Lurker > streamofthesky

Ok, let's start over.

I ask the alien three questions:
There have been 999 people before me and you predicted all of their choices correctly?
The $1 million is already either in B or not and you have no ability to change that reality from this point in time onward?
Did anyone of those 999 people have $1 million dollars in B during their offer?

If it refuses to answer all 3 in the affirmative or is evasive about it, you got your answer:
There is never money in B and your choice is $1000 or bragging rights over an alien.

If it says yes confidently to all 3, then...it might still be lying, but that would be sufficient to get me to choose B only.

streamofthesky posted...

So, all that matters is the alien's "prediction"?
If he predicts you take both and you do, you get $1000
If he predicts you take both and you take B, you get nothing
If he predicts you take B and you do, you get $1M
If he predicts you take B and you take both, you get $1M + $1000

Logically there's no reason not to take A and B b/c he could've just put nothing in B and the whole "prediction" thing is bull shit, you don't know. It's not like if you take B only you get the million if it wasn't in there, you just look like a fool.
The only reason to take B only is reverse psychology, "it expects me to be rational and choose both, so I'll do the opposite!" But it could counter your counter, and so on...

Should just take the $1000 and move on. This isn't the Monty Hall problem where your choice (and changing it) actually has a mathematical difference in the probability. Your choice means nothing, the alien already decided what's in B before it even talked to you.

One choice you get nothing, win or lose. One choice, you get $1000, win or lose. The latter is objectively better and again the only reason not to choose it is attempting reverse-psychology on a supposedly omniscient being.

Once again, with emphasis.

Zikten posted...

And yet, if it had been cops doing this beating, most of CE would be mad at the cops. I don't understand why people are ok with anyone beating someone

Anyway, it IS illegal. We will see when the trial happens

OMG, cops are held to a higher fucking standard than regular citizens (or should be, but in practice it's the opposite). Also, if it were cops, the second he threatened a gun on them and reached to his waistband, they would've filled him w/ a dozen holes and no one (sane) would blame them.
Did you also claim Jose Alba would be going to jail? How'd that work out for you?

itcheyness posted...

He was still fighting and trying to escape so he clearly wasn't restrained.

Yup. "Restrained" my ass. One dude grappling with him as he struggles w/ him mightily is not restrained, dude could've escaped if his legs weren't getting fucked up.

Prismsblade posted...

Since the law hasn'tbeen enough to detour this men and others enough from crime hopefully a little physical pain will do the trick.

I kept saying on 261 that if the law continues to fail to put these criminals in jail, eventually people will get fed up being victims and take the law into their own hands.
Far more important than deterrence or rejuvenating criminals is the actual punishment part. Victims want the scum that terrorized them off the streets and to pay for their fucking crimes. People gave up seeking vengeance to have a more orderly society where a fair and impartial court punishes the wrong-doers instead. When that social contract is shit upon, a lot of stuff in society will inevitably break down.

It's been really hard to rent a car lately. Places are literally out of stock completely.
A friend recently had one reserved at the airport car rental, only to get there and they had "no cars" and had to wait for hours for one to be returned.

I wonder if all these broken into rental cars in CA are driving a nationwide shortage? It wasn't like this even a year ago, at peak chip shortage era.

CrabFeeder posted...

https://twitter.com/stillgray/status/1686713571994959872?s=20

Full video, it sounds like the robber says something like "don't make me pull my strap on your bitch ass" at the 0:07 mark. I think due to that, self defense would fly in court

Yeah, guy made repeated deadly threats to them, should help their defense. I hope if the DA is stupid enough to press charges on them, they take it to court. No way in hell will 12 people unanimously convict.

Enclave posted...

Are you suggesting that the store owner would have charged the employees that assaulted the man for the lost items? Because that's illegal.

Like, I get it, nobody likes a thief but this response? Unacceptable. This isn't like somebody breaking and entering your home.

And when the store owner has to close down due to all the theft and their out of their jobs?
Doubt the store owner is rich, either. Probably just a middle class dude trying to make an honest living and getting victimized by thieves.
I don't think the guy filming is the owner, either. Everyone else is behind the counter (based on how the computers are facing, and cigs are usually kept behind counters. Think he's a customer. Owner might've been one of the two guys on Team Beat Down.

Enclave posted...

I mean, sucks he's having to go to these lengths but it's illegal and he should be prosecuted for it, just like the people assaulting him should also be prosecuted.

Pretty sure that post was sarcasm, but it is hard to tell sometimes.
You know, like, "He needed those cigarettes to feed to his family!"

RuneterranSnap posted...

But the problem with that last sentence is, especially when speaking in legal terms, it's a fantasy. If you set up a law that will only allow you to execute people with 100% certainty of no innocents, the law you've set up is one effectively abolishing the death penalty.

You cannot allow the death penalty without allowing the risk of innocent victims. It is not possible. There will always be people looking to abuse it.

You think this guy didn't do it?
You think it wasn't Dylan Roof in that black church?
You think there's a chance Norway has the wrong guy locked up?

Bull fucking shit.
There are plenty of cases where we know for certain we have the right guy.
Sounds like Pennsylvania (or federal?) has a good check and balance in place, where jurors have to unanimously choose the death penalty as an additional decision besides guilt, w/ it defaulting to life in prison otherwise. That's the level where you should have the even higher level of absolute certainty vs. normal convictions, just like how the standard for guilt is lower in civil cases than criminal.

The death penalty finally being applied in a case where it should be again!

Good news!

EDIT:

Despite the sentence, it could be years before an execution takes places in light of the Department of Justices moratorium on capital punishment.

FUCK MERRICK GARLAND!

Doesn't do shit about Trump, now will let a vile nazi live b/c of a dumb blanket ban on executions.
I'm so sick of Dems being spineless

Did she even hit the person that threw the drink at her? Thought I heard she missed and got an innocent person, which would be pretty believable that in a dense crowd she'd throw the mic and not unerringly strike the intended target.

Legally she's in trouble anyway*, but I'd say it's much worse if the person she hit didn't even do anything.

* But I'm skeptical anything will happen to her; she already bragged about drugging men to rob them and nothing was done

shorten the site name (get rid of the .gamespot)

Add multi-choice polls

Add expandable spoiler blocks as an option

Porn is now allowed on any board marked mature; users must enable that they are adults in their profile to access such boards

Spelunking

Fun to say, and sounds like it was intended from the start to be a... euphemism.

So, all that matters is the alien's "prediction"?
If he predicts you take both and you do, you get $1000
If he predicts you take both and you take B, you get nothing
If he predicts you take B and you do, you get $1M
If he predicts you take B and you take both, you get $1M + $1000

Logically there's no reason not to take A and B b/c he could've just put nothing in B and the whole "prediction" thing is bull shit, you don't know. It's not like if you take B only you get the million if it wasn't in there, you just look like a fool.
The only reason to take B only is reverse psychology, "it expects me to be rational and choose both, so I'll do the opposite!" But it could counter your counter, and so on...

Should just take the $1000 and move on. This isn't the Monty Hall problem where your choice (and changing it) actually has a mathematical difference in the probability. Your choice means nothing, the alien already decided what's in B before it even talked to you.

FunWithAFryPan posted...

If he knows with a certainty what youll pick, then it doesnt matter, you dont really have a choice. Both options are equal.

One choice you get nothing, win or lose. One choice, you get $1000, win or lose. The latter is objectively better and again the only reason not to choose it is attempting reverse-psychology on a supposedly omniscient being.

CADE_FOSTER posted...

God I hope he goes to prison but I seriously doubt it

The ratio of years sentenced to prison per felony charged continues to equal 0 and sadly will continue to equal zero, whether he has 10, 100, or 1000 felonies.

FortuneCookie posted...

I want him in prison, but I would settle for him being ineligible to run for president in 2024.

He can literally run for office from prison, by law. So hope for prison, it at least has a 0.00000001% chance of happening, unlike him being prevented from running for office again.

creativerealms posted...

I did like her videos. I found her because I was into Anti-MLM content and she was always recommended. I usually ignore drama and if I like someone I remain subscribed but then she made her "apology video" and I unsubscribed.

Yeah.
That's basically how I started watching her, occasionally.
Done w/ her now that I know she's a POS, was never a subscriber or anything more than a casual viewer anyway.

LordFarquad1312 posted...

1. Breaking the spaghetti

Why does it matter? How else will it fit in the damn pot?

2. Using a small pot/not enough water

Well, fuck...

3. Putting oil in the water

I've never added oil...

4. Not using enough salt in the water

I've also never added salt to pasta being cooked. Just good 'ol H2O

5. Overcooking it.

We prefer it softer instead of "al dente". Guess I do this, too

6. Not putting it into the sauce as soon as it's done cooking (aka, letting it die).

Why the fuck would you do that? Pour sauce on it once it's in a bowl to serve, keep the rest separate to store for later.

So... 5 out of 6. Maybe 4, not sure what counts as "overcooking". But these "rules" are dumb and I'm glad I break them, like I do my spaghetti, so I'll say I'm at 5.

It's one of the best games of all time.

My #2, after A Link to the Past

adjl posted...

BotW would have sold a non-negligible number of WiiUs, but I don't think there was any chance of really turning the system around, and pushing BotW forward to help the Switch gain a solid foothold right out of the gate was likely the smartest move overall.

When the Switch launched, it had almost nothing for a library, even compared to most console launches. BotW basically single-handedly sold the console.
Wii U was already getting sales and had a solid library. The idea that people would buy a full price Switch just for BotW but not a marked down Wii U w/ at least a few other games you'd want in order to play it makes no sense.
But yeah, whatever. Nintendo basically gave up on the console by 2015, so it was never going to be given a chance. Re-selling all the Wii U shit a 2nd time by porting it to the Switch was more profitable.

lol, it wasn't lack of stock that led to PS5 and Xbox SeX being unavailable. It was scalpers buying up tons of them in sweeps.
Pressure retailers to limit quantity to 1 and make it harder to spam-buy. But yeah, capitalism....so that won't happen.

New console is long overdue, should've launched it as the only console w/ TotK to get people to transition to it immediately.
As long as it's more powerful than PS4 when docked and BC w/ switch games, and...isn't a pain in the ass to code for by 3rd parties...., it'll succeed if they actually offer some good exclusives in the first year.
I still maintain Wii U could've turned things around if they didn't abandon the fucking console and delay BotW a year for Switch. In a reality where a Wii U was the only way to play BotW and it's in 2016, Wii U would sell.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Another 5000 explosions in Moscow and St. Pete and Ukraine will be like halfway towards getting even!
About damn time the war was brought to these fuckers' doorstep.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Pretty much. If Russia wants to negotiate that civilian targets are off-limits, let them.
They were oddly fine with it up to now. Hmm...

Jen0125 posted...

I want to make sure I have a place to live when I retire. I'm thinking extremely long game with my house. Unless I get some golden job opportunity and can BUY another house, I will not be moving. I don't like the state I live in a ton but I like that I have my own place.

Same.
I wanted a 1 story house so I can retire and stay here if I want to w/o having to move later. Most houses where I live are 2-story, it's one of the reasons I decided to build.

When I was still living in an apartment waiting for my house to be built and it was still just a vacant lot that I owned, I was getting letters to my apartment residence offering to buy "my house".
It was kinda comical.

Jen0125 posted...

NO! Barely anyone my age can even buy a house. I want to keep it.

I'm gonna be paying 50% of my net pay each month towards my mortgage/taxes/insurance.
But it's still worth it to own something finally.
(people say to go by gross pay, but that's fucking stupid, income taxes can vary wildly)

Torgo posted...

These situations are alike in one way because you have a so-called vigilante acting with what they thought were justified reasons to shoot to kill.

In this case, the vigilante didn't shoot until he was being shot at (again, if his claims are true). Using lethal force to defend against lethal force is completely justified. Mind you, I don't own guns and want gun control measures passed. But expecting someone literally being shot at to not shoot back is ridiculous.
Also again...was the vigilantism right in the first place? actually fucking matters a lot. If this guy did steal his truck, I'm fine w/ him pursuing after him. He was actually wronged and responded in a reasonable way. (again, the shooting came after, supposedly b/c the thief escalated it)

Zimmerman was dead fucking wrong; Trayvon never committed any crimes in the first place. And HE is the one to shoot first against the other person.
So no, I don't think the cases have any relevant cross-over at all, unless it turns out the truck owner lied.

Here. Literally in the name.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZUQZ0NwlDo

And...the official music video. Safe for youtube, but not gonna take my chances w/ the mods here. Remove the space and watch if you're ok w/ adult content. Great music video.

https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=NZzkdybfOxg

Torgo posted...

Exactly.

This is the type of situation that allowed George Zimmerman to get away with stalking and executing Trayvon Martin, only from all the evidence, Martin was merely walking around the neighborhood eating candy and talking on the phone to a girl like a normal teenage boy.

I'm generally opposed to vigilante "justice" because it's hard to get testimony from the deceased. Then to get a nice sympathetic "law and order" judge and jury isn't that hard in a state like Texas.

Again... if the dead guy did steal it AND pulled his gun first, I think the truck owner did nothing wrong. I just want the authorities to investigate it and verify he wasn't lying before I determine his innocence.
Just making sure that was clear, b/c it seemed like you were against his actions, even if it went down that way.

Zimmerman clearly was in the wrong. Trayvon did nothing wrong and was being stalked by a psycho racist w/ a gun. He stood his ground, got murdered for it, and the state let the murderer walk.
Trayvon and this situation are nothing alike.
Trayvon committed no crimes, let alone stealing directly from Zimmerman.
Trayvon wasn't armed with a lethal weapon, but his assailant was.
Zimmerman had no fucking justification for anything he did, and even had the authorities on the phone telling him to back the fuck off.

IF the guy who died really did steal the car...
and IF he really did shoot first....

Then this is a fair, next.
Forensics definitely needs to check the car for the dead guy's DNA and analyze the guns and trajectories and such.
And get the side of the story from the alleged thief's GF.
I will never unquestioningly trust the word of the guy that killed someone else until it's proven true independently.

WizardPowers posted...

This is the "detached from reality" part I was talking about

"Just insure it" has to be a meme at this point. Basic car insurance, which most people have (and can barely afford) doesn't even cover it being stolen. You typically need more expensive comprehensive coverage. Which again, a lot of people might not be able to afford.

And you know even if you DO get it, those companies are going to do their damndest to rate your car's value the lowest they can.

Bare minimum you're losing 5 figures of value out of this unless your car was a junker

This. Even IF you have insurance for theft, you still probably have a hefty deductible, they'll undervalue your vehicle, then jack your premiums up.
Having your car/truck stolen would be financially ruinous for most middle class and poor Americans, and it's pretty ivory tower level of callous to just dismiss those concerns.

buddhamonster posted...

You're not solving any problem here, you're just kicking the can down the road. Unless you also disincentive the use of the roads, then you still need a means of paying for them. The tax is not a punishment for buying a particular car, it's a cost of doing business to ensure our infrastrucure funtions well enough for you to use the car in the first place.

Everyone benefits from infrastructure. Everyone uses it. Everyone heavily relies on it for their day to day lives. So it stands to reason that the fairest solution is for everyone to chip in for its upkeep.

So charge the tax on EVERY car. Then at least there's no incentive being added to hold onto the ICE car vs. getting an EV. Why is that controversial?

CARRRNE_ASADA posted...

Just over the past decade.

It's basically right in line w/ the rise in prominence of dating apps, especially ones like Tinder where looks is all that matters.
There's been OK Cupid and other sites doing surveys where women find 80% of men to be "below average" and how utterly massively skewed matches received are for men vs. women. Seems like dating has turned into feast or famine for men. I'm glad I'm out.

"Data from the General Social survey indicates that around 23% of men aged 18-30 reported abstaining from sex in the past year. The percentage of young men abstaining increased from 10% in 2008 to 28% in 2018, while women reported slightly better numbers."

Suspected factors seem to be prolonged living at home, influence of social media, video games and other distractions. All this goes hand in hand with the "rise of the alpha male" influencers like Tate. What worries me most is that a lot of them resent this and are turning to misogynists that lay all the blame on women instead of trying to help themselves. All these kids that go and spend money on those only sites and them complain they dont want a girl with "high body count". Well guess what, NOBODY wants a person that doesnt take care of themselves, plays video games all day. Sure its more complicated than that, and the actual economy also plays a big part. Hard to feel confident when you dont have a decent paying job, have no place to yourself at a later age or just no positive outlook for the future. But first of all...work on yourselves before blaming women.

"Distractions"? What a bunch of bull shit. The distractions are the result of the dudes not being able to get a partner, not the cause.
And yeah, the pick up artist grifters are disgusting, preying upon guys who are miserable and desperate and filling their heads w/ that shit.
If you think there's an outcome where a huge amount of young adults want sex and companionship and can't find it and DON'T get upset about it though, you're delusional. I think we should just legalize prostitution. *shrug*

Damn, didn't realize so many states had the bad policy of targeting only EVs w/ taxes.
Need to check if my state does. EV was already a tough sell for me since I drive very little so the higher up-front cost would probably never be repaid in the lower "fuel" costs. But yeah, my sub-5000 miles per year in a sedan is really tearing up those roads, better pay up that flat fee that's the same as the guy in the EV SUV or truck driving 20,000 miles...

JE19426 posted...

Why would it only apply to non-commercial vehicles when commercial vehicles have way more of an impact on road conditions?

Mostly because if you levy it on commercial vehicles, companies will just pass the cost on to the rest of us w/ a 500% markup, just like they did with pandemic "inflation".

I think raising gas taxes would be more sensible, at least that'd push commercial vehicles towards adopting EV options where available.
But in general I'm wary of imposing higher transit costs on business, based on past experiences and how eager they are to have an excuse to write a blank check for what they claim higher prices is costing them.... I still remember from GWB's presidency when gas prices first surged over $4/gallon, I worked in a convenience store and all the distributors started tacking on "fuel surcharges" to deliveries.

JuanCarlos1 posted...

That shows shes a sore loser and an opportunist to get the win. She knows WHY she didnt shake her hand, but went to cry about it and somehow got the win. Really stupid.

How the fuck does the Russian terrorist lose the match and then still win?
Should just be a bye round for whoever would've faced Kharlan in the next round.
Well, the handshake thing shouldn't have been forced. But since it was, then at least the terrorist shouldn't have gotten to advance. She lost fair and square. But, being Russian, I'm sure she doesn't understand that concept.

Turbam posted...

I feel like she's gotta just be an edge lord....right?

Grifter. She doesn't believe any of the shit she says, which is why her own personal life and experiences run counter to everything she says. She says the stuff she does b/c she thinks it's what the dumb simps that give her money want to hear. Which apparently it is, sadly.

I just can't stand how utterly blitheringly stupid she is, more than anything. How the fuck do you get destroyed by the H3H3 guy in a debate?

voldothegr8 posted...

So why does California enforce the same kind of tax?

California
Sensible policies

> Pick One

If "paying for roads" was truly the goal, they could just levy a smaller tax on all non-commercial vehicles. Then people still are incentivized to get EVs to save on gas while still contributing to the road funds.
This is a blatant attack on EV ownership b/c the oil donor beholden Republicans don't like them.

If only Matt cared as much about WHEN she was born as he does about WHERE she was born...

GameLord113 posted...

This isnt weird or creepy at all.

It's basically reached a point where it's impossible to tell if a new troll account purporting to be Mead is actually Mead or just someone pretending to be.
Because 90% of the time, it actually is Mead.

Normally for most posters, you assume the other way.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


He also trolls on the Playstation boards as a Sony shill, tirelessly defending all of their censorship. So yeah, he is basically unpaid (bad; you get what you pay for) PR for Sony, WWE, and probably a few other awful companies.

I always was partial to "CryingGear".

Jokeaccountinc posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.12.user=80GearCrimson
Might be showing up too

That's his main alt, yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNpf9seRITM

So... 33% of $174K is $57,420.
Where'd the rest of the $70K or more loss come from? Did this investment lose a bunch of its value, even w/ the sky-high 33% commission fee (which at that kind of rate better damn well guarantee a positive return or else the losses are protected)?

Just pointing out he lost even more than 33%, so this scam company is even worse than first described.

Imagine if he just focused on governing Florida, pretended to be magnanimous by ceding 2024 to Trump, then had two whole years post-governorship to run his 2028 campaign as a fresh entrant.

Thank god DeSatan is stupid.

EDIT: Also, DeSatan is just an awful choice for all the establishment anti-Trump donors. Because he's not anti-Trump, he's Great Value Brand Trump. They need an actual business-friendly centrist that's charismatic, which DeSatan categorically is not.

Back_Stabbath posted...

what even is the X version of a tweet
last nail in the coffin

Instead of tweets, they're now called X-Communications. Or XComs for short.

First date should be free (walk in the park, Netflix and chill, etc...) or cheap (meet for drinks). That's the only way to navigate around the hypocrisy of feminism and not be a "foodie call".
If meeting up for drinks, get there early and pay for yours before she gets there. Then if it's an instant catastrophe (she looks completely different from her picture; she's rude/drunk/abrasive from the start; etc...) you can just bail immediately. Otherwise, you can buy her one drink and get to know her, minimal investment.

bigblu89 posted...

I didn't watch the video, and I haven't been on a "first date" in literally 20 years, but I though the new tradition was whoever asked is the one that pays?

That's just the new meta for "man always pays". It's a cop out. Women almost never ask the guy out, they'll just "send signals" to get him to ask her out.

So..after clicking on my profile pic I was logged in like nothing happened.

I legit can't tell if I was hacked or FB is just being sketchy as hell.

I check Facebook like twice a year and mostly still have it out of inertia. I have it linked to an email address I specifically use for sign ups that generate a lot of spam emails, so I can in turn just ignore all of it.
A few days ago on my main, actual email address that I use for professional contacts, resume, etc... I got a suspicious email sending me a "Facebook recovery code" I never asked for. Hell, it's been like over half a year since I went there. It was from [email protected] and wanted me to click a link to "let us know" if I didn't request a recovery code. It looked like a phishing attempt, honestly.
Looking into it, apparently this is a legit facebook email account, so I clicked it to let them know I didn't request it.
Ever since then, all the stupid "person on your friends list posted an update!" emails that used to go to the spam email address I had my FB account connected to are popping up in my real email inbox.
I wasn't even sure if I ever gave FB my real email (maybe I did, fuck if I know?) so I tried going on FB to check and... my password didn't work. I clicked "forgot password" and it pops up:

You�re Temporarily Blocked

It looks like you were misusing this feature by going too fast. You�ve been temporarily blocked from using it.
If you think this doesn't go against our Community Standards let us know.

The fuck? Other than clicking to let them know I didn't request a recovery code, this has been the sum total of all my FB activity in the past 6+ months. Was I hacked or something? Or is it some ploy by FB to dupe me into being more active?

How much MP do I get per day? These spells are partly balanced around their MP cost.
Does being a Blue Mage require being attacked with / affected by the spells I choose?

TMOG posted...

...What's the fucking point?

"You will own nothing and you will be happy."
But I like owning stuff...
"You will be happy, damn it! Now say you're happy...or else...."

legendary_zell posted...

This is absolutely something, along with everything becoming a service and micro transactions in physical products like cars that should NEVER be accepted.

One of the few primary benefits of capitalism is that we're supposed to own a bunch of variably useful stuff. Now, we don't even get the stuff, just a digital license and a chance to keep paying indefinitely without being arrested.

The oligarchs that control the world realized they can combine the absolute worst aspects of both capitalism and communism into one hideous Frankenstein endless money machine.

NeonTentacles posted...

First they came for the anime tiddies now they came for the alcohol.

What's next!? Sony deserves to lose against Microsoft

MS doesn't seem any better on the censorship front, unfortunately.
All we have left is Nintendo and PC. And Nintendo is an actual family-friendly console, so it's inevitable they'll eventually crack down on stuff again.

dancing_cactuar posted...

Literally "Rules for thee but not for me".

Fucking told you that the holy rays of light Sony employed in anime games would trickle to different forms of censorship, I was laughed at for muh slippery slope, but now we got games where they're censoring violence and drug/alcohol use in M rated games.

NeonTentacles posted...

So basically Sony is only okay with it if Sony does it and no one else?

Their "policy" is that the Japanese and indie games need to be kid-friendly, even when M-rated. Even as western AAA games and their own games have outright sex, drugs, straight up murder, and more. And they'll allow FIFA games rated E for everyone to have gambling (loot boxes).
I say "policy" in quotes because they've never released an actual official policy on censorship, they're too fucking cowardly and snakes to ever actually put out something in writing that could be examined and critiqued.

SpiritSephiroth posted...

Its funny how Sony allows a full on fucking sex scene from the Last of Us 2, but everything else that isn't a heavy hitter gets censored.

Actual hypocrites.

I remember when they started turning it into the Censorstation. There is no way to contact Sony to complain, so when they put out a video on parental controls for PS4, people took to the youtube comment section to let them have it and ask why the censorship was necessary if this exists. They kept taking the video down and re-uploading it to purge the negative comments and down votes, over and over.
That's also the first time I encountered youtube censorship, I had to say stuff like "sense of ship" to get my comment to actually post and not be shadow banned (it'd look like it would, but I'd go in private on another browser and it would not be there).
Ever since then, my youtube account seems to be perma-flagged as a spammer or something and I have to self-censor a shit load of words, including innocuous stuff like "video", "link", etc... or else it'll fake-post but not actually post.

In conclusion: fuck Sony

faramir77 posted...

Especially in cars.

Leather seats absolutely nuke your skin in the summer and then they barely warm up from your body heat in the winter, like sitting on an ice block. They cost more money and they're harder to repair.

Screw leather seats

Strong agree, and it's frustrating how most people I've talked to about it are pro-leather. How can you possibly like them? Cloth is superior in every conceivable way, AND cheaper!

Why would I watch a movie that hates me for existing?