Current Events > Pwnt the shit out of the president of the local news media.

(+) Yeah! (+)

rofl, look at sqauder going off for no reason, yet again.

Must be a day ending in "-y".

Can't wait for them to lock you up again. CE is great without your shitty topics.
---

How does TC survive when half the time hes in prison or probation, and 100% of the time he is a jobless leech on society with no income
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

No one said fighting for our rights is easy.

You're not fighting for anybody's rights. You claiming the law doesn't apply to you personally. It's literally sociopathic behavior.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

GOATTHlEF posted...

What did your probation worker say after you told him that?

Nothing. She just gave me my next appointments for next month.

You told your probation officer you were going to violate the rules of your probation and they said nothing? I don't think that is a good sign.

This was over a week ago. I've recorded multiple videos and sent them to the police since then.

Lol jfc
---

Darmik posted...

You're angry at this paper for reporting that you record conversations which gives people an impression that you record conversations without permission so you call up this guy and record the conversation without permission?

And you think you owned this guy?

So apparently you don't understand words? The paper states I am charged with "illegally taping phone calls" when I am charged with "Intercept" of an "Electronic Communication". It is important to say the right thing because recording telephones calls isn't a crime and never has been. Intercepting a communication against the strictures of state law is what would have to be done. Recording your own conversations cannot be an intercept because you are authorized to receive a communication willfully given to you by the sender of said communication. Furthermore, a telephone furnished by the user or subscriber, for connection to the facilities, during the ordinary course if its business" is NOT considered an "Electronic, Mechanical, or Other Device" under the strictures of the statute as it is written in General Proceedings 10-402. There is also case law on this matter.


They dun goofed.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Darmik posted...

You're angry at this paper for reporting that you record conversations which gives people an impression that you record conversations without permission so you call up this guy and record the conversation without permission?

And you think you owned this guy?

So apparently you don't understand words? The paper states I am charged with "illegally taping phone calls" when I am charged with "Intercept" of an "Electronic Communication". It is important to say the right thing because recording telephones calls isn't a crime and never has been. Intercepting a communication against the strictures of state law is what would have to be done. Recording your own conversations cannot be an intercept because you are authorized to receive a communication willfully given to you by the sender of said communication. Furthermore, a telephone furnished by the user or subscriber, for connection to the facilities, during the ordinary course if its business" is NOT considered an "Electronic, Mechanical, or Other Device" under the strictures of the statute as it is written in General Proceedings 10-402. There is also case law on this matter.


They dun goofed.

But you were arguing you were being defamed that they reported you recording calls without permission. While recording a call without their permission.

You even avoid answering that you're recording the call when asked. How are you supposed to sue for defamation? I was under the impression from your posts here that you constantly record calls.
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

Nobody triggers (and I'm not big on this word) this board like TC.

I don't think anyone is triggered. It's like a road stop freak show
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

Nobody triggers (and I'm not big on this word) this board like TC.

Nobody gets triggered by life in general like TC does.

This board just finds it funny to poke the bear. Because it is. ^_^
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

I see people legitimately get bothered by TC and even go so far as to wish him in prison and the like.

In fairness, wishing that a mentally disturbed sociopath goes to prison where he can't hurt himself or the people around him does not mean the person is triggered. It just sounds like a generally good idea considering he has shown countless times already that he is incapable of being a productive (or even simply a non-destructive) member of society.
---

Darmik posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Darmik posted...

You're angry at this paper for reporting that you record conversations which gives people an impression that you record conversations without permission so you call up this guy and record the conversation without permission?

And you think you owned this guy?

So apparently you don't understand words? The paper states I am charged with "illegally taping phone calls" when I am charged with "Intercept" of an "Electronic Communication". It is important to say the right thing because recording telephones calls isn't a crime and never has been. Intercepting a communication against the strictures of state law is what would have to be done. Recording your own conversations cannot be an intercept because you are authorized to receive a communication willfully given to you by the sender of said communication. Furthermore, a telephone furnished by the user or subscriber, for connection to the facilities, during the ordinary course if its business" is NOT considered an "Electronic, Mechanical, or Other Device" under the strictures of the statute as it is written in General Proceedings 10-402. There is also case law on this matter.


They dun goofed.

But you were arguing you were being defamed that they reported you recording calls without permission. While recording a call without their permission.

You even avoid answering that you're recording the call when asked. How are you supposed to sue for defamation? I was under the impression from your posts here that you constantly record calls.

You don't need permission to record your own phone calls. You need permission from all parties to intercept a communication. When the party is talking to you then you have permission to acquire the communication. That's why when I said "Are you willfully communicating to me?" and he said no I pwnt him. The fact he was willfully talking to me is why I could not possibly unlawfully intercept his communication. When he sent it to me he was consenting to its intercept (an intercept is an "acquisition" not a recording) by me.
---

We've already laughed at you and that recording. Go get some new ones and then come back

Axiom posted...

We've already laughed at you and that recording. Go get some new ones and then come back

You should be laughing at the dumbass who tells me he isn't willfully talking to me while willfully talking to me.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

You don't need permission to record your own phone calls. You need permission from all parties to intercept a communication. When the party is talking to you then you have permission to acquire the communication.

What are you basing this on?

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

That's why when I said "Are you willfully communicating to me?" and he said no I pwnt him.

No you didn't. I don't think he cared that you were recording the call.

That's not what I asked anyway.

I asked why you were threating to sue him for defamation because they reported that you record calls without consent while recording a call without consent and proceeding to brag about that here. Would you say it's inaccurate and unfair to your character that you record phone calls without permission?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Part of being a judge is taking an oath to uphold the Constitution. If he locks me up his ass is grass.

Locking people up for violating probation is 100% constitutional.

Darmik posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

You don't need permission to record your own phone calls. You need permission from all parties to intercept a communication. When the party is talking to you then you have permission to acquire the communication.

What are you basing this on?

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

That's why when I said "Are you willfully communicating to me?" and he said no I pwnt him.

No you didn't. I don't think he cared that you were recording the call.

That's not what I asked anyway.

I asked why you were threating to sue him for defamation because they reported that you record calls without consent while recording a call without consent and proceeding to brag about that here. Would you say it's inaccurate and unfair to your character that you record phone calls without permission?

The news headline says "Man charged with illegally taping phone calls" and I am not charged with that. I am charged with "Interception of an Electronic Communication".They don't even come close to meaning the same thing. Hence, defamation.

"You don't need permission to record your own phone calls. You need permission from all parties to intercept a communication. When the party is talking to you then you have permission to acquire the communication. "

http://bobbaumlaw.com/recording-on-cell-phone-does-not-violate-wiretap-laws/


http://www.rightgrrl.com/tripp/woods.html


http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmStatutesText.aspx?article=gcj&section=10-401&ext=html&session=2017RS&tab=subject5
---

"(8) “Electronic, mechanical, or other device” means any device or electronic communication other than:
(i) Any telephone or telegraph instrument, equipment or other facility for the transmission of electronic communications, or any component thereof, (a) furnished to the subscriber or user by a provider of wire or electronic communication service in the ordinary course of its business and being used by the subscriber or user in the ordinary course of its business or furnished by the subscriber or user for connection to the facilities of the service and used in the ordinary course of its business; or (b) being used by a communications common carrier in the ordinary course of its business, or by an investigative or law enforcement officer in the ordinary course of his duties; or"


http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmStatutesText.aspx?article=gcj&section=10-402&ext=html&session=2017RS&tab=subject5

"(3) It is lawful under this subtitle for a person to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where the person is a party to the communication and where all of the parties to the communication have given prior consent to the interception unless the communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of this State."


Also, even if there were an intercept, if you are talking to someone then you are consenting for them to acquire the communication you are giving to them as you are willfully talking (sending a communication) to them.



Here in 10-408 it even distinguishes between the word "record" and the word "intercept".

http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/webmga/frmStatutesText.aspx?article=gcj&section=10-408&ext=html&session=2017RS&tab=subject5



"(g) (1) The contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepted by any means authorized by this subtitle, if possible, shall be recorded on tape or wire or other comparable device. The recording of the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication under this subsection shall be done in the way as will protect the recording from editing or other alterations. Immediately upon the expiration of the period of the order, or extensions thereof, such recordings shall be made available to the judge issuing such order and sealed under his directions. Custody of the recordings shall be wherever the judge orders.
---

JE19426 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Part of being a judge is taking an oath to uphold the Constitution. If he locks me up his ass is grass.

Locking people up for violating probation is 100% constitutional.

An order not to record in public and post it on youtube is not.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Darmik posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Darmik posted...

You're angry at this paper for reporting that you record conversations which gives people an impression that you record conversations without permission so you call up this guy and record the conversation without permission?

And you think you owned this guy?

So apparently you don't understand words? The paper states I am charged with "illegally taping phone calls" when I am charged with "Intercept" of an "Electronic Communication". It is important to say the right thing because recording telephones calls isn't a crime and never has been. Intercepting a communication against the strictures of state law is what would have to be done. Recording your own conversations cannot be an intercept because you are authorized to receive a communication willfully given to you by the sender of said communication. Furthermore, a telephone furnished by the user or subscriber, for connection to the facilities, during the ordinary course if its business" is NOT considered an "Electronic, Mechanical, or Other Device" under the strictures of the statute as it is written in General Proceedings 10-402. There is also case law on this matter.


They dun goofed.

But you were arguing you were being defamed that they reported you recording calls without permission. While recording a call without their permission.

You even avoid answering that you're recording the call when asked. How are you supposed to sue for defamation? I was under the impression from your posts here that you constantly record calls.

You don't need permission to record your own phone calls. You need permission from all parties to intercept a communication. When the party is talking to you then you have permission to acquire the communication. That's why when I said "Are you willfully communicating to me?" and he said no I pwnt him. The fact he was willfully talking to me is why I could not possibly unlawfully intercept his communication. When he sent it to me he was consenting to its intercept (an intercept is an "acquisition" not a recording) by me.

Pretty sure you're the one mistaken here, TC. Here's a quick excerpt from the Digital Media Law Project's website:

When must you get permission from everyone involved before recording?

Eleven states require the consent of every party to a phone call or conversation in order to make the recording lawful. These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.

It seems pretty clear that this applies to any call, regardless of whether you're a party to the call or intercepting it or whatever. Thoughts?

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations
---

0AbsoluteZero0 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Darmik posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Darmik posted...

You're angry at this paper for reporting that you record conversations which gives people an impression that you record conversations without permission so you call up this guy and record the conversation without permission?

And you think you owned this guy?

So apparently you don't understand words? The paper states I am charged with "illegally taping phone calls" when I am charged with "Intercept" of an "Electronic Communication". It is important to say the right thing because recording telephones calls isn't a crime and never has been. Intercepting a communication against the strictures of state law is what would have to be done. Recording your own conversations cannot be an intercept because you are authorized to receive a communication willfully given to you by the sender of said communication. Furthermore, a telephone furnished by the user or subscriber, for connection to the facilities, during the ordinary course if its business" is NOT considered an "Electronic, Mechanical, or Other Device" under the strictures of the statute as it is written in General Proceedings 10-402. There is also case law on this matter.


They dun goofed.

But you were arguing you were being defamed that they reported you recording calls without permission. While recording a call without their permission.

You even avoid answering that you're recording the call when asked. How are you supposed to sue for defamation? I was under the impression from your posts here that you constantly record calls.

You don't need permission to record your own phone calls. You need permission from all parties to intercept a communication. When the party is talking to you then you have permission to acquire the communication. That's why when I said "Are you willfully communicating to me?" and he said no I pwnt him. The fact he was willfully talking to me is why I could not possibly unlawfully intercept his communication. When he sent it to me he was consenting to its intercept (an intercept is an "acquisition" not a recording) by me.

Pretty sure you're the one mistaken here, TC. Here's a quick excerpt from the Digital Media Law Project's website:

When must you get permission from everyone involved before recording?

Eleven states require the consent of every party to a phone call or conversation in order to make the recording lawful. These "two-party consent" laws have been adopted in California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington.

It seems pretty clear that this applies to any call, regardless of whether you're a party to the call or intercepting it or whatever. Thoughts?

http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/recording-phone-calls-and-conversations

Stop quoting garbage sources and check my two post post.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

An order not to record in public and post it on youtube is not.

If it's part of your probation, it is.

It's too bad TC reproduced, I fell bad his kid has him for a father.
---

JE19426 posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

An order not to record in public and post it on youtube is not.

If it's part of your probation, it is.

That's not how it works. It is an unconstitutional order and I only am required to follow lawful orders. I refuse to follow such a blatant violation of the 1st amendment. Please don't act like you actually know what you are talking about and aren't some random sheltered nerd online.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

I refuse to follow such a blatant violation of the 1st amendment

that doesn't mean its not a lawful order. you have proven you are incapable of being trusted with video cameras etc, thats why you have been lawfully ordered to not use them. you are refusing to follow a lawful order, thats all there is to it.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Aristoph posted...

TheVipaGTS posted...

This guy isn't real right everyone?

He is. His court dates and charges and such have been posted several times. And he's got several mental issues that he refuses to get help for even though he's been ordered to several times by the courts.

He's pretty much objectively the worst excuse for a human being on CE at the moment.

I am diagnosed with aspergers, ocd, adhd, bipolar, motor tic disorder/tourettes, anxiety disorder, and mathematics disorder. I see a therapist every 2 weeks and have for years. I see a psychiatrist every 2 months. She doesn't think I need medication other than cannabis currently. Lying is unnecessary bro.

I would recommend not giving a shit about anyone but your family(not to the point of being an asshole though)

Getting worked up and aggressive is gonna result in more trouble with the law. Just smoke that weed and relax. You don't have to be right all the time. You have a kid right? Stay out of trouble so you can be a father to them.

This video is exactly that. Why do you need to call up a newspaper to correct a technicality? You were pretty much arguing semantics. Put yourself in less opportunities to piss people off or get pissed of yourself. You know you have issues don't put yourself in situations that could escalate or raise your stress whenever possible.
---

pikachupwnage posted...

You don't have to be right all the time.

Any rational person would attempt to be correct as much as possible. In America today accuracy seems to be unimportant and as a result we are in the situation we are in. Just because the majority of the population is stupid doesn't mean I have to be. Plus, if anyone around here can change this stupid ass backwoods town, it's me.
---

-Gavirulax- posted...

Oi TC, what does your username mean?
Like what is it named after?

---

"How am I illegally taping phone calls?"
>tapes a phone call and posts it publicly
---

Lol, TC obviously wants nothing more than to be respected for his intelligence while continually displaying how far away from that goal he is.
---

bluezero posted...

"How am I illegally taping phone calls?"
>tapes a phone call and posts it publicly

Recording phone calls isn't illegal. Interception of a communication without all parties consenting to the interception is. You are consenting to the interception of a communication with anyone you are willfully speaking to. These are eavesdropping laws and you cannot eavesdrop on yourself.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

pikachupwnage posted...

You don't have to be right all the time.

Any rational person would attempt to be correct as much as possible. In America today accuracy seems to be unimportant and as a result we are in the situation we are in. Just because the majority of the population is stupid doesn't mean I have to be. Plus, if anyone around here can change this stupid ass backwoods town, it's me.

I mean you don't have to win every argument or go out of your way to correct technicalities and argue semantics. Sometimes you gotta accept someone is being dumb and do whatever you can to politely shoo them off without starting a fight. I would be out of a job a thousand times over without having put that into practice.

Arguing with a cop for example is a horrible idea. Just cooperate instead of freaking out.

Trying to be some kind of "facts hero" will make you miserable. You have too many issues for that to be feasible. Your crusade will only bring you misery. You need to recognize your weaknesses and see that its time to fold.

Please just live a more relaxed life with your family. Ignore what the world thinks.
---

Twinmold posted...

Lol, TC obviously wants nothing more than to be respected for his intelligence while continually displaying how far away from that goal he is.

I don't need to show off to CE because most of the people here outside of a small few are not even on my level to begin with. They are also extremely predictable with their behavior to the point someone could probably write a script predicting which fallacy they will respond with before even responding.
---

pikachupwnage posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

pikachupwnage posted...

You don't have to be right all the time.

Any rational person would attempt to be correct as much as possible. In America today accuracy seems to be unimportant and as a result we are in the situation we are in. Just because the majority of the population is stupid doesn't mean I have to be. Plus, if anyone around here can change this stupid ass backwoods town, it's me.

I mean you don't have to win every argument or go out of your way to correct technicalities and argue semantics. Sometimes you gotta accept someone is being dumb and do whatever you can to politely shoo them off without starting a fight. I would be out of a job a thousand times over without having put that into practice.

Arguing with a cop for example is a horrible idea. Just cooperate instead of freaking out.

Trying to be some kind of "facts hero" will make you miserable and aggressive. You have too many issues for that to be feasible. Your crusade will only bring you misery.

Please just live a more relaxed life with your family. Ignore what the world thinks.

Out of hundreds of members of my family I and my cousin Steve are the only liberals so I have little interest in them. As far as my daughter goes, she is well taken care of and will be even better taken care of once this litigation is over.
---

I don't need to show off to CE

Lol, then why do you spend so much time here begging for attention and praise? It's pretty easy to tell that this relentless mocking of you doesn't stop at the internet.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

pikachupwnage posted...

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

pikachupwnage posted...

You don't have to be right all the time.

Any rational person would attempt to be correct as much as possible. In America today accuracy seems to be unimportant and as a result we are in the situation we are in. Just because the majority of the population is stupid doesn't mean I have to be. Plus, if anyone around here can change this stupid ass backwoods town, it's me.

I mean you don't have to win every argument or go out of your way to correct technicalities and argue semantics. Sometimes you gotta accept someone is being dumb and do whatever you can to politely shoo them off without starting a fight. I would be out of a job a thousand times over without having put that into practice.

Arguing with a cop for example is a horrible idea. Just cooperate instead of freaking out.

Trying to be some kind of "facts hero" will make you miserable and aggressive. You have too many issues for that to be feasible. Your crusade will only bring you misery.

Please just live a more relaxed life with your family. Ignore what the world thinks.

Out of hundreds of members of my family I and my cousin Steve are the only liberals so I have little interest in them.As far as my daughter goes, she is well taken care of and will be even better taken care of once this litigation is over.

Are you seriously saying you don't care about someone who doesn't share your political beliefs even if they are family? Some clarification perhaps?

Because that looks a lot like that is what you are saying. That is yet another way to be miserable and alienate yourself. Although I was referring largely to your Wife and daughter when saying to live a relaxed life with family.
---

Twinmold posted...

I don't need to show off to CE

Lol, then why do you spend so much time here begging for attention and praise? It's pretty easy to tell that this relentless mocking of you doesn't stop at the internet.

I spend very little time here, especially when compared to everyone else here.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Twinmold posted...

Lol, TC obviously wants nothing more than to be respected for his intelligence while continually displaying how far away from that goal he is.

I don't need to show off to CE because most of the people here outside of a small few are not even on my level to begin with. They are also extremely predictable with their behavior to the point someone could probably write a script predicting which fallacy they will respond with before even responding.

If you are so smart how come you don't have a job you fucking leech?
---

pikachupwnage posted...

Are you seriously saying you don't care about someone who doesn't share your political beliefs even if they are family?

Beliefs are reflected in actions. I have no interest in willfully observing stupidity on the regular. I am not with my daughter's mother anymore and haven't been in 2 or 3 years.
---

there's a particular offensive and un-PC insult used to describe people like TC. he's earned it

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

I am diagnosed with aspergers, ocd, adhd, bipolar, motor tic disorder/tourettes, anxiety disorder, and mathematics disorder. I see a therapist every 2 weeks and have for years. I see a psychiatrist every 2 months. She doesn't think I need medication other than cannabis currently. Lying is unnecessary bro.

You need a new psychiatrist. If anything the weed is making you worse. :u She's probably a pothead too.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted...

Bio1590 posted...

We already had a topic on this.

But I guess now we get to "figure out" how exactly this doesn't violate the terms of your probation.

I told my probation officer I wasn't going to follow it anymore because it's horse shit and the worse the judge can do is throw me in jail for 60 days then I am no longer on probation or have a court order anyways.

You don't belong in jail.

You belong in a mental institution. You'd make a perfect case study.
---

What are you hoping to achieve TC by recording this phone call?
---

How do you record these phone calls? Some app on your phone?

Canuklehead posted...

How do you record these phone calls? Some app on your phone?

Yes. A call recording app put on my own phone, for connection to the facilities of my own service, during the ordinary course of both its and my business as required by law.
---

This is going to end poorly.
---

DelianSK posted...

This is going to end poorly.

Do you hear that a lot?
---