Topic List |
Page List:
1 |
---|---|
SwiftyDC 04/16/17 7:58:26 PM #1: |
--- Dilated Chemist DpObliVion is the one true king of Guru's. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
KanzarisKelshen 04/16/17 8:08:06 PM #2: |
SMB takes this home and it ain't close
SFF gon be strong yo --- Shine on, you crazy diamond. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Paratroopa1 04/16/17 8:29:04 PM #3: |
It really depends on how much the match pic makes it clear that 87 is WAY deeper
... Copied to Clipboard!
|
SwiftyDC 04/16/17 9:28:24 PM #4: |
I picked 87 without much thinking.
--- Dilated Chemist DpObliVion is the one true king of Guru's. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
SwiftyDC 04/16/17 9:29:31 PM #5: |
But historically, I've been bad picking the 2nd match of the contest.
--- Dilated Chemist DpObliVion is the one true king of Guru's. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
LeonhartFour 04/16/17 9:30:48 PM #6: |
SwiftyDC posted...
But historically, I've been bad picking the 2nd match of the contest. That's been the case historically for a lot of people. The second match of the contest is generally a toss-up, at least in theory. --- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
transience 04/16/17 9:34:27 PM #7: |
I wonder what would happen if you seeded it. hard to argue 1995 being the 1 seed.
I assume we're doing the wildcard matches first anyway? --- xyzzy ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
LeonhartFour 04/16/17 9:37:24 PM #8: |
Wild card matches are first, yeah.
--- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
tazzyboyishere 04/16/17 10:02:54 PM #9: |
Isn't SMB just barely stronger than Zelda? Can't imagine it'll be able to carry in this match.
--- http://i.imgur.com/l7xxLh1.jpg PSN/Steam - RoboQuote ; NNID - TazzyMan ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
LeonhartFour 04/16/17 10:52:29 PM #10: |
If you consider 53-54% to be barely, then I guess so.
--- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
JDPizza 04/16/17 11:01:51 PM #11: |
Link, um, I mean Zelda, wins.
--- By the slice, baby. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
LusterSoldier 04/16/17 11:06:53 PM #12: |
transience posted...
I wonder what would happen if you seeded it. hard to argue 1995 being the 1 seed. In past contests, this has been the seeding structure for each division of a 32 entrant bracket: 1 vs. 8 4 vs. 5 3 vs. 6 2 vs. 7 If we applied this to the main bracket of this contest (Round 1), we're looking at the following seeds: 1 seeds - 1995, 1997, 1991, 1998 2 seeds - 2008, 1996, 2011, 2015 3 seeds - 2001, 2000, 1994, 2013 4 seeds - 1985, 2007, 2002, 1992 5 seeds - 1987, 2012, 2010, 2016 6 seeds - 2014, 1990, 2004, 2003 7 seeds - 2009, 1989, 2006, 2005 8 seeds - 1986, 1999, 1988, 1993 9 seeds - 1979, 1983, 1981, 1978 The Vote-In years were treated as 9 seeds in this bracket. --- Luster Soldier --- ~Shield Bearer~ | ~Data Analyst~ Popular at school, but not as cool as DpObliVion, Guru Champ! ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Paratroopa1 04/17/17 12:06:31 AM #13: |
I think for most voters 1987's list of franchise-starting games will jump off the page enough to beat 1985, which literally has one game. One. 1987's got like five franchises with noteworthy voting power and 1985 has just Super Mario Bros. Maybe Duck Hunt.
... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Big Bob 04/17/17 12:08:17 AM #14: |
I picked 1987. None of those games are the most popular in their franchise, but they are ALL the first in some of the most recognized series in gaming. SMB is strong, but I don't think it can hold up.
--- Come watch me on Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/gameryogi ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
redrocket_pub 04/17/17 12:15:47 AM #15: |
So we're just ignoring the NES itself?
--- Blasting off ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Paratroopa1 04/17/17 1:59:17 AM #16: |
redrocket_pub posted...
So we're just ignoring the NES itself? I mean, I don't really put a lot of stock into it? Most GameFAQs users either weren't alive or weren't old enough to notice the NES's release, and the NES's first year is really crap compared to its third, at least NA-release wise. It's got a certain charm to it in a way, you can like kind of immediately tell those really early NES games - Excitebike, Ice Climber, Clu Clu Land, and all the rest - apart from their later counterparts, but really, they're mostly kind of novelties at this point. 1987 is when the NES really started coming out with heavy hitters, and for most people 1987-1990 are going to be the years that define the NES and what it was, and not the 1985 launch that most people weren't around for. It would be utterly bizarre to me for people to be voting for 1985 because of the NES. That's like giving 2006 credit for the PS3. ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1 |