Current Events > I absolutely HATE the pet worshipping culture

Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
smoke_break 11/04/19 1:25:16 PM #251:	furb posted... Should I save you or your dog if you're both drowning? Good question tbh, for the pet people ITT. --- https://imgur.com/WTmIPt8 <cite>smoke_break posted [p:929655494] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>furb posted... </cite> <quote>Should I save you or your dog if you're both drowning?</quote>Good question tbh, for the pet people ITT. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StealthRock 11/04/19 1:53:34 PM #252:	PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point --- Pokemon is awesome <cite>StealthRock posted [p:929656645] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StealthRock 11/04/19 1:55:25 PM #253:	LinkPizza posted... PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And? We dont worship cows. Just like we dont worship cats like Egypt did. Doesnt mean we cant love our pets like family. The point is that people have valued certain animals above humans at a time. Some cultures probably still do. I believe the point they are trying to make is that its subjective... Thats exactly the point --- Pokemon is awesome <cite>StealthRock posted [p:929656727] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And? We dont worship cows. Just like we dont worship cats like Egypt did. Doesnt mean we cant love our pets like family. The point is that people have valued certain animals above humans at a time. Some cultures probably still do. I believe the point they are trying to make is that its subjective...</quote> Thats exactly the point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PIITB415 11/04/19 2:02:22 PM #254:	StealthRock posted... PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point It means that they aren't as important as they were once. --- https://imgur.com/VawbBVM https://imgur.com/6Si4h <cite>PIITB415 posted [p:929657018] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point</quote> It means that they aren't as important as they were once.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 11/04/19 2:12:00 PM #255:	So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:929657452] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/04/19 2:25:25 PM #256:	PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point It means that they aren't as important as they were once. To you, maybe. But not to other cultures. Just because other places that werent Egypt didnt worship cats, its didnt mean they werent important in Egypt. Which goes back to its all subjective. All youre doing is helping to prove the point... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929658043] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point</quote> It means that they aren't as important as they were once.</quote> To you, maybe. But not to other cultures. Just because other places that werent Egypt didnt worship cats, its didnt mean they werent important in Egypt. Which goes back to its all subjective. All youre doing is helping to prove the point...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/04/19 2:26:17 PM #257:	thanosibe posted... So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? No. The point is its subjective. Just because you think a stranger is more important to save doesnt mean others will think the same thing. Others will usually save friends or family first... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929658081] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote>So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them?</quote> No. The point is its subjective. Just because you think a stranger is more important to save doesnt mean others will think the same thing. Others will usually save friends or family first...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PIITB415 11/04/19 2:29:00 PM #258:	LinkPizza posted... thanosibe posted... So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? No. The point is its subjective. Just because you think a stranger is more important to save doesnt mean others will think the same thing. Others will usually save friends or family first... We aren't talking about family or friends. We are talking about pets. Pets are not as important as people. Simple as that. --- https://imgur.com/VawbBVM https://imgur.com/6Si4h <cite>PIITB415 posted [p:929658202] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote>So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them?</quote> No. The point is its subjective. Just because you think a stranger is more important to save doesnt mean others will think the same thing. Others will usually save friends or family first...</quote> We aren't talking about family or friends. We are talking about pets. Pets are not as important as people. Simple as that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/04/19 2:35:12 PM #259:	PIITB415 posted... LinkPizza posted... thanosibe posted... So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? No. The point is its subjective. Just because you think a stranger is more important to save doesnt mean others will think the same thing. Others will usually save friends or family first... We aren't talking about family or friends. We are talking about pets. Pets are not as important as people. Simple as that. I was talking about everything. Including how others say to save he baby over grandma. But that being said, thats your opinion. Pets are important to some people. Why are we more important? Were animals just like they are. So what makes us more important than our pets? --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929658497] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote>So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them?</quote> No. The point is its subjective. Just because you think a stranger is more important to save doesnt mean others will think the same thing. Others will usually save friends or family first...</quote> We aren't talking about family or friends. We are talking about pets. Pets are not as important as people. Simple as that.</quote> I was talking about everything. Including how others say to save he baby over grandma. But that being said, thats your opinion. Pets are important to some people. Why are we more important? Were animals just like they are. So what makes us more important than our pets?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarqueeSeries 11/04/19 2:37:39 PM #260:	thanosibe posted... So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? When it comes to theology and religion, animal worship didn't fall out of favor because we deemed it to be ignorant. It was naturally phased out in favor of other religious ideas, usually as a result of invasions or occupations. Or, in the case of Hinduism, never fell out at all. Cows are still considered sacred to Hindus --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>MarqueeSeries posted [p:929658620] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote>So because past cultures worshiped some animals, mostly out of ignorance, we should still today? Isn't there a lot of things past cultures have done that we don't do today because we've learned better because of them? </quote> When it comes to theology and religion, animal worship didn't fall out of favor because we deemed it to be ignorant. It was naturally phased out in favor of other religious ideas, usually as a result of invasions or occupations. Or, in the case of Hinduism, never fell out at all. Cows are still considered sacred to Hindus</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 11/04/19 2:46:08 PM #261:	LinkPizza posted... PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And? We dont worship cows. Just like we dont worship cats like Egypt did. Doesnt mean we cant love our pets like family. The point is that people have valued certain animals above humans at a time. Some cultures probably still do. I believe the point they are trying to make is that its subjective... It's not about how much value you place on them, it's about their objectively lesser brains giving them less worth over a person. I already made this point to you --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:929659015] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And? We dont worship cows. Just like we dont worship cats like Egypt did. Doesnt mean we cant love our pets like family. The point is that people have valued certain animals above humans at a time. Some cultures probably still do. I believe the point they are trying to make is that its subjective...</quote> It's not about how much value you place on them, it's about their objectively lesser brains giving them less worth over a person. I already made this point to you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarqueeSeries 11/04/19 2:58:41 PM #262:	Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>MarqueeSeries posted [p:929659608] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/04/19 3:00:02 PM #263:	ledbowman posted... LinkPizza posted... PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And? We dont worship cows. Just like we dont worship cats like Egypt did. Doesnt mean we cant love our pets like family. The point is that people have valued certain animals above humans at a time. Some cultures probably still do. I believe the point they are trying to make is that its subjective... It's not about how much value you place on them, it's about their objectively lesser brains giving them less worth over a person. I already made this point to you So, theyre lesser because you think so. So, subjective. Does that mean that we should save the dog if our dog is smart and the baby has a disability that will never allow him to fully function past a certain age? Because they have smart dogs that can do many things like save lives and solve puzzles. Or should we save a smart chimpanzee over that same child? And why does not being smart mean they are lesser? Should I save a genius serial killer over you because theyre smarter? Also, why do you assume they are lesser. Animals are really smart. I mean, animals can understand other animals and us. Where we can only understand humans, most of the time. they also have theyre own way of living. They dont live the same way as humans. In the end, if you want to treat then as lesser, you go right ahead. But other treat them like family. And theres nothing wrong with that. And most people will save friends and family before a random baby you know nothing about. Nor anything about theyre future. Like others have said, they could grow up to be a serial killer, or the person who ends the world. It sounds ridiculous, but not more ridiculous than this scenario in the first place... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929659681] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And? We dont worship cows. Just like we dont worship cats like Egypt did. Doesnt mean we cant love our pets like family. The point is that people have valued certain animals above humans at a time. Some cultures probably still do. I believe the point they are trying to make is that its subjective...</quote> It's not about how much value you place on them, it's about their objectively lesser brains giving them less worth over a person. I already made this point to you</quote> So, theyre lesser because you think so. So, subjective. Does that mean that we should save the dog if our dog is smart and the baby has a disability that will never allow him to fully function past a certain age? Because they have smart dogs that can do many things like save lives and solve puzzles. Or should we save a smart chimpanzee over that same child? And why does not being smart mean they are lesser? Should I save a genius serial killer over you because theyre smarter? Also, why do you assume they are lesser. Animals are really smart. I mean, animals can understand other animals and us. Where we can only understand humans, most of the time. they also have theyre own way of living. They dont live the same way as humans. In the end, if you want to treat then as lesser, you go right ahead. But other treat them like family. And theres nothing wrong with that. And most people will save friends and family before a random baby you know nothing about. Nor anything about theyre future. Like others have said, they could grow up to be a serial killer, or the person who ends the world. It sounds ridiculous, but not more ridiculous than this scenario in the first place...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 11/04/19 3:06:45 PM #264:	MarqueeSeries posted... Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:929659983] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology</quote> Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 11/04/19 3:11:08 PM #265:	LinkPizza posted... So, theyre lesser because you think so No. Read it again --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:929660185] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>So, theyre lesser because you think so</quote> No. Read it again</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#266	Post #266 was unavailable or deleted.
LinkPizza 11/04/19 3:14:25 PM #267:	ledbowman posted... LinkPizza posted... So, theyre lesser because you think so No. Read it again No. I read it fine. You said objectively. But its really subjectively. So, in the end, you just think their lesser. Thats fine. Not everybody thinks of value like that... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929660358] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>So, theyre lesser because you think so</quote> No. Read it again</quote> No. I read it fine. You said objectively. But its really subjectively. So, in the end, you just think their lesser. Thats fine. Not everybody thinks of value like that...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 11/04/19 3:16:53 PM #268:	LinkPizza posted... ledbowman posted... LinkPizza posted... So, theyre lesser because you think so No. Read it again No. I read it fine. You said objectively. But its really subjectively. So, in the end, you just think their lesser. Thats fine. Not everybody thinks of value like that... Their brains are literally less capable of thinking. Objectively less capable --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:929660467] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted...</cite> <quote>So, theyre lesser because you think so</quote> No. Read it again</quote> No. I read it fine. You said objectively. But its really subjectively. So, in the end, you just think their lesser. Thats fine. Not everybody thinks of value like that...</quote> Their brains are literally less capable of thinking. Objectively less capable</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkPizza 11/04/19 3:30:29 PM #269:	To us. Yet, they can still communicate with other animals and understand us, while we only understand animal to a degree. We dont know everything they know. And why would they make them less valuable, anyway? --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929661055] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>To us. Yet, they can still communicate with other animals and understand us, while we only understand animal to a degree. We dont know everything they know. And why would they make them less valuable, anyway?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StealthRock 11/04/19 4:12:54 PM #270:	PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... PIITB415 posted... StealthRock posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Dragonblade01 posted... Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either. This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective. This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them. And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point It means that they aren't as important as they were once. .... still subjective --- Pokemon is awesome <cite>StealthRock posted [p:929662980] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>StealthRock posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>Humans have applied personhood to their pets for a long time. Someone valuing their wellbeing over a stranger's shouldn't be hard to understand. You don't have to think the same way, because to whom and how people give personhood is just as much individual as it is cultural, but it shouldn't blow your mind either.</quote> This pretty much says it best. It's nothing new to value pets as equal members of family. In fact, it seems like many people forget that cats were literally worshipped in Egypt for centuries, and the penalties for any crime against them were extremely severe. And yet people still want to claim that value isn't subjective.</quote> This Thank you. All the so called intellectuals in this thread cant even bring themselves to acknowledge this fact, let alone discuss how their are no absolutes in this scenario. They would rather hurl insults while peering down from their heroic self righteous highhorses</quote> Just how cows are worshipped in India right? We still eat them.</quote> And?? If you were an indian man, you probably wouldnt. Still proves my point</quote> It means that they aren't as important as they were once.</quote> .... still subjective</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
StealthRock 11/04/19 4:33:19 PM #271:	ledbowman posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next Proof? --- Pokemon is awesome <cite>StealthRock posted [p:929663877] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology</quote> Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next</quote> Proof?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IloveJesus 11/04/19 5:07:08 PM #272:	ledbowman posted... Their brains are literally less capable of thinking. Objectively less capable Even if we were to accept this (which we shouldn't, because I'm beginning to think my pets are smarter than you), worth isn't intrinsically linked to intelligence. Most people wouldn't choose to save a morally devoid genius over a kid with extreme learning difficulties. Your entire foundation of your position simply doesn't work. This topic is basically: You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. Loads of other people: We don't actually think that you are right. You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. --- Jesus loves us. It only seems fair to love him back. <cite>IloveJesus posted [p:929665390] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted... </cite> <quote>Their brains are literally less capable of thinking. Objectively less capable</quote> Even if we were to accept this (which we shouldn't, because I'm beginning to think my pets are smarter than you), worth isn't intrinsically linked to intelligence. Most people wouldn't choose to save a morally devoid genius over a kid with extreme learning difficulties. Your entire foundation of your position simply doesn't work. This topic is basically: You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. Loads of other people: We don't actually think that you are right. You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
--Zero- 11/04/19 5:41:58 PM #273:	I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. --- SIGNATURE <cite>--Zero- posted [p:929667085] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 11/04/19 6:47:10 PM #274:	IloveJesus posted... ledbowman posted... Their brains are literally less capable of thinking. Objectively less capable Even if we were to accept this (which we shouldn't, because I'm beginning to think my pets are smarter than you), worth isn't intrinsically linked to intelligence. Most people wouldn't choose to save a morally devoid genius over a kid with extreme learning difficulties. Your entire foundation of your position simply doesn't work. This topic is basically: You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. Loads of other people: We don't actually think that you are right. You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. You're right most people wouldn't choose the genius in your very specific example involving two humans designed to miss my point. I'm talking about high thought and feeling as it relates to the two species as a whole and if you can't see why one of those species generally has more worth I can't help you. More likely is you're trolling and have rope a doped me into another go round. Congrats I guess --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:929669990] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>IloveJesus posted...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted... </cite> <quote>Their brains are literally less capable of thinking. Objectively less capable</quote> Even if we were to accept this (which we shouldn't, because I'm beginning to think my pets are smarter than you), worth isn't intrinsically linked to intelligence. Most people wouldn't choose to save a morally devoid genius over a kid with extreme learning difficulties. Your entire foundation of your position simply doesn't work. This topic is basically: You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. Loads of other people: We don't actually think that you are right. You: I am right. It is clear to everybody that I'm right and nobody will deny it. </quote> You're right most people wouldn't choose the genius in your very specific example involving two humans designed to miss my point. I'm talking about high thought and feeling as it relates to the two species as a whole and if you can't see why one of those species generally has more worth I can't help you. More likely is you're trolling and have rope a doped me into another go round. Congrats I guess</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AwesomeToTheMAX 11/04/19 6:52:09 PM #275:	Worth is subjective. Thinking otherwise is more reminiscent of a sociopath than picking a dog over a kid --- "shut the f*** up. There's no such thing as a "sniper rifle"." - tamagucci <cite>AwesomeToTheMAX posted [p:929670233] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>Worth is subjective. Thinking otherwise is more reminiscent of a sociopath than picking a dog over a kid</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 11/04/19 6:55:07 PM #276:	It's also important to note that worship doesn't have anything to do with it. It can, of course, especially in the context of certain religions. But valuing your pet doesn't require you worship it. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:929670364] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>It's also important to note that worship doesn't have anything to do with it. It can, of course, especially in the context of certain religions. But valuing your pet doesn't require you worship it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 11/04/19 6:56:14 PM #277:	--Zero- posted... I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. this easily dont care if it makes me a sociopath --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:929670426] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>--Zero- posted...</cite> <quote>I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. </quote> this easily dont care if it makes me a sociopath</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SailorGoon 11/04/19 6:58:30 PM #278:	lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts. --- Me irl: https://i.imgtc.ws/DaWXgKp.png <cite>SailorGoon posted [p:929670560] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 11/04/19 6:59:23 PM #279:	SailorGoon posted... lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts. my dogs are my daughters --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:929670598] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>SailorGoon posted...</cite> <quote>lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts.</quote> my dogs are my daughters</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AzureAnihilator 11/04/19 6:59:27 PM #280:	I hate to weigh in on a thread like this, because I know it's bound to be filled with low-IQ individuals, but what matters to each person is totally subjective and I'm not particularly offended by the notion that a man might choose his dog's life over mine, or a woman might choose a cat's life over mine, especially if I were a stranger. Pets are family to some. Nothing strange about it. It just ain't that novel an idea. --- Man of the People - Hero of the Hour https://imgur.com/H3MsnzZ <cite>AzureAnihilator posted [p:929670606] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>I hate to weigh in on a thread like this, because I know it's bound to be filled with low-IQ individuals, but what matters to each person is totally subjective and I'm not particularly offended by the notion that a man might choose his dog's life over mine, or a woman might choose a cat's life over mine, especially if I were a stranger. Pets are family to some. Nothing strange about it. It just ain't that novel an idea.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 11/04/19 7:05:34 PM #281:	SailorGoon posted... lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts. There's a difference between how we appraise groups as a whole and how we appraise individual members of those groups. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:929670883] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>SailorGoon posted...</cite> <quote>lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts.</quote> There's a difference between how we appraise groups as a whole and how we appraise individual members of those groups.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AwesomeToTheMAX 11/04/19 7:06:49 PM #282:	Imagine telling someone their mother has less worth than a baby... While calling other people sociopaths. Unironically --- "shut the f*** up. There's no such thing as a "sniper rifle"." - tamagucci <cite>AwesomeToTheMAX posted [p:929670926] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>Imagine telling someone their mother has less worth than a baby... While calling other people sociopaths. Unironically</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SailorGoon 11/04/19 7:08:11 PM #283:	Dragonblade01 posted... SailorGoon posted... lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts. There's a difference between how we appraise groups as a whole and how we appraise individual members of those groups. You're misunderstanding my point. I don't see anything wrong with others holding a higher/lesser value towards individuals so long as they acknowledge their bias --- Me irl: https://i.imgtc.ws/DaWXgKp.png <cite>SailorGoon posted [p:929670982] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>Dragonblade01 posted...</cite> <quote>SailorGoon posted...</cite> <quote>lmao. It's one thing to say you'd save an animal over a person because one may hold a higher sentimental value, but to say that an animals life is objectively worth that of a human life? Nahh man. When people pick the animals in these scenarios I say cool. So long as you acknowledge the narrow mindedness/selfishness of your decisions you're free to do as you like. I'd be a hypocrite to say you shouldn't do things that benefit only yourself. We all make decisions that best suit ourselves and our needs/desires all the time. Id find it especially stupid if you try to justify things by saying your pets worth is equivalent to the worth of a humans if you consume any kind of meat or animal byproducts.</quote> There's a difference between how we appraise groups as a whole and how we appraise individual members of those groups.</quote> You're misunderstanding my point. I don't see anything wrong with others holding a higher/lesser value towards individuals so long as they acknowledge their bias</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PIITB415 11/04/19 7:09:27 PM #284:	Ryuko_Chan posted... --Zero- posted... I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. this easily dont care if it makes me a sociopath No wonder why the majority of CE are basement dwellers --- https://imgur.com/VawbBVM https://imgur.com/6Si4h <cite>PIITB415 posted [p:929671039] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>Ryuko_Chan posted...</cite> <quote>--Zero- posted...</cite> <quote>I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. </quote> this easily dont care if it makes me a sociopath</quote> No wonder why the majority of CE are basement dwellers</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 11/04/19 7:10:25 PM #285:	PIITB415 posted... Ryuko_Chan posted... --Zero- posted... I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. this easily dont care if it makes me a sociopath No wonder why the majority of CE are basement dwellers My dogs are my daughters, family above anything --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:929671080] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>Ryuko_Chan posted...</cite> <quote>--Zero- posted...</cite> <quote>I'd save my pet over a child 10/10 times. If it was my own child then yeah I'd save my kid. </quote> this easily dont care if it makes me a sociopath</quote> No wonder why the majority of CE are basement dwellers</quote> My dogs are my daughters, family above anything</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 11/04/19 7:10:43 PM #286:	SailorGoon posted... You're misunderstanding my point. I don't see anything wrong with others holding a higher/lesser value towards individuals so long as they acknowledge their bias I think it's bias regardless, individual or otherwise. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:929671092] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>SailorGoon posted...</cite> <quote>You're misunderstanding my point. I don't see anything wrong with others holding a higher/lesser value towards individuals so long as they acknowledge their bias</quote> I think it's bias regardless, individual or otherwise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarqueeSeries 11/04/19 7:10:49 PM #287:	ledbowman posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next I dont see those sources Tsk tsk --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>MarqueeSeries posted [p:929671100] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote> Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology</quote> Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next</quote> I dont see those sources Tsk tsk</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
PIITB415 11/04/19 7:40:34 PM #288:	MarqueeSeries posted... ledbowman posted... MarqueeSeries posted... Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next I dont see those sources Tsk tsk They eat their own vomit and shit. --- https://imgur.com/VawbBVM https://imgur.com/6Si4h <cite>PIITB415 posted [p:929672478] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>MarqueeSeries posted...</cite> <quote> Define "objectively lesser brains" Be specific, and preferably cite some sources pertaining to studies in psychology or neurology</quote> Dogs don't wonder about god and the cosmos. Next</quote> I dont see those sources Tsk tsk</quote> They eat their own vomit and shit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funkydog 11/04/19 7:41:11 PM #289:	PIITB415 posted... They eat their own vomit and shit. People eat fast food and kebabs. --- https://imgur.com/BGbZK <cite>Funkydog posted [p:929672502] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>PIITB415 posted...</cite> <quote>They eat their own vomit and shit. </quote> People eat fast food and kebabs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#290	Post #290 was unavailable or deleted.
#291	Post #291 was unavailable or deleted.
thanosibe 11/04/19 8:01:56 PM #292:	GregShmedley posted... "But that's different because I'd never eat my fur babez!!!" Yeah thats a stupid American double standard. Pigs and cows are unfeeling animals that taste delicious. Omg other cultures eat dogs, cats and horses!!!!! clutches pearl necklace --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:929673489] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>GregShmedley posted... </cite> <quote>"But that's different because I'd never eat my fur babez!!!"</quote>Yeah thats a stupid American double standard. Pigs and cows are unfeeling animals that taste delicious. Omg other cultures eat dogs, cats and horses!!!!! clutches pearl necklace </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz 11/04/19 8:03:53 PM #293:	smoke_break posted... furb posted... Should I save you or your dog if you're both drowning? Good question tbh, for the pet people ITT. save my cat, let him eat my body problem solved --- FFXIV: Lucius Hexenseele (Brynhildr) \| RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/Fish/Cook/Fletch/Div/Mining/Smithing/Thieving, 80 crafting <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:929673615] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>smoke_break posted...</cite> <quote>furb posted... </cite> <quote>Should I save you or your dog if you're both drowning?</quote>Good question tbh, for the pet people ITT. </quote> save my cat, let him eat my body problem solved</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ryuko_Chan 11/04/19 8:03:59 PM #294:	thanosibe posted... [LFAQs-redacted-quote] Yeah thats a stupid American double standard. Pigs and cows are unfeeling animals that taste delicious. Omg other cultures eat dogs, cats and horses!!!!! clutches pearl necklace i would not have a pet fish so idk about that i would honestly have a pet cow and i would put my pet cow over some random stranger too, because like i said family over absolutely EVERYTHING its not that dogs are special because theyre dogs, the specific dogs are special because they are family i dont care about other cultures eating dogs, thats their own business and custom --- https://i.imgtc.com/LCLKlZX.gif Life Fiber Kamui SENKETSU! <cite>Ryuko_Chan posted [p:929673620] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>thanosibe posted...</cite> <quote><cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> Yeah thats a stupid American double standard. Pigs and cows are unfeeling animals that taste delicious. Omg other cultures eat dogs, cats and horses!!!!! clutches pearl necklace </quote> i would not have a pet fish so idk about that i would honestly have a pet cow and i would put my pet cow over some random stranger too, because like i said family over absolutely EVERYTHING its not that dogs are special because theyre dogs, the specific dogs are special because they are family i dont care about other cultures eating dogs, thats their own business and custom</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#295	Post #295 was unavailable or deleted.
LinkPizza 11/04/19 8:15:25 PM #296:	AwesomeToTheMAX posted... Imagine telling someone their mother has less worth than a baby... While calling other people sociopaths. Unironically And a random baby, at that... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:929674267] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>AwesomeToTheMAX posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine telling someone their mother has less worth than a baby... While calling other people sociopaths. Unironically</quote> And a random baby, at that...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 11/04/19 8:22:00 PM #297:	Imagine if someone said your mother was in a burning building, but I decided to save a schnauzer. --- Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand. Sampson, Terrordactyl PSN: DarkHoosier <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:929674585] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>Imagine if someone said your mother was in a burning building, but I decided to save a schnauzer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz 11/04/19 8:23:39 PM #298:	mustachedmystic posted... Imagine if someone said your mother was in a burning building, but I decided to save a schnauzer. as someone who really loves his pets, I would understand. --- FFXIV: Lucius Hexenseele (Brynhildr) \| RS3: UltimaSuende . 99 WC/Fish/Cook/Fletch/Div/Mining/Smithing/Thieving, 80 crafting <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:929674676] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>mustachedmystic posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine if someone said your mother was in a burning building, but I decided to save a schnauzer.</quote> as someone who really loves his pets, I would understand.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01 11/04/19 8:25:28 PM #299:	mustachedmystic posted... Imagine if someone said your mother was in a burning building, but I decided to save a schnauzer. That would be a weirdly antagonistic thing to just say to someone. <cite>Dragonblade01 posted [p:929674768] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>mustachedmystic posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine if someone said your mother was in a burning building, but I decided to save a schnauzer.</quote> That would be a weirdly antagonistic thing to just say to someone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Justin2Krelian 11/04/19 8:27:31 PM #300:	KillerKhan420 posted... When I run into someone who equates their fucking pet into a child I roll my eyes. It's not comparable in the slightest. Some people are just nuts, you gotta just ignore them. This, and I think pets can be great. I actually have fish, and I know they're no comparison to dogs/cats, just like dogs and cats are no comparison to kids. --- -J2K "And who are you? The proud Lord Zedd!" <cite>Justin2Krelian posted [p:929674879] in I absolute... [t:78120178]...</cite> <quote>KillerKhan420 posted... </cite> <quote>When I run into someone who equates their fucking pet into a child I roll my eyes. It's not comparable in the slightest. Some people are just nuts, you gotta just ignore them.</quote> This, and I think pets can be great. I actually have fish, and I know they're no comparison to dogs/cats, just like dogs and cats are no comparison to kids. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Current Events > I absolutely HATE the pet worshipping culture (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > I absolutely HATE the pet worshipping culture