Current Events > Hillary Clinton warns birth control is next, after Alabama IVF ruling

(+) Yeah! (+)

She hasn't been wrong about these fuckheads yet.

She was right when she called Trump supporters deplorables and she's right here as well.

Everyone: "Don't worry, Roe V Wade is Safe. Donald Trump would never end Roe V. Wade."

Later:

Everyone: "Okay, maybe they'd get rid of Roe V. wade, but they're not going to do anything about IVF."

Later:

Everyone: "Okay, maybe they are going after IVF. But Birth control is safe."

The pattern is obvious to anyone with two brain cells to put together.

Wow the justice explaining his reasoning is so batshit insane

Dancedreamer posted...

Everyone: "Don't worry, Roe V Wade is Safe. Donald Trump would never end Roe V. Wade."

Later:

Everyone: "Okay, maybe they'd get rid of Roe V. wade, but they're not going to do anything about IVF."

Later:

Everyone: "Okay, maybe they are going after IVF. But Birth control is safe."

The pattern is obvious to anyone with two brain cells to put together.

It was the same when we predicted Trump wouldnt leave office quietly.

mybbqrules posted...

She hasn't been wrong about these fuckheads yet.

What about when she said half of them are deplorable? She was being way to kind.

Oh look, it's the jackass who lost against a clown because she insisted it was her turn. Why is this idiot who cost us the supreme court giving out warnings after she ignored all the warnings about her disastrous presidential campaign?

Axiom posted...

Wow the justice explaining his reasoning is so batshit insane

So fucked that a person who writes that shit doesnt get immediately removed from their position in government

Dancedreamer posted...

Everyone: "Don't worry, Roe V Wade is Safe. Donald Trump would never end Roe V. Wade."

Later:

Everyone: "Okay, maybe they'd get rid of Roe V. wade, but they're not going to do anything about IVF."

Later:

Everyone: "Okay, maybe they are going after IVF. But Birth control is safe."

The pattern is obvious to anyone with two brain cells to put together.

My favorite was after Roe got struck down people, rightfully, got nervous about same sex marriage and even interracial marriage, with of course right wingers going "hurrr durrrr u bn paranoid chicken little sky fallin orange man bad u doomer!" Then you read the judges opinions and even some of the GOP were like, hell yeah, let's go after gay and interracial marriage next!

1337toothbrush posted...

Oh look, it's the jackass who lost against a clown because she insisted it was her turn. Why is this idiot who cost us the supreme court giving out warnings after she ignored all the warnings about her disastrous presidential campaign?

Lot of words to say she's right.

1337toothbrush posted...

Oh look, it's the jackass who lost against a clown because she insisted it was her turn. Why is this idiot who cost us the supreme court giving out warnings after she ignored all the warnings about her disastrous presidential campaign?

I want to know who was in charge of her campaign. Whose bright idea was it to do that. I hope they weren't just fired, but also nobody will hire such an idiot ever again. Like it's unreal they thought that was a good idea.

Revisited posted...

I want to know who was in charge of her campaign. Whose bright idea was it to do that. I hope they weren't just fired, but also nobody will hire such an idiot ever again. Like it's unreal they thought that was a good idea.

Yet she managed to still have more people vote for her than Trump and only lost because of our shitty way of electing people.

Considering Trump is probably going to win in 2024, women as a whole will be nothing but slaves to their partner. It is the obvious next logical step. Sadly this will probably win him the vote with how many fascist male fucks live in this country.

PeteyParker posted...

Yet she managed to still have more people vote for her than Trump and only lost because of our shitty way of electing people.

Plus the GOPs anti-democratic practices.

Heineken14 posted...

Lot of words to say she's right.

I'm not surprised you'd read my post so incorrectly when you consider two sentences a lot of words. She's stating the obvious here that everyone already knew. She's just trying to insert herself into the situation because she wants to feel important and relevant. She was dead wrong when it counted, which is why we're here in the first place.

PeteyParker posted...

Yet she managed to still have more people vote for her than Trump and only lost because of our shitty way of electing people.

That's not saying much. She lost against a borderline orangutan for goodness sakes. Which is insulting to orangutans admittedly. But she dropped the ball so hard, and we had to contend with a monster winning, who went from "lol the dude from the apprentice?" to "this man is dangerous, and has made being racist/sexist/evil a badge of honor to wear rather than something that was bubbling under the surface"

PeteyParker posted...

Yet she managed to still have more people vote for her than Trump and only lost because of our shitty way of electing people.

Party-controlled primaries are a shitty way of nominating candidates, but you don't see democrats complaining about that.

Axiom posted...

Wow the justice explaining his reasoning is so batshit insane

I'd also like to hear his thoughts on the death penalty.

Heineken14 posted...

Lot of words to say she's right.

You're completely missing the point. She was supposed to protect us from this, like the old saying all it takes for evil is good men to do nothing. But instead she went with "derp I'm a teh female, a womaynz" as a campaign slogan. It's almost like she was trying to lose out of some sort of spite. No one could have okayed these decisions outside of a skit on Veep or something.

Nothing she says now matters, it barely amounts to empty platitudes.

This has been obvious for a long time, since before even Roe v Wade was overturned.

I do feel like TC kinda only posted this to trigger the people who would fly into anti-Hillary rages as we certainly did need her to tell us something that's been obvious to anybody who's been paying attention to the desires of the Christo-fascist right.

Revisited posted...

That's not saying much. She lost against a borderline orangutan for goodness sakes. Which is insulting to orangutans admittedly. But she dropped the ball so hard, and we had to contend with a monster winning, who went from "lol the dude from the apprentice?" to "this man is dangerous, and has made being racist/sexist/evil a badge of honor to wear rather than something that was bubbling under the surface"

It will never not be funny to me that HC is so unpalatable that basically half the country looked at her, the Trump, back to her and said "yeah no we'll take our chances with this buffoon"

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f475c027.jpg

Nothing is off the table with this current GOP and courts.

I don't get it

I read an article about some politician thinking about the death penalty for women that aborted

They all have gotten mad

They force children to carry the child of men that raped them

She is right, As much as the GQP will deny it she is right, After all the same people said that Roe v Wade was settled law and that the GQP would never overturn it.. then after it was overturned they said that we were all just doom posting and that they would never pass laws forcing women to give birth and that if they really wanted an abortion they would just be able to travel, Then some passed laws making that criminal, then they said that dont worry, if its still a medical emergency or rape then they could still get an abortion.. and well, we have all seen how that has gone

Thud posted...

It will never not be funny to me that HC is so unpalatable that basically half the country looked at her, the Trump, back to her and said "yeah no we'll take our chances with this buffoon"

~30% of the voting age population is a far cry from basically half the country

Cant speak for if its the "Next Target" but with what i know, i would not be surprised... hell im pretty sure ive heard people flat out say as much in the past

...online only, i dont think abortion as a topic has much drama in my country, AFAIK its just a thing (i think the limit under normal situations is 12 weeks)

Deeply religious people should not be in charge of this shit. Or literally anything, for that matter. Ever.

havean776 posted...

What about when she said half of them are deplorable? She was being way to kind.

You know, I almost included in my original post that her "basket of deplorables" comment was way too nice.

Dark_Arbron posted...

It was the same when we predicted Trump wouldnt leave office quietly.

When she and the DNC pushed Trump, causing all this mess. She was pretty wrong then.

Hilary has been spot on when it comes to these political trends. I wouldn't completely don't her on this.

wackyteen posted...

Hillary Clinton is warning about the legality of birth control in the wake of a decision by the Alabama Supreme Court that found frozen embryos created through fertility treatments are children under state law.

I didn't know this was up for debate.

What else would they be?

yes. conservatives don't want people having sex unless it's for procreation.

Zeeak4444 posted...

~30% of the voting age population is a far cry from basically half the country

Not to mention that Hillary won the popular vote against additional hurdles like standard Republican voter suppression and Russian influence. We still havent nipped this half the country vote Republican myth in the bud yet it seems.

1337toothbrush posted...

Oh look, it's the jackass who lost against a clown because she insisted it was her turn. Why is this idiot who cost us the supreme court giving out warnings after she ignored all the warnings about her disastrous presidential campaign?

You've never been "us" Toothbrush.

Every step backwards always seems to blur the line between church and state

This shit isn't supposed to govern everyone, forcing their belief as fact

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I thought it was Thomas who announced a list of 4 cases he wanted to go after because people kept pointing out that it was *odd* that he didn't want to "revisit" Loving, the case that allowed for interracial marriage.

Thud posted...

It will never not be funny to me that HC is so unpalatable that basically half the country looked at her, the Trump, back to her and said "yeah no we'll take our chances with this buffoon"

Here's the difference between the elections of 2016 and 2020. In 2016, a few tens of thousands of votes in critical states gave Trump a win. In 2020, a few tens of thousands of votes in critical states gave Biden the win.

So all of these arguments to the effect that Hillary Clinton was a shit-tier candidate "because she lost to Trump" are invalid -- the margins in 2016 and in 2020 were too close to support any arguments like that.

Arguments that Clinton got ratfucked and/or made campaign mistakes are fair game, of course.

They also want to go after the federal government's ability to regulate corporations from not putting thinngs like cynaide and poison into our drinking water, products and pretty much every single thing we use in our lives and Thomas most recently renounced his previous decision expanding the federal government's right to do that

We're finished as a country, what we're in is a downfall with no hope of getting out of as long as the supreme court is owned by billionaires and the judges have absolutely no rules for obvious corruption, open brazen corruption, actively taunting the citizens about how untouchable they are.

On top of that we have an entire party of foreign agents actively working to undermine the federal government yet the head of the department of justice refuses to actually do anything because it's his team,that same head was once up for being a supreme court justice.

bnui_ransder posted...

Every step backwards always seems to blur the line between church and state

This shit isn't supposed to govern everyone, forcing their belief as fact

And I'm going to restate that I think any votes in relation well to abortion and LGBTQ+ rights should have a major caveat in that those voting against need to go through a purity test/inspection and pass before their vote can be recognized.

No, not giving them a chance to win, but that just as anti-abortion and Anti-LGBTQ+ detractors don't give any leeway towards their target(s), so even the slightest misdemeanor can be used to disqualify their vote from making any impact.

And maybe so the voter and their misconducts can be publicized worldwide.

Hillary Clinton is almost always right.

Thats why Republicans hate her so much. Well that and the fact that she speaks her mind.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Looking it back up it seems it was a "concurring opinion", so Alito wrote the tripe and Thomas agreed with like 3 of the big ones by name.

Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion released on Friday that the Supreme Court should reconsider its past rulings codifying rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256

That list from Alito is insane though, like, so many rights and precedents he clearly wants to throw out because he thinks the Cons doesn't grant us autonomy rights? Like, what an absolutely ridiculous argument to think the Founders escaping a King who controlled society, religion, and the person themselves would set up a government to just do the exact same thing under the guise of "Freedom".

EPR-radar posted...

Here's the difference between the elections of 2016 and 2020. In 2016, a few tens of thousands of votes in critical states gave Trump a win. In 2020, a few tens of thousands of votes in critical states gave Biden the win.

So all of these arguments to the effect that Hillary Clinton was a shit-tier candidate "because she lost to Trump" are invalid -- the margins in 2016 and in 2020 were too close to support any arguments like that.

Arguments that Clinton got ratfucked and/or made campaign mistakes are fair game, of course.

Plus, Hillary got three million more votes than Trump.

I'd sure love for someone to point out why every single election from student council president to dog catcher is "whoever has the most votes wins" but not for literally the most important election in the country.