shock is not that Putin said it - after all, to these people he's an "evil dictator," while, by Russian standards, the guy is quite liberal. The shock comes when they start asking themselves whether he's right.

Mr Lasastryke posted...

gee, i wonder why vlado didn't quote this part of the first article.

I didn't quote anything (except for the extended title), the whole article should be read. As I said, Putin is a liberal himself. Just not the insane type of liberal that's become the norm for the west in the last ~20 years.
---

Nothing more liberal than hating the gays, am I right?
---

TheRock1525 posted...

Nothing more liberal than hating the gays, am I right?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvTYMhbMbQ0" data-time="
---

Corporations pay lip service to liberal causes because the majority of their consumer base is liberal. In terms of actual ACTIONS, corporations are far more conservative and benefit from nationalism.
---

>google censors anything remotely resembling conservative opinion
>"lip service"

And then you wonder why you're not taken seriously.
---

The shock is not that Putin said it - after all, to these people he's an "evil dictator," while, by Russian standards, the guy is quite liberal. The shock comes when they start asking themselves whether he's right.

ok but my point is he doesnt show any example of all these hypothetical shocked liberals. Its an idea completely fabricated by the author.
---

Vlado posted...

>google censors anything remotely resembling conservative opinion
>"lip service"

And then you wonder why you're not taken seriously.

Google downplays false and inaccurate information in their search results...which for some STRANGE reason seem to all come from conservative sources with a history of publishing false or misleading information as fact.

But sure. Censorship. Whatever makes you feel like youre a victim and the world is out to get you.
---

God I wish I lived in a world where websites actually censored conservatives' dumbass lies
---

Vlado do you experience oppressive censorship on the internet?
---

Lets reduce the argument down to a more personal one.

You, Vlado, believe the mainstream media is in the tank of globalism, and therefore cannot be trusted.

You, Vlado, only post news articles from RT, random conservative websites, or archive.org links to the rare instance in which the MSM reports something that agrees with your beliefs.

By YOUR logic, you are censoring liberal beliefs. By MY logic, you are exercising your right to not signal boost journalism that you consider to be false or untrustworthy. Which is it?
---

And to head off the inevitable deflection post, it does not matter that you are a million times less relevant than Google. The baseline result of your actions is the same, regardless of scale.
---

Kenri posted...

God I wish I lived in a world where websites actually censored conservatives' dumbass lies

just for fun i googled "abortion opinion piece" and found an anti-abortion article within 2 seconds

yeah, they're sure "censoring anything remotely resembling conservative opinion"
---

Mr Lasastryke posted...

Kenri posted...

God I wish I lived in a world where websites actually censored conservatives' dumbass lies

just for fun i googled "abortion opinion piece" and found an anti-abortion article within 2 seconds

yeah, they're sure "censoring anything remotely resembling conservative opinion"

https://searx.me/?q=google+censorship
---

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1147276144942579712

I like Tulsi and all... but "take your opponent's word for how to best defeat them" is horrible advice. It's why the Republicans kept nominating moderate wimps and kept getting destroyed with them.
---

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1147957011738329088

All the Democrats have to do is not be insane, and they can't do it. Trump continues to rise in the polls, by doing nothing, simply because he seems good in comparison to those lunatics.
---

yeah if there's one thing trump is known for it's not being insane
---

SmartMuffin posted...

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1147957011738329088

All the Democrats have to do is not be insane, and they can't do it. Trump continues to rise in the polls, by doing nothing, simply because he seems good in comparison to those lunatics.

Oh so we believe the polls now.

It's very hard to keep track of what polls are real or fake anymore.
---

muffin must suck at gamefaqs contests if he thinks poll results are the way they are because of one single variable lol
---

Can I just say: post the fucking poll. Dont just link to Ann Coulters Twitter discussion of a poll shes not linking to. Thats not news.
---

Ann Coulter's twitter discussion is literally more reliable of a news source than the New York Times.
---

SmartMuffin posted...

Ann Coulter's twitter discussion is literally more reliable of a news source than the New York Times.

Still not linking the poll.
---

SmartMuffin posted...

Ann Coulter's twitter discussion is literally more reliable of a news source than the New York Times.

This is factually incorrect.
---

SmartMuffin posted...

Ann Coulter's twitter discussion is literally more reliable of a news source than the New York Times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4" data-time="
---

SmartMuffin posted...

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1147276144942579712

I like Tulsi and all... but "take your opponent's word for how to best defeat them" is horrible advice. It's why the Republicans kept nominating moderate wimps and kept getting destroyed with them.

Uh. Most importantly, the comment is right. Tulsi and Bernie have the best chances to beat Trump. But neither is getting the nomination, so it doesn't matter.

Anyway, Pizzagate main player Epstein arrested for sex trafficking:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/07/billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-arrested-on-sex-trafficking-charges.html

"But Pizzagate is totally fake, guys!" - random democratic party fanboy
---

pedophiles can be real without a ridiculous email pizza code being real
---

You mean Trump's good friend Jeffrey Epstein?

MoogleKupo141 posted...

pedophiles can be real without a ridiculous email pizza code being real

Keep in mind that Pizzagate is also built around the idea that a Pizza restaurant that doesn't have a basement had a child sex ring... in the basement. No one denies pedophiles exist. Everyone who isn't a functional moron realizes pizza gate was one of the dumbest things ever created and believing in it literally makes you an embarrassment to humanity.
---

lmfao @ implying Pizzagate is about a single restaurant. It's the tip of the tip of the iceberg.
---

Vlado posted...

lmfao @ implying Pizzagate is about a single restaurant. It's the tip of the tip of the iceberg.

I mean, a guy who believed the theory sure did go to a specific restaurant and shoot up the place.

But that happened in America. It doesnt even remotely affect you. So why should you care about the consequences of pushing radicalized bullshit on the kinds of gullible morons who think there needs to be a secret, underground sex dungeon for pedophilia to exist in Washington?
---