Poll of the Day > Clinton acquitted

Topic List	Page List: 1
Dmess85 02/14/21 5:56:54 PM #1:	Kenneth Starr's report couldn't convince the senate. Oh well 3 more years of Bill. --- Previewing your message before you post is for suckers. . <cite>Dmess85 posted [p:950639906] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Kenneth Starr's report couldn't convince the senate. Oh well 3 more years of Bill. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 02/14/21 6:22:50 PM #2:	I bet hell leave the economy in shambles --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:950640766] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>I bet hell leave the economy in shambles </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 02/14/21 6:36:38 PM #3:	Billghazi --- https://imgur.com/1XbPahR <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:950641170] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Billghazi </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 02/14/21 6:41:06 PM #4:	Funny how hung up on the Clintons these brittle MAGA types are even though the Clintons have been out of office for years lmao --- https://imgur.com/ZwO4qO2 "Far-Queue is probably one of the least troll-like of the posters here." - LinkPizza <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:950641302] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Funny how hung up on the Clintons these brittle MAGA types are even though the Clintons have been out of office for years lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#5	Post #5 was unavailable or deleted.
streamofthesky 02/14/21 8:37:39 PM #6:	Zangulus posted... Lying to the Senate Attempting an armed insurrection to overturn an election. well fuck. Those are obviously comparable. I was somewhat young at the time, so I didn't delve into it much. But ever since, every time someone brings up that Bill lied to the Senate, I wonder, "why the fuck did he even say anything to them at all?" Beyond like...a more politically correct version of, "go fuck yourselves." Like, if it was me, I'd refuse to even entertain the question because it was ridiculous and none of Congress's business. I'd demand them to let me know what crime I had committed. Outright dare them to make fools of themselves trying to impeach me over it. But never even give an answer, because: 1) fuck them 2) giving them a serious response only validates such ridiculous "inquiries" 3) fuck them It was the lying under oath that got him into any trouble at all, it was so stupid and such an unforced error. Why did he do it? <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:950645068] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Zangulus posted... </cite> <quote>Lying to the Senate Attempting an armed insurrection to overturn an election. well fuck. Those are obviously comparable.</quote>I was somewhat young at the time, so I didn't delve into it much. But ever since, every time someone brings up that Bill lied to the Senate, I wonder, "why the fuck did he even say anything to them at all?" Beyond like...a more politically correct version of, "go fuck yourselves." Like, if it was me, I'd refuse to even entertain the question because it was ridiculous and none of Congress's business. I'd demand them to let me know what crime I had committed. Outright dare them to make fools of themselves trying to impeach me over it. But never even give an answer, because: 1) fuck them 2) giving them a serious response only validates such ridiculous "inquiries" 3) fuck them It was the lying under oath that got him into any trouble at all, it was so stupid and such an unforced error. Why did he do it? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Clench281 02/14/21 8:43:51 PM #7:	Because there was the assumption that the GOP wasn't just acting in bad faith. Bill sat and gave testimony related to his impeachment. Hillary provided testimony over ten hours of questioning about Benghazi. Trump wouldn't so much as utter a peep about either impeachment because he's full of shit and wouldn't last five seconds without incriminating or perjuring himself. He isn't and never will be qualified to govern. --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me. <cite>Clench281 posted [p:950645225] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Because there was the assumption that the GOP wasn't just acting in bad faith. Bill sat and gave testimony related to his impeachment. Hillary provided testimony over ten hours of questioning about Benghazi. Trump wouldn't so much as utter a peep about either impeachment because he's full of shit and wouldn't last five seconds without incriminating or perjuring himself. He isn't and never will be qualified to govern. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GrabASnickers 02/14/21 8:48:20 PM #8:	Keep your eye on Texas, George Bush's kid is the governor there and looks like a nice up and comer who could take our country places as the next president <cite>GrabASnickers posted [p:950645369] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Keep your eye on Texas, George Bush's kid is the governor there and looks like a nice up and comer who could take our country places as the next president </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LuciferSage 02/14/21 9:22:22 PM #9:	Guys, we really need to impeach Andrew Jackson. --- http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u260/luciferxsage/LxSsigFinal.png pigs we get what pigs deserve... -\|\\| \| \|/\| <cite>LuciferSage posted [p:950646381] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Guys, we really need to impeach Andrew Jackson. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 02/14/21 9:46:20 PM #10:	Clench281 posted... Because there was the assumption that the GOP wasn't just acting in bad faith. Bill sat and gave testimony related to his impeachment. Hillary provided testimony over ten hours of questioning about Benghazi. Trump wouldn't so much as utter a peep about either impeachment because he's full of shit and wouldn't last five seconds without incriminating or perjuring himself. He isn't and never will be qualified to govern. The irony being that there was more legitimacy to the Clinton impeachment than there was to either Trump impeachment and Democrats had been calling for Trump's impeachment before he even took office. Clench281 posted... Hillary provided testimony over ten hours of questioning about Benghazi. Your conflations are hilarious. The Benghazi hearings are in no way comparable to an impeachment and, more importantly, Benghazi related to the biggest US intelligence failure since Iraq where there were some very legitimate questions and concerns. And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term, Democrats would have attacked Trump -- rather than his Secretary of State -- with the force of a thousand suns. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:950647038] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Clench281 posted... </cite> <quote>Because there was the assumption that the GOP wasn't just acting in bad faith. Bill sat and gave testimony related to his impeachment. Hillary provided testimony over ten hours of questioning about Benghazi. Trump wouldn't so much as utter a peep about either impeachment because he's full of shit and wouldn't last five seconds without incriminating or perjuring himself. He isn't and never will be qualified to govern.</quote> The irony being that there was more legitimacy to the Clinton impeachment than there was to either Trump impeachment and Democrats had been calling for Trump's impeachment before he even took office. Clench281 posted... </cite> <quote>Hillary provided testimony over ten hours of questioning about Benghazi.</quote> Your conflations are hilarious. The Benghazi hearings are in no way comparable to an impeachment and, more importantly, Benghazi related to the biggest US intelligence failure since Iraq where there were some very legitimate questions and concerns. And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term, Democrats would have attacked Trump -- rather than his Secretary of State -- with the force of a thousand suns. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GrabASnickers 02/14/21 10:16:04 PM #11:	Not sure what people here are talking about. Trump? Like Donald? Is he president in your alternate universe? Ha, not likely! <cite>GrabASnickers posted [p:950647963] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Not sure what people here are talking about. Trump? Like Donald? Is he president in your alternate universe? Ha, not likely! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 02/14/21 10:49:32 PM #12:	Zeus posted... Your conflations are hilarious. The Benghazi hearings are in no way comparable to an impeachment and, more importantly, Benghazi related to the biggest US intelligence failure since Iraq where there were some very legitimate questions and concerns. And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term, Democrats would have attacked Trump -- rather than his Secretary of State -- with the force of a thousand suns. You think Benghazi was worse than the attack on the capitol? --- https://imgur.com/1XbPahR <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:950649034] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Your conflations are hilarious. The Benghazi hearings are in no way comparable to an impeachment and, more importantly, Benghazi related to the biggest US intelligence failure since Iraq where there were some very legitimate questions and concerns. And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term, Democrats would have attacked Trump -- rather than his Secretary of State -- with the force of a thousand suns.</quote>You think Benghazi was worse than the attack on the capitol? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 02/15/21 3:43:46 AM #13:	Zeus posted... And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term Umm --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:950654758] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term</quote>Umm </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Clench281 02/15/21 4:39:38 AM #14:	Zeus trying to rationalize why Trump never provides testimony: --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me. <cite>Clench281 posted [p:950655422] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Zeus trying to rationalize why Trump never provides testimony: </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BUMPED2002 02/16/21 8:34:00 AM #15:	Dmess85 posted... Kenneth Starr's report couldn't convince the senate. Oh well 3 more years of Bill. Dmess85 posted... Kenneth Starr's report couldn't convince the senate. Oh well 3 more years of Bill. Clinton hasn't been pres for over 2 decades. --- SpankageBros <cite>BUMPED2002 posted [p:950692505] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Dmess85 posted... </cite> <quote>Kenneth Starr's report couldn't convince the senate. Oh well 3 more years of Bill.</quote> Dmess85 posted... </cite> <quote>Kenneth Starr's report couldn't convince the senate. Oh well 3 more years of Bill.</quote>Clinton hasn't been pres for over 2 decades. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dmess85 02/17/21 6:48:07 PM #16:	BUMPED2002 posted... Clinton hasn't been pres for over 2 decades. this is true. --- Previewing your message before you post is for suckers. . <cite>Dmess85 posted [p:950759254] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>BUMPED2002 posted... </cite> <quote>Clinton hasn't been pres for over 2 decades.</quote> this is true. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 02/17/21 6:56:28 PM #17:	BUMPED2002 posted... Clinton hasn't been pres for over 2 decades. youre thinking of bill clinton --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:950759865] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>BUMPED2002 posted... </cite> <quote>Clinton hasn't been pres for over 2 decades.</quote> youre thinking of bill clinton </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 02/17/21 6:57:51 PM #18:	Zeus posted... The irony being that there was more legitimacy to the Clinton impeachment than there was to either Trump impeachment and Democrats had been calling for Trump's impeachment before he even took office. Your conflations are hilarious. The Benghazi hearings are in no way comparable to an impeachment and, more importantly, Benghazi related to the biggest US intelligence failure since Iraq where there were some very legitimate questions and concerns. And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term, Democrats would have attacked Trump -- rather than his Secretary of State -- with the force of a thousand suns. Maybe the first one. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:950759966] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote> The irony being that there was more legitimacy to the Clinton impeachment than there was to either Trump impeachment and Democrats had been calling for Trump's impeachment before he even took office. Your conflations are hilarious. The Benghazi hearings are in no way comparable to an impeachment and, more importantly, Benghazi related to the biggest US intelligence failure since Iraq where there were some very legitimate questions and concerns. And if something like Benghazi happened during Trump's term, Democrats would have attacked Trump -- rather than his Secretary of State -- with the force of a thousand suns. </quote> Maybe the first one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 02/25/21 7:59:48 PM #19:	Blightzkrieg posted... You think Benghazi was worse than the attack on the capitol? Are you seriously asking whether a violent attack on a US embassy where an ambassador was murdered in office -- the first time it's happened in what, 100+ years? -- was worse than a riot where the only deaths we've since learned (since the NYT published unverified, apparently false claims that wound up retracting) were the rioters themselves? Is that seriously what you're asking? Because you've just embroiled yourself in a scandal. #Blighazi Clench281 posted... Zeus trying to rationalize why Trump never provides testimony: Clench: "Why won't Trump play along in our baseless, partisan witch hunts designed to discredit him?!" --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:951080209] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Blightzkrieg posted... </cite> <quote>You think Benghazi was worse than the attack on the capitol?</quote> Are you seriously asking whether a violent attack on a US embassy where an ambassador was murdered in office -- the first time it's happened in what, 100+ years? -- was worse than a riot where the only deaths we've since learned (since the NYT published unverified, apparently false claims that wound up retracting) were the rioters themselves? Is that seriously what you're asking? Because you've just embroiled yourself in a scandal. #Blighazi Clench281 posted... </cite> <quote>Zeus trying to rationalize why Trump never provides testimony:</quote> Clench: "Why won't Trump play along in our baseless, partisan witch hunts designed to discredit him?!" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 02/25/21 8:03:58 PM #20:	Zeus posted... Are you seriously asking whether a violent attack on a US embassy where an ambassador was murdered in office -- the first time it's happened in what, 100+ years? -- was worse than a riot where the only deaths we've since learned (since the NYT published unverified, apparently false claims that wound up retracting) were the rioters themselves? Is that seriously what you're asking? Because you've just embroiled yourself in a scandal. #Blighazi One week later and you still get the details wrong --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:951080378] in Clinton ac... [t:79295355]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Are you seriously asking whether a violent attack on a US embassy where an ambassador was murdered in office -- the first time it's happened in what, 100+ years? -- was worse than a riot where the only deaths we've since learned (since the NYT published unverified, apparently false claims that wound up retracting) were the rioters themselves? Is that seriously what you're asking? Because you've just embroiled yourself in a scandal. #Blighazi</quote>One week later and you still get the details wrong </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Clinton acquitted (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Clinton acquitted