Current Events > Pwnt the shit out of the president of the local news media.

Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
JE19426
08/24/17 2:45:04 PM
#152:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
the judge greatly overstepped his boundaries when he ruled in such a manner to create such an order.


How so?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi
08/24/17 2:50:29 PM
#153:


Is a mod willing to explain why did they lift this dweebenheimer's suspension?
---
Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting.
Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time!
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/24/17 3:09:33 PM
#154:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
the judge greatly overstepped his boundaries when he ruled in such a manner to create such an order.


How so?



That case had nothing to do with the wiretapping case. The only people I recorded in that case were the police. He can't issue an order like that because I recorded the police. Not in a manner protected by the Constitution anyways.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
#155
Post #155 was unavailable or deleted.
0AbsoluteZero0
08/24/17 4:03:21 PM
#156:


thelovefist posted...
I would still like to read TC's explanation for why they refused to answer the reporter's question re: him recording them. If TC feels so strongly that they are in the right, then why not simply acknowledge that he is recording them? Refusing to the answer the question could reasonable be taken as him knowing that he is in the wrong.

Seriously. If you're soooo confident that you're 100% right about the law, why not answer the question?
---
Organized people are just too lazy to look for things.
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/24/17 4:05:42 PM
#157:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...

That case had nothing to do with the wiretapping case.


By that logic, if you don't kidnap people you can't go to jail.

He can't issue an order like that because I recorded the police.


Didn't you say the probation was due to disorderly conduct?
... Copied to Clipboard!
#158
Post #158 was unavailable or deleted.
Kim Kusanagi
08/24/17 4:23:05 PM
#159:


And there is zero communication between them?
---
Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting.
Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time!
... Copied to Clipboard!
#160
Post #160 was unavailable or deleted.
SomeLikeItHoth
08/24/17 5:48:42 PM
#161:


Dawkins mere existence is enough to make half of CE turn into epic rage meltdown mode.
---
"Maybe I keep seeing you die because I'm supposed to take your place." -- Desmond
... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590
08/24/17 6:12:10 PM
#162:


SomeLikeItHoth posted...
Dawkins mere existence is enough to make half of CE turn into epic rage meltdown mode.

The degenerate defense force arrives
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rika_Furude
08/24/17 11:07:41 PM
#163:


Bio1590 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Bio1590 posted...
Fuck this site why would you let him back



You're free to go.

Awww it thinks it's being funny

Stop, youll make him smash his face into the road and various cars in protest
---
Posted with GameRaven 3.2.2
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/24/17 11:17:06 PM
#164:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...

That case had nothing to do with the wiretapping case.


By that logic, if you don't kidnap people you can't go to jail.

He can't issue an order like that because I recorded the police.


Didn't you say the probation was due to disorderly conduct?



Do you have trouble reading? The probation was for disorderly conduct yes. Nothing involved had to do with recording anything so he cannot make a baseless order that he has nothing to do with and is in violation of the 1st amendment. It is also implying guilty before trial which becomes a due process issue.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/24/17 11:17:39 PM
#165:


Conflict posted...
Kim Kusanagi posted...
Is a mod willing to explain why did they lift this dweebenheimer's suspension?


Mods can't explain it because it was Allen that lifted the suspension



it said a Lead Mod did it.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
NOM
08/24/17 11:25:47 PM
#166:


On behalf of Marylanders, I would like to apologize for Xsquader.

We're not all like him.
---
this just here so I ain't a smelly sigless user
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/24/17 11:37:28 PM
#167:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Nothing involved had to do with recording anything so he cannot make a baseless order that he has nothing to do with and is in violation of the 1st amendment.


It's not baseless, you were found guilty of disorderly conduct and probation is your punishment.

It is also implying guilty before trial which becomes a due process issue.


How are on probation if you haven't been tried?
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/24/17 11:52:45 PM
#168:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Nothing involved had to do with recording anything so he cannot make a baseless order that he has nothing to do with and is in violation of the 1st amendment.


It's not baseless, you were found guilty of disorderly conduct and probation is your punishment.

It is also implying guilty before trial which becomes a due process issue.


How are on probation if you haven't been tried?



Please read. "It's not baseless, you were found guilty of disorderly conduct and probation is your punishment. "

The ORDER was baseless. The order being the ORDER not to record anyone and post it on social media for 2 years while on probation. That term was not within his authority based on what I was being tried for. Anyways that is currently in appeals.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
metralo
08/25/17 12:01:45 AM
#169:


>literally ruining your life and family over your ego
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 12:02:54 AM
#170:


metralo posted...
>literally ruining your life and family over your ego



The payout will be helpful for them after I sue when this all is done.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Peter_Griffin33
08/25/17 12:12:59 AM
#171:


I wish there was a way I could like, tell the government that taxpayer money should not be spent on you. You'd be out of your precious cannibus, unable to afford a lawyer/bail, and on the streets. I mean, you obviously aren't taking the time and money from American taxpayers to get the help you truly deserve.


Also, don't you have a rally to be at somewhere?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi
08/25/17 12:34:19 AM
#172:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
metralo posted...
>literally ruining your life and family over your ego



The payout will be helpful for them after I sue when this all is done.


What are you suing for when you get thrown into the slammer
---
Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting.
Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time!
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 12:35:45 AM
#173:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
That term was not within his authority based on what I was being tried for.


How so?
... Copied to Clipboard!
EyeWontBeFooled
08/25/17 12:36:20 AM
#174:


Aristoph posted...
TheVipaGTS posted...

This guy isn't real right everyone?


He is. His court dates and charges and such have been posted several times. And he's got several mental issues that he refuses to get help for even though he's been ordered to several times by the courts.

He's pretty much objectively the worst excuse for a human being on CE at the moment.

Reminder: He has a child. Dude, you need to get yourself help. If only for your kid.
---
Welcome to the Brave New World of 1984! Current temp: Fahrenheit 451
It's never a bad day, and always a good night, so BE HAPPY and enjoy your stay!
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 12:44:01 AM
#175:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
That term was not within his authority based on what I was being tried for.


How so?



Because it had nothing to do with my charges or why I was there. It would be like him telling me I can't drink milk anymore while I am on probation. Has nothing to do with why I was there.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 12:46:03 AM
#176:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Because it had nothing to do with my charges or why I was there. It would be like him telling me I can't drink milk anymore while I am on probation. Has nothing to do with why I was there.


By that argument if you don't kidnap people you can't be imprisoned.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 12:58:17 AM
#177:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
Because it had nothing to do with my charges or why I was there. It would be like him telling me I can't drink milk anymore while I am on probation. Has nothing to do with why I was there.


By that argument if you don't kidnap people you can't be imprisoned.



If you kidnap people and aren't charged with kidnapping people you can't be convicted of kidnapping people but you can be imprisoned on the charges you are facing. False equivalence.


Let us say one goes for an assault charge. They get convicted. A term of probation is not to drink because it was found during trial that drinking helped lead to the assault. That's reasonable due to relevance. I was not charged with anything that has anything to do with recording nor did any recording cause the events I was charged for or correlate to them in any way.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:09:57 AM
#178:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
That's reasonable due to relevance.


And that matters why?
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:11:22 AM
#179:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
That's reasonable due to relevance.


And that matters why?



" It would be like him telling me I can't drink milk anymore while I am on probation. Has nothing to do with why I was there."


Judges can't just make you do whatever they want because they feel like it. it has to be relevant in some way.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:12:37 AM
#180:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
it has to be relevant in some way.


Why?
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:16:54 AM
#181:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
it has to be relevant in some way.


Why?



Judicial ethics commissions.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
YourAlt
08/25/17 1:25:54 AM
#182:


Worst thing is that this guy has a kid.
---
I was Amputation
Currently playing: Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE, The Last Story, Breath Of The Wild, Overwatch
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:26:55 AM
#183:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Judicial ethics commissions.


That's not an answer to my question.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:27:05 AM
#184:


YourAlt posted...
Worst thing is that this guy has a kid.



Jelly that I get some?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:27:44 AM
#185:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Judicial ethics commissions.


That's not an answer to my question.



it actually is.


http://www.courts.state.md.us/ethics/
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
YourAlt
08/25/17 1:28:53 AM
#186:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
YourAlt posted...
Worst thing is that this guy has a kid.



Jelly that I get some?


More like concerned about the well-being of a child.
---
I was Amputation
Currently playing: Tokyo Mirage Sessions #FE, The Last Story, Breath Of The Wild, Overwatch
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:29:52 AM
#187:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...

it actually is.


No it's not.

http://www.courts.state.md.us/ethics/


Is there a particular part I shouod look at to see tge evidence of your claim?
... Copied to Clipboard!
Darmik
08/25/17 1:31:27 AM
#188:


Are you actually getting this advice from a lawyer or are you doing it yourself by using Google?
---
Kind Regards,
Darmik
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:35:25 AM
#189:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...

it actually is.


No it's not.

http://www.courts.state.md.us/ethics/


Is there a particular part I shouod look at to see tge evidence of your claim?


So you are saying the judge could order me to not drink any milk for two years if he wanted to and that would not be unethical?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:36:35 AM
#190:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
So you are saying the judge could order me to not drink any milk for two years if he wanted to and that would not be unethical?


Yes. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:37:52 AM
#191:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
So you are saying the judge could order me to not drink any milk for two years if he wanted to and that would not be unethical?


Yes. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?



We're done talking because you're wasting my time.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:41:31 AM
#192:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...

We're done talking because you're wasting my time.


So that's a no, you don't have any evidence. Cool.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Aristoph
08/25/17 1:42:59 AM
#193:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...
JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
So you are saying the judge could order me to not drink any milk for two years if he wanted to and that would not be unethical?


Yes. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?



We're done talking because you're wasting my time.


That's clearly never mattered before.

Actually, the fact that that has never stopped you before is pretty much the exact reason you are consistently in the shitty situations you're in.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 1:44:00 AM
#194:


JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...

We're done talking because you're wasting my time.


So that's a no, you don't have any evidence. Cool.



No, that's a if you think I have to take the time to prove a judge can fucking order someone not to drink milk for 2 years by a court order for no reason other than they feel like it then you are not gonna keep wasting my time.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
JE19426
08/25/17 1:46:00 AM
#195:


DawkinsNumber4 posted...

No, that's a if you think I have to take the time to prove a judge can fucking order someone not to drink milk for 2 years by a court order for no reason other than they feel like it then you are not gonna keep wasting my time


And yet you typed all that out. It would been much quicker to just post the evidence

If you want to risk imprisonment by breaking rules you have been given. As you're so convince they are unlawful with no evidence to back it up, I can't stop you but I think you're quit foolish.
... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist
08/25/17 7:43:39 AM
#196:


thelovefist posted...
I would still like to read TC's explanation for why they refused to answer the reporter's question re: him recording them. If TC feels so strongly that they are in the right, then why not simply acknowledge that he is recording them? Refusing to the answer the question could reasonable be taken as him knowing that he is in the wrong.

---
N/A
... Copied to Clipboard!
#197
Post #197 was unavailable or deleted.
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 7:58:55 AM
#198:


Conflict posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...
JE19426 posted...
DawkinsNumber4 posted...

it actually is.


No it's not.

http://www.courts.state.md.us/ethics/


Is there a particular part I shouod look at to see tge evidence of your claim?


So you are saying the judge could order me to not drink any milk for two years if he wanted to and that would not be unethical?


That's a poor analogy for obvious reasons




It is not a poor analogy at all. Both are lawful activities that have nothing to do with the case at hand.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
El Mexicano Texano
08/25/17 8:00:13 AM
#199:


thelovefist posted...
thelovefist posted...
I would still like to read TC's explanation for why they refused to answer the reporter's question re: him recording them. If TC feels so strongly that they are in the right, then why not simply acknowledge that he is recording them? Refusing to the answer the question could reasonable be taken as him knowing that he is in the wrong.


He never answered this
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth
08/25/17 8:01:00 AM
#200:


When was the last time that you admitted to doing something wrong, TC? And I don't mean criminally, I mean, just in fucking general.
---
If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply.
... Copied to Clipboard!
DawkinsNumber4
08/25/17 8:04:33 AM
#201:


El Mexicano Texano posted...
thelovefist posted...
thelovefist posted...
I would still like to read TC's explanation for why they refused to answer the reporter's question re: him recording them. If TC feels so strongly that they are in the right, then why not simply acknowledge that he is recording them? Refusing to the answer the question could reasonable be taken as him knowing that he is in the wrong.


He never answered this




Yes I did. I told him I'd answer his questions when he answers mine. He never did. I also said this already in this topic and someone else noticed too because they mentioned it here before I did.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6