Poll of the Day > Have you ordered your free at-home COVID tests?

Topic List	Page List: 1
captpackrat 01/19/22 8:02:40 PM #1:	https://special.usps.com/testkits Limit one order of 4 tests per residential address. Orders will ship in late January. --- Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, Minutus carborata descendum pantorum. <cite>captpackrat posted [p:961898384] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>https://special.usps.com/testkits Limit one order of 4 tests per residential address. Orders will ship in late January. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 01/19/22 8:02:56 PM #2:	yes <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:961898391] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>yes </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
captpackrat 01/19/22 8:05:32 PM #3:	Most insurance companies will also cover at-home test kits as well, up to 8 tests per month per member (so family of 4 with all members covered, that's 32 tests per month). Depending on your particular plan and pharmacy, the tests may be no-cost, or you have have to pay up front and file for reimbursement. Call the number on the back of your insurance card to find out. --- Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, Minutus carborata descendum pantorum. <cite>captpackrat posted [p:961898461] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Most insurance companies will also cover at-home test kits as well, up to 8 tests per month per member (so family of 4 with all members covered, that's 32 tests per month). Depending on your particular plan and pharmacy, the tests may be no-cost, or you have have to pay up front and file for reimbursement. Call the number on the back of your insurance card to find out. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/19/22 8:46:22 PM #4:	I've been picking some up whenever convenient. Supplies have become considerably more limited now and there's only a handful of pop-up sites where you can grab a batch (of 5), but other sites are handing them out by appointment because they've become the default test for most people (which I think is pretty stupid because they're less reliable than PCR tests and mean the province is basically no longer counting the vast majority of cases because the health authority only processes PCR results, but that's another issue). We've currently got 6 left between the two of us, I believe, since we've burned through several in the past week. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961899578] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>I've been picking some up whenever convenient. Supplies have become considerably more limited now and there's only a handful of pop-up sites where you can grab a batch (of 5), but other sites are handing them out by appointment because they've become the default test for most people (which I think is pretty stupid because they're less reliable than PCR tests and mean the province is basically no longer counting the vast majority of cases because the health authority only processes PCR results, but that's another issue). We've currently got 6 left between the two of us, I believe, since we've burned through several in the past week. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 01/19/22 8:53:13 PM #5:	4 per residential address? wlel that's biased against poor people --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:961899792] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>4 per residential address? wlel that's biased against poor people </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BEERandWEED 01/19/22 9:37:19 PM #6:	No. I'm choosing to not buy in to the profiteering. <cite>BEERandWEED posted [p:961901112] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>No. I'm choosing to not buy in to the profiteering. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EclairReturns 01/19/22 10:24:33 PM #7:	BEERandWEED posted... buy But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge. --- Number XII: Larxene. The Organization's Savage Nymph. <cite>EclairReturns posted [p:961902439] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote><cite>BEERandWEED posted...</cite> <quote>buy</quote> But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 01/19/22 10:25:27 PM #8:	EclairReturns posted... But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge. Yeah but the Gov paid for them Might as well get them anyway because your taxes already paid for it <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:961902460] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>EclairReturns posted... </cite> <quote>But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge.</quote> Yeah but the Gov paid for them Might as well get them anyway because your taxes already paid for it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MetalGarurumon 01/19/22 10:27:35 PM #9:	Jen0125 posted... Might as well get them anyway because your taxes already paid for it mhm mhm it's fun to point that out to people bitching about big pharma and how they aren't gonna get their money like they already did lmao <cite>MetalGarurumon posted [p:961902531] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>Might as well get them anyway because your taxes already paid for it</quote>mhm mhm it's fun to point that out to people bitching about big pharma and how they aren't gonna get their money like they already did lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BEERandWEED 01/19/22 10:42:28 PM #10:	EclairReturns posted... But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge. People are making money from them. Jen0125 posted... Yeah but the Gov paid for them Might as well get them anyway because your taxes already paid for it I have principles and stand against pointless spending. MetalGarurumon posted... mhm mhm it's fun to point that out to people bitching about big pharma and how they aren't gonna get their money like they already did lmao It's why they shouldn't be trusted. --- Always have a hamms in hand. <cite>BEERandWEED posted [p:961902948] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>EclairReturns posted... </cite> <quote>But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge.</quote>People are making money from them. Jen0125 posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah but the Gov paid for them Might as well get them anyway because your taxes already paid for it</quote>I have principles and stand against pointless spending. MetalGarurumon posted... </cite> <quote>mhm mhm it's fun to point that out to people bitching about big pharma and how they aren't gonna get their money like they already did lmao</quote>It's why they shouldn't be trusted. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jen0125 01/19/22 10:46:10 PM #11:	Well the spending has already been done and for your benefit. You're wasting your own money. <cite>Jen0125 posted [p:961903029] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Well the spending has already been done and for your benefit. You're wasting your own money. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
teddy241 01/19/22 10:51:12 PM #12:	No. Rapid testing isnt accurate. I went for the saliva lab test. <cite>teddy241 posted [p:961903134] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>No. Rapid testing isnt accurate. I went for the saliva lab test. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 01/19/22 10:57:55 PM #13:	captpackrat posted... Most insurance companies will also cover at-home test kits as well, up to 8 tests per month per member (so family of 4 with all members covered, that's 32 tests per month). Depending on your particular plan and pharmacy, the tests may be no-cost, or you have have to pay up front and file for reimbursement. Call the number on the back of your insurance card to find out. which is ridiculous... why do they need to test twice a week? --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:961903287] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>captpackrat posted...</cite> <quote>Most insurance companies will also cover at-home test kits as well, up to 8 tests per month per member (so family of 4 with all members covered, that's 32 tests per month). Depending on your particular plan and pharmacy, the tests may be no-cost, or you have have to pay up front and file for reimbursement. Call the number on the back of your insurance card to find out. </quote> which is ridiculous... why do they need to test twice a week?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
agesboy 01/19/22 10:59:13 PM #14:	ill go for one if i ever feel slightly covidy which i kind of did the week after christmas, but i also wasn't in contact with anyone then so lol --- http://i.imgur.com/LabbRyN.jpg raytan and Kana are on opposite ends of the Awesome Spectrum. <cite>agesboy posted [p:961903327] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>ill go for one if i ever feel slightly covidy which i kind of did the week after christmas, but i also wasn't in contact with anyone then so lol </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/19/22 11:04:29 PM #15:	No. But I think my mom sent me the link not too long ago --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:961903447] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>No. But I think my mom sent me the link not too long ago</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
captpackrat 01/20/22 6:54:41 AM #16:	Krazy_Kirby posted... which is ridiculous... why do they need to test twice a week? This would actually be a great idea, distribute enough tests, easy simple tests, so that people could test themselves on a regular basis. Then people could learn if they're infected within days, rather than wondering around for possibly weeks infecting everyone they meet. The BinaxNOW test doesn't require jamming a swab into your brain, you just swab the inside of your nostril. So you make it part of your morning routine. Swab your nose and start the test, brush your teeth, take a shower, get dressed, check the results. --- Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, Minutus carborata descendum pantorum. <cite>captpackrat posted [p:961909463] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Krazy_Kirby posted... </cite> <quote>which is ridiculous... why do they need to test twice a week?</quote>This would actually be a great idea, distribute enough tests, easy simple tests, so that people could test themselves on a regular basis. Then people could learn if they're infected within days, rather than wondering around for possibly weeks infecting everyone they meet. The BinaxNOW test doesn't require jamming a swab into your brain, you just swab the inside of your nostril. So you make it part of your morning routine. Swab your nose and start the test, brush your teeth, take a shower, get dressed, check the results. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 01/20/22 8:09:26 AM #17:	Taxpayer dollars being funneled pointlessly into the greedy hands of profiteers and Americans are unsurprisingly ok with it. --- "I don't question our existence, I just question our modern needs" Pearl Jam - Garden My theme song - https://youtu.be/-PXIbVNfj3s <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:961910418] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Taxpayer dollars being funneled pointlessly into the greedy hands of profiteers and Americans are unsurprisingly ok with it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/20/22 9:06:49 AM #18:	BEERandWEED posted... People are making money from them. Do you think people aren't also making money from high Covid rates? That many of the politicians actively opposing masks and vaccines under the pretense that they benefit corporations selling such products don't have stock in companies that service ventilators and sell oxygen so they can directly profit from increased hospitalizations? People are going to make money off of Covid regardless of how it goes. To that end, you might as well ignore the money angle and focus on saving/improving lives. BEERandWEED posted... I have principles and stand against pointless spending. Principles with no basis in practicality are useless. Principles at the expense of practicality are stupid. Principles at the expense of literal lives are evil. Krazy_Kirby posted... which is ridiculous... why do they need to test twice a week? Generally speaking, if you're infected, you can expect to start testing positive (and therefore being infectious) about 2-3 days after exposure. By testing every 3-4 days, you ensure that the longest you can possibly go being infectious without knowing it is 4 days, which is a lot better than waiting a week for symptoms to show up. You can improve that even further by adjusting your testing schedule to reflect when an exposure might have been possible (e.g. if you went out on Sunday but didn't interact with anyone on Friday, Saturday, or Monday, the best day to test is Wednesday because Sunday was your only possible exposure) or testing right before going somewhere that might result in you infecting somebody. It's a matter of being proactive and identifying infectious cases as early as possible to limit the number of people they can infect. Obviously, if you're only leaving the house once a week, testing twice a week is kind of pointless (the best schedule would be to test right before leaving for that outing), but for those that are going out regularly, testing twice a week strikes a nice balance between early identification of positive tests and ensuring there are enough tests for everyone. SunWuKung420 posted... Taxpayer dollars being funneled pointlessly into the greedy hands of profiteers and Americans are unsurprisingly ok with it. Remember kids: Being proactive for the sake of limiting the impact of the greatest public health crisis in a century is "pointless." --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961911370] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>BEERandWEED posted... </cite> <quote>People are making money from them.</quote> Do you think people aren't also making money from high Covid rates? That many of the politicians actively opposing masks and vaccines under the pretense that they benefit corporations selling such products don't have stock in companies that service ventilators and sell oxygen so they can directly profit from increased hospitalizations? People are going to make money off of Covid regardless of how it goes. To that end, you might as well ignore the money angle and focus on saving/improving lives. BEERandWEED posted... </cite> <quote>I have principles and stand against pointless spending.</quote> Principles with no basis in practicality are useless. Principles at the expense of practicality are stupid. Principles at the expense of literal lives are evil. Krazy_Kirby posted... </cite> <quote>which is ridiculous... why do they need to test twice a week?</quote> Generally speaking, if you're infected, you can expect to start testing positive (and therefore being infectious) about 2-3 days after exposure. By testing every 3-4 days, you ensure that the longest you can possibly go being infectious without knowing it is 4 days, which is a lot better than waiting a week for symptoms to show up. You can improve that even further by adjusting your testing schedule to reflect when an exposure might have been possible (e.g. if you went out on Sunday but didn't interact with anyone on Friday, Saturday, or Monday, the best day to test is Wednesday because Sunday was your only possible exposure) or testing right before going somewhere that might result in you infecting somebody. It's a matter of being proactive and identifying infectious cases as early as possible to limit the number of people they can infect. Obviously, if you're only leaving the house once a week, testing twice a week is kind of pointless (the best schedule would be to test right before leaving for that outing), but for those that are going out regularly, testing twice a week strikes a nice balance between early identification of positive tests and ensuring there are enough tests for everyone. SunWuKung420 posted... </cite> <quote>Taxpayer dollars being funneled pointlessly into the greedy hands of profiteers and Americans are unsurprisingly ok with it.</quote> Remember kids: Being proactive for the sake of limiting the impact of the greatest public health crisis in a century is "pointless." </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pionear 01/20/22 1:28:03 PM #19:	Got 3: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/6/3/AADtvSAAC0_z.jpg Used one, results came back negative <cite>pionear posted [p:961918023] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Got 3: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/6/3/AADtvSAAC0_z.jpg Used one, results came back negative </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 01/20/22 3:07:17 PM #20:	I've never felt the need to take a test so no. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:961921073] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>I've never felt the need to take a test so no. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 01/20/22 4:41:00 PM #21:	wwinterj25 posted... I've never felt the need to take a test so no. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:961923987] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote><cite>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote>I've never felt the need to take a test so no. </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 01/20/22 5:12:26 PM #22:	adjl posted... Remember kids: Being proactive for the sake of limiting the impact of the greatest public health crisis in a century is "pointless." Putting unreliable test kits, that haven't been approved or cleared by the fda, in the hands of the not medically trained doesn't help anyone but the profits of the test makers. --- "I don't question our existence, I just question our modern needs" Pearl Jam - Garden My theme song - https://youtu.be/-PXIbVNfj3s <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:961924987] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Remember kids: Being proactive for the sake of limiting the impact of the greatest public health crisis in a century is "pointless."</quote>Putting unreliable test kits, that haven't been approved or cleared by the fda, in the hands of the not medically trained doesn't help anyone but the profits of the test makers. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/20/22 6:41:01 PM #23:	SunWuKung420 posted... Putting unreliable test kits, that haven't been approved or cleared by the fda, in the hands of the not medically trained doesn't help anyone but the profits of the test makers. It's picking your nose with a q-tip. It's not exactly something that requires extensive medical education. The reliability is clearly inferior to what you can get from a PCR test, but the convenience, reduction in staffing requirements, and speed of results do a lot to make up for that. You're going to see far better early detection of Covid cases (and subsequent isolation, ideally) if people are routinely using rapid tests at home than if they aren't, especially if you offer confirmatory PCR tests for anyone that tests positive at home and recommend that symptomatic people get a PCR test regardless (both of which mitigate the potential reliability issues). The fact that it's not as reliable as giving everyone two PCR tests a week does nothing to change that, especially where giving everyone two PCR tests a week isn't remotely feasible in the vast majority of areas. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961927575] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>SunWuKung420 posted... </cite> <quote>Putting unreliable test kits, that haven't been approved or cleared by the fda, in the hands of the not medically trained doesn't help anyone but the profits of the test makers.</quote> It's picking your nose with a q-tip. It's not exactly something that requires extensive medical education. The reliability is clearly inferior to what you can get from a PCR test, but the convenience, reduction in staffing requirements, and speed of results do a lot to make up for that. You're going to see far better early detection of Covid cases (and subsequent isolation, ideally) if people are routinely using rapid tests at home than if they aren't, especially if you offer confirmatory PCR tests for anyone that tests positive at home and recommend that symptomatic people get a PCR test regardless (both of which mitigate the potential reliability issues). The fact that it's not as reliable as giving everyone two PCR tests a week does nothing to change that, especially where giving everyone two PCR tests a week isn't remotely feasible in the vast majority of areas. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
captpackrat 01/20/22 6:58:11 PM #24:	SunWuKung420 posted... Putting unreliable test kits, that haven't been approved or cleared by the fda, in the hands of the not medically trained doesn't help anyone but the profits of the test makers. Except that these are FDA approved tests. --- Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, Minutus carborata descendum pantorum. <cite>captpackrat posted [p:961928092] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>SunWuKung420 posted... </cite> <quote>Putting unreliable test kits, that haven't been approved or cleared by the fda, in the hands of the not medically trained doesn't help anyone but the profits of the test makers.</quote>Except that these are FDA approved tests. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/20/22 7:01:28 PM #25:	captpackrat posted... Except that these are FDA approved tests. I believe all available antigen tests still just have emergency authorization, rather than full approval. Of course, one has to wonder why Sunny's bringing up FDA approval to discredit them here when we all know he'll switch gears to "FDA approval means nothing about a product's efficacy or safety" as soon as they receive full approval. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961928182] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>captpackrat posted... </cite> <quote>Except that these are FDA approved tests.</quote> I believe all available antigen tests still just have emergency authorization, rather than full approval. Of course, one has to wonder why Sunny's bringing up FDA approval to discredit them here when we all know he'll switch gears to "FDA approval means nothing about a product's efficacy or safety" as soon as they receive full approval. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 01/20/22 7:38:24 PM #26:	captpackrat posted... Except that these are FDA approved tests. Nope. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/4/3/AAQhJCAAC1Fv.jpg --- "I don't question our existence, I just question our modern needs" Pearl Jam - Garden My theme song - https://youtu.be/-PXIbVNfj3s <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:961929119] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>captpackrat posted... </cite> <quote>Except that these are FDA approved tests.</quote>Nope. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/7/4/3/AAQhJCAAC1Fv.jpg </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/21/22 9:49:25 AM #27:	adjl posted... Of course, one has to wonder why Sunny's bringing up FDA approval to discredit them here when we all know he'll switch gears to "FDA approval means nothing about a product's efficacy or safety" as soon as they receive full approval. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961943007] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Of course, one has to wonder why Sunny's bringing up FDA approval to discredit them here when we all know he'll switch gears to "FDA approval means nothing about a product's efficacy or safety" as soon as they receive full approval.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BEERandWEED 01/21/22 10:05:12 AM #28:	You quoting yourself is very weird. --- Always have a hamms in hand. <cite>BEERandWEED posted [p:961943327] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>You quoting yourself is very weird. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/21/22 10:08:28 AM #29:	BEERandWEED posted... You quoting yourself is very weird. Why waste time typing an original response when something I've already said suffices perfectly? --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961943395] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>BEERandWEED posted... </cite> <quote>You quoting yourself is very weird.</quote> Why waste time typing an original response when something I've already said suffices perfectly? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BEERandWEED 01/21/22 10:15:24 AM #30:	adjl posted... Why waste time typing an original response when something I've already said suffices perfectly? It wasn't even a question. Just an ad hominem attack. --- Always have a hamms in hand. <cite>BEERandWEED posted [p:961943529] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Why waste time typing an original response when something I've already said suffices perfectly?</quote>It wasn't even a question. Just an ad hominem attack. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 01/21/22 2:18:09 PM #31:	Lokarin posted... 4 per residential address? wlel that's biased against poor people ...what? EclairReturns posted... But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge. I mean, the government is paying for the tests so there's plenty of profiteering happening. A lot of the companies providing COVID-related medical services are posting record profits https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/11/covid-19-pfizer-reports-massive-revenues-while-hurting-the-chances-of-millions-to-get-vaccinated/ As much I hate to say it, governments should have been relying on wartime provisions to temporarily control the production of emergency medical supplies to actually get the supply out there. Then again, I suspect a lot of these activities are allowed both because of politicians' vested interests in those companies as well as in exchange for political favors (Pfizer did Democrats a HUGE solid by deliberately withholding vaccine news until after election to favor Biden; that's close to a kingmaker move) adjl posted... Do you think people aren't also making money from high Covid rates? That many of the politicians actively opposing masks and vaccines under the pretense that they benefit corporations selling such products don't have stock in companies that service ventilators and sell oxygen so they can directly profit from increased hospitalizations? Oh lawdy... --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:961949919] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted... </cite> <quote>4 per residential address? wlel that's biased against poor people</quote> ...what? EclairReturns posted... </cite> <quote>But corona-tests are to be distributed free of charge.</quote> I mean, the government is paying for the tests so there's plenty of profiteering happening. A lot of the companies providing COVID-related medical services are posting record profits https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/11/covid-19-pfizer-reports-massive-revenues-while-hurting-the-chances-of-millions-to-get-vaccinated/ As much I hate to say it, governments should have been relying on wartime provisions to temporarily control the production of emergency medical supplies to actually get the supply out there. Then again, I suspect a lot of these activities are allowed both because of politicians' vested interests in those companies as well as in exchange for political favors (Pfizer did Democrats a HUGE solid by deliberately withholding vaccine news until after election to favor Biden; that's close to a kingmaker move) adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Do you think people aren't also making money from high Covid rates? That many of the politicians actively opposing masks and vaccines under the pretense that they benefit corporations selling such products don't have stock in companies that service ventilators and sell oxygen so they can directly profit from increased hospitalizations?</quote> Oh lawdy... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 01/21/22 2:22:53 PM #32:	Zeus posted... Oh lawdy... Protip: People will profit from just about anything that happens, regardless of the response to it. That's not any particular degree of conspiracy, that's just the nature of a world in which there are multiple ways to make money from a given problem. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:961950040] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Oh lawdy...</quote> Protip: People will profit from just about anything that happens, regardless of the response to it. That's not any particular degree of conspiracy, that's just the nature of a world in which there are multiple ways to make money from a given problem. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Snake07 01/21/22 2:40:28 PM #33:	So I guess households with more than 4 people can go fuck themselves --- "People incapable of guilt usually do have a good time" -Detective Rust Cohle <cite>Solid Snake07 posted [p:961950522] in Have you o... [t:79860969]...</cite> <quote>So I guess households with more than 4 people can go fuck themselves </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Have you ordered your free at-home COVID tests? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Have you ordered your free at-home COVID tests?