Lurker > GiftedACIII

Dash_Harber posted...

Garioshi posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Garioshi posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

I've never read the series or watched the show, but he's a grown ass man who can't outwit a few plucky orphans that he is literally related to despite being old enough to, you know, hire a lawyer. How savvy could he be?

Olaf in the books was a cruel, cold, and calculating bastard who never broke character for an instant.

Again, how calculating if he is constantly outwitted by someone literally in diapers.

I really wouldn't consider it "outwitted" when the three main characters are only barely escaping by the skin of their teeth each and every time. Every guardian they had wound up dead by his hand; they once had to resort to burning down half a hospital to escape him.

Again, though, he is evenly matched by children, then.

tbf those children are prodigies. Violet builds a hot air balloon out of paper, Klaus reads dictionaries or something, and the baby makes gourmet food and holds her own in a fucking swordfight with a grown adult with her teeth.
---

</topic>

Olaf was relatively smart because the entire rest of the world are complete morons. The baudelaires are like the only characters in their world to have above room temperature IQ. Like even the Quigleys, the second smartest group were dumb enough to leave their fake Sunny potato bag behind after they've almost won in the fifth book.
---

</topic>

Eventually the whole universe will collapse
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/UsefulNotes/HistoryOfTheUniverse
---

</topic>

Rika used to be the original definition of a troll. He specifically posted the way he did to rile people up so they'd flame him and he'd mark them. I don't he think he believed 3/4s of the stuff he posted.
Though he seems to be taking himself a lot more seriously recently and genuinely seems to be more bitter. Wonder if something in his personal life happened.
---

</topic>

---

</topic>

---

</topic>

philsov posted...

Are we allowing "perfect rolls?"
https://pathofexile.gamepedia.com/Ventor%27s_Gamble

Path of Exile has as a rare unique with about 7 different attributes, with half the values ranging from -25 to +50. There is a 1 out of 45.5 billion chance that a ventor's explicit modifiers will roll perfectly, on top of the dreadfully low odds to get it in the first place.

This is why I support hacking
---

</topic>

Tyranthraxus posted...

flat_tyre posted...

YOUHAVENOHOPE posted...

i wanna know waht game this is

Don't have any idea at all, I never saw it myself, just remember reading about it and thinking how screwed up it was. :o

Sounds like one of those urban legend things that isn't true.

That is definitely uboa from Yume Nikki
---

</topic>

No, I view it the same way I view drugs.
---

</topic>

butthole666 posted...

P4wn4g3 posted...

It was bad. 1 was the good one.

2 was honestly better from a gameplay standpoint and only suffered from tryung to retcon in a character that was never even mentioned

Yeah 2 is extremely underrated. It also had a very silly story (still better than infinite's) but it has by far the best gameplay and had a really cool protecting little sister mechanic. Also Minerva's den makes up for the poor main story
---

</topic>

The one in question was "Number39"
---

</topic>

Yeah dude is unstable to say the least. He made a post lamenting how automatic assault rifles aren't as easily accessible where he lives. Scary stuff
---

</topic>

But the main characters literally side and team up with Jason who doesn't kill them when he has the chance.
---

</topic>

yusiko posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

yusiko posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

He's a slut shamer

no he isnt he treats the promiscuous the same as anyone else
he truly has no bias

He generally seems to only kill the promiscuous and their friends from what I've seen. Like, he'll actually just leave random non-promiscuous people alone. And of course, the final girls (the ones he goes easy on) tend to almost always be "pure".

he killed a hiker, who he had no idea of her sexual activity. and tried to kill kids in the 6th one.
he really treats everyone the same.

and rarely are the final girls all that pure
ginny is in a relationship with her boss and the only reason they didnt have sex in the movie is because she was on her period and its clear there relationship is already a sexual one

Hmm. I mean, there's always exceptions. Isn't the whole premise of Jason vs Freddy with Jason being more of the "good guy" being because Jason only targets certain people while Freddy tries to torture and kill everyone?
---

</topic>

yusiko posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

He's a slut shamer

no he isnt he treats the promiscuous the same as anyone else
he truly has no bias

He generally seems to only kill the promiscuous and their friends from what I've seen. Like, he'll actually just leave random non-promiscuous people alone. And of course, the final girls (the ones he goes easy on) tend to almost always be "pure".
---

</topic>

He's a slut shamer
---

</topic>

26_Sandman_39 posted...

r4X0r posted...

sopfed posted...

Some things are complicated, and some things are simple.

That sexual thoughts about or actions towards children are unacceptable is among the simplest of the simple.

Absolutely.

But you can't put people in prison for their thoughts.

Yeah I'm pretty sure the world could have a "no-pedophilia" rule and go on fucking fine and dandy.

People with pedophilic thoughts have no use in society. No one's asking to censor other thoughts that aren't fucking literal pedophilia.

We should start by putting people on a watch list whose search history includes things like loli. NSA already monitors people, might as well monitor something useful.

Since violent crimes are statistically far more prevalent than child molestation it's be even better to monitor people who've advocated for insane psychopathic ideals, like nuking a country. The world could have a no "genocide advocate" rule and go on fine and dandy.
---

</topic>

pres_madagascar posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

pres_madagascar posted...

Burial at sea was excellent though

Burial at sea makes an already fan-fiction tier hallway shooter even worse.

By becoming more stealth oriented?

How can Columbia influence Rapture when the whole point of infinite's ending is to stop Columbia from ever being made? How can God Elizabeth who can manipulate time and space lose to a single big daddy? Why does going into a universe make her lose her omnipotence when the luteces routinely do so? How does her sacrificing herself to save the little sisters prevent the countless other universes where the little sisters would die anyway? Why does Elizabeth even exist in the first place when all Elizabeths should've been prevented from existing? It's an absolute mess
---

</topic>

Don't take Sandman seriously. He's known for having some of the most ignorant and uninformed opinions possible.
---

</topic>

pres_madagascar posted...

Burial at sea was excellent though

Burial at sea makes an already fan-fiction tier hallway shooter even worse.
---

</topic>

alphagamble posted...

Aurora Borealis?

At this time of year? At this time of day? In this part of the country? Localized entirely within your kitchen?
---

</topic>

Resident evil
---

</topic>

What was it in a TOU friendly way?
---

</topic>

I thought the whole thing was a joke from the start and that it'd be something like that.
---

</topic>

Ok actually just read all that. You should definitely tell at least one person this in real life. Even just your mom is ok.
---

</topic>

K
---

</topic>

Classic joke topic from TC
---

</topic>

@AlternativeFAQS
---

</topic>

I haven't played any myself but isn't there a bunch of early final fantasies that had the final boss be some random animal/bug monster that has nothing to do with the actual story
---

</topic>

Yeah, other than her one flaw she's a pretty cool person.
---

</topic>

lol I get welching over closing your account but are you also going to welch on something you actually like?
---

</topic>

lol
---

</topic>

bigotry created a new topic on Current Events, named "Anime turns vulnerable young men into pansexual pedophiles."
hmm....
combined with this topic, is this TC trying to say something in a roundabout way?
---

</topic>

Kaname_Madoka posted...

its difficult to explain what i mean by written as them. but basically other than calling themselves male they act the way trans women do

They're just really feminine men. Being feminine or masculine doesn't really have anything to do with being transgender. A transgender woman can also be very masculine or "tomboyish/butch" just like a cis woman can be. Likewise a tomboy woman (or "reverse trap" in some anime that some people say) isn't a transman.
---

</topic>

Knowledge_King posted...

Zikten posted...

Kajagogo posted...

Because it probably takes only a second to get it formed, it's just slowed down for the viewers so they can clearly see the movements.

this too. it doesn't take as long as it seems. much like when sailor moon transforms or does her attacks. it's just stylized for anime.

That's blatantly not true. It literally takes as long as it seems like it does. That's a headcanon/thing fans made up.

Are you just talking about those specific shows? Because it's a common thing in fiction for things that are happening in milliseconds to be shown slowed down to the viewer.
---

</topic>

No, "traps" are not transpeople. They're feminine men, crossdressers/drag queens at most. They firmly identify as male though.
---

</topic>

... there was a link to a certain gore site in the video lol
---

</topic>

GuessMyUserName posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

gmun-chama posted...

.....

what.

the.

fuck.

lol this is a bot right? Even the bot is disgusted!

negative, that's my mobile account

Oh lol my bad.
And what composer?
---

</topic>

---

</topic>

PBusted posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Tyranthraxus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Because bears look around the size and weight as a lion/tiger.

that literally means nothing. Apples vs Oranges etc. Only thing they have in common is they're both mammals.

Apples and oranges are very similar in size and weight. You're just being a contrarian for contrarian's sake now

It's chromaticangel

Oh, no wonder
---

</topic>

---

</topic>

Tyranthraxus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Because bears look around the size and weight as a lion/tiger.

that literally means nothing. Apples vs Oranges etc. Only thing they have in common is they're both mammals.

Apples and oranges are very similar in size and weight. You're just being a contrarian for contrarian's sake now
---

</topic>

Tyranthraxus posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Tyranthraxus posted...

MrBobGray posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Bears regularly go above 1000+ pounds so I don't see why some lions/tiger can't. I thought this was about a domesticated cat lol

Yeah what the hell TC lmao

You guys know that bears aren't cats, right?

Are you intentionally missing the point?

No. I'm just missing the point in general.

"lol an elephant weighs like 5 tons why does it surprise you that cats can weigh over 900 pounds?"

Like what the fuck does an animal that isn't a cat have to do with cat biology?

Because bears look around the size and weight as a lion/tiger.
You're being pedantic for no reason. It's like if someone said "yo wtf some spiders molt?!", I say "well yeah, a lot of invertebrates like bugs molt" and then you go "SPIDERS ARENT BUGS"
---

</topic>

Tyranthraxus posted...

MrBobGray posted...

GiftedACIII posted...

Bears regularly go above 1000+ pounds so I don't see why some lions/tiger can't. I thought this was about a domesticated cat lol

Yeah what the hell TC lmao

You guys know that bears aren't cats, right?

Are you intentionally missing the point?
---

</topic>

Bears regularly go above 1000+ pounds so I don't see why some lions/tiger can't. I thought this was about a domesticated cat lol
---

</topic>

Fam_Fam posted...

also this is kind of topic that shows that CE is more sexist than racist

TC frequently gets purged for misogynistic topics and being anti-lgbt
---

</topic>