Lurker > StealThisSheen

It was like 0-10 five minutes ago and at the current pace of this board I'd say these results are surely legitimate

People stuff the weirdest things

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

They need to massively speed up the Pokemon that follow you because even normal walk speed leaves them in the dust

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Sorozone posted...

What. Male or female, you aren't born with 'bizarrely broad' shoulders. It's something you work on knowingly or unknowingly by working out, body building, or physically intensive labor with ample amounts of protein and calories so the body can repair .

You absolutely get broad shoulders by working out and body building.

I'm not talking about the pectorals or whatever Biscuit is, nor am I talking about just her shoulders. Her proportions just seem super weird for anybody, male or female. In some of the scenes from the earlier video, her torso is just... oddly broad and block shaped, which makes what should be broad shoulders not even look like broad shoulders anymore, proportionately. She almost looks like a Lego person at times.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Yeah, she's like bizarrely broad, which isn't something body building is going to cause.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

As I continue to read through comments, I'm still confused what logic people base their algorithms on for making twitter bot accounts.

"We need this account to look real. What does the average American twitter user account look like?"
"I believe they commonly misspell their own first name and then add 9-14 random numbers after it."
"Yes, this seems both real and accurate."
"Look, their President fell for it, so we must be right!"

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Yeah, there's no debate that he was found guilty of domestic abuse.

The only debate is around the motives. The argument started apparently because he said he wanted a divorce, and was trying to grab a phone out of her hand and grabbed her wrist/bruised it. She may or may not have filed charges as an attempt to make him call off the divorce.

In the end none of that really matters. He did it and was found guilty.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

red sox 777 posted...

You can't have it both ways. Either Tucker is a journalist and the standard of actual malice applies, or he's an entertainer and his statements should not be seen as factual, so there is no libel.

Yes. That's exactly our point. Tucker is presented as a journalist, and thus his lawyer's defense of "He doesn't need to be factual" doesn't work.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

So, wait. Their supposed grand message about the "CIRCLE OF REVENGE" literally has you taking turns playing as characters that are psychotically hell-bent on getting revenge on the character you just played as?

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

red sox 777 posted...

Wouldn't he have an easier time if his entire show is opinions? It's like if you're watching the Colbert Report - you know that nothing reported on that show should be trusted as a fact.

It would be if he actually presented his show that way, but he doesn't.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

red sox 777 posted...

Also, Rachel Maddow just won a similar lawsuit because the judge said any reasonable audience would infer that she was talking about her opinion, not facts.

The difference is that it was ruled that way for Maddow due to her tone and the context in which she said it in within the segment. It wasn't just "Her entire show is nothing but opinions." The ruling was "In this particular case, she's giving a clear opinion based on other facts which were presented, and her tone/the context makes it clear she's not presenting it as a fact."

Tucker would have a much tougher time with that argument.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

To be fair, his argument wasn't that he couldn't be charged. It was that he's not going to be found guilty.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Oh, it's absolutely fair. I'd just like to see some consistency, and not just picking and choosing which assholes to ban and which ones not to.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

PrivateBiscuit1 posted...

FChamp is an idiot and everyone calling him out as an idiot is completely fair.

But this is kind of a dumb reason to perma-ban him from all Capcom events. Cancel culture is getting fucking absurd anymore.

Edit: I should clarify that banning him from events for x amount of time is more reasonable than a perma-forever-ban from every event. That's the absurd part.

Well it says "indefinitely," so it's likely not a perma-forever-ban.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

fchamp is an idiot, anyway, but it does seem a bit unfair considering Mike Z made an "I can't breathe" joke on a stream and nothing came of it.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

They've been trying to stop being 24 hours for the last 5 years or so.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Yeah, with how blatantly political the message is, I find it extremely hard to believe

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Also remember the bucket of rocks that was left out to throw at police

That ended up being a planter with the plant taken out

EDIT: And the pallet of bricks in an area where there was no construction or buildings with bricks of that type around at all.

It's tough to instantly believe anything like this anymore.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

You literally replied to "Black people get killed by cops disproportionately compared to white people" with "It's not because of race."

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik: You just don't understand because you aren't in a part of the country where you HAVE to drive drunk!

Also Corrik: There is no racism problem in the police force because I don't personally see it.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

To be fair, they did have Saxton say the match wasn't happening like right after.

I assume due to difficulties running from the... Dumpster octopus?

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Do you think it's a coincidence that minutes after you post that, red sox posts a poll topic expressing the desire to ban driverless cars

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

I had a launch PS4 with those sensor buttons that didn't necessarily die, but it started having that issue where the sensors on the buttons would go nutty and the system would start resetting itself/put itself to sleep/etc. while playing.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik7 posted...

You don't understand it because you don't live in an area where you have to!

Because there is literally no area in the world where you HAVE to do this.

Where the hell did this "I MUST go to the bar, I have no choice!" stuff from you and people like SephG come from

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

I'll never understand the "There's no Uber/Lyft/etc., in my town, and the bar isn't within walking distance, so I HAVE to drive drunk!" argument.

If that's literally the case, then maybe don't go to the fucking bar to drink?

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Kinglicious posted...

Doing shitty things =/= being a piece of shit. There's a difference between the two.

Also if we're tossing out driving offenses, texters are worse.

I mean we're not talking about somebody taking change from the take a penny, leave a penny tray when they don't need it, or somebody purposely not holding the door for the person behind them.

There is no lack of knowledge about the dangers of driving drunk. This isn't something people aren't educated about, it's not a "whoopsy, my bad."

It's not something to just handwave as a "shitty thing to do."

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

The tune literally did not change.

If you drive drunk, you are a piece of shit.

That doesn't mean you are one for life.

That also doesn't mean that you can't be one again at another point in your life.

People can learn and make a legitimate effort to be better.

People can also then do it again and prove they never actually stopped being a piece of shit.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik7 posted...

Tons of unequivocal pieces of shit out there! It's just an objective reality!

Yep. Glad you agree.

Now, said people can over time stop being pieces of shit if they prove they've learned their lesson and don't do it anymore. But as soon as it happens again, they're a piece of shit again.

Pretty simple.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

I mean anybody that chooses to drive drunk is objectively a piece of shit.

It's not really an insult or anything. It's just a fact.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

I'm gonna need some details on how and why this happened so I can take every precaution to make it not happen

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Now that said, Wang's probably right that it'll be easy for the union to just go "He was trained to shoot in that situation even if it's just a taser etc. etc." and probably just get a "go away" settlement.

But any kind of "I thought it was a real gun" defense would frankly be silly to try, since it'd just run up against
"Does this look like a gun?"
"Well, no."
"Does this sound like a gun?"
"Well, no."

And then it becomes an actual personal matter of "Why did you, personally, think it was a gun and respond the way you did?"

It ends up circling back to the bigger problem of "I was trained this way" and "why?"

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Like, just to make where I'm coming from clear

https://i.imgur.com/K2SbhLK.jpg

This is what the taser looks like.

If it was one of those smaller black ones, I'd probably agree with you.

But if "I thought it was a real gun" flies with THAT, when he was that close to the guy, then we're pretty much all fucked because they'll be able to say anything looks like a gun.

We can agree to disagree. It's just a bit of a crazy defense when the taser looks like that.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

It's a big. Clunky. Yellow. Taser. That he even saw the guy take from his partner. And that he is holding one of himself. And that the guy has in his hand the entire time for several seconds as he's chasing him. It's literally not "a split second."

It's a big ass hunk of bright yellow plastic.

C'mon, man.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Also, rewatching the video, the cop that shot him was chasing after him with his own taser pointed at him. And was less than ten feet away. So there's pretty much no way he'd miss a big, clunky, yellow taser being pointed at him just like the one he is holding.

Like you can see it in his hand the entire time. It's a big ass yellow thing.

There's no way "I thought it was a gun" flies.

I could buy an argument of "We're trained to shoot in that situation even if it's a taser" and blame the culture. But "I thought it was a real gun" is a big nope.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

PrivateBiscuit1 posted...

I think it's a lot easier to see it's a taser with multiple slow-mo shots and us actively knowing it's a taser before seeing it. When he's in the middle of a chase, trying to stop the guy from getting away, and the guy turns and points something at him that has a bright spark coming from it, I think it's pretty reasonable to think it might have been a gun. But the thing is, if he had waited to consider what he was being shot at by, he could have been shot at multiple more times.

Dude, the tasers are big, clunky, and yellow. And, you know, they don't go "BANG."

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Anyhoo, as for the argument of "how did he do his job incorrectly"

1. His car was in a drive-thru line at Wendy's, and it was off. He reportedly complied with moving his car into a space. There was no actual reason to arrest him.
2. The main defense of tasers is that they aren't lethal weapons. Thus, a taser does not necessitate the need for responding with lethal force.
3. They apparently waited over 2 minutes before even attempting to render aid once they shot him.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

PrivateBiscuit1 posted...

In the heat of a moment, a guy turned and fired something at him and he reacted by firing back. I don't know that he would immediately assume or know it was a taser at that point. But if he thought it was a gun he could have been worried that he'd fire more rounds at him or someone else. I don't know that this is an outrageous reaction by the cop given the circumstances.

I mean in the video you posted it's very clearly not a gun even from far away. And they know he took the taser.

I'm not sure "They thought it was a gun" is reasonable.

Especially when guns and tasers make very, very different noises when shot.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik7 posted...

What part of their job did they do incorrectly?

I don't know, I'm not the one that fired him.

Clearly they either think he actually did something wrong, or did something they don't think they can actually defend, since they fired him. So clearly he did his job incorrectly enough to warrant it in their eyes.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Wouldn't getting fired suggest they did their job incorrectly

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Jakyl25 posted...

https://twitter.com/senatorcollins/status/1271871411041251334?s=21

Such a blatant lie

By "work to overturn" she means that she'll leave it at that and then say she believes the president has learned his lesson in a TV interview.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

The reason you were used as an example is because you whine about the law being too harsh about crimes that you, personally, have committed, and yet you blindly and tirelessly defend the taking of somebody's life when they were not a threat to anybody else's in that time.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Ah, yes. The law shouldn't take away somebody's legal right to drive if they're proven a danger to public lives multiple times.

But the law should take away somebody's life if they maybe possibly potentially are a threat with a taser.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik7 posted...

Oh I did. Show me.

Even if I give you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't and multiple people misunderstood your posts, you have definitely admitted to driving intoxicated multiple times, so you were still a recurring danger to public lives.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik7 posted...

Also, did I say I drove without a license?

Yes.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

So what it sounds like is you got a DUI (or multiple?) and lost your license over it. You then drove anyway without your license.

Sounds to me like you didn't obey the police. Sounds to me like you resisted their lawful attempt to detain you from driving.

Sounds to me like your argument is that people who drive once their license is taken away deserve to be shot.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Corrik7 posted...

Losing your license for a DUI is a foolish sentence that should be changed, yes. There are better means to punish that crime.

Anyways, back to the topic at hand before you rehash the same conversation for the 50th time for no reason because you think it somehow debases the character.

But driving under the influence means you are a direct threat to the lives of others. You were as much of a danger, if not moreso, than this guy with a taser. So should the punishment be changed to just shooting you the next time you drive drunk?

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Isn't Corrik's stance about DUIs that you shouldn't lose your license over them because "then people will just be encouraged to drive without their license unlawfully and it won't be their fault"

There's no actual internal consistency

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Funny how when cops use a taser, it's fair because "it's non-lethal"

Yet in this case "you know, a taser isn't REALLY non-lethal..."

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

The Raiders don't need four quarters.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

PrivateBiscuit1 posted...

That he went out of his way to try and defend some idiot who compared his schlock to Schindler's List is the ridiculous part, regardless of how tasteful he was with it.

That's not what the guy did, though. The guy said the game gave him a similar emotional response, is all.

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!

Yeah I'm not too sure what's wrong with that

---

Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!