Current Events > Hey Mal_Fet, remember our conversation Trump on Roy Moore?

(+) Yeah! (+)

But yeah, I didn't think this topic could get funnier than him just flat out ignoring it, but instead he does.... this. lol
---

Mal_Fet posted...

was probably forged

Claims Roy Moore's lawyer.
---

NinjaWarrior455 posted...

Clown_Fet

Dork_Fet
---

Really? The defense is that someone forged a politician's signature in a yaerbook?
---

trump cultists and neo nazis on this board act like hillary runs a pedo ring in her basement with no evidence other than some virgins on 4chan, but defend a republican from raping a 14 year old girl

too rich
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Yes he should, if the allegations are true

And what would have to happen for you to believe them?
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Moore's signature was probably forged; a different pen was used to write the name than the rest of what was written and they refuse to submit the yearbook for forensic testing. This is Gloria Allred we're talking about.

None of this is evidence nor does it discredit the half dozen other women who have accused Moore.

Just admit it, nothing will be good enough because it's party above all for you types
---

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Yes he should, if the allegations are true

And what would have to happen for you to believe them?

Him switching to become a democrat.
---

Apparently a photo of AL Franken hovering over a woman is more damning proof of his impropriety than Drumpf bragging on tape about how easy it is for him to sexually assault women. What a time to be alive.
---

This topic explains why nobody takes Mal seriously in his topic about having a live debate.
---

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Yes he should, if the allegations are true

And what would have to happen for you to believe them?

Photographic evidence, for example
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Photographic evidence, for example

What percent of sexual assault cases have photographic evidence of the assault happening?
---

davyheinz posted...

This topic explains why nobody takes Mal seriously in his topic about having a live debate.

Mal "I'm totally not a republican or a trump supporter, i don't even like them but i 100% support everything they do and will protect them at all costs even though I'm totally a libertarian or something" Fet
---

A_Good_Boy posted...

bragging on tape about how easy it is for him to sexually assault women

Lol. People still have a hard time understanding what sexual assault is.

It's certainly not assault when they let you do it.
---

Capn Circus posted...

A_Good_Boy posted...

bragging on tape about how easy it is for him to sexually assault women

Lol. People still have a hard time understanding what sexual assault is.

It's certainly not assault when they let you do it.

Well fuck, we got the good word of a known serial liar telling us they let him do it. Good enough for me!
---

CrimsonRage posted...

Can't strawman your way outta arguments in person as easily as you can online.

Have you seen presidential debates?
---

Capn Circus posted...

A_Good_Boy posted...

bragging on tape about how easy it is for him to sexually assault women

Lol. People still have a hard time understanding what sexual assault is.

It's certainly not assault when they let you do it.

This is just flat out not true
---

pinky0926 posted...

Moore has been banned from malls for his behaviour.

Franken has a photo against him showing him not touching a woman.

Did you just pretend to read the story? Because the mall fiasco was was just another allegation, the journalist even said in the middle of the fucking article that he couldn't find evidence, and the idea that some rent-a-cop would even remember someone they busted after almost 40 years is ridiculous.

Also, Al (grab 'em while they're unconscious) Franken admitted to doing it and claimed "It's just a prank bro"
---

Conservatives on CE: "That LIBERAL DEFINITELY runs a secret undergound sex ring under a pizza parlor...i don't need proof its just so obvious"

Also those same conservatives: "that conservative just got hit with ALLEGATIONS...JUST ALLEGATIONS..How do you know it REALLY happened!"
---

TheVipaGTS posted...

Conservatives on CE: "That LIBERAL DEFINITELY runs a secret undergound sex ring under a pizza parlor...i don't need proof its just so obvious"

Also those same conservatives: "that conservative just got hit with ALLEGATIONS...JUST ALLEGATIONS..How do you know it REALLY happened!"

nothing but fake allegations from the WASHINGTON DEEP STATE ELITE scared that ROY MOORE FROM ALA BAMA is going to washington to help drain the swamp
---

CrimsonRage posted...

Anteaterking posted...

CrimsonRage posted...

Can't strawman your way outta arguments in person as easily as you can online.

Have you seen presidential debates?

They're usually called out by their opponents or moderators when they do and if they double down, they tend to look terrible which costs them points in the debate.

At least that's how it's supposed to work. >_>

But we're talking about a CE moderator for a crowd of CE people who probably already have an opinion on who is right or wrong.

And in addition Mal would probably use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop (thanks to @Balrog0 for the expression).
---

TheVipaGTS posted...

Conservatives on CE: "That LIBERAL DEFINITELY runs a secret undergound sex ring under a pizza parlor...i don't need proof its just so obvious"

Also those same conservatives: "that conservative just got hit with ALLEGATIONS...JUST ALLEGATIONS..How do you know it REALLY happened!"

You'd have to be a fool not to believe in a secret underground pedophile sex ring. Trump bragging on tape about how awesome it is to sexual assault women is just fake news though.
---

Capn Circus posted...

It's certainly not assault when they let you do it.

"I don't even wait, I just start kissing them"

Sounds like Trump and Franken have something in common after all
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Photographic evidence, for example

Okay, and if that evidence is not available? Or is that simply the only thing you'd believe?
---

Capn Circus posted...

Lol. People still have a hard time understanding what sexual assault is.

It's certainly not assault when they let you do it.

lmao, that's some excellent shitposting
---

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Photographic evidence, for example

Okay, and if that evidence is not available? Or is that simply the only thing you'd believe?

How about anything more solid than he said/she said?

Not even the mall ban has proof of being real

Also



Different pen used to write the signature. And if this really were written the year Allred claims it was, Moore was not the D. A. at the time. Weird that he would give the wrong title to his own job, huh?

You really gotta scrutinize everything Gloria Allred says. She lies like crazy.
---

Tropicalwood posted...

Also, Al (grab 'em while they're unconscious) Franken admitted to doing it and claimed "It's just a prank bro"

He also said that just because it was a joke does not mean it was okay, and that his intentions at the time are not relevant to how damaging his actions were
---

Mal_Fet posted...

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Photographic evidence, for example

Okay, and if that evidence is not available? Or is that simply the only thing you'd believe?

How about anything more solid than he said/she said?

Not even the mall ban has proof of being real

Also



Different pen used to write the signature. And if this really were written the year Allred claims it was, Moore was not the D. A. at the time. Weird that he would give the wrong title to his own job, huh?

You really gotta scrutinize everything Gloria Allred says. She lies like crazy.

Why is the writing in different colors in your picture when the LA Times has all the writing in black?
---

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.
---

eston posted...

Tropicalwood posted...

Also, Al (grab 'em while they're unconscious) Franken admitted to doing it and claimed "It's just a prank bro"

He also said that just because it was a joke does not mean it was okay, and that his intentions at the time are not relevant to how damaging his actions were

He also recommended that the senate open an ethics investigation into him.

Sounds to me like he knows how to correctly handle a situation and not come off like a scumbag while doing so

Also, this topic is better than Mals 9/11 flop
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.

https://www.metabunk.org/explained-roy-moore-two-color-yearbook-signature-depth-of-field-chromatic-aberration.t9253/

According to this article, the color change actually bleeds in and isn't actually as abrupt as your picture makes it seem. The author of the article was also able to duplicate the same color change with a black pen on white paper and says the color change is actually an artifact of depth of field.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.

Lolol, just like proof positive Obama's birth certificate was a fake. You guys are a fucking joke.
---

This can be summed up simply:

Frankenstien admits it and there's an inappropriate photo.

Moore doesn't admit it and there is no definite proof. He hasn't been convicted of anything.

At this point in time, the two cases as they stand are different.
---

CableZL posted...

According to this article, the color change actually bleeds in and isn't actually as abrupt as your picture makes it seem. The author of the article was also able to duplicate the same color change with a black pen on white paper and says the color change is actually an artifact of depth of field.

Good link and breaking down the "color change/different ink!" that's being alleged by all the morons out there. Unfortunately I doubt Mal will believe it or give it any legitimacy because he's already got the narrative set in his mind.
---

Giant_Aspirin posted...

it's times like these when i like to remind everyone that, according to Mal_Fet himself, he is not a Trump supporter. just let that sink in.

Yeah he's a "classically trained libertarian"
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Being banned from a mall once isn't as bad as a photo of you about to grope a sleeping femal

Mal_Fet the mental gymnast
---

CableZL posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.

https://www.metabunk.org/explained-roy-moore-two-color-yearbook-signature-depth-of-field-chromatic-aberration.t9253/

According to this article, the color change actually bleeds in and isn't actually as abrupt as your picture makes it seem. The author of the article was also able to duplicate the same color change with a black pen on white paper and says the color change is actually an artifact of depth of field.

This is an actual possibility.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.

"the ink used was written with during a full moon at a 90 degree angle and if you flip the paper horizontally you can see that the end of that message was written during a half moon at a 45 degree angle. clearly two different pens"
---

TheVipaGTS posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.

"the ink used was written with during a full moon at a 90 degree angle and if you flip the paper horizontally you can see that the end of that message was written during a half moon at a 45 degree angle. clearly two different pens"

See, making bizzare exaggerations like that doesn't change how simply holding the page at an angle proves the ink is different.

Also how the forger for Moore's job title wrong.

If you don't have an argument, just stop posting. It's more dignified.
---

Meanwhile Trump has literally admitted to-no, bragged about sexually assaulting women.
---

TheVipaGTS posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

Look at the image in the LA Times again. The ink reflects differently in the light when you hold it at an angle as opposed to looking at it head-on. Proof positive the brand of ink on the signature is different.

"the ink used was written with during a full moon at a 90 degree angle and if you flip the paper horizontally you can see that the end of that message was written during a half moon at a 45 degree angle. clearly two different pens"

I really love the thought process these people have to have. Like, I mean, REALLY think about it. These people are devious enough to get someone with such impeccable mimicry skills that they can masterfully recreate Roy Moore's handwriting.... but they just said fuck it, blue is all we got, getting a black pen is way too difficult a task.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

See, making bizzare exaggerations like that doesn't change how simply holding the page at an angle proves the ink is different.

Also how the forger for Moore's job title wrong.

If you don't have an argument, just stop posting. It's more dignified.

Holding the page at an angle doesn't prove the ink is different, though. As the article I posted states, the color change is an artifact of depth of field. It also shows that the color change isn't as abrupt as you're trying to say it is. The color change was duplicated with a black pen on white paper. What are your thoughts on that?
---

CableZL posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

See, making bizzare exaggerations like that doesn't change how simply holding the page at an angle proves the ink is different.

Also how the forger for Moore's job title wrong.

If you don't have an argument, just stop posting. It's more dignified.

Holding the page at an angle doesn't prove the ink is different, though. As the article I posted states, the color change is an artifact of depth of field. It also shows that the color change isn't as abrupt as you're trying to say it is. The color change was duplicated with a black pen on white paper. What are your thoughts on that?

His thoughts are likely that he isn't going to respond.
---

CableZL posted...

Mal_Fet posted...

See, making bizzare exaggerations like that doesn't change how simply holding the page at an angle proves the ink is different.

Also how the forger for Moore's job title wrong.

If you don't have an argument, just stop posting. It's more dignified.

Holding the page at an angle doesn't prove the ink is different, though. As the article I posted states, the color change is an artifact of depth of field. It also shows that the color change isn't as abrupt as you're trying to say it is. The color change was duplicated with a black pen on white paper. What are your thoughts on that?

Missed that article, guess the color isn't proof then

I think its still suspicious that Moore would get his own job title wrong in his signature. What are your thoughts on that?
---

Mal_Fet posted...

Missed that article, guess the color isn't proof then

I think its still suspicious that Moore would get his own job title wrong in his signature. What are your thoughts on that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Moore



He was an assistant district attorney, which would be A.D.A, which is strange indeed.

However... His attorney's claim:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/roy-moore-rape-accusers-yearbook-might-be-fake

He then claimed that Moore never used to sign D.A. after his name when he was a district attorney. Instead, Jauregui alleged, when he was on the bench, his assistant, whose initials are D.A., Deborah Adams, would stamp his signature on documents and put capital D.A.

His assistant wouldn't be stamping D.A. next to his signature, nor would she even have a stamp that has D.A. after his signature, without his approval in the first place.

So are we to believe his assistant was somehow stamping his signature improperly (such stamps have to be specifically custom ordered) on tons of documents without Roy Moore's knowledge?
---

Heineken14 posted...

Lolol, just like proof positive Obama's birth certificate was a fake

i wonder if Mal still makes that assertion.
---

Mal_Fet posted...

I think its still suspicious that Moore would get his own job title wrong in his signature. What are your thoughts on that?

Not really, especially if he was trying to present himself as more important than he was and as a subtle intimidation tactic reminding the victim of his power in the town.

But whatever, we both know you'll always believe Moore over any of his victims regardless of the "proof" they have.
---