Lurker > Nemu

This movie or a future sequel desperately needs like a two minute gag where Sonic gets morphed to look like the original version, causing everyone to freak out at his ugliness.

Is there any particular data that actually shows them to be that dangerous under neutral conditions or is it just the tough dog image has resulted in them being owned by a higher than normal frequency of shitty people who don't train or control their dogs?

Unless they're going to ban its import whatsoever, not like they can't just make their own. That'd probably cut out a lot of smoking if people actually had to buy and roll their own instead of being easily available.

Yeah, its a job like any other. There are the lucky few who make big bucks with relatively no work. There are the lucky few who make big bucks with a ton of hard work. And then theres everyone else putting in their hours the same as anyone else

Considering these worlds have tolerance for random people looting homes, they seemingly don't really care that much about personal security.

There's no reason why someone shouldn't be able to amass that much wealth, but the system being so broken that it can be easily exploited is a problem and there there's obvious issues with Amazon's treatment of employees.

It didn't really do enough to endear the side characters to the viewer, but I'd definitely say top three.

VipaGTS posted...

Im not gonna read the article or argue with people about what is racist or not.

if children are struggling at a higher rate (even if it happens to primarily affect one race of student), its the schools responsibility to help them and possibly change curriculum to help those students. Thats the entire point. The fact that that sort of consideration is met with push back and debate is absolutely absurd.

The question would be if the entire curriculum needs to change or if we just need to better fund schools and pay teachers what they actually deserve so that kids get the education they need and teachers can have the resources to give more one on one time with both students that are excelling and students that are falling behind. I have a hard time imagining how a particular curriculum in itself is the problem when it's probably more that these kids are not getting the attention needed to help them understand on the same level as better funded schools.

Are there any specifics in there as to what exactly theyre proposing theyd be doing differently and why the current routines are specifically unproductive? Feels like some kind of feel good nonsense meant to ignore the fact that its probably shitty underfunded schools that are the main issue.

They're both peak jank, but I'd say 2 is the better one.

I honestly cannot remember most of it, but final boss was definitely good. Monster arena, I cannot remember what you even do there. Looking at the added dungeon on Youtube, that doesn't look particularly fun, so I don't know if I even bothered with it.

The trailer definitely makes that score look accurate. Even if the core plot isn't inherently trash, they're going way too heavy handed on their supposed messaging that it sounds a bad right-wing parody.

Kratos is about as consistent as your average comic book character, so fairly hard to gauge his actual strength. But there are plenty of characters way above even his highest range out there.

That has to be bait. Not super familiar with the character, but she looks to have been tits-out since the first game going by an image gallery. Seems like the definition of sexualized.

AceMos posted...

not usually no normally the person who made the claim gets it

and people who do not even own a property can make a claim

"Claimant" is the term for the person/entity who makes the claim that the content is under their copyright.

It's understandable that the system is going to be abused given its sheer size, but from my understanding the claimant gets the revenue until the strike is removed and there's no particular punishment in place for abusing the system. That's never made a lick of sense unless it has been changed in the last few years.

Biases against names and hairstyles happening definitely make sense. Stuff that doesn't fit certain "norms" is still seen as alien for some stupid reason. Doesn't look like there's a free way to view the study, so hard to say anything about the speech patterns without knowing exactly what they're associating.

Anything where you can slap a brand name on gold plated literal shit and people would still buy it.

Immortality without some kind of magical cloud memory backup would be pointless anyway considering you'd forget more then you ever knew after a certain point. Toss on eternal suffering in a extremely weak body relative to the conditions you'd be facing over billions of years, and that's just placing yourself in a literal eternal hell.

First one was great. Second one feels way worse as far as I played it, though I did drop it right at the camp during the prologue. Probably should give it more of a chance, but it just feels like such a slog and I'm not even into the proper gameplay loop yet.

Fuck that, should be a full boycott, bar anyone from competing, and reimburse them like 1.5x whatever they were expected to make from it.

Seems fairly hard to legally prove without having multiple parties being part of the lawsuit. If they don't have some definite proof, might be just hoping for a settlement offer from the firm just to avoid dragging it out for bad publicity.

Probably doesn't have one.

Curious if everything in the Mushroom Kingdom canonically works off of the life system so theyre all essentially immortal.

Basically its the same if they do any crossovers with the actual comic universes. Theyre all part of the wider Marvel multiverse but not part of the MCU.

Why would you ever wish charges on the parents of children who themselves are going through a tragedy unless it can be proven that there was gross negligence on their part or even outright encouragement of their child's insane actions such as it seems to be in this particularly unique case?

Public domain being based solely on age is kinda dumb in the first place. It was based on individual creators rather than corporate entities that can make proper use of their properties for longer. Usability should take precedence. If an entity can still make proper use of its property in a way that benefits people culturally, then it should basically just be an indefinite extension. Though there should be a regulatory body to weed out scams looking to put in minimal effort to capitalize on a property unfairly like rights-holders to movie rights do when they pump out a low effort schlock to keep them from expiring. On the flipside, if a company dies and nobody makes use of the purchased rights to a property, then it should go into the public domain more quickly.

VGAddict90 posted...

"You have to search for what you're looking for in YouTube videos".

I mean, you have to search for the thing you're looking for in GameFaqs guides too.

Ctrl+F is a lot easier than scanning through a four hour video hoping to find the right segment.

Creators who use copious time stamps or pair it with a partial text guide are the exception rather than the rule from what Ive seen.

For games that are still for sale, justifying it is kinda silly, but any game that is not legally for sale by the rights holder is morally fair game.

Barter by using actual assets relatively priced by local economic desirability.

It's about the same, high-highs and low-lows all the same.

Imagine being the one guy who actually rube goldberged his way into something like that and nobody will ever believe you.

PoundGarden posted...

I don't agree with that. I've been saying for well over a decade we need to start holding accountable whoever the gun is registered to or whoever allowed access to the gun used in a mass shooting. Start doing that and watch sales of gun safes/locks go up and shootings go down.

You'd have to be able to prove the person was being irresponsible with gun storage, which is going to be fairly hard. It's not like safes are unpickable or unbreakable either. If it can be clearly proven that the assailant had unrestricted access to the gun, then charges could be feasible depending on circumstances.

EmbraceOfDeath posted...

Imagine being a bootlicker and thinking police at schools is a good thing. It might deter students shooting other students, but now you've invited trigger happy psychopaths to the school.

We have a definite per capita problem with police, but please don't act as if police murdering civilians is actually likely to happen to anyone.

Normally, such a thing would seem like too much of a stretch in culpability, but these parents seem to be exceptionally shitty people so it might actually stick.

That assumes that this supposed job couldn't be done by anyone. There are cases where people go above and beyond just to get kicked in the teeth for their effort, but otherwise you're just a cog in the machine that can easily be replaced.

Pointless achievements like "do this one technique 7500 times despite it really not being particularly useful."
Multiplayer grindy achievements.
Inconsequential in-game rewards (literal golden pile of shit being the most apt example that will ever exist).
Poor balance between the main story and side things (like Ubisoft's one billion collectables).
Challenges are too niche like speedrunning or too pointlessly difficult like in-game no death challenges.

Dedicated text guides have better searchability than videos, and they, when comprehensive, usually will be better than the average wiki guide. Though that ultimately depends on comparative quality of both.

Only real blame would come if there was reason to call the police but they didnt in some stupid, bullheaded attempt to save face.

She was a rather boring character awkwardly shoved into everything. I still don't understand why you'd give the character whose only notable skill is driving a subplot about bows and arrows instead of "driving" a lion dog either.

The fuck is with these articles that just quote some random ass no-name on Twitter?

That they've built a rather complex system for a game but cater to playability for toddlers and offer no options at all to increase difficulty other than battling real people. It would be better if they went all the way and dumbed down absolutely everything to take away any appeal.

Sure. No downsides other than bruising assuming it's identical replica rather than a perfect version of myself.