Current Events > Battlefield 5 beta is a wash :(

Topic List	Page List: 1
AvantgardeAClue 09/09/18 11:50:01 PM #1:	I don't know what compelled them to make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize but that's all that's really new about it Otherwise it's just Battlefield 1.5 I just hope they don't fuck up the next modern combat entry because this game will be abandoned within the year --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:908445218] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>I don't know what compelled them to make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize but that's all that's really new about it Otherwise it's just Battlefield 1.5 I just hope they don't fuck up the next modern combat entry because this game will be abandoned within the year</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/09/18 11:51:13 PM #2:	Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with. --- https://imgur.com/6VeX04D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7Gkh_9hyi8 <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:908445276] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 09/09/18 11:51:36 PM #3:	It's time for BF 2143. I hope DiCE had fun on this little historical diversion, but it's time to get back to the real game. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:908445297] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>It's time for BF 2143. I hope DiCE had fun on this little historical diversion, but it's time to get back to the real game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Northlane 09/09/18 11:54:26 PM #4:	Battlefield is in its death throes as a series tbh BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion --- Lakers \| D'Angelo died for our sins Raiders \| https://imgur.com/7OgSX2o <cite>Northlane posted [p:908445438] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>Battlefield is in its death throes as a series tbh BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperMedz3 09/09/18 11:54:46 PM #5:	s0nicfan posted... historical Lol --- Fallout 4 <cite>SuperMedz3 posted [p:908445450] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>historical</quote> Lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/09/18 11:56:21 PM #6:	All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes? --- https://imgur.com/6VeX04D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7Gkh_9hyi8 <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:908445531] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MuayThai85 09/09/18 11:57:04 PM #7:	The gun play is vastly different to BF1. Running out into the open is actually dangerous now as the guns are definitely more deadly. Vyrulisse posted... Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with. 2 maps. Narvik and Rotterdam. Northlane posted... Battlefield is in its death throes as a series tbh BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion See, in my opinion BF4 was the worst of the mainline games (Hardline and BC1 were worse). Nothing has topped BF3 for me (PC, console version is a neutered mess). --- How can one person post so much stupid s***? <cite>MuayThai85 posted [p:908445559] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>The gun play is vastly different to BF1. Running out into the open is actually dangerous now as the guns are definitely more deadly. <cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with.</quote> 2 maps. Narvik and Rotterdam. <cite>Northlane posted...</cite> <quote>Battlefield is in its death throes as a series tbh BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion</quote> See, in my opinion BF4 was the worst of the mainline games (Hardline and BC1 were worse). Nothing has topped BF3 for me (PC, console version is a neutered mess).</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MuayThai85 09/09/18 11:58:20 PM #8:	Vyrulisse posted... All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes? Yes. Grand Operations is literally all about having various objectives. For Narvik day 1 is an airborne drop to take out artillery sites, day 2 is a rush style map where you have to capture certain objectives in order. --- How can one person post so much stupid s***? <cite>MuayThai85 posted [p:908445618] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes?</quote> Yes. Grand Operations is literally all about having various objectives. For Narvik day 1 is an airborne drop to take out artillery sites, day 2 is a rush style map where you have to capture certain objectives in order.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/10/18 12:07:54 AM #9:	MuayThai85 posted... Vyrulisse posted... All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes? Yes. Grand Operations is literally all about having various objectives. For Narvik day 1 is an airborne drop to take out artillery sites, day 2 is a rush style map where you have to capture certain objectives in order. That's cool if it's got a large number of players. None of this small squad nonsense. I'm talkin' like Battlefield Vietnam and those oldies. --- https://imgur.com/6VeX04D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7Gkh_9hyi8 <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:908446038] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>MuayThai85 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes?</quote> Yes. Grand Operations is literally all about having various objectives. For Narvik day 1 is an airborne drop to take out artillery sites, day 2 is a rush style map where you have to capture certain objectives in order.</quote> That's cool if it's got a large number of players. None of this small squad nonsense. I'm talkin' like Battlefield Vietnam and those oldies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue 09/10/18 12:10:59 AM #10:	Vyrulisse posted... Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with. Rotterdam and I can't remember the other one Rotterdam is just Amiens from Battlefield 1 and the other one has shit visibility --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:908446186] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with.</quote> Rotterdam and I can't remember the other one Rotterdam is just Amiens from Battlefield 1 and the other one has shit visibility</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/10/18 12:12:45 AM #11:	AvantgardeAClue posted... Vyrulisse posted... Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with. Rotterdam and I can't remember the other one Rotterdam is just Amiens from Battlefield 1 and the other one has shit visibility At least it's beta and they can fix it? --- https://imgur.com/6VeX04D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7Gkh_9hyi8 <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:908446257] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>Is there only one map for the beta? I see a lot of complaints that a map is terrible and not good to show off with.</quote> Rotterdam and I can't remember the other one Rotterdam is just Amiens from Battlefield 1 and the other one has shit visibility</quote> At least it's beta and they can fix it?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OmegaShinkai 09/10/18 12:14:23 AM #12:	Northlane posted... BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion Imagine thinking Battlefield 3.1 is the best FPS <cite>OmegaShinkai posted [p:908446330] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Northlane posted...</cite> <quote>BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion</quote> Imagine thinking Battlefield 3.1 is the best FPS</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheCyborgNinja 09/10/18 12:17:07 AM #13:	BF is done. The formula is stale and their only options are "more of the same" or "change it dramatically". Neither is going to make the majority happy. Unlike CoD, which is super casual and much smaller-scale, they're kind of stuck. The only thing I could see livening it up would be extreme alternate history. Have an alternate WWII based on America staying out of WWI and it ending in a stalemate. Global politics from there could easily lead to "the imperialists" (Britain, France, Germany, Japan) vs "the anti-imperialists" (Soviet Union, Nationalist China, USA). Fronts in Canada, the Pacific, and Eastern Europe would be the most likely. --- "message parlor" ? do you mean the post office ? - SlayerX888 <cite>TheCyborgNinja posted [p:908446427] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>BF is done. The formula is stale and their only options are "more of the same" or "change it dramatically". Neither is going to make the majority happy. Unlike CoD, which is super casual and much smaller-scale, they're kind of stuck. The only thing I could see livening it up would be extreme alternate history. Have an alternate WWII based on America staying out of WWI and it ending in a stalemate. Global politics from there could easily lead to "the imperialists" (Britain, France, Germany, Japan) vs "the anti-imperialists" (Soviet Union, Nationalist China, USA). Fronts in Canada, the Pacific, and Eastern Europe would be the most likely.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
halomonkey1_3_5 09/10/18 12:27:38 AM #14:	i liked the beta a lot played about 4-5 hours of it glad I bought a year of Origin Access for Madden tbh --- Billy Mays: July 20, 1958 - June 28, 2009 The Greatest <cite>halomonkey1_3_5 posted [p:908446890] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>i liked the beta a lot played about 4-5 hours of it glad I bought a year of Origin Access for Madden tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Scarecrow 09/10/18 12:28:50 AM #15:	I just want bad company 3 tbh --- https://imgur.com/3Iqe55A <cite>The_Scarecrow posted [p:908446921] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>I just want bad company 3 tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MuayThai85 09/10/18 12:31:43 AM #16:	halomonkey1_3_5 posted... i liked the beta a lot played about 4-5 hours of it glad I bought a year of Origin Access for Madden tbh I got Premier simply for BFV, Fifa 19 and Anthem were nice bonuses. I downloaded Madden but never been much of a football fan. --- How can one person post so much stupid s***? <cite>MuayThai85 posted [p:908447035] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>halomonkey1_3_5 posted...</cite> <quote>i liked the beta a lot played about 4-5 hours of it glad I bought a year of Origin Access for Madden tbh</quote> I got Premier simply for BFV, Fifa 19 and Anthem were nice bonuses. I downloaded Madden but never been much of a football fan.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spanky1 09/10/18 12:32:18 AM #17:	I didn't like it at first. Now I love it. --- https://imgur.com/DCjoiZ0 <cite>spanky1 posted [p:908447055] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>I didn't like it at first. Now I love it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mrtopgoon327 09/10/18 12:41:57 AM #18:	shit is solid watch your mouth thomp --- mr top goon in this thang <cite>mrtopgoon327 posted [p:908447401] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>shit is solid watch your mouth thomp</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
apocalyptic_4 09/10/18 12:54:49 AM #19:	Looks spectacular on my xbox X it's a day one buy for me. Was never intrested in this series since bad company but this may bring me back. --- PSN: Adrian396 XBL: Prime Legacy Nintendo ID: Apocalypse <cite>apocalyptic_4 posted [p:908447925] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>Looks spectacular on my xbox X it's a day one buy for me. Was never intrested in this series since bad company but this may bring me back.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue 09/10/18 12:55:23 AM #20:	OmegaShinkai posted... Northlane posted... BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion Imagine thinking Battlefield 3.1 is the best FPS It's definitely the best with the Frostbite engine 750 hours later and that game still isn't old to me --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:908447942] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>OmegaShinkai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Northlane posted...</cite> <quote>BF4 was the best FPS I ever played and ever since then the series has been dumbed down, released with a lack of content, and just been Battlefront'd into oblivion</quote> Imagine thinking Battlefield 3.1 is the best FPS</quote> It's definitely the best with the Frostbite engine 750 hours later and that game still isn't old to me</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aelia 09/10/18 1:20:46 AM #21:	They need to make Bad Company 3. IMO, BC2 is without a doubt the best Battlefield and maybe the best shooter ever. --- En Taro Tassadar FFBE FC: 970.089.321 \| 1050+ MAG Fryevia <cite>Aelia posted [p:908448804] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>They need to make Bad Company 3. IMO, BC2 is without a doubt the best Battlefield and maybe the best shooter ever.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AvantgardeAClue 09/10/18 1:50:50 AM #22:	Aelia posted... They need to make Bad Company 3. IMO, BC2 is without a doubt the best Battlefield and maybe the best shooter ever. Let's not get too crazy here Bad Company 2 for starters wasn't even a 64 player affair --- Sometimes I say things and I'm not voice acting. <cite>AvantgardeAClue posted [p:908449826] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Aelia posted...</cite> <quote>They need to make Bad Company 3. IMO, BC2 is without a doubt the best Battlefield and maybe the best shooter ever.</quote> Let's not get too crazy here Bad Company 2 for starters wasn't even a 64 player affair</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spanky1 09/10/18 12:18:14 PM #24:	Vyrulisse posted... All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes? Battlefield is most definitely NOT just shoot, die, respawn. That's the entire reason I love it so much. You're describing Call of Duty, basically. BF has so many epic, crazy moments, it's amazing. I imagined what games would be like too when I was younger, and I basically imagined Battlefield. Huge battles with wide open fields and various objectives with lots of players. Battlefield delivers exactly that, V included. Sometimes I see people comparing BFV to the recent Battlefront games. I wonder if they've even played either of these games. They're so different it's amazing. Star Wars is just about funneling two teams down a narrow hallway and having them shoot each other. BFV is big and open with a ton of freedom, just like the older BF games. --- https://imgur.com/DCjoiZ0 <cite>spanky1 posted [p:908469148] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>All these FPS games are just pew pew you shoot, you die, respawn, you shoot, you kill guy, you die again respawn... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. Does Battlefield still have those kind of modes?</quote> Battlefield is most definitely NOT just shoot, die, respawn. That's the entire reason I love it so much. You're describing Call of Duty, basically. BF has so many epic, crazy moments, it's amazing. I imagined what games would be like too when I was younger, and I basically imagined Battlefield. Huge battles with wide open fields and various objectives with lots of players. Battlefield delivers exactly that, V included. Sometimes I see people comparing BFV to the recent Battlefront games. I wonder if they've even played either of these games. They're so different it's amazing. Star Wars is just about funneling two teams down a narrow hallway and having them shoot each other. BFV is big and open with a ton of freedom, just like the older BF games.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MuayThai85 09/10/18 12:20:35 PM #25:	Aelia posted... They need to make Bad Company 3. IMO, BC2 is without a doubt the best Battlefield and maybe the best shooter ever. Maybe best console shooter but you're delusional if you think BC2 is better than BF1942, BF2 or BF3 PC. --- How can one person post so much stupid s***? <cite>MuayThai85 posted [p:908469274] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Aelia posted...</cite> <quote>They need to make Bad Company 3. IMO, BC2 is without a doubt the best Battlefield and maybe the best shooter ever.</quote> Maybe best console shooter but you're delusional if you think BC2 is better than BF1942, BF2 or BF3 PC.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
alphagamble 09/10/18 12:30:01 PM #26:	I prefer COD gameplay but I always try free betas and I wasn't impressed. Biggest problems were the ammo, 15 second respawn and the sniper glare, did they take that out? It was quite pronounced in Battlefield 1. --- ooh <cite>alphagamble posted [p:908469804] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>I prefer COD gameplay but I always try free betas and I wasn't impressed. Biggest problems were the ammo, 15 second respawn and the sniper glare, did they take that out? It was quite pronounced in Battlefield 1.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ROBANN_88 09/10/18 12:33:25 PM #27:	AvantgardeAClue posted... make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize what did they do? --- https://imgur.com/cUNC8DI <cite>ROBANN_88 posted [p:908469987] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize </quote> what did they do?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spanky1 09/10/18 12:37:04 PM #28:	ROBANN_88 posted... AvantgardeAClue posted... make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize what did they do? You start with less ammo (3 clips I believe), and you only auto heal up to 50% health. To revive to 100%, you need to have a health pack in your inventory. To get a health pack, you either need to be given one by a medic, who has infinite health packs, or you need to pick one up from a flag base, which has ammo and health stations. The system is more complicated, but it's honestly a welcome change. It makes the game feel more tactical, less arcadey, and promotes teamwork more. --- https://imgur.com/DCjoiZ0 <cite>spanky1 posted [p:908470210] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>ROBANN_88 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize </quote> what did they do?</quote> You start with less ammo (3 clips I believe), and you only auto heal up to 50% health. To revive to 100%, you need to have a health pack in your inventory. To get a health pack, you either need to be given one by a medic, who has infinite health packs, or you need to pick one up from a flag base, which has ammo and health stations. The system is more complicated, but it's honestly a welcome change. It makes the game feel more tactical, less arcadey, and promotes teamwork more.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 09/10/18 12:47:18 PM #29:	ROBANN_88 posted... AvantgardeAClue posted... make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize what did they do? Made it better Also the reviving is waaaaay better so you dont have to kill the same guy twice because his buddy spammed a button from around the corner --- https://imgur.com/Scl5rwX https://imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq https://imgur.com/NidhAni https://imgur.com/IGIbQPk <cite>Samurontai posted [p:908470816] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>ROBANN_88 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize </quote> what did they do?</quote> Made it better Also the reviving is waaaaay better so you dont have to kill the same guy twice because his buddy spammed a button from around the corner</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MuayThai85 09/10/18 12:53:40 PM #30:	spanky1 posted... ROBANN_88 posted... AvantgardeAClue posted... make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize what did they do? You start with less ammo (3 clips I believe), and you only auto heal up to 50% health. To revive to 100%, you need to have a health pack in your inventory. To get a health pack, you either need to be given one by a medic, who has infinite health packs, or you need to pick one up from a flag base, which has ammo and health stations. The system is more complicated, but it's honestly a welcome change. It makes the game feel more tactical, less arcadey, and promotes teamwork more. 2 magazines for the STG44 and you can pick up a third magazine from a support or ammo cache. --- How can one person post so much stupid s***? <cite>MuayThai85 posted [p:908471179] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>spanky1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ROBANN_88 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>make the healing/ammo mechanics HARDER to utilize </quote> what did they do?</quote> You start with less ammo (3 clips I believe), and you only auto heal up to 50% health. To revive to 100%, you need to have a health pack in your inventory. To get a health pack, you either need to be given one by a medic, who has infinite health packs, or you need to pick one up from a flag base, which has ammo and health stations. The system is more complicated, but it's honestly a welcome change. It makes the game feel more tactical, less arcadey, and promotes teamwork more.</quote> 2 magazines for the STG44 and you can pick up a third magazine from a support or ammo cache.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Forlorn_Ass 09/10/18 12:58:58 PM #31:	When did the trend of not being able to heal yourself to 100% happen? Pubg and fortnite? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Forlorn_Ass posted [p:908471507] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>When did the trend of not being able to heal yourself to 100% happen? Pubg and fortnite?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
YUHH 09/10/18 12:59:35 PM #32:	Forlorn_Ass posted... When did the trend of not being able to heal yourself to 100% happen? Pubg and fortnite? Back in the 1990s when regen wasnt a thing and you had to manually pick up health items and armor which were highly contested pickups. --- https://imgur.com/QusJhjm <cite>YUHH posted [p:908471546] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Forlorn_Ass posted...</cite> <quote>When did the trend of not being able to heal yourself to 100% happen? Pubg and fortnite?</quote> Back in the 1990s when regen wasnt a thing and you had to manually pick up health items and armor which were highly contested pickups.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
halomonkey1_3_5 09/10/18 1:41:04 PM #33:	alphagamble posted... I prefer COD gameplay but I always try free betas and I wasn't impressed. Biggest problems were the ammo, 15 second respawn and the sniper glare, did they take that out? It was quite pronounced in Battlefield 1. the sniper glare is still there but there is something weird about it I've only noticed it a few times and i've been in quite a few sniper battles so idk what the trigger is for it --- Billy Mays: July 20, 1958 - June 28, 2009 The Greatest <cite>halomonkey1_3_5 posted [p:908474121] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>alphagamble posted...</cite> <quote>I prefer COD gameplay but I always try free betas and I wasn't impressed. Biggest problems were the ammo, 15 second respawn and the sniper glare, did they take that out? It was quite pronounced in Battlefield 1.</quote> the sniper glare is still there but there is something weird about it I've only noticed it a few times and i've been in quite a few sniper battles so idk what the trigger is for it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMarthKoopa 09/10/18 1:43:06 PM #34:	Vyrulisse posted... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. PlanetSide tried to innovate but nobody cared Instead we get Battle Royale, Hero Shooters, and CoD/BF rehashes <cite>TheMarthKoopa posted [p:908474246] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more.</quote> PlanetSide tried to innovate but nobody cared Instead we get Battle Royale, Hero Shooters, and CoD/BF rehashes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DezDroppedFreak 09/10/18 1:43:53 PM #35:	Felt like a reskinned BF1 with a stupid revive mechanic --- https://imgtc.com/i/6wZBSPr.png -Turbam https://imgtc.com/i/XrKGPKv.jpg <cite>DezDroppedFreak posted [p:908474296] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote>Felt like a reskinned BF1 with a stupid revive mechanic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 09/10/18 1:45:12 PM #36:	TheMarthKoopa posted... Vyrulisse posted... A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more. PlanetSide tried to innovate but nobody cared Instead we get Battle Royale, Hero Shooters, and CoD/BF rehashes Planetside did fine until EA did what EA does. The first game ran strong for a long time before they released OP expansion content that you could use in the base game, totally destroying game balance and making every fight the same. Then Planetside 2 came out and they gutted a lot of their own mechanics to streamline the game, and THEN put in prohibitively expensive upgrades to force people to buy station cash, again creating a clear pay-to-win power imbalance. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:908474362] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheMarthKoopa posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vyrulisse posted...</cite> <quote>A few years ago I used to imagine what games like that would be like and I'd be imagining these HUGE battles with wide open fields and various objectives etc... it seems we've regressed more and more.</quote> PlanetSide tried to innovate but nobody cared Instead we get Battle Royale, Hero Shooters, and CoD/BF rehashes</quote> Planetside did fine until EA did what EA does. The first game ran strong for a long time before they released OP expansion content that you could use in the base game, totally destroying game balance and making every fight the same. Then Planetside 2 came out and they gutted a lot of their own mechanics to streamline the game, and THEN put in prohibitively expensive upgrades to force people to buy station cash, again creating a clear pay-to-win power imbalance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheMarthKoopa 09/10/18 1:54:35 PM #37:	s0nicfan posted... Planetside did fine until EA did what EA does. The first game ran strong for a long time before they released OP expansion content that you could use in the base game, totally destroying game balance and making every fight the same. PlanetSide was SOE The population was never "strong". No advertisements when Halo/CoD/BF/Counter Strike had all the attention and then died an obscure death because of complete mishandling in every aspect An amazing, innovative game that couldn't revolutionize because... nobody cared. <cite>TheMarthKoopa posted [p:908474946] in Battlefiel... [t:76985762]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>Planetside did fine until EA did what EA does. The first game ran strong for a long time before they released OP expansion content that you could use in the base game, totally destroying game balance and making every fight the same. </quote> PlanetSide was SOE The population was never "strong". No advertisements when Halo/CoD/BF/Counter Strike had all the attention and then died an obscure death because of complete mishandling in every aspect An amazing, innovative game that couldn't revolutionize because... nobody cared.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Battlefield 5 beta is a wash :( (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Battlefield 5 beta is a wash :(