Poll of the Day > Child molesters in Alabama will now be chemically castrated, ok?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
Mead 01/01/20 3:58:31 PM #51:	Dreaming_King posted... Like I said, the people who are the most ignorant tend to be the loudest on this topic. Although I guess that sort of thing is pretty common actually. didnt realize I had the volume turned up so high on my post oh well --- Lemonheads <cite>Mead posted [p:932331217] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Dreaming_King posted... </cite> <quote>Like I said, the people who are the most ignorant tend to be the loudest on this topic. Although I guess that sort of thing is pretty common actually.</quote> didnt realize I had the volume turned up so high on my post oh well </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 01/01/20 4:00:42 PM #52:	won't remove their desires, just lessen it a bit --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:932331279] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>won't remove their desires, just lessen it a bit</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Aculo 01/01/20 4:01:00 PM #53:	pedro45 posted... And the amount of hate some people have... Maybe we need to address mental health since this has been a thing since humans were...human. we're all animals. Why some of us rape is beyond most of our understanding and why some of us are attracted to another creature not able to reproduce is beyond like all of us. I think it was batman that said killing a killer, still leaves with a killer. Taking out someone who committed the crime does not prevent the crime from ever happening, just that one person. Anger makes you stupid. Let's channel our anger and make it productive. I'm all for preventative measures. I honestly think that none are beyond help, as long as they haven't taken that first step and acted on their desires. However, once that happens, that door should be shut, and they should be removed from society one way or another (I prefer permanently, but I'm not in charge), ok? But either way, my remark was more suggesting we might have a lot of users here on this very board who share similar desires, ok? --- ok? <cite>Aculo posted [p:932331288] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>pedro45 posted... </cite> <quote>And the amount of hate some people have... Maybe we need to address mental health since this has been a thing since humans were...human. we're all animals. Why some of us rape is beyond most of our understanding and why some of us are attracted to another creature not able to reproduce is beyond like all of us. I think it was batman that said killing a killer, still leaves with a killer. Taking out someone who committed the crime does not prevent the crime from ever happening, just that one person. Anger makes you stupid. Let's channel our anger and make it productive.</quote>I'm all for preventative measures. I honestly think that none are beyond help, as long as they haven't taken that first step and acted on their desires. However, once that happens, that door should be shut, and they should be removed from society one way or another (I prefer permanently, but I'm not in charge), ok? But either way, my remark was more suggesting we might have a lot of users here on this very board who share similar desires, ok? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 4:06:52 PM #54:	Mead posted... didnt realize I had the volume turned up so high on my post oh well I gave you the remote. You just have to use it. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932331485] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>didnt realize I had the volume turned up so high on my post oh well</quote> I gave you the remote. You just have to use it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deoxxys 01/01/20 4:44:20 PM #55:	I mean we arent cutting off the hands of thieves so I dont see why this is a good punishment. --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:932332984] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>I mean we arent cutting off the hands of thieves so I dont see why this is a good punishment. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 01/01/20 4:48:09 PM #56:	deoxxys posted... I mean we arent cutting off the hands of thieves maybe you arent --- Lemonheads <cite>Mead posted [p:932333106] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>deoxxys posted... </cite> <quote>I mean we arent cutting off the hands of thieves</quote> maybe you arent </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 01/01/20 5:41:37 PM #57:	kind9 posted... You say that as if pedos choose to be attracted to kids. The choice is whether they act on their urges. That is the exact opposite of what I said. I said guys are attracted to women all the time, heck, ones that specifically dress up extremely sexy, yet don't rape them. It should be the norm, not the exception. Guys don't get to choose if they are attracted to women either, just if they act on it and how. --- Zangulus "I try to avoid having any knowledge at all of his dick." Glowing Elephant "Stonehedge was a sex thing." <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:932334989] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>kind9 posted... </cite> <quote>You say that as if pedos choose to be attracted to kids. The choice is whether they act on their urges.</quote> That is the exact opposite of what I said. I said guys are attracted to women all the time, heck, ones that specifically dress up extremely sexy, yet don't rape them. It should be the norm, not the exception. Guys don't get to choose if they are attracted to women either, just if they act on it and how. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 5:45:41 PM #58:	wolfy42 posted... That is the exact opposite of what I said. I said guys are attracted to women all the time, heck, ones that specifically dress up extremely sexy, yet don't rape them. It should be the norm, not the exception. Guys don't get to choose if they are attracted to women either, just if they act on it and how. I think adjl was saying that we should treat the ones that dont act on their urges as normal people, since they didnt act on the urges that actual child molesters do... I think... I think it was in the previous page... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932335162] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted...</cite> <quote>That is the exact opposite of what I said. I said guys are attracted to women all the time, heck, ones that specifically dress up extremely sexy, yet don't rape them. It should be the norm, not the exception. Guys don't get to choose if they are attracted to women either, just if they act on it and how.</quote> I think adjl was saying that we should treat the ones that dont act on their urges as normal people, since they didnt act on the urges that actual child molesters do... I think... I think it was in the previous page...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 01/01/20 5:59:13 PM #59:	Most of those guys have the option of acting on their attraction without hurting people. Bear in mind also that a lot of child molestation isn't as overt and forcible as people tend to consider rape to be. That doesn't make it any better, of course, but it does make it easier for the person doing it to rationalize it as being consensual enough (or at least to skip the step of considering whether or not their "partner" can actually consent). I am of course only talking about actual molestation, although things like sleeping in the bed naked with kids is obviously wrong and should prevent anyone doing that from being alone with kids in the future. If someone controls themselves fine, sucks that is what they are attracted to, but if they don't do anything harmful about it, then good for them, they are a decent human being. Try talking to a friend about it for support, and odds are you'll lose a friend, not end up with somebody who will discourage you from applying to be a gym teacher. As long as people hear "pedophile" and think "child molester" (lumping people who consume child porn in with that), that's not going to change, which means you're going to get more people with pedophilic urges trying (and potentially failing) to handle them on their own. Again, I do think people should come forward and I think it shouldn't be villianized to have such feelings or desires, just to actually act on them. They should get help to prevent such actions from happening, and by identifying themselves will be put in less positions where it could. Sadly humans seem to be selfish and even if such help was available, I don't think most would use it :( I even consider virutal (anime etc) child porn should be illegal because it could escalate someone etc. I'd actually consider that to be one of the healthy outlets I alluded to earlier. Virtual stuff is actually harmless to make, meaning consuming it isn't harmful. That's not to say its consumption isn't cause for concern or that anyone using it as an outlet doesn't need to be seeking other help to keep their urges under control, but saying that it should be illegal because its consumers might want more is like saying that money should be illegal because it might make those who have it want to steal more. Illegality should be based on actual harm, not the presumption that it might inspire somebody to escalate to something more harmful (see also: "gateway drug"). See I get that nobody directly is harmed here, and in an eventual society where people were easily identified or came forward it might be different, but in a world where there are people out there who are attracted to kids, this kinda stuff could be dangerous. Is a crime being commited? No not really, it's technically art etc, but it could lead to crimes so I think the best bet is to prevent it from being created/spread around etc. Yeah it's a legal grey spot, but I think it's worth it. Laws can be created based on the majority of people considering it best for society. Generally a knee-jerk overreaction, but basically, yeah. Child molesters suck and deserve pretty much all the hate they get (although the "won't somebody think of the children?!?!" attitude that drives people to consider it the worst crime ever is thoroughly irrational). I don't disagree there. It's not a knee jerk reaction for me. I worked as a teacher, care about kids, and hate the fact that we live in a world where we have to be so careful with them. None of my students were even abducted or harmed, but we had tons of security to ensure that. It seems like the worst crime because it happens to those so young and can seriously ruin/harm their lives. Rape in any form is horrid, and sex offenders should be segregated from society, but yes, many people have a strong reaction to children being abused or harmed/put in danger etc. I think it's ingrained in us. You basically just described a concentration camp. Being based on criminal convictions instead of some politician's genocidal inclinations takes a lot of the sting out of the concept, but it's still not really a reasonable approach. Rehabilitative prison and post-release restrictions (i.e. not being allowed to work with kids) is generally going to be more reasonable, though obviously America kind of struggles with the whole "rehabilitation" thing. Not at all, I'm talking about something better (by far) than our current prisons. You might call it a concentration camp, but it is WAY better then what we currently have. Basically full towns, with homes/apartments, that have places to eat just like normal homes, grocery stores etc. There are no kids at all though, you can't have a family inside, you can't leave whenever you want etc, but you can live a normal life otherwise (possibly even better than some since your guarrenteed a job etc). Is this perfect? Heck no, but it's WAY better then the current jail system, and would be sustainable (money wise). --- Zangulus "I try to avoid having any knowledge at all of his dick." Glowing Elephant "Stonehedge was a sex thing." <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:932335676] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote> <quote>Most of those guys have the option of acting on their attraction without hurting people. Bear in mind also that a lot of child molestation isn't as overt and forcible as people tend to consider rape to be. That doesn't make it any better, of course, but it does make it easier for the person doing it to rationalize it as being consensual enough (or at least to skip the step of considering whether or not their "partner" can actually consent). </quote> I am of course only talking about actual molestation, although things like sleeping in the bed naked with kids is obviously wrong and should prevent anyone doing that from being alone with kids in the future. If someone controls themselves fine, sucks that is what they are attracted to, but if they don't do anything harmful about it, then good for them, they are a decent human being. Try talking to a friend about it for support, and odds are you'll lose a friend, not end up with somebody who will discourage you from applying to be a gym teacher. As long as people hear "pedophile" and think "child molester" (lumping people who consume child porn in with that), that's not going to change, which means you're going to get more people with pedophilic urges trying (and potentially failing) to handle them on their own. Again, I do think people should come forward and I think it shouldn't be villianized to have such feelings or desires, just to actually act on them. They should get help to prevent such actions from happening, and by identifying themselves will be put in less positions where it could. Sadly humans seem to be selfish and even if such help was available, I don't think most would use it :( <quote>I even consider virutal (anime etc) child porn should be illegal because it could escalate someone etc. I'd actually consider that to be one of the healthy outlets I alluded to earlier. Virtual stuff is actually harmless to make, meaning consuming it isn't harmful. That's not to say its consumption isn't cause for concern or that anyone using it as an outlet doesn't need to be seeking other help to keep their urges under control, but saying that it should be illegal because its consumers might want more is like saying that money should be illegal because it might make those who have it want to steal more. Illegality should be based on actual harm, not the presumption that it might inspire somebody to escalate to something more harmful (see also: "gateway drug").</quote> See I get that nobody directly is harmed here, and in an eventual society where people were easily identified or came forward it might be different, but in a world where there are people out there who are attracted to kids, this kinda stuff could be dangerous. Is a crime being commited? No not really, it's technically art etc, but it could lead to crimes so I think the best bet is to prevent it from being created/spread around etc. Yeah it's a legal grey spot, but I think it's worth it. Laws can be created based on the majority of people considering it best for society. <quote>Generally a knee-jerk overreaction, but basically, yeah. Child molesters suck and deserve pretty much all the hate they get (although the "won't somebody think of the children?!?!" attitude that drives people to consider it the worst crime ever is thoroughly irrational). I don't disagree there. </quote> It's not a knee jerk reaction for me. I worked as a teacher, care about kids, and hate the fact that we live in a world where we have to be so careful with them. None of my students were even abducted or harmed, but we had tons of security to ensure that. It seems like the worst crime because it happens to those so young and can seriously ruin/harm their lives. Rape in any form is horrid, and sex offenders should be segregated from society, but yes, many people have a strong reaction to children being abused or harmed/put in danger etc. I think it's ingrained in us. You basically just described a concentration camp. Being based on criminal convictions instead of some politician's genocidal inclinations takes a lot of the sting out of the concept, but it's still not really a reasonable approach. Rehabilitative prison and post-release restrictions (i.e. not being allowed to work with kids) is generally going to be more reasonable, though obviously America kind of struggles with the whole "rehabilitation" thing. Not at all, I'm talking about something better (by far) than our current prisons. You might call it a concentration camp, but it is WAY better then what we currently have. Basically full towns, with homes/apartments, that have places to eat just like normal homes, grocery stores etc. There are no kids at all though, you can't have a family inside, you can't leave whenever you want etc, but you can live a normal life otherwise (possibly even better than some since your guarrenteed a job etc). Is this perfect? Heck no, but it's WAY better then the current jail system, and would be sustainable (money wise). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 01/01/20 6:16:53 PM #60:	Mead posted... I agree that even illustrations of minors in obvious pornographic depictions should be illegal and considered CP it just encourages the mental illness and makes them more likely to harm a child as the illness progresses Lol no You've got a lot of people to arrest for hentai. Also pedophilia doesn't "progress" like cancer. It's a fetish, and the more you suppress it the more it comes out, so you would probably indirectly be responsible for more molested children if you did that. Like, the only real world non-moronic solution to pedophilia is drawn pictures to keep people from going to the real world with it. If you have a scab don't scratch it off. This topic is essentially "I hate tumors so much that I'm going to cut them all off because I'm a real healthy person, unlike those pussy doctors". Alabama went for this solution that's been proven ineffective because Alabama appeals to simple people. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZNqaAh6iLU <cite>Yellow posted [p:932336344] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>I agree that even illustrations of minors in obvious pornographic depictions should be illegal and considered CP it just encourages the mental illness and makes them more likely to harm a child as the illness progresses</quote>Lol no You've got a lot of people to arrest for hentai. Also pedophilia doesn't "progress" like cancer. It's a fetish, and the more you suppress it the more it comes out, so you would probably indirectly be responsible for more molested children if you did that. Like, the only real world non-moronic solution to pedophilia is drawn pictures to keep people from going to the real world with it. If you have a scab don't scratch it off. This topic is essentially "I hate tumors so much that I'm going to cut them all off because I'm a real healthy person, unlike those pussy doctors". Alabama went for this solution that's been proven ineffective because Alabama appeals to simple people. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 6:18:56 PM #61:	wolfy42 posted... See I get that nobody directly is harmed here, and in an eventual society where people were easily identified or came forward it might be different, but in a world where there are people out there who are attracted to kids, this kinda stuff could be dangerous. Is a crime being commited? No not really, it's technically art etc, but it could lead to crimes so I think the best bet is to prevent it from being created/spread around etc. Yeah it's a legal grey spot, but I think it's worth it. Laws can be created based on the majority of people considering it best for society. While I see what youre saying, the opposite is also true. As its their only safe outlet. And could cause more problems if they cant use that. Not to mention, loli stuff probably isnt going anywhere anytime soon... And most people probably wouldnt agree to a law that prevents something like anime characters. Thats very unlikely to happen... For many reasons... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932336425] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted...</cite> <quote>See I get that nobody directly is harmed here, and in an eventual society where people were easily identified or came forward it might be different, but in a world where there are people out there who are attracted to kids, this kinda stuff could be dangerous. Is a crime being commited? No not really, it's technically art etc, but it could lead to crimes so I think the best bet is to prevent it from being created/spread around etc. Yeah it's a legal grey spot, but I think it's worth it. Laws can be created based on the majority of people considering it best for society.</quote> While I see what youre saying, the opposite is also true. As its their only safe outlet. And could cause more problems if they cant use that. Not to mention, loli stuff probably isnt going anywhere anytime soon... And most people probably wouldnt agree to a law that prevents something like anime characters. Thats very unlikely to happen... For many reasons...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 6:27:05 PM #62:	wolfy42 posted... Not at all, I'm talking about something better (by far) than our current prisons. You might call it a concentration camp, but it is WAY better then what we currently have. Basically full towns, with homes/apartments, that have places to eat just like normal homes, grocery stores etc. There are no kids at all though, you can't have a family inside, you can't leave whenever you want etc, but you can live a normal life otherwise (possibly even better than some since your guarrenteed a job etc). Is this perfect? Heck no, but it's WAY better then the current jail system, and would be sustainable (money wise). I think that already exist... Well, sort of... I think there is a trailer park full of them. But I havent seen the video. I think its by one of the YouTube channels Ive been watching crime videos on... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932336749] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted...</cite> <quote>Not at all, I'm talking about something better (by far) than our current prisons. You might call it a concentration camp, but it is WAY better then what we currently have. Basically full towns, with homes/apartments, that have places to eat just like normal homes, grocery stores etc. There are no kids at all though, you can't have a family inside, you can't leave whenever you want etc, but you can live a normal life otherwise (possibly even better than some since your guarrenteed a job etc). Is this perfect? Heck no, but it's WAY better then the current jail system, and would be sustainable (money wise).</quote> I think that already exist... Well, sort of... I think there is a trailer park full of them. But I havent seen the video. I think its by one of the YouTube channels Ive been watching crime videos on...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deoxxys 01/01/20 6:30:30 PM #63:	Yellow posted... Lol no You've got a lot of people to arrest for hentai. lmao yeah got to protect the imaginary underaged girls --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:932336883] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Yellow posted... </cite> <quote>Lol no You've got a lot of people to arrest for hentai. </quote>lmao yeah got to protect the imaginary underaged girls </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 01/01/20 6:30:54 PM #64:	LinkPizza posted... While I see what youre saying, the opposite is also true. As its their only safe outlet. And could cause more problems if they cant use that. Not to mention, loli stuff probably isnt going anywhere anytime soon... And most people probably wouldnt agree to a law that prevents something like anime characters. Thats very unlikely to happen... For many reasons... I like anime, and loli basically is sexualized young looking chars right? It's not actual sex with them, or pictures of them naked etc? From my understanding loli stuff wouldn't be illegal then. Anything that depicts adults having sex with kids though would be, or porn with kid like characters etc. I do not think that is common at least right now. I don't know if there is such thing as a "Safe" outlet for something like that. If I look at pictures of pizza on the internet, that isn't going to stop me from wanting pizza, it's going to make me want that pizza MUCH MORe and soon. I love pizza....I don't wanna have sex with it, but I just about enjoy it as much as sex. I HATE seeing pizza comercials at 3 am, when I can't get any good pizza. It's freaking torture. I'd say that would be the same thing for pedophiles seeing pictures and never getting any of what they really want, why torture yourself? I can't get delicious NY pizza (there is one place in NY in particular with such good pizza I dream about it). I don't go online and look at pictures of that pizza to ease my cravings, that would be insane. I would quickly end up flying to NY just for that pizza (again, did it in my 20's). So yeah, nope on the scratching an itch etc, the best outlet is something else that has nothing to do with kids at all. People redirect sexual urges into sports, art and tons of other things. Do that, not look at pictures of kids. --- Zangulus "I try to avoid having any knowledge at all of his dick." Glowing Elephant "Stonehedge was a sex thing." <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:932336898] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>While I see what youre saying, the opposite is also true. As its their only safe outlet. And could cause more problems if they cant use that. Not to mention, loli stuff probably isnt going anywhere anytime soon... And most people probably wouldnt agree to a law that prevents something like anime characters. Thats very unlikely to happen... For many reasons...</quote> I like anime, and loli basically is sexualized young looking chars right? It's not actual sex with them, or pictures of them naked etc? From my understanding loli stuff wouldn't be illegal then. Anything that depicts adults having sex with kids though would be, or porn with kid like characters etc. I do not think that is common at least right now. I don't know if there is such thing as a "Safe" outlet for something like that. If I look at pictures of pizza on the internet, that isn't going to stop me from wanting pizza, it's going to make me want that pizza MUCH MORe and soon. I love pizza....I don't wanna have sex with it, but I just about enjoy it as much as sex. I HATE seeing pizza comercials at 3 am, when I can't get any good pizza. It's freaking torture. I'd say that would be the same thing for pedophiles seeing pictures and never getting any of what they really want, why torture yourself? I can't get delicious NY pizza (there is one place in NY in particular with such good pizza I dream about it). I don't go online and look at pictures of that pizza to ease my cravings, that would be insane. I would quickly end up flying to NY just for that pizza (again, did it in my 20's). So yeah, nope on the scratching an itch etc, the best outlet is something else that has nothing to do with kids at all. People redirect sexual urges into sports, art and tons of other things. Do that, not look at pictures of kids. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deoxxys 01/01/20 6:43:10 PM #65:	wolfy42 posted... I don't know if there is such thing as a "Safe" outlet for something like that. If I look at pictures of pizza on the internet, that isn't going to stop me from wanting pizza, it's going to make me want that pizza MUCH MORe and soon. I love pizza....I don't wanna have sex with it, but I just about enjoy it as much as sex. I HATE seeing pizza comercials at 3 am, when I can't get any good pizza. It's freaking torture. I mean its a bit different then eating pizza. There no paralells I can think of for masturbating for when it comes to eating pizza. If you were to compare it then eating of the pizza is more like sex. You dont need to have sex to have your sexual urges satiated. On here alone theres plenty of 30 year old virgins who get off on just masturbation. --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:932337354] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted... </cite> <quote>I don't know if there is such thing as a "Safe" outlet for something like that. If I look at pictures of pizza on the internet, that isn't going to stop me from wanting pizza, it's going to make me want that pizza MUCH MORe and soon. I love pizza....I don't wanna have sex with it, but I just about enjoy it as much as sex. I HATE seeing pizza comercials at 3 am, when I can't get any good pizza. It's freaking torture.</quote>I mean its a bit different then eating pizza. There no paralells I can think of for masturbating for when it comes to eating pizza. If you were to compare it then eating of the pizza is more like sex. You dont need to have sex to have your sexual urges satiated. On here alone theres plenty of 30 year old virgins who get off on just masturbation. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 6:43:52 PM #66:	wolfy42 posted... I like anime, and loli basically is sexualized young looking chars right? It's not actual sex with them, or pictures of them naked etc? From my understanding loli stuff wouldn't be illegal then. Anything that depicts adults having sex with kids though would be, or porn with kid like characters etc. I do not think that is common at least right now. I don't know if there is such thing as a "Safe" outlet for something like that. If I look at pictures of pizza on the internet, that isn't going to stop me from wanting pizza, it's going to make me want that pizza MUCH MORe and soon. I love pizza....I don't wanna have sex with it, but I just about enjoy it as much as sex. I HATE seeing pizza comercials at 3 am, when I can't get any good pizza. It's freaking torture. I'd say that would be the same thing for pedophiles seeing pictures and never getting any of what they really want, why torture yourself? I can't get delicious NY pizza (there is one place in NY in particular with such good pizza I dream about it). I don't go online and look at pictures of that pizza to ease my cravings, that would be insane. I would quickly end up flying to NY just for that pizza (again, did it in my 20's). So yeah, nope on the scratching an itch etc, the best outlet is something else that has nothing to do with kids at all. People redirect sexual urges into sports, art and tons of other things. Do that, not look at pictures of kids. Loli anime doesnt have sex, but thats because its anime. Hentai is different. And theres Loli hentai. But that also wont wont be outlawed. Because loli means they look and act like children. But it doesnt mean they are children. Which then makes it legal... And if they did outlaw it here (which they wont), they could move to Japan. Anything goes there, it seems... You can say that for you. But you cant say that for others. I know people on diets who looks at cakes and others sweets to help them stop wanting them as much. So, theres that... So, just because it doesnt work for you doesnt mean it wont work for them. Not to mention, as adjl said, their brains are wired differently... So, I still stand by what I said. Its a safe outlet. And probably the safest... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932337378] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted...</cite> <quote>I like anime, and loli basically is sexualized young looking chars right? It's not actual sex with them, or pictures of them naked etc? From my understanding loli stuff wouldn't be illegal then. Anything that depicts adults having sex with kids though would be, or porn with kid like characters etc. I do not think that is common at least right now. I don't know if there is such thing as a "Safe" outlet for something like that. If I look at pictures of pizza on the internet, that isn't going to stop me from wanting pizza, it's going to make me want that pizza MUCH MORe and soon. I love pizza....I don't wanna have sex with it, but I just about enjoy it as much as sex. I HATE seeing pizza comercials at 3 am, when I can't get any good pizza. It's freaking torture. I'd say that would be the same thing for pedophiles seeing pictures and never getting any of what they really want, why torture yourself? I can't get delicious NY pizza (there is one place in NY in particular with such good pizza I dream about it). I don't go online and look at pictures of that pizza to ease my cravings, that would be insane. I would quickly end up flying to NY just for that pizza (again, did it in my 20's). So yeah, nope on the scratching an itch etc, the best outlet is something else that has nothing to do with kids at all. People redirect sexual urges into sports, art and tons of other things. Do that, not look at pictures of kids. </quote> Loli anime doesnt have sex, but thats because its anime. Hentai is different. And theres Loli hentai. But that also wont wont be outlawed. Because loli means they look and act like children. But it doesnt mean they are children. Which then makes it legal... And if they did outlaw it here (which they wont), they could move to Japan. Anything goes there, it seems... You can say that for you. But you cant say that for others. I know people on diets who looks at cakes and others sweets to help them stop wanting them as much. So, theres that... So, just because it doesnt work for you doesnt mean it wont work for them. Not to mention, as adjl said, their brains are wired differently... So, I still stand by what I said. Its a safe outlet. And probably the safest...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 6:48:18 PM #67:	deoxxys posted... I mean its a bit different then eating pizza. There no paralells I can think of for masturbating for when it comes to eating pizza. If you were to compare it then eating of the pizza is more like sex. You dont need to have sex to have your sexual urges satiated. On here alone theres plenty of 30 year old virgins who get off on just masturbation. Yeah. This as well. Masturbation can satisfy sexual urges. But I dont really think food has something like that... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932337547] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>deoxxys posted...</cite> <quote>I mean its a bit different then eating pizza. There no paralells I can think of for masturbating for when it comes to eating pizza. If you were to compare it then eating of the pizza is more like sex. You dont need to have sex to have your sexual urges satiated. On here alone theres plenty of 30 year old virgins who get off on just masturbation. </quote> Yeah. This as well. Masturbation can satisfy sexual urges. But I dont really think food has something like that...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sodium-chloride 01/01/20 7:01:38 PM #68:	LinkPizza posted... Yeah. This as well. Masturbation can satisfy sexual urges. But I dont really think food has something like that... Of course there is. There are entire industries dedicated to making foods designed to satisfy certain urges that people actively try to avoid. Diet foods, vegan foods, imitation meat, etc. <cite>sodium-chloride posted [p:932338032] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah. This as well. Masturbation can satisfy sexual urges. But I dont really think food has something like that...</quote> Of course there is. There are entire industries dedicated to making foods designed to satisfy certain urges that people actively try to avoid. Diet foods, vegan foods, imitation meat, etc. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 01/01/20 7:08:26 PM #69:	sodium-chloride posted... Of course there is. There are entire industries dedicated to making foods designed to satisfy certain urges that people actively try to avoid. Diet foods, vegan foods, imitation meat, etc. Wouldnt that still be eating, though. That would probably be like the handjobs and blowjobs of the sex worlds. Still still sex with another. Just not full vaginal/anal sex. Haha. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:932338301] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>sodium-chloride posted...</cite> <quote>Of course there is. There are entire industries dedicated to making foods designed to satisfy certain urges that people actively try to avoid. Diet foods, vegan foods, imitation meat, etc.</quote> Wouldnt that still be eating, though. That would probably be like the handjobs and blowjobs of the sex worlds. Still still sex with another. Just not full vaginal/anal sex. Haha.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dreaming_King 01/01/20 7:16:33 PM #70:	LinkPizza posted... I think that already exist... Well, sort of... I think there is a trailer park full of them. But I havent seen the video. I think its by one of the YouTube channels Ive been watching crime videos on... There are laws in place in most states that restrict where sex offenders can live, usually within 1000 feet of a school, park, daycare, etc. Many larger cities deliberately do things like put down a single bench on the side of a street and classify it as a "park" to make the entire surrounding area off limits, that and letting anyone start a "daycare" regardless of if they have any qualifications or accreditation to further cut off parts of the area (totally kid safe). The thing is, like the objectively proven thing, is that the chance of some guy snatching a kid off the street outside of a school/park, especially one within a close distance to his house is incredibly small and if we're talking someone already convicted of a sex crime almost 0%. The vast majority of cases of child abuse come from within the home or from a close family friend or relative. The laws passed to stop the almost non existent threat of stranger abductions by segregating sex offenders don't really do anything except create situations where they all get grouped together since most would be on some sort of probation or parole and be forced to live in a certain town or city even though the majority of the city is off limits to them. That and give easy votes to politicians for being "tough on crime" . And then what happens next is people complain and ask why such a thing is allowed, letting so many criminals congregate where there are probably still kids running around anyways. There was a case in my town years ago where a little girl was dismembered by some mad man in such a place full of sex offenders, but the guy who did it wasn't one of them but that's all the media could focus on, this "secret" sex offender trailer park and how dangerous it must be. Not the unrelated child murder or anything. --- Nil- <cite>Dreaming_King posted [p:932338599] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>I think that already exist... Well, sort of... I think there is a trailer park full of them. But I havent seen the video. I think its by one of the YouTube channels Ive been watching crime videos on...</quote>There are laws in place in most states that restrict where sex offenders can live, usually within 1000 feet of a school, park, daycare, etc. Many larger cities deliberately do things like put down a single bench on the side of a street and classify it as a "park" to make the entire surrounding area off limits, that and letting anyone start a "daycare" regardless of if they have any qualifications or accreditation to further cut off parts of the area (totally kid safe). The thing is, like the objectively proven thing, is that the chance of some guy snatching a kid off the street outside of a school/park, especially one within a close distance to his house is incredibly small and if we're talking someone already convicted of a sex crime almost 0%. The vast majority of cases of child abuse come from within the home or from a close family friend or relative. The laws passed to stop the almost non existent threat of stranger abductions by segregating sex offenders don't really do anything except create situations where they all get grouped together since most would be on some sort of probation or parole and be forced to live in a certain town or city even though the majority of the city is off limits to them. That and give easy votes to politicians for being "tough on crime" . And then what happens next is people complain and ask why such a thing is allowed, letting so many criminals congregate where there are probably still kids running around anyways. There was a case in my town years ago where a little girl was dismembered by some mad man in such a place full of sex offenders, but the guy who did it wasn't one of them but that's all the media could focus on, this "secret" sex offender trailer park and how dangerous it must be. Not the unrelated child murder or anything. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GreenKnight127 01/01/20 7:20:18 PM #71:	Aculo posted... The empathy most of you seem to have for child molesters is concerning, to say the least, ok? It's concerning that people have empathy for human beings? Not every "child molester" molested children. You realize that, right? Not everyone in prison is guilty for their crime. Sometimes there are false accusations that can lead to arrests. Sometimes juries can be INCREDIBLY stupid....and convict someone of a crime they didn't commit. They were just easily swayed by a fancy lawyer and some kind of personal bias the prosecutor took advantage of. Sometimes juries convict someone just because they are more scared by the possibility he didn't commit the crime....but it would be worse to risk letting an innocent man go free on the OFF CHANCE he did commit the crime. Sometimes the law just needs someone to take a fall for the crime. There needs to be blame and justice assigned. You have to take into consideration that some of the people in prison are totally innocent, so perhaps stringing them all up by their balls in a public square while an audience cheers....isn't exactly the best idea? --- Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content. Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements. <cite>GreenKnight127 posted [p:932338743] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Aculo posted... </cite> <quote>The empathy most of you seem to have for child molesters is concerning, to say the least, ok?</quote> It's concerning that people have empathy for human beings? Not every "child molester" molested children. You realize that, right? Not everyone in prison is guilty for their crime. Sometimes there are false accusations that can lead to arrests. Sometimes juries can be INCREDIBLY stupid....and convict someone of a crime they didn't commit. They were just easily swayed by a fancy lawyer and some kind of personal bias the prosecutor took advantage of. Sometimes juries convict someone just because they are more scared by the possibility he didn't commit the crime....but it would be worse to risk letting an innocent man go free on the OFF CHANCE he did commit the crime. Sometimes the law just needs someone to take a fall for the crime. There needs to be blame and justice assigned. You have to take into consideration that some of the people in prison are totally innocent, so perhaps stringing them all up by their balls in a public square while an audience cheers....isn't exactly the best idea? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 01/01/20 7:26:51 PM #72:	GreenKnight127 posted... You have to take into consideration that some of the people in prison are totally innocent, so perhaps stringing them all up by their balls in a public square while an audience cheers....isn't exactly the best idea? If the system isn't reasonably accurate then you can't do any penalty. If you can imprison someone for 15 years by trusting the accuracy of your judgement, you can use the same trust to torture a theoretically innocent person. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:932338987] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>GreenKnight127 posted...</cite> <quote>You have to take into consideration that some of the people in prison are totally innocent, so perhaps stringing them all up by their balls in a public square while an audience cheers....isn't exactly the best idea?</quote> If the system isn't reasonably accurate then you can't do any penalty. If you can imprison someone for 15 years by trusting the accuracy of your judgement, you can use the same trust to torture a theoretically innocent person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GreenKnight127 01/01/20 7:35:19 PM #73:	Kyuubi4269 posted... If the system isn't reasonably accurate then you can't do any penalty. If you can imprison someone for 15 years by trusting the accuracy of your judgement, you can use the same trust to torture a theoretically innocent person. It's one thing to put a man in a cell for a crime he may or may not have committed. It's another thing entirely to put that man in a cell....and then slowly cut his balls off with a dull knife. And then cut his eyes out. And then flay him. Pour salt on him. Piss on him. Torturing him in such a way says more about the country that can imprisoned him, than the crime he allegedly committed. --- Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content. Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements. <cite>GreenKnight127 posted [p:932339303] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>If the system isn't reasonably accurate then you can't do any penalty. If you can imprison someone for 15 years by trusting the accuracy of your judgement, you can use the same trust to torture a theoretically innocent person.</quote> It's one thing to put a man in a cell for a crime he may or may not have committed. It's another thing entirely to put that man in a cell....and then slowly cut his balls off with a dull knife. And then cut his eyes out. And then flay him. Pour salt on him. Piss on him. Torturing him in such a way says more about the country that can imprisoned him, than the crime he allegedly committed. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AdmittedFelon 01/01/20 8:18:27 PM #74:	GreenKnight127 posted... I've noticed an odd trend lately where people just talk about how they hate pedophiles and child molesters. No shit. We get it. Have you ever seen American Beauty? Think Chris Cooper's character. --- Draven 2013 Undertale 2015 <cite>AdmittedFelon posted [p:932340822] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>GreenKnight127 posted... </cite> <quote>I've noticed an odd trend lately where people just talk about how they hate pedophiles and child molesters. No shit. We get it.</quote>Have you ever seen American Beauty? Think Chris Cooper's character. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 01/01/20 9:22:59 PM #75:	GreenKnight127 posted... It's one thing to put a man in a cell for a crime he may or may not have committed. It's another thing entirely to put that man in a cell....and then slowly cut his balls off with a dull knife. And then cut his eyes out. And then flay him. Pour salt on him. Piss on him. Torturing him in such a way says more about the country that can imprisoned him, than the crime he allegedly committed. There's no difference I see worth noting. 15 years of imprisonment is insanely cruel, a day of brutal torture is just a quicker way to dole it out. As far as I'm concerned, if you're willing to subject an innocent man to 15 years of prison, you should be willing to kill one or torture one. If you're not willing to do that, then you're only choosing prison so you don't have to witness their torture and take it on personally. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:932343442] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>GreenKnight127 posted...</cite> <quote>It's one thing to put a man in a cell for a crime he may or may not have committed. It's another thing entirely to put that man in a cell....and then slowly cut his balls off with a dull knife. And then cut his eyes out. And then flay him. Pour salt on him. Piss on him. Torturing him in such a way says more about the country that can imprisoned him, than the crime he allegedly committed. </quote> There's no difference I see worth noting. 15 years of imprisonment is insanely cruel, a day of brutal torture is just a quicker way to dole it out. As far as I'm concerned, if you're willing to subject an innocent man to 15 years of prison, you should be willing to kill one or torture one. If you're not willing to do that, then you're only choosing prison so you don't have to witness their torture and take it on personally.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 01/01/20 10:36:47 PM #76:	Kyuubi4269 posted... If the system isn't reasonably accurate then you can't do any penalty. If you can imprison someone for 15 years by trusting the accuracy of your judgement, you can use the same trust to torture a theoretically innocent person. Literally What The Fuck <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:932346276] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>If the system isn't reasonably accurate then you can't do any penalty. If you can imprison someone for 15 years by trusting the accuracy of your judgement, you can use the same trust to torture a theoretically innocent person.</quote>Literally What The Fuck </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GreenKnight127 01/01/20 10:37:11 PM #77:	Kyuubi4269 posted... There's no difference I see worth noting. 15 years of imprisonment is insanely cruel, a day of brutal torture is just a quicker way to dole it out. As far as I'm concerned, if you're willing to subject an innocent man to 15 years of prison, you should be willing to kill one or torture one. If you're not willing to do that, then you're only choosing prison so you don't have to witness their torture and take it on personally. No difference worth noting?! Jesus Christ. Are you serious? Or are you just being disagreeable for the sake of being disagreeable? Simply putting a man in a cell......you are separating him from society so he is no longer a danger to anyone. Skinning him alive, covering him in salt, cutting his balls off, cutting out his eyes, and any other form of physical torture you can think of......now you are just being sadistic. It has gone from separating him from society.....to personally torturing him. It went from a logical punishment......to petty vengeance and bloodthirst. If you see no difference, I highly suggest seeing a therapist. --- Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content. Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements. <cite>GreenKnight127 posted [p:932346288] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>There's no difference I see worth noting. 15 years of imprisonment is insanely cruel, a day of brutal torture is just a quicker way to dole it out. As far as I'm concerned, if you're willing to subject an innocent man to 15 years of prison, you should be willing to kill one or torture one. If you're not willing to do that, then you're only choosing prison so you don't have to witness their torture and take it on personally.</quote> No difference worth noting?! Jesus Christ. Are you serious? Or are you just being disagreeable for the sake of being disagreeable? Simply putting a man in a cell......you are separating him from society so he is no longer a danger to anyone. Skinning him alive, covering him in salt, cutting his balls off, cutting out his eyes, and any other form of physical torture you can think of......now you are just being sadistic. It has gone from separating him from society.....to personally torturing him. It went from a logical punishment......to petty vengeance and bloodthirst. If you see no difference, I highly suggest seeing a therapist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 01/01/20 10:53:33 PM #78:	Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently --- Lemonheads <cite>Mead posted [p:932346846] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 01/01/20 10:54:21 PM #79:	I would choose neither if I had a choice and just die, but if I had to choose between being put in a cell for 10 years, or being tortured for 1 day, I would go with being tortured for 1 day (I'd still fight against that torture though). Keeping people in cells is horrid, and should only be done in a worst case scenerio and only with the CONSENT of that person where the other option is death. Don't feel like killing them because of religious reasons etc, fine, but give them the ability to kill themselves at least. Do not stick people in over crowded, unsafe, torture chambers for decades. It's horrific. --- Zangulus "I try to avoid having any knowledge at all of his dick." Glowing Elephant "Stonehedge was a sex thing." <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:932346871] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>I would choose neither if I had a choice and just die, but if I had to choose between being put in a cell for 10 years, or being tortured for 1 day, I would go with being tortured for 1 day (I'd still fight against that torture though). Keeping people in cells is horrid, and should only be done in a worst case scenerio and only with the CONSENT of that person where the other option is death. Don't feel like killing them because of religious reasons etc, fine, but give them the ability to kill themselves at least. Do not stick people in over crowded, unsafe, torture chambers for decades. It's horrific. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wolfy42 01/01/20 10:59:40 PM #80:	Mead posted... Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently It's not just what those predators have done directly, which is horrid enough, but the fact that it has changed our society so children are no longer free to be children, where you can't trust strangers around them, where teachers (at least male ones) can not comfort or hold a child who is upset. Sexual predators have created a society of fear. I don't think people on here are really defending them though. Defending the right to create art for instance, isn't totally wrong, and I admit my stance on such art is controversial. I hate the way things have changed within my lifetime. I was lucky enough to go to a private school at the end (for one year) and it was like a family. Everyone cared for all the kids there, and I was often in charge of watching them etc. Such a thing wouldn't be done now, you wouldn't trust other adults to watch the kids, people won't just send them over to each others homes and I doubt there are such family like schools at this point. It's a really sad thing to me. It's only a small number of people who could/would harm kids, but it has had a huge impact on how almost all children live in this day and age. There are tons of sad things in the world, but this is certainly a big one (and I know, it was always around and happened, it just wasn't as well known...so in some ways it's better now since less children are actually (hopefully) being abused/hurt. It still sucks though. --- Zangulus "I try to avoid having any knowledge at all of his dick." Glowing Elephant "Stonehedge was a sex thing." <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:932347032] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently</quote> It's not just what those predators have done directly, which is horrid enough, but the fact that it has changed our society so children are no longer free to be children, where you can't trust strangers around them, where teachers (at least male ones) can not comfort or hold a child who is upset. Sexual predators have created a society of fear. I don't think people on here are really defending them though. Defending the right to create art for instance, isn't totally wrong, and I admit my stance on such art is controversial. I hate the way things have changed within my lifetime. I was lucky enough to go to a private school at the end (for one year) and it was like a family. Everyone cared for all the kids there, and I was often in charge of watching them etc. Such a thing wouldn't be done now, you wouldn't trust other adults to watch the kids, people won't just send them over to each others homes and I doubt there are such family like schools at this point. It's a really sad thing to me. It's only a small number of people who could/would harm kids, but it has had a huge impact on how almost all children live in this day and age. There are tons of sad things in the world, but this is certainly a big one (and I know, it was always around and happened, it just wasn't as well known...so in some ways it's better now since less children are actually (hopefully) being abused/hurt. It still sucks though. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dreaming_King 01/01/20 11:15:32 PM #81:	wolfy42 posted... Sexual predators have created a society of fear. The media sensationalizing and hyper focusing on horrific but ultimately extremely rare cases while largely ignoring more widespread but "mundane" cases of child abuse has created a society of fear. Negative emotions like fear, anger, and hatred are their bread and butter after all. I could even get into the research that suggests the extreme reaction people have towards certain cases of abuse is just as damaging to the child as the act itself, but that's an even touchier subject. --- Nil- <cite>Dreaming_King posted [p:932347589] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wolfy42 posted... </cite> <quote>Sexual predators have created a society of fear.</quote>The media sensationalizing and hyper focusing on horrific but ultimately extremely rare cases while largely ignoring more widespread but "mundane" cases of child abuse has created a society of fear. Negative emotions like fear, anger, and hatred are their bread and butter after all. I could even get into the research that suggests the extreme reaction people have towards certain cases of abuse is just as damaging to the child as the act itself, but that's an even touchier subject. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 01/01/20 11:19:14 PM #82:	Mead posted... Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently Right, opposing cruel and unusual punishment of criminals because we're a society that believes in some fundamental human decency means that we don't care about protecting vulnerable children. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:932347726] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently</quote>Right, opposing cruel and unusual punishment of criminals because we're a society that believes in some fundamental human decency means that we don't care about protecting vulnerable children. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LuciusLatios 01/01/20 11:41:22 PM #83:	Lokarin posted... Philia is not an action. Unless you want to police thoughts. If someone keeps it to themselves, let them be. Philia means brotherly love. How is the death penalty brotherly love? --- Stop reading this signature, get off your device and do something worthwhile. 2DS FC:0963-6134-2863 <cite>LuciusLatios posted [p:932348419] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Lokarin posted... </cite> <quote>Philia is not an action. Unless you want to police thoughts. If someone keeps it to themselves, let them be.</quote> Philia means brotherly love. How is the death penalty brotherly love? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GreenKnight127 01/01/20 11:48:07 PM #84:	Relatives are significantly more likely to molest your children than some strange guy at the park. And opposing cruel and unusual punishment doesn't mean you aren't valuing the protection of children....and it doesn't mean you are defending pedophilia either. But I can understand how some people might want to jump to such conclusions....because their minds only operate in extremes and they are only on this message board to get into arguments. Just another day on Gamefaqs. --- Offensive (according to GameFaqs): sexually explicit, gory, or other obscene content. Different opinions are not offensive unless they contain these elements. <cite>GreenKnight127 posted [p:932348597] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Relatives are significantly more likely to molest your children than some strange guy at the park. And opposing cruel and unusual punishment doesn't mean you aren't valuing the protection of children....and it doesn't mean you are defending pedophilia either. But I can understand how some people might want to jump to such conclusions....because their minds only operate in extremes and they are only on this message board to get into arguments. Just another day on Gamefaqs. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sodium-chloride 01/01/20 11:49:59 PM #85:	GreenKnight127 posted... because their minds only operate in extremes and they are only on this message board to get into arguments. that's how a lot of people are in the real world too unfortunately. people in general are very narrow-minded and it takes a lot for some to actually listen to another view point or argument. <cite>sodium-chloride posted [p:932348632] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>GreenKnight127 posted... </cite> <quote>because their minds only operate in extremes and they are only on this message board to get into arguments. </quote> that's how a lot of people are in the real world too unfortunately. people in general are very narrow-minded and it takes a lot for some to actually listen to another view point or argument. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deoxxys 01/02/20 12:02:45 AM #86:	GreenKnight127 posted... Relatives are significantly more likely to molest your children than some strange guy at the park. And opposing cruel and unusual punishment doesn't mean you aren't valuing the protection of children....and it doesn't mean you are defending pedophilia either. But I can understand how some people might want to jump to such conclusions....because their minds only operate in extremes and they are only on this message board to get into arguments. Just another day on Gamefaqs. +1 --- twylite sprinkle http://tinyurl.com/jeqyas3 https://tinyurl.com/mgvx7h2 <cite>deoxxys posted [p:932349009] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>GreenKnight127 posted... </cite> <quote>Relatives are significantly more likely to molest your children than some strange guy at the park. And opposing cruel and unusual punishment doesn't mean you aren't valuing the protection of children....and it doesn't mean you are defending pedophilia either. But I can understand how some people might want to jump to such conclusions....because their minds only operate in extremes and they are only on this message board to get into arguments. Just another day on Gamefaqs.</quote>+1 </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 01/02/20 12:20:00 AM #87:	Mead posted... Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently Right? That pesky 8th amendment. I want to to violate some basic human rights, what's a little casual bodily mutilation? Must be a bunch of pedos here. --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZNqaAh6iLU <cite>Yellow posted [p:932349496] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Why oh why does society focus on protecting vulnerable children instead of defending the rights and freedoms of sexual predators -potd, apparently</quote>Right? That pesky 8th amendment. I want to to violate some basic human rights, what's a little casual bodily mutilation? Must be a bunch of pedos here. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 01/02/20 1:19:24 AM #88:	GreenKnight127 posted... Simply putting a man in a cell......you are separating him from society so he is no longer a danger to anyone. You are "simply" taking away a large section of their life they will never get back and guaranteeing there will be nothing for them when they leave. Don't even, prison isn't "just a room", you're ignoring the brutality as is convenient and normal. GreenKnight127 posted... It went from a logical punishment......to petty vengeance and bloodthirst. There's nothing logical about imprisonment, it's all petty vengeance for the appeasement of society. The point of the law is to ensure wronged people gain suitable vengeance in a standardised way so you don't get feuding civilians escalating trouble. If vengeance is not delivered then people get restless, that's all there is. Don't be a coward, if you really feel somebody has molested a child, go all out and give them the death they deserve, don't sit on the fence and fail to deliver vengeance. We will occasionally get the wrong person, but that's the price we pay to ensure the public gets its retribution. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:932351172] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>GreenKnight127 posted...</cite> <quote>Simply putting a man in a cell......you are separating him from society so he is no longer a danger to anyone.</quote> You are "simply" taking away a large section of their life they will never get back and guaranteeing there will be nothing for them when they leave. Don't even, prison isn't "just a room", you're ignoring the brutality as is convenient and normal. GreenKnight127 posted...</cite> <quote>It went from a logical punishment......to petty vengeance and bloodthirst.</quote> There's nothing logical about imprisonment, it's all petty vengeance for the appeasement of society. The point of the law is to ensure wronged people gain suitable vengeance in a standardised way so you don't get feuding civilians escalating trouble. If vengeance is not delivered then people get restless, that's all there is. Don't be a coward, if you really feel somebody has molested a child, go all out and give them the death they deserve, don't sit on the fence and fail to deliver vengeance. We will occasionally get the wrong person, but that's the price we pay to ensure the public gets its retribution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ClarkDuke 01/02/20 1:27:53 AM #89:	Hop103 posted... It's ineffective, I believe RKelly was using similar drugs to reduce his libido and it didn't do shit, thus not a good idea. Nope, you're muddying the waters. cool, i had no clue you're r kelly's private physician, ok? Lokarin posted... If the castration worked, then it would be prescriptive. you have evidence showing it doesn't? --- https://imgur.com/qL0DHFI https://imgur.com/JL9rRLt https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ <cite>ClarkDuke posted [p:932351406] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Hop103 posted... </cite> <quote>It's ineffective, I believe RKelly was using similar drugs to reduce his libido and it didn't do shit, thus not a good idea. Nope, you're muddying the waters.</quote>cool, i had no clue you're r kelly's private physician, ok? Lokarin posted... </cite> <quote>If the castration worked, then it would be prescriptive.</quote>you have evidence showing it doesn't? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 01/02/20 1:33:50 AM #90:	Aculo posted... Why only in Alabama? This should really be a nation wide sensation, ok? Yes it should, ok? --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/YvP6isz <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:932351568] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Aculo posted... </cite> <quote>Why only in Alabama? This should really be a nation wide sensation, ok?</quote>Yes it should, ok? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ClarkDuke 01/02/20 1:37:24 AM #91:	Yellow posted... Right? That pesky 8th amendment. I want to to violate some basic human rights, what's a little casual bodily mutilation? Must be a bunch of pedos here. chemical castration requires no body mutilation, ok? --- https://imgur.com/qL0DHFI https://imgur.com/JL9rRLt https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ <cite>ClarkDuke posted [p:932351665] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Yellow posted... </cite> <quote>Right? That pesky 8th amendment. I want to to violate some basic human rights, what's a little casual bodily mutilation? Must be a bunch of pedos here.</quote> chemical castration requires no body mutilation, ok? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 01/02/20 1:40:44 AM #92:	_AdjI_ posted... Pedophiles that don't progress into child molesters deserve respect for their self-control, not the same vilification that they would face if they did find themselves a toddler to diddle. Still you expect me to feel respect to someone who would think sexually about my niece and nephews who are kids because they haven't acted on it? For someone as smart as yourself that's one stupid expectation. A bullet to the head is what they deserve. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/YvP6isz <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:932351758] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>_AdjI_ posted... </cite> <quote>Pedophiles that don't progress into child molesters deserve respect for their self-control, not the same vilification that they would face if they did find themselves a toddler to diddle.</quote> Still you expect me to feel respect to someone who would think sexually about my niece and nephews who are kids because they haven't acted on it? For someone as smart as yourself that's one stupid expectation. A bullet to the head is what they deserve. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 01/02/20 1:42:43 AM #93:	wwinterj25 posted... Still you expect me to feel respect to someone who would think sexually about my niece and nephews who are kids because they haven't acted on it? Yes, just as you should respect your friend who wants to bone your wife but doesn't. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:932351809] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote>Still you expect me to feel respect to someone who would think sexually about my niece and nephews who are kids because they haven't acted on it? </quote> Yes, just as you should respect your friend who wants to bone your wife but doesn't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Parasite_Eve 01/02/20 1:44:35 AM #94:	I assume there is an equivalent in place also for females that are pedos and child molestors also. --- DFFOO ID: Parasite Eve RIP Sheeva <cite>Parasite_Eve posted [p:932351855] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>I assume there is an equivalent in place also for females that are pedos and child molestors also. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 01/02/20 1:49:30 AM #95:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Yes, just as you should respect your friend who wants to bone your wife but doesn't. I respect the person who thinks about raping my dog on a daily bases too. Spoiler: I have no dog. Honestly though while paedophiles and child molesters are different they are both scum on the earth so deserve the same punishment in my eyes. I would say "get pedos help" but honestly they don't deserve the time, money and resources wasted on them when folk who actually deserve help are going without and even taking their own lifes. I'm all for helping with most mental health issues but not that kind. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/YvP6isz <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:932351983] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>Yes, just as you should respect your friend who wants to bone your wife but doesn't.</quote>I respect the person who thinks about raping my dog on a daily bases too. Spoiler: I have no dog. Honestly though while paedophiles and child molesters are different they are both scum on the earth so deserve the same punishment in my eyes. I would say "get pedos help" but honestly they don't deserve the time, money and resources wasted on them when folk who actually deserve help are going without and even taking their own lifes. I'm all for helping with most mental health issues but not that kind. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 01/02/20 1:57:28 AM #96:	wwinterj25 posted... I respect the person who thinks about raping my dog on a daily bases too. Spoiler: I have no dog. You also have no wife or friend, it's an analogy. wwinterj25 posted... Honestly though while paedophiles and child molesters are different they are both scum on the earth so deserve the same punishment in my eyes. I would say "get pedos help" but honestly they don't deserve the time, money and resources wasted on them when folk who actually deserve help are going without and even taking their own lifes. I'm all for helping with most mental health issues but not that kind. I imagine you consider yourself one of those people deserving help, despite pedophiles as a whole on average contributing more to society than you. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:932352160] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote>I respect the person who thinks about raping my dog on a daily bases too. Spoiler: I have no dog.</quote> You also have no wife or friend, it's an analogy. wwinterj25 posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly though while paedophiles and child molesters are different they are both scum on the earth so deserve the same punishment in my eyes. I would say "get pedos help" but honestly they don't deserve the time, money and resources wasted on them when folk who actually deserve help are going without and even taking their own lifes. I'm all for helping with most mental health issues but not that kind.</quote> I imagine you consider yourself one of those people deserving help, despite pedophiles as a whole on average contributing more to society than you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
wwinterj25 01/02/20 1:59:40 AM #97:	Kyuubi4269 posted... I imagine you consider yourself one of those people deserving help, despite pedophiles as a whole on average contributing more to society than you. Obviously as I'm not a danger to kids. --- One who knows nothing can understand nothing. http://psnprofiles.com/wwinterj - https://imgur.com/YvP6isz <cite>wwinterj25 posted [p:932352200] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Kyuubi4269 posted... </cite> <quote>I imagine you consider yourself one of those people deserving help, despite pedophiles as a whole on average contributing more to society than you.</quote> Obviously as I'm not a danger to kids. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269 01/02/20 2:38:13 AM #98:	So obvious it took you 6 edits to figure out a response lol --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:932352938] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>So obvious it took you 6 edits to figure out a response lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 01/02/20 3:00:41 AM #99:	Yellow posted... Right? That pesky 8th amendment. I want to to violate some basic human rights, what's a little casual bodily mutilation? Must be a bunch of pedos here. If someone is attracted to children and has shown that they cant control those urges and has harmed children, then I really dont consider it cruel or unusual to give them drugs to suppress their libido as a precaution to protect children from them --- Lemonheads <cite>Mead posted [p:932353363] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>Yellow posted... </cite> <quote>Right? That pesky 8th amendment. I want to to violate some basic human rights, what's a little casual bodily mutilation? Must be a bunch of pedos here.</quote> If someone is attracted to children and has shown that they cant control those urges and has harmed children, then I really dont consider it cruel or unusual to give them drugs to suppress their libido as a precaution to protect children from them </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SpaceBear_ 01/02/20 5:29:17 AM #100:	"gIvE mE tWo mInUtEs iN a room for wItH them" --- - God bless, downtime and TheSlinja. YNWA GameFAQs' Favourite Sons. - Official Barman Of Champion Pub <cite>SpaceBear_ posted [p:932355401] in Child mole... [t:78296070]...</cite> <quote>"gIvE mE tWo mInUtEs iN a room for wItH them" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Poll of the Day > Child molesters in Alabama will now be chemically castrated, ok? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Child molesters in Alabama will now be chemically castrated, ok?