Lurker > Corrik7

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9274907/Now-scientists-spot-variant-Finland-detects-new-strain.html

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Lots of great characters being drug as terrible here.


---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

Im admittedly veering this way off of the initial point since Im talking about places more anonymous and fleeting than B8, but what is the point of pretending to be someone youre not when there is no recognition or attention for it?

How you view attention and recognition can be very different than how another views it.

It's not very often you find basically an everything you see on the internet is true argument. Sorta.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

Why not? Obviously this is not exactly anonymous posting here since we have established relationships and histories together, even if we dont generally know real names. There are social consequences here that Ill admit require people to behave certain ways.

But when youre online interacting with people youve never met before and will never talk to again and there are no consequences to your behavior, thats when you reveal what youre truly like.

When people can't see who you truly are, you can act like the person you want to be seen as and actually aren't.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

Who we are online under relative anonymity is who we really are inside

Lol not even close.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

DoomTheGyarados posted...

Yeah but we aren't exactly random. Most of us have a better idea of who you are, for better or for worse, than many friends. Decade and a half now. We are old.

100% disagree actually. Many people act way differently behind a keyboard than they would in real life unfortunately. If this were all voice interaction, moreso yeah but not entirely. Behind keys on a keyboard... You might have some of the biggest piece of shits over here virtue signalling to the ends of the earth for all you know. Or the "biggest trolls who are terrible beings for disagreeing with my opinions" who are actually the most polite, understanding people in real life.

Not saying everyone here is fake. But, I think everyone isn't necessarily who we think they are either or what they are pegged as. It's sorta like facebook. How many dysfunctional relationships act like they are Landon and Jamie having the perfect relationship under God's divine influence as they can? How many are talking about how great their lives are then ODing on heroin 48 hours later. Granted, people do this in real life also. But, it's a lot easier online. And even easier behind keys on a keyboard.

I am wary. Especially at the most ardent of people who want to tell you how good of a person they are over and over.


---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

masterplum posted...

Wouldn't hang out is too strong. More like wouldn't go out of my way to track people down.

I mean, I hope not. You ain't gotta be a stalker to be someone's friend.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Plum trying to give people on B8 money but wouldn't ever hang out with any of them. Hmmm.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/i-will-not-make-happen-biden-declines-democrats-call-cancel-n1258069

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Dot dot dot

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Buffy

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red13n posted...

Don't think I'm being particularly dark here.

I said you are a dark person. Period. You don't consider yourself dark here because you are much darker regularly.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Red is a very dark person. Surprised you haven't realized that yet.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

KamikazePotato posted...

Man the topic hasn't smelt blood in the water to this degree in a while. Guess Corrik wasn't an exciting enough target anymore. This is fresh meat.

Difference is I am usually right in what I say so you guys have to collectively shitpost to different playing fields to try and turn the arguments to your preference. It requires some work.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red13n posted...

Also I want to point out that the 2000 election essentially was stolen. If votes were counted consistently across Florida(Either all hanging chads/etc counted or all thrown out), Gore would have won.

This is untrue. They have already agreed Bush won if all votes were counted.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

UshiromiyaEva posted...

As a black man he knows that said "society" is going to flip on him as soon as they start thinking he's "taking it too far".

And he's not wrong.

Love when ushi tells us how the person actually thinks when they talk. The minority can't mean what they say and actually mean what I as a White person say they mean. Lmfao

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

My dog ate my house


---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Machete posted...

It's corrik7. If he isn't playing or talking about forum mafia games, he has nothing of value to say.

O.o

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Conflict posted...

Sounds to me like you're crying about it right now

Nice try.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Help me pay off my house, Plum. God. Think of the children.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

I am sure a crybaby liberal or two has blocked me. Woe is me.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Host mafia and the winning team gets $100 a head. Let's see Town fuck that shit up.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Supposedly the rest of the season plot and storylines have leaked. Be careful.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red sox 777 posted...

I'm siding with Bill Clinton on this. Even if he did commit perjury, I don't think that is an impeachable offense unless the perjury had to do with his public duties. If he committed perjury about his private affairs, that doesn't rise to the level of an impeachable offense in my eyes.

The problem moreso for removal would be the obstruction of justice.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red sox 777 posted...

This is correct. The Senate is the highest court of impeachment. There is no appeal from its decisions. The Supreme Court does not have the authority to overrule the Senate on impeachment.

Wrong.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red13n posted...

Thats nice. It is also completely unrelated as to how the Senate voted to proceed.

If a senate votes to proceed a way doesn't make it constitutional. I don't get what you don't understand. You are arguing about constitutionality.

That said, I agree it is constitutional.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

I like that you know how the Supreme Court would rule, counter to the Senate

I didn't say I knew how they would rule...

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

Sure but I dont understand how perjury and obstruction of justice dont fit this criteria. Its literally a crime against the system itself

I guess Id have to ask 90s Dems

I agree his was the most obvious case for being indicted.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red13n posted...

No. The Supreme Court can have their own say, but the Senate specifically voted on the constitutionality of the proceedings. Unless the Supreme Court superseded that vote, as far as they were concerned for this trial it was considered constitutional.

Senate can vote on anything they want. It doesn't mean it is constitutional. The Supreme Court decides that.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

red13n posted...

Actually it was the Senate's job and they already deemed it to be constitutional. They just chose to ignore that vote happened.

Supreme Court determines whether something is constitutional or not.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

If not then the President is above the law

The President isn't supposed to be removed from offense for just any crime. It is supposed to be a crime that merits that response.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

Corrik what do you make of Mitchs argument that Trump is responsible but still not guilty because the trial itself is unconstitutional

Merit to that argument, or just trying to have it both ways?

He is incorrect, and it is not his decision to determine constitutionality.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

People on Facebook are super pumped that this exonerates Trump. At least on mine. SEE: He was innocent. I told you!

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Jakyl25 posted...

They proved perjury in the Clinton impeachment and still couldnt convict

The process is broken

This is true. The question is perjury and obstruction of justice a big enough crime to impeach over. Idk.

You should never expect indictment in an impeachment unless it is egregious and not a matter of opinion.

If Trump was on tape murdering someone. He would have been bipartisan indicted. But, I mean, it is never going to happen unless there is serious egregiousness or a 2/3rd majority.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Hbthebattle posted...

Like, what exactly, such that inviting a riot to take over the Capitol doesnt qualify

I don't think anyone would get convicted by a regular jury for this. It's too subjective. Like I said, it's condemnable but convictable is a reach. There is no beyond a benefit of a doubt that this was his intention. I always said this was a hard case to ever prove

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

PerfectChaosZ posted...

Can't believe 57 with seven of his own party turning on him somehow still isn't enough. You'd think it was designed for folks not to be able to punish the president.

It was designed for egregious offenses that clearly crossed political lines.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

You guys do realize Biden told them to 180 on the witnesses and just to end it because it wasn't going to happen right? Nobody thought it was going to happen. Acting outraged now is laughable. It never was going to happen.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

They aren't wrong. Many politicians encouraged the BLM riots by the definition they attributed to Trump. I think we should condemn both sides of this.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

UshiromiyaEva posted...

I stopped paying attention to anything Tony says after he said "daddy wants his check".

Honestly might have been the most despicable thing ever uttered in these topics... And that's saying something.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Forceful_Dragon posted...

But acting on that breach is clearly at someone's discretion or she would have been fired before this latest offense. Either way it has nothing to do with her free speech being infringed upon.

That doesn't make an at will employment. Having grounds to fire someone doesn't mean you have to or will. It means you have justification to do so because your job is not at will which requires no justification.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Xeybozn posted...

"Right to work" has nothing to do with at-will employment, though.

Second time he has confused the two I believe. Gina Carano almost certainly wasn't an at-will employee either. She likely had a contract in which her conduct was considered a breach somehow.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

the Dems said the checks would go out the door day 1, and with tax season being delayed a few weeks, daddy wants his money.

Do you even know how you sound

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Lightning Strikes posted...

So to phrase it a different way, you would say that Biden is more popular than Obama?

You would have to account for population size changes.

But, while you loosely can correlate popularity to vote totals, there are other reasons to vote for someone besides liking them too. There is likely a large contigent that loathed Trump so voted for Biden as well.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Americas foundation was literally built on the backs of African slaves, so tl;dr yeah youre the perfect mark for the shit Republicans want to pull

That's a stretch imo. It also has very little to do with what the claim even was. That it was the foundation of American Democracy.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

"arguing that Black Americans are the foundation of U.S. democracy."

= /

I don't know what the project entails but that is obviously a loaded and what would be a controversial take. I mean, that doesn't say that African Americans were a Pillar upon which US Democracy was founded or played an integral part or so on. That's definitely. Interesting if that is what the project intends to push to K-12 students. I won't say it's not worthy, but Idk... I can see some controversy if that quoted part is really the intent of its inclusion.


---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

What's the 1619 project

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/07/opinions/covid-flu-twindemic-mystery-sepkowitz/index.html

Good read

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

https://nationalpost.com/news/world/with-millions-of-cases-has-india-achieved-herd-immunity

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Lightning Strikes posted...

What if I told you that there are countries where cops don't have guns and people don't have guns, almost nobody is ever killed by the police, and crime rates are significantly lower than in the US?

Was that the situation here? I mean, I am pro limiting guns, but this doesn't seem like the situation so not much worth bringing up in regards to it.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)

Dancedreamer posted...

Maybe the Cops wouldn't have been shot at if they didn't break down the door in the middle of the night without announcing their presence. Are you telling me conservatives wouldn't shoot at someone who broke down their door in the middle of the night? Isn't that like the #1 argument they have against gun control. "I need to protect my home from intruders." That's exactly what Breonna Taylor's boyfriend was doing. The police were intruders.

This doesn't change that the cops should have returned gunfire. As Inviso said, every side was pretty much justified the whole way around.

---

Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)