Poll of the Day > NASA is going back to the moon.

Topic List	Page List: 1
WastelandCowboy 11/17/18 3:57:56 PM #1:	https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeA7edXsU40" data-time=" <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:912572913] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeA7edXsU40" data-time="</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanonsSpirit 11/17/18 4:01:17 PM #2:	In before funding cut. --- https://imgur.com/tsQUpxC Thanks, Nade Duck! [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] <cite>GanonsSpirit posted [p:912573071] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>In before funding cut.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dragon504 11/17/18 4:01:39 PM #3:	Neat. Isn't China trying for their first crack at the moon soonish? --- http://myanimelist.net/profile/dragon504 http://followmy.tv/u/dragon504/time_wasted <cite>dragon504 posted [p:912573088] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>Neat. Isn't China trying for their first crack at the moon soonish?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EclairReturns 11/17/18 4:04:59 PM #4:	What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? --- Number XII: Larxene. The Organization's Savage Nymph. <cite>EclairReturns posted [p:912573250] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dragon504 11/17/18 4:06:11 PM #5:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? To make a jump off point for further solar system exploration. --- http://myanimelist.net/profile/dragon504 http://followmy.tv/u/dragon504/time_wasted <cite>dragon504 posted [p:912573339] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> To make a jump off point for further solar system exploration.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pedro45 11/17/18 4:07:18 PM #6:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? For the Republic --- Warning: Sometimes biased https://imgur.com/V0x5fw8 https://imgur.com/IOovUge https://imgur.com/zw7bqPH <cite>pedro45 posted [p:912573389] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> For the Republic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SmokeMassTree 11/17/18 4:08:22 PM #7:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? lol no they didn't --- A.K. 2/14/10 T.C.P. Victorious Champion of the 1st Annual POTd Hunger Games and the POTd Battle Royale Season 3 <cite>SmokeMassTree posted [p:912573448] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> lol no they didn't</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/17/18 4:09:26 PM #8:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Why do people climb mountains when they've already been climbed? --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:912573496] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Why do people climb mountains when they've already been climbed?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dragon504 11/17/18 4:09:27 PM #9:	SmokeMassTree posted... EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? lol no they didn't Careful you don't fall off the edge of the Earth. --- http://myanimelist.net/profile/dragon504 http://followmy.tv/u/dragon504/time_wasted <cite>dragon504 posted [p:912573499] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>SmokeMassTree posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> lol no they didn't</quote> Careful you don't fall off the edge of the Earth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanonsSpirit 11/17/18 5:01:06 PM #10:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Did you watch the video? It explicitly states they're building a moon base so they can get to other places in the solar system easier. --- https://imgur.com/tsQUpxC Thanks, Nade Duck! [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|\|]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] <cite>GanonsSpirit posted [p:912576053] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Did you watch the video? It explicitly states they're building a moon base so they can get to other places in the solar system easier.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/17/18 5:05:48 PM #11:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? It seems this time it's to build a base for mars travel. To be fair it seems kind of logical, we waste a lot of fuel leaving the atmosphere and we are going to need a lot of supplies to actually go to mars. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:912576273] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> It seems this time it's to build a base for mars travel. To be fair it seems kind of logical, we waste a lot of fuel leaving the atmosphere and we are going to need a lot of supplies to actually go to mars.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
green dragon 11/17/18 5:06:24 PM #12:	oh, are they gonna do it for real this time? --- Just because you're trash doesn't mean you can't do great things. It's called garbage can, not garbage cannot. <cite>green dragon posted [p:912576309] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>oh, are they gonna do it for real this time?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
aDirtyShisno 11/17/18 5:08:55 PM #13:	We Are NASA Dum, dum, dum, dum, dum, dum, dum! --- Que sera, sera. Whatever happens, happens. ...and he was never heard from again. <cite>aDirtyShisno posted [p:912576435] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>We Are NASA Dum, dum, dum, dum, dum, dum, dum!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ferarri619 11/17/18 5:14:51 PM #14:	The first thing I was reminded of when watching this vid was the UAC from Doom 3, and now I see poeple are actually mentioning Mars. Uh-oh X__X --- ~Nintendo 64. Get N or Get out. Coming Fall 1996~ <cite>Ferarri619 posted [p:912576697] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>The first thing I was reminded of when watching this vid was the UAC from Doom 3, and now I see poeple are actually mentioning Mars. Uh-oh X__X</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 11/17/18 5:41:54 PM #15:	They announced the lead Astronaut this time. Her name is Alice:) --- "did you steal my f***in signature" Helly <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:912578087] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>They announced the lead Astronaut this time. Her name is Alice:)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sahuagin 11/17/18 6:49:10 PM #16:	yay Mike Rowe --- *The truth basks in scrutiny.* https://imgur.com/GMouTGs http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png <cite>Sahuagin posted [p:912581452] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>yay Mike Rowe</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ninja_lootz 11/17/18 7:16:22 PM #17:	More remakes from Hollywood? Can't they come up with something original? --- MY HELMET'S ON YOU CAN'T TELL ME I'M NOT IN SPACE <cite>ninja_lootz posted [p:912582842] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>More remakes from Hollywood? Can't they come up with something original?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
coinstarcad 11/17/18 8:36:44 PM #18:	The first time we went to the moon was just because the russians beat us to outside the atmosphere. Going again seems to be a boondoggle waste of money. <cite>coinstarcad posted [p:912587045] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>The first time we went to the moon was just because the russians beat us to outside the atmosphere. Going again seems to be a boondoggle waste of money.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/17/18 8:40:28 PM #19:	coinstarcad posted... The first time we went to the moon was just because the russians beat us to outside the atmosphere. Going again seems to be a boondoggle waste of money. This is how you know someone didn't watch the video or read any other comments in the thread. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:912587219] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>coinstarcad posted...</cite> <quote>The first time we went to the moon was just because the russians beat us to outside the atmosphere. Going again seems to be a boondoggle waste of money.</quote> This is how you know someone didn't watch the video or read any other comments in the thread.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 11/17/18 8:57:16 PM #20:	GanonsSpirit posted... EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Did you watch the video? It explicitly states they're building a moon base so they can get to other places in the solar system easier. Which is odd, because it seems like it would be far easier and more efficient to establish some sort of space station base as a launching off point than one on the moon. Because while gravity is certainly reduced there, you still need to use a signifcant amount of fuel to break orbit there, which wouldn't be an issue if you were launching from space. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:912588068] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Did you watch the video? It explicitly states they're building a moon base so they can get to other places in the solar system easier.</quote> Which is odd, because it seems like it would be far easier and more efficient to establish some sort of space station base as a launching off point than one on the moon. Because while gravity is certainly reduced there, you still need to use a signifcant amount of fuel to break orbit there, which wouldn't be an issue if you were launching from space. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/17/18 9:11:43 PM #21:	ParanoidObsessive posted... GanonsSpirit posted... EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Did you watch the video? It explicitly states they're building a moon base so they can get to other places in the solar system easier. Which is odd, because it seems like it would be far easier and more efficient to establish some sort of space station base as a launching off point than one on the moon. Because while gravity is certainly reduced there, you still need to use a signifcant amount of fuel to break orbit there, which wouldn't be an issue if you were launching from space. If I were to make a wild guess they are probably planning a base larger than we currently have the technology to make into a satellite. Right now sending things into space is an exponential cost equation, even if the moon has gravity it's not the same sort of thing that requires such massive rockets to escape the pull. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:912588787] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GanonsSpirit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Did you watch the video? It explicitly states they're building a moon base so they can get to other places in the solar system easier.</quote> Which is odd, because it seems like it would be far easier and more efficient to establish some sort of space station base as a launching off point than one on the moon. Because while gravity is certainly reduced there, you still need to use a signifcant amount of fuel to break orbit there, which wouldn't be an issue if you were launching from space. </quote> If I were to make a wild guess they are probably planning a base larger than we currently have the technology to make into a satellite. Right now sending things into space is an exponential cost equation, even if the moon has gravity it's not the same sort of thing that requires such massive rockets to escape the pull.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dragon504 11/17/18 9:26:51 PM #22:	I really hope this happens and is a big success. I'd be super stoked to see asteroid mining in my lifetime and people on Mars. --- http://myanimelist.net/profile/dragon504 http://followmy.tv/u/dragon504/time_wasted <cite>dragon504 posted [p:912589488] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>I really hope this happens and is a big success. I'd be super stoked to see asteroid mining in my lifetime and people on Mars.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 11/17/18 9:48:36 PM #23:	EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Helium-3 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/infographic.view.php?id=11272 <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:912590493] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Helium-3 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/infographic.view.php?id=11272</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/17/18 9:54:30 PM #24:	Questionmarktarius posted... EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Helium-3 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/infographic.view.php?id=11272 This. The moon is rich in potential fuel. --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:912590738] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Helium-3 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/infographic.view.php?id=11272</quote> This. The moon is rich in potential fuel.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/17/18 10:06:57 PM #25:	Questionmarktarius posted... EclairReturns posted... What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again? Helium-3 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/infographic.view.php?id=11272 I like the 1. Go to moon 2. ? 3. Minerals part of the infographic. But yea there are too many reasons to want to exploit the moon we are never going to progress if we never take a step. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:912591256] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>EclairReturns posted...</cite> <quote>What exactly is the point of this endeavor? America already went to the Moon forty-nine years ago. Why must they do so again?</quote> Helium-3 https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/infographic.view.php?id=11272</quote> I like the 1. Go to moon 2. ? 3. Minerals part of the infographic. But yea there are too many reasons to want to exploit the moon we are never going to progress if we never take a step.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dragon504 11/17/18 10:38:06 PM #26:	I don't care if greed gets us into space, as long as we get there. --- http://myanimelist.net/profile/dragon504 http://followmy.tv/u/dragon504/time_wasted <cite>dragon504 posted [p:912592624] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>I don't care if greed gets us into space, as long as we get there.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 11/17/18 10:40:53 PM #27:	Why even worry about "environmental concerns" on the moon? <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:912592752] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>Why even worry about "environmental concerns" on the moon?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AwesomeTurtwig 11/17/18 10:41:24 PM #28:	Mentioned partners. Not Lockheed. I'm gonna rage. --- http://potders.com/sigs/1.gif My flash games: http://bit.ly/kO1BDd Rule free PotD: http://www.potders.com/forum/ <cite>AwesomeTurtwig posted [p:912592786] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>Mentioned partners. Not Lockheed. I'm gonna rage.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dragon504 11/17/18 11:17:14 PM #29:	I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities. --- http://myanimelist.net/profile/dragon504 http://followmy.tv/u/dragon504/time_wasted <cite>dragon504 posted [p:912594219] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 11/17/18 11:26:15 PM #30:	The moon has always been the potential launch point for any further exploration, I mean, always as in from before I was born (50 years ago +). Unless we come up with cold fusion or some infinite source of power here on earth, it just makes sense to create a base (and then expand on them) on the moon and launch from there. Basically infinite energy source on the moon and far less needed to launch anything, still plenty of metals etc to actually build things as well (without having to get it out of our atmosphere). If I remember correctly and it's been eons, Mars is the next step primarily due to large amounts of ice which can be converted into o2, and again a lower gravity (A bit over 1/3rd earths). Would be the easiest way to resupply the moon and any bases on saturns/jupiters moons etc. The basic plan was always to build a space station initially (allowing the building of mining equipment, and supplies to make a sustainable station on the moon). Then build a station on the moon (expanding to including mining operations etc), then expand to mars. The plan has been still born for most of my life though. --- "did you steal my f***in signature" Helly <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:912594547] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>The moon has always been the potential launch point for any further exploration, I mean, always as in from before I was born (50 years ago +). Unless we come up with cold fusion or some infinite source of power here on earth, it just makes sense to create a base (and then expand on them) on the moon and launch from there. Basically infinite energy source on the moon and far less needed to launch anything, still plenty of metals etc to actually build things as well (without having to get it out of our atmosphere). If I remember correctly and it's been eons, Mars is the next step primarily due to large amounts of ice which can be converted into o2, and again a lower gravity (A bit over 1/3rd earths). Would be the easiest way to resupply the moon and any bases on saturns/jupiters moons etc. The basic plan was always to build a space station initially (allowing the building of mining equipment, and supplies to make a sustainable station on the moon). Then build a station on the moon (expanding to including mining operations etc), then expand to mars. The plan has been still born for most of my life though.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sahuagin 11/18/18 12:21:39 AM #31:	dragon504 posted... I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities. yes, metallic asteroids are supposed to be worth in the tens of trillions of dollars. a problem with that, though, is that the price of metal wouldn't stay so high if we had that much of it. mining a gold asteroid would make you a lot of money at first, but it would also crash the price the gold. --- *The truth basks in scrutiny.* https://imgur.com/GMouTGs http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png <cite>Sahuagin posted [p:912596773] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>dragon504 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities.</quote> yes, metallic asteroids are supposed to be worth in the tens of trillions of dollars. a problem with that, though, is that the price of metal wouldn't stay so high if we had that much of it. mining a gold asteroid would make you a lot of money at first, but it would also crash the price the gold.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/18/18 12:57:00 AM #32:	Sahuagin posted... dragon504 posted... I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities. yes, metallic asteroids are supposed to be worth in the tens of trillions of dollars. a problem with that, though, is that the price of metal wouldn't stay so high if we had that much of it. mining a gold asteroid would make you a lot of money at first, but it would also crash the price the gold. And? You act like that would exist in a vacuum. Most of the things that will be targeted for mining first would probably be things that will be used in furthering space technology. Like gold in particular has use in electronic components. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:912597944] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sahuagin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dragon504 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities.</quote> yes, metallic asteroids are supposed to be worth in the tens of trillions of dollars. a problem with that, though, is that the price of metal wouldn't stay so high if we had that much of it. mining a gold asteroid would make you a lot of money at first, but it would also crash the price the gold.</quote> And? You act like that would exist in a vacuum. Most of the things that will be targeted for mining first would probably be things that will be used in furthering space technology. Like gold in particular has use in electronic components.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shadowsword87 11/18/18 3:24:07 AM #33:	Sahuagin posted... dragon504 posted... I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities. yes, metallic asteroids are supposed to be worth in the tens of trillions of dollars. a problem with that, though, is that the price of metal wouldn't stay so high if we had that much of it. mining a gold asteroid would make you a lot of money at first, but it would also crash the price the gold. Didn't stop the Spanish. --- ImmortalityV, "I would like to kiss Icoyar to be honest in a non gay way though" <cite>shadowsword87 posted [p:912601631] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sahuagin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>dragon504 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm fairly convinced the lure of big bucks via space mining will eventually be a big leap in space tech/travel. The sheer amount of valuable metals in some asteroids is too big of a lure imo. Then, if we can process the metal while it's still in space, we'll open up a ton of space construction options/possibilities.</quote> yes, metallic asteroids are supposed to be worth in the tens of trillions of dollars. a problem with that, though, is that the price of metal wouldn't stay so high if we had that much of it. mining a gold asteroid would make you a lot of money at first, but it would also crash the price the gold.</quote> Didn't stop the Spanish.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sahuagin 11/18/18 3:30:11 AM #34:	BlackScythe0 posted... And? just that it's somewhat economically dangerous shadowsword87 posted... Didn't stop the Spanish. a single gold asteroid can have something like 5000x the amount of gold the spanish stole --- *The truth basks in scrutiny.* https://imgur.com/GMouTGs http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png <cite>Sahuagin posted [p:912601762] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>And?</quote> just that it's somewhat economically dangerous <cite>shadowsword87 posted...</cite> <quote>Didn't stop the Spanish.</quote> a single gold asteroid can have something like 5000x the amount of gold the spanish stole</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
shadowsword87 11/18/18 3:31:39 AM #35:	Sahuagin posted... a single gold asteroid can have something like 5000x the amount of gold the spanish stole My point is that people don't really think about the market crashing if they're on top of the market when it crashes. --- ImmortalityV, "I would like to kiss Icoyar to be honest in a non gay way though" <cite>shadowsword87 posted [p:912601795] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sahuagin posted...</cite> <quote>a single gold asteroid can have something like 5000x the amount of gold the spanish stole</quote> My point is that people don't really think about the market crashing if they're on top of the market when it crashes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FatalAccident 11/18/18 3:44:31 AM #36:	jesus fucking christ America, why does everything always have to be so fucking dramatic lol --- walks away <cite>FatalAccident posted [p:912602071] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>jesus fucking christ America, why does everything always have to be so fucking dramatic lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
green dragon 11/18/18 9:20:33 AM #37:	FatalAccident posted... jesus fucking christ America, why does everything always have to be so fucking dramatic lol Our president is a reality tv star.... --- Just because you're trash doesn't mean you can't do great things. It's called garbage can, not garbage cannot. <cite>green dragon posted [p:912608671] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>FatalAccident posted...</cite> <quote>jesus fucking christ America, why does everything always have to be so fucking dramatic lol</quote> Our president is a reality tv star....</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BeerOnTap 11/18/18 9:29:57 AM #38:	Over 21 trillion in debt and the devaluation of the US dollar looming over our heads as a result. Glad to know the government still knows how to waste more money. <cite>BeerOnTap posted [p:912608979] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote>Over 21 trillion in debt and the devaluation of the US dollar looming over our heads as a result. Glad to know the government still knows how to waste more money.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/18/18 10:14:35 AM #39:	Sahuagin posted... BlackScythe0 posted... And? just that it's somewhat economically dangerous And my belief is that we won't see serious exploitation of space resources until we have some form of manufacturing in space. Which causes me to suspect that most of what we end up mining in space won't even make it back to earth. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:912610315] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sahuagin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>And?</quote> just that it's somewhat economically dangerous</quote> And my belief is that we won't see serious exploitation of space resources until we have some form of manufacturing in space. Which causes me to suspect that most of what we end up mining in space won't even make it back to earth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 11/18/18 4:42:26 PM #40:	green dragon posted... FatalAccident posted... jesus fucking christ America, why does everything always have to be so fucking dramatic lol Our president is a reality tv star.... This suddenly reminded me of how Doc Brown in 1955 was horrified that the President in 1985 was an actor in Back to the Future. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:912629085] in NASA is go... [t:77211795]...</cite> <quote><cite>green dragon posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FatalAccident posted...</cite> <quote>jesus fucking christ America, why does everything always have to be so fucking dramatic lol</quote> Our president is a reality tv star....</quote> This suddenly reminded me of how Doc Brown in 1955 was horrified that the President in 1985 was an actor in Back to the Future. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > NASA is going back to the moon. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > NASA is going back to the moon.