Poll of the Day > 19 y/o Girl who LIED about 2 Black Guys RAPING HER gets 1 YEAR IN PRISON!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

19 y/o Heifer, Nikki Yovino will spend a YEAR in Prison after she falsely accused 2 black football players of RAPE when she confided in the boy she REALLY liked about it to get him jealous!!

The former student at Sacred Heart University was set to go to trial next tuesday but at the last minute she took a plea deal admitting to making up the rape and will spend a year in prison.

She will be officially sentenced in August but skipped bail and went straight to her prison sentence immediately

She was a student in Connecticut when police say she reported being raped by 2 african american footall players at an off-campus party in October 2016. 3 months after, they pressed her on the accusations but then admitted the sex was consensual. She made up the story because she didn't want the man she really loved to lose interest in her..Witnesses said she LURED the 2 men to the bathroom where they got their freak on as it was reported she willingly had sex with them

Nikki was charged with evidence tampering, a felony and falsely reporting an incident and faced 5 years in prison but it was downgraded to 2 counts of 2nd degree false reporting, one count of interfering and 2 misdemeanors

After lengthy discussions with all the parties, they decided this was an appropriate disposition that will send a message on how serious this is

The 2 men were happy with the disposition as her mother wiped away tears seeing her daughter hauled away for the next year

Her lawyer, Royan O'Neill said this was a very difficult decision for her and a sad day for the family but wants to put this behind her and start her sentence.

The 2 players were never charged but withdrew from the school as one of them lost a FOOTBALL SCHOLARSHIP as well as their lawyer said they lost their education and college experience as it affected them greatly

Do you think this heifer got off easy?.

Nikki - Prisoner

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/05/20/4CF248B100000578-5809523-image-a-91_1528227686583.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/05/20/4CDFDEDE00000578-5809523-image-a-83_1528227643822.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/05/20/4CF248B500000578-5809523-image-m-90_1528227680263.jpg

University -

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/06/05/20/4CF2503500000578-5809523-image-a-87_1528227655160.jpg
---

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this heifer got off easy?

Absolutely. False rape claims should be punished a lot more harsh than this. Perhaps then folk will think twice about making them. I feel bad for the lifes she's ruined.

On a side note: She's kinda hot though.
---

why is race relevant?

Fam_Fam posted...

why is race relevant?

It actually is in this case. Not all men are equally likely to be falsely accused of rape.
---

Yeah, but I think any crime that deliberately and negatively impacts another's life should carry the death penalty... I'm hardly the right person to determine reasonable punishments.
---

She should have gotten a hell of a lot more than 1 year. She ruined two peoples lives.

Fam_Fam posted...

why is race relevant?

Because the whiter the accused, the easier it is for them to escape prosecution even if guilty.
---

1 year only? Wow.. ya that's going to stop others from falsely accusing people.. dumb laws as usual.

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this heifer got off easy?

no, since it took two guys to get her off

fuck her.
---

green dragon posted...

no, since it took two guys to get her off

https://imgur.com/b2ny89e
---

Nade Duck posted...

fuck her.

How it all got started fam.
---

Would the men get 1 year if they were convicted?

It's fucking pathetic that our own court doesn't understand just how serious these kind of accusations are. Hell, even if you're proven innocent, it only takes one little accusation for people to potentially see you in a different light.

Edit: Hell, last paragraph:

The 2 players were never charged but withdrew from the school as one of them lost a FOOTBALL SCHOLARSHIP as well as their lawyer said they lost their education and college experience as it affected them greatly

SKEWER. THAT. BITCH.
---

Golden Road posted...

Fam_Fam posted...

why is race relevant?

It actually is in this case. Not all men are equally likely to be falsely accused of rape.

Or sentenced equally.

Interracial sex regarding black men is still a tough pill to swallow for the older people running this country.
---

I don't think they should be punished but I think it should be harder for women to accuse men of rape if it's been more then a day

if women are scared to admit they lied more innocent people may go to jail

Pathetic. How can a gender be strong and independent when they're never held accountable for their actions? She should be in jail for the exact period of time those guys would have gotten had they been found guilty of the alleged crime.

#holdwomenaccountable
---

RoboXgp89 posted...

I don't think they should be punished but I think it should be harder for women to accuse men of rape if it's been more then a day

if women are scared to admit they lied more innocent people may go to jail

And if women are scared of being prosecuted if they're unable to sufficiently prove their allegations, more guilty people may not go to jail, and sexual assault already has a fairly low conviction rate. False convictions are a problem, yes, but cracking down on them to the extent that people are afraid to raise legitimate allegations is not the way to solve that. Especially where there are significantly more unpunished sexual assaults out there than there are plausible false allegations.
---

1) What she did was as traumatic and damaging to those men as rape. She didn't just make a false police report, she told a horrible lie about two specific individuals. Their lives will forever be harmed for this.

2) Let's still remember that sexual assault crimes are very rarely falsely reported. Women should still be believed by default. This one idiot shouldn't make us lose sight of that. She is in fact doubly wrong because her actions might be seen as indicative, thereby harming other women who really are raped.

3) The severity of punishment is not shown to be a deterring factor in criminology. The surety of punishment is. Certainly I agree that one year is not enough punishment for such an awful crime, but punishing her at all will still have a deterant effect on others who would consider such a crime, and a lower prison sentence will mean that she's less likely to become institutionalized. This was probably the best ruling from a societal perspective, regardless of whether she deserved to be punished harder.

green dragon posted...

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this heifer got off easy?

no, since it took two guys to get her off

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/092/184/a6d.gif

Krow_Incarnate posted...

Would the men get 1 year if they were convicted?

It's fucking pathetic that our own court doesn't understand just how serious these kind of accusations are. Hell, even if you're proven innocent, it only takes one little accusation for people to potentially see you in a different light.

EDIT: Actually, to add to this post....she should be put on the sex offender registry, too.
That shit will stick to the convicted person for decades even after the prison sentence.

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this heifer got off easy?.

Compared to what they would have got, yeah. But that's not just a matter of #femaleprivilege but also the perceived difference in severity of the crimes. Plus it's a plea anyway.

wwinterj25 posted...

On a side note: She's kinda hot though.

Yeah, despite being on the heavier side. Although maybe all the crazy makes her seem hot.

green dragon posted...

Full Throttle posted...

Do you think this heifer got off easy?

no, since it took two guys to get her off

Golden Road posted...

Fam_Fam posted...

why is race relevant?

It actually is in this case. Not all men are equally likely to be falsely accused of rape.

...except it's literally incidental in this case because she would have done the same to *anybody* (except her crush). So unless the implication is that blacks are more likely to more open to double-teaming a crazy girl in a bathroom (and you'd need to show some proof there), there's no real relevance.
---

Krow_Incarnate posted...

SKEWER. THAT. BITCH.

Pretty sure they already did.

SushiSquid posted...

2) Let's still remember that sexual assault crimes are very rarely falsely reported. Women should still be believed by default. This one idiot shouldn't make us lose sight of that. She is in fact doubly wrong because her actions might be seen as indicative, thereby harming other women who really are raped.

Uh, the standard should ALWAYS be innocent until proven guilty. If you start an investigation with the belief that somebody is guilty and you need to prove it, you're creating a substantial bias.
---

SushiSquid posted...

2) Let's still remember that sexual assault crimes are very rarely falsely reported. Women should still be believed by default. This one idiot shouldn't make us lose sight of that. She is in fact doubly wrong because her actions might be seen as indicative, thereby harming other women who really are raped.

No. That's fucking dumb. You can take the EVENT of rape seriously, but any accusations without actual proof should never, EVER be taken seriously until it is proven 100% beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Having a vagina does not remove's someone's else right to due process.
---

Believing a rape report does not mean immediately convicting. We believe people who report theft or assault, but we still collect evidence and go through a trial. The issue is that our society has long treated rape victims differently from victims of other crimes, and I want to point out that, although there are idiots like this woman who abuse the system and lie, that is by far the minority.

SushiSquid posted...

Believing a rape report does not mean immediately convicting. We believe people who report theft or assault, but we still collect evidence and go through a trial. The issue is that our society has long treated rape victims differently from victims of other crimes, and I want to point out that, although there are idiots like this woman who abuse the system and lie, that is by far the minority.

not when 85% percent of rape reports aren't followed up because the woman just say 'meh'

this kind of thinking is why punishing people so harshly when there is a lack of evidence is so dangerous and why I don't want women holding out their lie til the bitter end

The_tall_midget posted...

No. That's f***ing dumb. You can take the reporting of rape seriously, but any accusations without actual proof should never, EVER be taken seriously until it is proven 100% beyond the shadow of a doubt.

"Taken seriously" does not mean "definitely results in a conviction." If accusations couldn't be taken seriously until there was guaranteed proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were true, there'd be no reason for courts to exist. Taking accusations seriously just means investigating as though there's a real chance the accusations are true.
---

Nade Duck posted...

fuck her.

they did
---

should've been death penalty
---

I don't think you need to put so much emphasis on capitalizing words Johnny.

adjl posted...

"Taken seriously" does not mean "definitely results in a conviction." If accusations couldn't be taken seriously until there was guaranteed proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were true, there'd be no reason for courts to exist. Taking accusations seriously just means investigating as though there's a real chance the accusations are true.

Here is the problem: modern accusations = accusing someone directly and having the simp white knights and feminist idiots ruining the person's reputation before ANY investigation is done.

That's bullshit. Someone's identity should never be revealed publicly until that person has been trialed and found guilty with actual proofs. This era of fake metoo bullshit needs to end. Due process takes priority over "believe the vagina."

Also, the double standards need to end. A male teacher is accused of molesting students? He's basically gone for life or killed in prison. A female teacher molests students? Slaps on the wrist in majority of cases.
---

SushiSquid posted...

Women should still be believed by default.

Wrong. Innocent until proven guilty. This culture of immediately assuming all men are guilty needs to stop. Especially when crimes involving men being raped by women are still treated as a joke in this country.

MirMiros posted...

SushiSquid posted...

Women should still be believed by default.

Wrong. Innocent until proven guilty. This culture of immediately assuming all men are guilty needs to stop. Especially when crimes involving men being raped by women are still treated as a joke in this country.

The_tall_midget posted...

Here is the problem: modern accusations = accusing someone directly and having the simp white knights and feminist idiots ruining the person's reputation before ANY investigation is done.

How often does that actually happen? It's often cited as a major problem that's serious enough that nothing should be done to make reporting assault any easier or more effective, but how often does that really happen compared to the number of assault allegations?

MirMiros posted...

Especially when crimes involving men being raped by women are still treated as a joke in this country.

That's the kind of nonsense whataboutism that needs to stop immediately. "It's not a problem because this tangentially related problem also exists" has never been and will never be valid logic. You got a problem with female-on-male sexual assault not being taken seriously? Do something about it. Don't use it as a reason to justify not doing something about male-on-female sexual assault while never actually getting off of your couch to address what's allegedly such a grave indignity.
---

adjl posted...

How often does that actually happen? It's often cited as a major problem that's serious enough that nothing should be done to make reporting assault any easier or more effective, but how often does that really happen compared to the number of assault allegations?

Irrelevant. A woman's allegations should never, EVER take precedence over due process or conserving the anonymity of an accused person's until he's proven guilty. A vagina does not give you the right to destroys another person's life over flimsy accusations.
---

SushiSquid posted...

Believing a rape report does not mean immediately convicting. We believe people who report theft or assault, but we still collect evidence and go through a trial. The issue is that our society has long treated rape victims differently from victims of other crimes, and I want to point out that, although there are idiots like this woman who abuse the system and lie, that is by far the minority.

Rape by its very nature is different from most other crimes, though, so it's natural to treat it differently. When an assault is reported, for instance, you'll have injuries on the person. If there's a beak-in, you'll have signs of forced entry. And it's worth noting that there *are* other crimes where the claim is questioned -- threats, for instance (and it's worth noting that people *frequently* lie about threats to get the law to go after a person. When I worked retail, a customer got in an argument with one of my coworkers then called the cops claiming that the coworker had threatened to shoot him with a guy stored in his car. It was a complete lie, but my coworker's car wound up being searched and nothing finally happened to the accuser).

adjl posted...

The_tall_midget posted...

No. That's f***ing dumb. You can take the reporting of rape seriously, but any accusations without actual proof should never, EVER be taken seriously until it is proven 100% beyond the shadow of a doubt.

"Taken seriously" does not mean "definitely results in a conviction." If accusations couldn't be taken seriously until there was guaranteed proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were true, there'd be no reason for courts to exist. Taking accusations seriously just means investigating as though there's a real chance the accusations are true.

They're usually taken seriously enough to make inquiries, even when the claim is dubious or the evidence against the guy is weak, as shown by the huge number of false convictions where DNA or a confession later proved innocence.

adjl posted...

The_tall_midget posted...

Here is the problem: modern accusations = accusing someone directly and having the simp white knights and feminist idiots ruining the person's reputation before ANY investigation is done.

How often does that actually happen? It's often cited as a major problem that's serious enough that nothing should be done to make reporting assault any easier or more effective, but how often does that really happen compared to the number of assault allegations?

It happens pretty damn frequently enough to be an issue, thanks to the 24-hour news cycle and SJWs who care more about narratives than evidence. Which is why there should be laws protecting the accused's identity at least until things go to trial.
---

the college should be punished too for taking away that guys scholar ship

dioxxys posted...

the college should be punished too for taking away that guys scholar ship

They could give him a free ride, that'd make up for it. IMO 1 year for accusations that led to no time served is reasonable

The_tall_midget posted...

Irrelevant

The frequency with which a problem occurs is irrelevant to how significant that problem is? Don't be absurd. If that were true, we should all be panicking over meteor strikes 24/7.

Zeus posted...

It happens pretty damn frequently enough to be an issue,

Numbers, my friend. You want to claim that it's a significant issue, you need to prove its significance, and that means providing actual data instead of a vague "it happens often just look at the news and all those SJW's."

Zeus posted...

Which is why there should be laws protecting the accused's identity at least until things go to trial.

I think this wouldn't be a bad idea in general, regardless of the crimes alleged. That's not going to do anything about cases where criminal charges wouldn't be laid, though, which encompasses most of the sexual harassment cases coming out of #metoo (abusing power to behave inappropriately, while deplorable, is only illegal if the behaviour falls into a fairly narrow set of actual charges).
---