Poll of the Day > Sexy Girl causes OUTRAGE by MESSAGING Girl's BOYFRIENDS!! Is it ENTRAPMENT???

(+) Yeah! (+)

28 y/o Paige Woolen from Los Angeles, an instagram model who helps women find out if their bfs are CHEATING DOGS by sliding into their dms..and she's gotten interesting results!

She offers to help out if their partner is cheating and revealed that some men just can't be trusted..

She has over 200,000 followers and runs a separate account where she documents inappropriate and sleazy comments she gets from men

This month she offered to message girl's boyfriends suspected of cheating and published the results as some remained faithful, others pretended to be single to score a date with her!!

Paige offered to privately message the boyfriends to help girls dump the cheaters...and well some praised her as a "hero" others said it was ENTRAPMENT as men called her out on what she's doing to trick men into cheating with her by sending flirtatious messages.

She said "I personally believe snitches get stitches but i felt like using the power of this for good and helping out female followers".

Men no doubt were calling her a PROSTITUTE and that she should join the popular porn site but that didn't stop her from doing her job to catch the bad guys as she will continue to do so when girls need help.

Do you think this is "entrapment"?

https://i.imgur.com/oygyfZq.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/6mMLtWD.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/fB3JPB6.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/JnMJ1Hj.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/MGN3Xkl.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/wnIqKnj.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/OBfOmQX.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/AXSjlyj.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/kWAIvnk.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/XVP1hwK.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/NktBIrY.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/4aZWeTg.jpg
---

Definitely entrapment. And any woman who would resort to pulling that shit already has a doomed relationship.

---

All this is doing is proving how much of these woman don't trust their boyfriend but I'd say it's entrapment as she's trying to catch these blokes out. She's hot af though. I'd imagine some men do this with woman too, right?


---

Entrapment isn't the right word. More predatory and exploitive.

But this is stupid, you're basically throwing a stronger magnet at your bf to rip him off of you. Most guys would never get a chick like this, even if their GF thinks they could. You might as well offer your addict cocaine to see if they're still clean. This is kind of destructive and predatory, exploiting girls' paranoia for money.

Also this lady is definitely getting off to this.

---

social media brings out the absolute worst in humans

Also, notice how all the guys who turned her down turned her down because she was unattractive to them. Those ones weren't faithful, they just weren't into her.

But yeah, if a rich looking supermodel floozie comes after your BF, you'd better be a pretty good catch! Maybe don't pay for it!

---

Body...9-10
Face...7-8ish?
Personality...5?

---

wwinterj25 posted...

All this is doing is proving how much of these woman don't trust their boyfriend but I'd say it's entrapment as she's trying to catch these blokes out. She's hot af though. I'd imagine some men do this with woman too, right?

Haha... The male instinct is to violently hurt or intimidate another man that does this, not pay them. We're too much like apes to conspire an elaborate scheme like this.

We'd probably lose focus in the middle of plotting it and jump straight to "I'm going to punch that guy if he goes near my girl oog"

DANTE20XX posted...

Body...9-10
Face...7-8ish?
Personality...5?

She's honestly like a 9/10 with those pics and a 10/10 with that gimmick.

---

Tricked into cheating?

Yeah. No.

Yellow posted...

Entrapment isn't the right word. More predatory and exploitive.

But this is stupid, you're basically throwing a stronger magnet at your bf to rip him off of you. Most guys would never get a chick like this, even if their GF thinks they could. You might as well offer your addict cocaine to see if they're still clean. This is kind of destructive and predatory, exploiting girls' paranoia for money.

Kinda is what entrapment is. It's basically strongly enticing somebody to do something when they're unlikely to ever even be presented with the opportunity, let alone somebody coaxing them into it. A great case-in-point was an undercover cop who enticed a person into a long series of sporting bets until he exceeded a number where it became a crime of a certain level and arrested him. None of that shit would have happened if the cop didn't initiate every step of the way.

Yellow posted...

Also, notice how all the guys who turned her down turned her down because she was unattractive to them. Those ones weren't faithful, they just weren't into her.

Or they were immediately suspicious (like the guy who asked if she was a hooker). Honestly, any time somebody that hot is trying to initiate contact, I get a little suspicious. Unless you're a celebrity and/or wealthy, chicks that hot aren't going to make the first move.


---

Nobody honest has anything to worry about. I am fine with this. Any dude that takes the bait isn't worth it for their g/f anyways.

---

Is she the police? Is she, as an agent of the state, enticing dudes to commit crimes they would otherwise be unlikely or unwilling to commit?

No?

Then this isn't entrapment.

---

Yellow posted...

Entrapment isn't the right word. More predatory and exploitive.

Pretty much. Namely, she's preying on insecure women with trust issues by using those trust issues to sabotage their relationships.

---

She is sexy? I don't mean that sarcastically. I look at her and just feel "something is wrong" like when people make those robots that are supposed to look human and they make to feel uncomfortable.

By definition that is entrapment.

Raddest_Chad posted...

Nobody honest has anything to worry about. I am fine with this. Any dude that takes the bait isn't worth it for their g/f anyways.

Well the girlfriends must be pretty psycho themselves to want to do this in the first place.

dainkinkaide posted...

Is she the police? Is she, as an agent of the state, enticing dudes to commit crimes they would otherwise be unlikely or unwilling to commit?

No?

Then this isn't entrapment.

Entrapment isn't just a legal term.
---

Revelation34 posted...

By definition that is entrapment.

Well the girlfriends must be pretty psycho themselves to want to do this in the first place.

Entrapment isn't just a legal term.

Oh sure. So, were they lured into a dangerous situation or into illegal activity?

No?

Still not entrapment.

If another woman these men found very attractive had, unbeknownst to their girlfriends and out of genuine interest, propositioned them for sex, would they have not pretended to be single and taken her up on the offer?

Judging by their actions with this particular woman who merely acted like she had genuine interest in them, we can consider it quite likely that they would willingly cheat on their girlfriends, so this also doesn't fit the definition of entrapment.

---

Yellow posted...

Haha... The male instinct is to violently hurt or intimidate another man that does this, not pay them. We're too much like apes to conspire an elaborate scheme like this.

I must have lost my male instinct because hypnotically I wouldn't hurt anyone I'd have hired to catch my misses out as the person who I hired is faking it and not actually going throw with "cheating". Even if it was legit cheating chances are I'd want to hurt them mentally and emotionally rather than violently anyway. I've never been a violent person.

dainkinkaide posted...

Oh sure. So, were they lured into a dangerous situation or into illegal activity?

No?

Still not entrapment.

The word entrapment, comes from the verb "to entrap", meaning to catch in a trap and that's what this is.
I also feel the need to post this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SlwV7mtsmw

---

I don't find this any different than those guys who hunt child predators on social media then meet them in person.

---

mrduckbear posted...

https://i.imgur.com/4aZWeTg.jpg

this is me
begone thot

Not entrapment, just dumbass cheaters.

---

SunWuKung420 posted...

Not entrapment, just dumbass cheaters.

How is trying to get people to do something they shouldn't just so you can bust them not entrapment?

---

Muscles posted...

How is trying to get people to do something they shouldn't just so you can bust them not entrapment?

it's not really cunning or forceful enough to be considered entrapment.

"You look like a knock off Kardashian"

That got a good chuckle out of me.

---

wwinterj25 posted...

The word entrapment, comes from the verb "to entrap", meaning to catch in a trap and that's what this is.
I also feel the need to post this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SlwV7mtsmw

When people use "entrap" in that sense, they're almost always referring to an actual physical trap or snare. And they never refer to the state of being entrapped (in that specific sense) as "entrapment".

Absolutely nobody has ever (for example) found a mouse caught in a live trap and said or even thought, "This is entrapment."

When English speakers use the word "entrapment" we are almost always referring to the legal sense.

...incorrectly.

---

dainkinkaide posted...

When English speakers use the word "entrapment" we are almost always referring to the legal sense.

So you admit there is times where the word is used outside of legal terms. Got it. Also Thanks for telling me how to speak English. I'd have never known. I can't even read English.


---

wwinterj25 posted...

So you admit there is times where the word is used outside of legal terms. Got it. Also Thanks for telling me how to speak English. I'd have never known. I can't even read English.

Yes, there are times where the word is used outside of the legal sense.

Those times are literally the 19th century.

---

Apparently not as folk literally do it now just as I have.


---

wwinterj25 posted...

So you admit there is times where the word is used outside of legal terms. Got it. Also Thanks for telling me how to speak English. I'd have never known. I can't even read English.

I can't recall any time it's been used outside of the legal sense, for whatever that is worth.

Entrapment is a practice in which a law enforcement agent or agent of the state induces a person to commit a "crime" that the person would have otherwise been unlikely or unwilling to commit.[1] It "is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer or agent, and the procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion or fraud of the officer or state agent.

I honestly don't think this qualifies as entrapment, any guy when asked "are you single" by a random person responds with "yes" by the second question he isn't being coerced into something he wouldn't otherwise do.

BlackScythe0 posted...

I can't recall any time it's been used outside of the legal sense, for whatever that is worth.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/entrapment
"the act of causing someone to do something they would not usually do by tricking them:" It is indeed mostly used in law though.

---

Muscles posted...

How is trying to get people to do something they shouldn't just so you can bust them not entrapment?

Because the cheaters can say no, they just choose not to.

---

SunWuKung420 posted...

Because the cheaters can say no, they just choose not to.

And anyone that gets tricked by a cop can just not commit that felony

---

Zeus posted...

Definitely entrapment. And any woman who would resort to pulling that shit already has a doomed relationship.

It depends. It's only considered entrapment if a person is pressured into it.

Simply saying hi to someone then using basic flattery such as 'you're cute' and then asking if they have a GF isn't entrapment since the person isn't trying to lead them on. The only time it'd turn into entrapment is if she was to push the BF into saying something he wouldn't otherwise say/do as a result of her actions.

-Hi
-I think you're cute/whatever
-Do you have a GF?

This is baiting, it's not entrapment as she hasn't said anything to manipulate him into saying no, if he says no he's doing it of his own free will, not because she's pressured him into saying it.


---

Muscles posted...

And anyone that gets tricked by a cop can just not commit that felony

She isn't a cop. And yes, a person can avoid committing felonies.

Also, by law, "A valid entrapment defense has two related elements: (1) government inducement of the crime, and (2) the defendant's lack of predisposition to engage in the criminal conduct. Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (1988). Of the two elements, predisposition is by far the more important."

So, trapping a cheater is not entrapment since a non-cheater wouldn't engage in that conduct. Also she isn't working for the government.

---

If you're sending a thot after your SO to test them instead of talking to them straight up, there's already irreconcilable trust issues in your relationship.

---

LuciferSage posted...

If you're sending a thot after your SO to test them instead of talking to them straight up, there's already irreconcilable trust issues in your relationship.

Also this.

---

WTF did she do to her face?
Body is fine, but the face looks like it was assembled in a factory.
And I don't care whether it's literal entrapment or not, it's still messed up what she's doing and is basically just going to cause a lot of break ups and harsh realizations for the women hiring her that they're not the amazing catches they think they are.

As for this, "test"... What if the guy says, "I have a GF. But if you're interested, I'm fine with breaking up with her."?
That's honest. Brutally so. Would a guy who says that be a "cheater"? lol. I doubt their GFs would be too keen on staying together after that, even though he was honest and never tried to cheat.

Raddest_Chad posted...

Nobody honest has anything to worry about. I am fine with this. Any dude that takes the bait isn't worth it for their g/f anyways.

lol, "not worth it," like their GF's are all perfect angels. Women cheat on and ditch their partners when they think they can "trade up" all the time. And women projecting this much paranoia about cheating are probably thinking about it or have done it themselves.

This is just a shit thing to do, and even though I'd pass such a test (not even on the merits of ethics...I'm a cautious person and someone cold contacting me and immediately asking if I'm single is super sketchy), I'd dump my significant other after finding out she tested me, b/c that's fucking juvenile and insulting.

SunWuKung420 posted...

She isn't a cop. And yes, a person can avoid committing felonies.

Also, by law, "A valid entrapment defense has two related elements: (1) government inducement of the crime, and (2) the defendant's lack of predisposition to engage in the criminal conduct. Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (1988). Of the two elements, predisposition is by far the more important."

So, trapping a cheater is not entrapment since a non-cheater wouldn't engage in that conduct. Also she isn't working for the government.

It's still the same tactic, the only difference is they won't be going to jail

---

SunWuKung420 posted...

Also this.

It's not how soulmates behave, it's how a fuck buddy looking for a gotcha behaves.

---

Muscles posted...

It's still the same tactic, the only difference is they won't be going to jail

There is no coercion. Entrapment needs coercion.

---

Zeus posted...

Definitely entrapment. And any woman who would resort to pulling that shit already has a doomed relationship.

Definitely not, it's offering a circumstance they know they're not meant to get involved in in the first place. They're not tricked in to trying to score, they choose to be garbage. This is a perfectly reasonable thing to do if you're concerned, it puts that fear at ease and nobody even finds out if he ain't a POS.

Secondly, I'd turn her down because I don't like her face so it'd give me false cover lmao
---

a man would have to be stupid enough to believe in the shiny vampires in the twilight books for this to work, ok?

---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Definitely not, it's offering a circumstance they know they're not meant to get involved in in the first place. They're not tricked in to trying to score, they choose to be garbage. This is a perfectly reasonable thing to do if you're concerned, it puts that fear at ease and nobody even finds out if he ain't a POS.

Secondly, I'd turn her down because I don't like her face so it'd give me false cover lmao

Lol.
---

TrueSephir0th posted...

social media brings out the absolute worst in humans

The human race was definitely not ready for social media.

---

Revelation34 posted...

Lol.

Anytime literally Kyuubi is on my side in an argument, it's time to take a step back and be introspective, really examining the issue and seriously questioning if I'm in the wrong on this one.
Fortunately, it's almost never happened. But damn do I kind of secretly dread it.
Just the thought of being on the same side as him in an argument feels so icky and disgusting.

ClarkDuke posted...

a man would have to be stupid enough to believe in the shiny vampires in the twilight books for this to work, ok?

That I'll agree with. Like I said, her method of approach is super sketchy.
It's not really a trap for cheaters so much as a mini Darwin award for stupid guys. And while keeping stupid people from maintaining relationships and thus being unable to procreate sounds kind of like a societal good.... it's also kinda low key eugenics....

streamofthesky posted...

I'm a cautious person and someone cold contacting me and immediately asking if I'm single is super sketchy

I'd just assume it was a bot (either looking for money or looking for subs to a porn page) and block them immediately.

---

rexcrk posted...

The human race was definitely not ready for social media.

This. The human brain evolved to keep track of the existence of about 150 humans tops, most of which you don't even talk to daily.

It is not equipped to deal with the onslaught of the ass backward and wrong opinions of tens of thousands of stupid humans at once.

---

VioletMassacre posted...

Shes doing nothing wrong.

You know I agree. She gets paid just to help out gals with trust issues.

The girls are better off without boyfriends that drop them for random hoes

Here is the thing. We don't know these peoples relationship problems save for the trust issues. I'd say they shouldn't be together whatever the result of this trap as there is no trust. This includes those who didn't 'cheat' too.

---

Anyone who just says "Hi :) / ;)" as their only first message, I assume is a bot and would get an automatic block.

---

wwinterj25 posted...

You know I agree. She gets paid just to help out gals with trust issues.

Here is the thing. We don't know these peoples relationship problems save for the trust issues. I'd say they shouldn't be together whatever the result of this trap as there is no trust. This includes those who didn't 'cheat' too.

setting traps for a person you love as a test is not how a healthy relationship works. if you can't communicate openly, and honestly with your SO, there is already a much bigger problem with the relationship.

---