Lurker > darkphoenix181

Caelthus posted...

FireMageTheJust posted...

Caelthus posted...

FireMageTheJust posted...

Stay Weights by Job:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ffxiv/comments/88pc5o/stat_weights_for_all_jobs_as_of_patch_425/

Wow, so much inaccuracies in that reddit post

Seriously. SkS barely behind DH for Paladin? What?
So,looking at the comments....yeah....look at when it was posted.

Even for the previous gear tier it's way off

Again, look at the date it was posted.
It was an april fool's joke.

lol baited
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

DEKMStephens posted...

anybody tried glam farming alex savage since SB came out? wondering how irritating it is because I kinda wanna get those glam sets at some point

Ye, it not bad if you know what you doing. Problem is getting pf to fill.

You will want a sch since you usually don'get lb3 in time now. Good thing is he should die before crystal phase.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

This one is good and kinda related and needs more views so:


---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Esrac posted...

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

I'm not going to watch that this second but it really shouldn't be that difficult to see that other people have legitimate complaints about how society functions.
Recognizing disadvantages that males have doesn't hurt the legitimacy of female issues.

I think its Cassie Jay. She was a feminist who made a documentary about men's rights activism and was pretty heavily villified by feminist protesters who attacked the movie for any manner of invented reasons.

If I recall, she no longer identifies as a feminist. Not that they would have her after she made a movie that was sympathetic to MRAs.

Yea. Her documentary is called The Red Pill.

At the end she says she no longer considers herself a feminist though she still ofc believes in advancing women's rights, but she also thinks men's rights should be considered.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

"When you start to humanize your enemy, you may be dehumanized by your community."

Powerful words.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

What if I have a gun to protect myself from knives and fists tc?

what then hmm?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Resident Burger

the Umbrella Corp has gone too far!

Alice save us!
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Zikten posted...

I wonder what the baby will think when it finds it's mom's sex pics someday

mom, teach me how to dougie
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

SSJ2GrimReaper posted...

To be fair, TLJ did all the characters dirty except maybe Kylo Ren, you can tell Rian Johnson had a hard-on for Kylo in TLJ.

fair point

even Luke and Yoda

like how do you mess those two up? wow
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

BWLurker posted...

Fine, disagreements aside, can we agree

1.Obama didn't deserve his prize
2. As of yet, Trump doesn't deserve one
3. These particular (arguably cherry picked) students are nitwits
4. Trump supporters clamoring that he deserves one essentially want Trump to win a participation trophy

?

agree
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

TheVipaGTS posted...

uuhhh, NK has already gone against our "agreement" and said they won't denuclearize....

So now it is important to see how he deals with a broken agreement.

Like I said above, bringing a person to the table to sign an agreement is still doing that thing.

If a real estate agent gets you to agree to buy a house and work with a loan company, and you stop paying the monthly payment, do we take away that sale from that agent? Do we take away the commission they got for getting you to agree?

no, no we don't
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

agreed

his role in TLJ was pretty bad

they could have done more with him

and it would been cool if he had a lightsaber and was able to use it even without the force

missed opportunity there

I mean, couldn't Boba Fett use a saber without force sensitivity?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

BWLurker posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

you defend the young people in the video who believe Obama deserved the award without any reason to explain why.

So now who's not reading who's posts?

I admitted I jumped to conclusions on you, can you do the same?

read my edit

still, jumping to conclusions is not the same as literally not reading something clearly stated.

Does Trump deserve to win the peace prize? Probably not.

I did indeed jump to a conclusion based on what was not in your post and the tone your were taking. You edited the post to clear some things and I edited mine too.

Nevertheless, I did jump to conclusion which I shouldn't have done.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

dreamvoid posted...

how is calling sk the little guy belittling? compared to the us, they are the little guy.

You saying Americans are tall and South Koreans are short?

gasp
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

BWLurker posted...

Would it make you agree with me more if I said I don't believe Obama deserved one?

I would say you are being consistent and critically thinking as per this one point as I said of that one guy in the video who said the same thing.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

BWLurker posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

Perhaps NK will relapse into what they were before. That doesn't mean that Kim didn't agree and sign an agreement which was an accomplishment.

What's the value of an agreement that won't be honored? Can you even call such a thing an "agreement"? I thought Trump supporters were against participation trophies.

You realize the irony here, right? You want Trump awarded a literal participation trophy. One of the rights biggest sources of contention with millennials.

Do you Trump supporters possess any self awareness?

The real irony is these statements you just made:

1. You want Trump awarded a literal participation trophy.

So you didn't read the OP, nice.

2. Can you even call such a thing an "agreement"?

Do you somehow think a real agreement cannot be broken? Like when you get a loan for a car, that it is not an agreement if you fail to pay it?

3. One of the rights biggest sources of contention with millennials.

? We are all millennials here bro. Or are you 13?

4. Do you Trump supporters possess any self awareness?

Might try asking them. I on the other hand possess the self-awareness to destroy each of your low effort strawmans as such.
But it is also ironic that you defend the young people in the video who believe Obama deserved the award without any reason to explain why.

edit: so I see you don't think Obama deserved it, what then do you think of these youngster saying he did when they have no reason why? Curious if you defend them or not as I thought you were.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Axiom posted...

BWLurker posted...

Imagine STILL being on the "Trump deserves a peace prize" crazy train.

Just a week after their "historic meeting", Trump is calling for additional sanctions and satellite footage shows NK reinforcing their nuclear sites.

Lmao for real. Dude starts a trade war that even republicans don't want and achieved jack shit from the meeting but he still deserves a peace prize cause *Insert delusional trump supporter reason here*

To be fair, I said in my OP that he doesn't deserve the prize but rather that compared to Obama he would deserve it a whole lot more. But that is only because we know why Obama won was because Europe wanted to kiss his butt. So that is not a high standard.

The one who said Trump deserved the prize rather was South Korean President Moon Jae-in.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

BWLurker posted...

Imagine STILL being on the "Trump deserves a peace prize" crazy train.

Just a week after their "historic meeting", Trump is calling for additional sanctions and satellite footage shows NK reinforcing their nuclear sites.

Perhaps NK will relapse into what they were before. That doesn't mean that Kim didn't agree and sign an agreement which was an accomplishment.

You know, it is kinda funny how this goes.
First it is "Trump did nothing and cannot claim any credit!"

And now it will be "oh it didn't work! That is because of Trump! 100% he didn't do things right!"

You can't have it both ways.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

dreamvoid posted...

when you're the little guy in the sandbox, you do everything you can to appease the bully and hope he doesn't blow things up.

So your response is to belittle South Korean's president?

Very classy.

This mindset of lashing out when facts disprove your distorted and biased view is not healthy. One day you will look back on your life and regret these years. Until then, carry on.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Ivanka is pretty fine but she is happily married.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Rimmer_Dall posted...

The one who first said Trump should get a peace prize was the president of South Korea.

Oh. I didn't know that.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-southkorea-trump/south-korea-president-says-trump-deserves-nobel-peace-prize-idUSKBN1I10OD

SEOUL (Reuters) - South Korean President Moon Jae-in said U.S. President Donald Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to end the standoff with North Korea over its nuclear weapons program, a South Korean official said on Monday.

President Trump should win the Nobel Peace Prize. What we need is only peace, Moon told a meeting of senior secretaries, according to a presidential Blue House official who briefed media.

Wow.

Wait a second, @dreamvoid said Trump was DETRIMENTAL and erratic.
Why would Moon Jae-in want someone like that to have this honor?


---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

some important highlights

Donald Trump was elected US President in 2016 with a position of opposition to Barack Obama's policy of "strategic patience" towards North Korea. While advocating a tough stance, he also expressed openness to dialogue, saying he would be prepared to "eat a hamburger" with Kim. He put himself at odds with military allies, saying that it would be better if South Korea and Japan protect themselves. In return, a pro-North Korean website, DPRK Today, described him as a "wise politician".[9] The editorial suggested that Trump might make the slogan "Yankee go home" a reality.[10] In 2017, Moon Jae-in was elected President of South Korea with a promise to return to the Sunshine Policy of friendly relations with the North.[11]

On the 10 of May, three Americans held by the North Korean regime were released following the advanced negotiations between the Trump administration and the North Korean regime and immense pressure by the Trump administration for their release. Some have speculated that their release was part of an attempt of the regime to motivate the US to continue the negotiations and perhaps ease the pressure upon the North Koreans. Nevertheless, their release has managed to ease the tensions between the Trump administration and the North Korean regime, enabling both sides to proceed to further negotiations, possibly leading to the 2018 North KoreaUnited States summit.

Subsequently, Trump and Kim signed a joint statement, titled "Joint Statement of President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America and Chairman Kim Jong-un of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea at the Singapore Summit", which Trump described as a "very important" and "comprehensive" agreement.[163]

The document said:[164]

President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong Un state the following:

The United States and the DPRK commit to establish new U.S.-DPRK relations in accordance with the desire of the peoples of the two countries for peace and prosperity.
The United States and the DPRK will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula.
Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work towards the complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
The United States and the DPRK commit to recovering POW/MIA remains including the immediate repatriation of those already identified.

In addition to the numbered provisions, the joint statement also mentions Trump's commitment to providing security guarantees to North Korea. Follow-up negotiations between Pompeo and an undetermined high-level North Korean official are also called for by the joint statement.[163]

---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

dreamvoid posted...

what i make of that is south korea moving to engage north korea despite the erratic and detrimental behavior of trump. the only thing he might have gotten credit for is the denuclearization, which as everyone knew would never happen.

So why involve Trump at all if he was not only not needed for anything but infact detrimental as you claim?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_North_Korea%E2%80%93United_States_summit

U.S. President Donald Trump met with North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un on June 12, 2018, in Singapore, in the first summit meeting between the leaders of the United States of America and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea). They signed a joint statement, agreeing to security guarantees for North Korea, new peaceful relations, reaffirmation of the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, recovery of soldiers' remains, and follow-up negotiations between high-level officials. Immediately following the summit, Trump announced that the US would discontinue "provocative" joint military exercises with South Korea and would "eventually" withdraw troops stationed there.[2][3]

Hmmm
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Crepes posted...

Do you think people would look back to the end of the 2010's and say:

"the warning signs were there, why didn't they so anything?".

No because you wouldn't be free to say that without facing a firing squad under fascism or socialism or any such forms.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

iPhone_7 posted...

Another one of those asking random people on the street videos, el oh el

Trump actually helped foster peace between two foreign nations

El oh el

You didn't know he went to North Korea and met with Kim and had a summit?

@dreamvoid posted...

what peace are you referring to? nothing was accomplished with north korea and they are still operating their nuclear facilities. in fact, his diplomatic policy has made enemies of our own allies.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/12/south-korea-increases-engagement-with-north-korea.html

One month since the U.S-North Korea summit, skepticism about Kim Jong Un's commitment to denuclearization still hangs over Washington. But in South Korea, the mood is overwhelmingly optimistic as President Moon Jae-in's government pushes for improved ties with its nuclear-armed neighbor.

From sports diplomacy to corporate ventures, Seoul is pulling out all the stops to re-engage Pyongyang as it builds on the positive momentum sparked by April's inter-Korean summit.

Major conglomerates such as Lotte, Hyundai, Hyosung and KT have announced task forces dedicated to exploring inter-Korean ventures. Meanwhile, a group of South Korean businessmen who operated factories at the defunct Kaesong joint industrial complex in North Korea are seeking government approval to visit in hopes of resuming operations.

Pyongyang and Seoul also agreed last month to jointly improve North Koreas railways and potentially connect them with the South's. Moreover, the two nations pledged to form joint sports teams for the upcoming Asian Games and recently played a series of friendly basketball matches with one another.

What do you make of this hmm?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

UnfairRepresent posted...

Students also state they would rather date Ms-13 gang members than Trump supporters

Young girls do find gangsters sexy though before they grow maturity.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

I mean, if they were consistent it might make sense. But it appears they aren't critically thinking.
Does Trump deserve to win the peace prize? Probably not. But did Obama deserve? nope. That one guy at least said this, he must be a critical thinker.
Trump actually helped foster peace between two foreign nations no matter your views on this or how much you think he was involved, this is literally fact. So he at least has that.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

boxington posted...

what if I hold the door open for everyone?

cuck to the world?

do you want to be identified as cuck of the world? if so then maybe
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

What if the door is actually a zipper tc?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Chicken posted...

Imagine getting offended on behalf of a dead person. They dont care and neither should you.

Mummies can curse you dude.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

boxington posted...

if you know what they identified as, then yea.

if not, then there's not much you can do.

Interesting.

What if we found a secret journal written by Mark Twain revealing he identified a woman.

Do you think we should edit works written about her before this revelation to reflect this and any discussion involving them? Or would it be ok to not do any changes?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

0AbsoluteZero0 posted...

Remember that time you posted an Onion article as fact? That was funny

You can't identify something I posted as being a fact to me that I haven't identified as a fact. And yet you try to do so.

I am quite offended.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Kinda funny how we dig up mummies and the doctor looks at their bone structure and determines that it was a woman. I wonder if this has caused the mummies curse.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Rad_Chad posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

Will it be legal to be a Chad in 50 years?

Incel's are more likely to conform to being cucked then Chads so they will probably not be illegal.

nobody is going to fuck a true incel. sorry. they are too toxic so its chads or extinction i think going forward. besides all that bullshit sjw bullshit is on its way out... they are eating each other alive over dumb stupid things while chads are just fiving high and lowing down.

In 50 years babies could be born from banks in intricate laboratories allowing cucks to enjoy getting cucked by more than just other men.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

it's treason then
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Will it be legal to be a Chad in 50 years?

Incel's are more likely to conform to being cucked then Chads so they will probably not be illegal.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Alucard188 posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

the dark haired lady on his right is probably his mom

she kinda looks like Charisma Carpenter

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/09/04/article-2742936-2108B0C700000578-688_634x698.jpg

infact, her son is 15!

That kid looks like he will straight up murder someone for looking at him the wrong way.

I mean, he has probably been trained by Angel to hunt vampires so...
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

ExtremeLuchador posted...

How come the feds never went after Urkel?

Bruce Urkel would have destroyed them.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

_OujiDoza_ posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

pretty sure the player is in her 20s and the "chad" is like a 15 year old dude

Ball girls most of the time are teenagers.

I wasn't basing that she is in her 20s based on an average, but that she actually looks like she is in her 20s.

For ex:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/8/7242/7317818212_5f91d32f22_b.jpg

How old is this woman iyo?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

the dark haired lady on his right is probably his mom

she kinda looks like Charisma Carpenter

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/09/04/article-2742936-2108B0C700000578-688_634x698.jpg

infact, her son is 15!
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

pretty sure the player is in her 20s and the "chad" is like a 15 year old dude
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

I am captain basch fon rosenberg of dalmasca
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-44644127/doki-doki-warnings-over-suicide-themed-video-game

http://www.theweek.co.uk/94588/what-is-doki-doki-literature-club-and-was-it-linked-to-boy-s-suicide

Police and a coroner have also urged parents to be vigilant amid growing concerns about the free-to-play game, which officials describe as a risk to children and young people, says the Manchester Evening News.

Players read the games story and are then prompted to create their own endings. Darren Walmsley, whose son Ben killed himself in February after playing the game, believes this feature played a part in his sons death.

It starts as a dating simulation before one of the girls dies, reports The Times. Other unsettling events then take place, including characters who self-harm or kill themselves, adds the paper.

Characters suggest things and you decide what to do. It drags you in and they make it very real. Ben did not speak about it, but parents need to be aware of this game and other similar games, said Walmsley, from Bury.

It is free to download but once you get into it, it will not leave you alone. The characters befriend and love you and give you tasks to do but if you do not do them, they turn nasty.

Is it linked to suicide?

Although there is no evidence to suggest the game is directly linked to Ben Walmsleys death, schools and councils have been alerted by the Manchester Coroners Office, which is investigating his death. Awareness messages are also being shared on Facebook.

The warning, signed by the senior coroner for North Manchester, says: I believe the information is so concerning that this warrants my writing at this stage to make the local authorities aware of the issue so appropriate information can be disseminated.

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/doki-literature-club-coroner-warning-14830749

Bens school, Philips High in Whitefield, posted online: A concern has recently been brought to our attention by HM Senior Coroner regarding the use by young people of the online game Doki Doki, also known as Doki Doki Literature Club.

A concern has been expressed that the game may trigger suicidal thoughts in young people who may be emotionally vulnerable.

Please monitor and check your childs internet use regularly and be mindful of the time spent.

What do you think?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

dameon_reaper posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

Actually, I recall the civil rights movement being famous for non-violet protest? I don't recall civil rights coming from using hate against those in power. If you believe it did, please inform me.

Lol, I didn't suggest that at all. I questioned why does any side have to feel obligated to try and sway a racist's ways? I asked what did anyone of those people did to deserve it? For asking for rights? How dare they? That's sarcasm.

Is boogie a racist?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

But anyways, we are getting off track.

Boogie is not a nazi is he?

Boogie is not a KKK member is he?

He is just a centrist who shared his opinion.

We went to the extremes when that isn't even the point of the thread.
It wasn't even to get along with some KKK guy, but to not tell a guy like Boogie to die because he shared an opinion that disagrees.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

dameon_reaper posted...

but don't I don't agree that she should feel obligated.

good, because I literally said that she shouldn't be obligated

the difference is I have been arguing that she is obligated to not be like the people BEATING him with signs

darkphoenix181 posted...

all that was said was that hate doesn't stop hate

hate does indeed make MORE hate however

Now, you tried to handwave the argument away saying I just can't get it.

But that is fine. You cannot argue Keisha Thomas didn't get it.

And what did SHE SAY?

QUOTE:

"You can't beat goodness into a person"

dameon_reaper posted...

Also, this "treat people how you want to be treated" s*** would work alright...if years and years ago, black men weren't being hanged for their mistreatment of white people...how dare they want rights.

Like I said "side of the fence". I don't necessarily disagree with people going out of their way to try and pull people off that side of racism but I don't think anyone should ever feel obligated to do that when it involves this discussion of racism.

I mean, why can't the racists try and befriends people that they're racist against? Why can't they do it? What's wrong with them? They sick?

Actually, I recall the civil rights movement being famous for non-violet protest? I don't recall civil rights coming from using hate against those in power. If you believe it did, please inform me.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

@dameon_reaper

https://imgur.com/3h6xY0a

How does this photo make you feel?

This black woman was protesting this KKK man. Then the mob tried to kill him.

So she PROTECTED him.

Now, she didn't have to do this. It wasn't her responsibility.
But she glorified the human ideal by doing so. She has gained respect and visibility as a great human.
Why? Because she could put aside her hate (actually she probably had none) and protect her enemy. That takes a strong spirit and a mind that has compassion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keshia_Thomas

In June 1996 a branch of the Ku Klux Klan announced plans to hold a rally in Ann Arbor, Michigan.[3] Several people in the Ann Arbor area planned to hold a protest against the Ku Klux Klan's presence on the day of the rally. Thomas was one of several people that attended and protested from an area that had been fenced and set aside for the protesters.[4]

The protest proceeded until one protester announced over a megaphone that there was "a Klansman in the crowd".[4] The unnamed man was a middle-aged white male wearing a T-shirt depicting the Confederate flag and an "SS tattoo".[5] The man began to run but was knocked down, kicked, and beaten with placards.[5]

Thomas, who was at that time 18 years old, shielded the man from the crowd and shouted for the attackers to stop and is credited as saying that you "can't beat goodness into a person".[6] Shortly after that point the police arrived on the scene.[7]

A news report stated that seven anti-Klansmen protesters were arrested at the event and a large group of protesters were tear gassed after they attempted to enter the police station where fifteen Klansmen were being kept for their safety.[7] The police later reported that the man was not a Klan member.[8]

The golden rule:

treat others how you want to be treated

it is not

treat others how they have treated you to gain vengeance and feel self-pride
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

dameon_reaper posted...

darkphoenix181 posted...

Balnazarr posted...

Why should I get along with people who hate me because of my skin color?

How would you convince people that it is wrong to hate people because of skin color?

You do know there is literally grand wizards who renounced their ideals because a black guy befriended them and showed them through not hating them the error of their ways.

So basically...black people have that new job of turning racists down that straight path?

Bruh, you righties.

nobody said that

all that was said was that hate doesn't stop hate

hate does indeed make MORE hate however

and then a guy like boogie doesn't hate anyone and is treated with hate

understand?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful

Balnazarr posted...

Why should I get along with people who hate me because of my skin color?

How would you convince people that it is wrong to hate people because of skin color?

You do know there is literally grand wizards who renounced their ideals because a black guy befriended them and showed them through not hating them the error of their ways.
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful