Lurker > CyricZ

IanKinglerFalfl posted...

Are you implying that cis women can't do the same in say, baseball? There's not ban on women in MLB

Sounds like someone else is making implications.

MahdeenSkyVT is a channel on YouTube.

Yay I beat the stinky dragon. :D

jon davis posted...

qqq dared say something against "the message"

Are you one of those types who wants to be able to say things and not have things said back to you?

Because that's what I'm picking up here.

Either that you or you want to have sex with qqq.

Me returning to the Chapel of Anticipation.

https://youtu.be/pJ_Pfuj9wPE?t=20

rexcrk posted...

I need a source specifically on JK Rowling intending that to be the case, because Ive never gotten that vibe at all. It just seems wrong to make baseless accusations for the sake of creating an issue where none exists.

So you want JK Rowling admitting publicly to being antisemitic? You know that's not how it works, right?

People don't just say "Hey guys I'm antisemitic." You observe patterns.

In this case, in the multiple Jewish stereotypes present in the goblin race.

rexcrk posted...

You got a source on that?

You need a source of historically used Jewish stereotypes?

Also just for clarity, the lawmaker is seeking that performing or having an abortion would be classified as an assault or a homicide, the latter of which carries the possibility of the death penalty in the state of Texas. He's not specifically saying "if you have an abortion, you should die".

But then he doesn't have to.

Safety consultant

The cruelty is, and was always, the point.

CapnMuffin posted...

Just finished there too but no Boc. Does he appear by the broken bridge there or somewhere else?

Have you met him at all?

I hadn't up until this point.

Beat Raya Lucaria. Also Boc finally appeared for me. :D

;_;

This isn't a desire for personal free speech but to control reactions.

It pre-supposes that some are allowed to speak, and others should not be allowed to respond.

It demolishes a fundamental right as citizens of a free country: the right to think some beliefs are shameful.

Wait until the religious people learn that their leaders were making it up as they went.

You should be charging me rent the amount of time I live in your head.

Wow this topic got off the rails.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I've actually dated multiple women who had this as an issue, and experienced all the things you mention. Never knew until the first one but when I dated another I'm like "oh this is clearly a thing".

Sometimes I even had to go without "Feminine products.."

Yeah that's just cruel.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


Yeah definitely. I did find it interesting that despite actually mentioning periods briefly, the main thread of the film itself can basically be considered an allegory for having periods and puberty. Bodily changes. Embarrassing things that draw attention to you. Things that you don't understand and freak you out. The color red.

Like it's all right there.

And while I can't relate to being a girl, Chinese, or Canadian, I can relate to having been an awkward teen and thinking embarrassing stuff is basically the end of the world.

It's weird to me that some of the arguments being made are "but what if the game is good?"

Guys, you don't have to play EVERY good game out there and frankly I'm amazed some of you have that time. There are a lot of good games out there right now.

Gladius, did you watch Turning Red yet? :)

That article's a good read too.

Here's a part that stuck out to me:

Do you wonder if its easier to dismiss shows about young girls? Ive been watching conversations about the Pixar movie Turning Red and realizing theres a lot of discomfort related to stories about girls who arent little children but are also not adults.

People are extremely uncomfortable with this period in girls lives. It seems to be the time of life that girls lose faith in themselves, and I think its because they dont see representation of where theyre actually at. Girls are expected to go straight from Doc McStuffins to Euphoria. Theyre not ready for TV about having sex, but they dont want to be little girls. So who are they? Its a really easy time for girls to define themselves solely by how theyre seen by other people and then you dont get your sense of self back until youre 35. What if you werent missing those 20 years?

What if you always got to be yourself and see yourself represented in a real way? And not have to be all about who thinks youre pretty or who thinks you have the right clothes? Or how old they think you are or how old they think you look? The Baby-Sitters Club speaks to so many girls because it meets them where they are. Its not about adults telling them who they are. Its not really about boys, although they have crushes, which is a realistic part of life at that age.

Theres something about stories geared to this age that always felt like hindsight from adults, as opposed to what it actually feels like to be that age. What we could do with The Baby-Sitters Club was make the girls as smart and interesting and mature as girls are without making it all about how other people see them. Its about how they see themselves.

hsvhighlife posted...

edit: read that Lia Thomas blocks T but doesn't take estrogen supplements. Why? couldn't be the adverse musculoskeletal effects of estrogen, oh no (that every other female swimmer would have to deal with)

Okay what about that is unfair outside of your personal feelings?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Hey who isn't.

DystopiaMan posted...

So? My point still stands.
Of course I know we're not allowed to have a real conversation on here like real people would have about this. It wouldn't be transphobic or anything. Just that I don't feel like Lia Thomas should be competing with other women and it is an unfair advantage. Even with all the stuff Lia has went through.

Can you scientifically prove that Lia Thomas has an unfair advantage? Specifically that it is unfair? What is fair?

But we have to have sports though.

We need to know who is better. So those who are worse can be properly shamed for it.

I never played it on PC so I can't tell you.

Kircheis posted...

Actually, you can! In Kiwami 1 at least lol.

Ehhhh, he's Tiger Dropping the attacking enemy that he's standing next to. While the attack is a gunshot, it registers as an attack. If Kiryu were distant (as Jingu insists on being), then you're only dealing with a hitbox, not a hurtbox.

I mean yeah it's funny, but it predicates being next to the guy.

Kircheis posted...

Don't fall for the meme that Jingu is a hard fight, just Tiger Drop bro!

If there's one thing you can't Tiger Drop, it's a bullet.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Bathroom bills.

Rayman2943 posted...

And you know deep down.

I'm right.

I can't remember the last time you've been right on this board.

No.

Rayman2943 posted...

You know what I'm implying.

We sure do.

Rayman2943 posted...

people like naomi osaka

The last time we had a Naomi Osaka topic it was to bitch at her for being emotional.

Here it is:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/79940800

And look its the same guy posting the topic, dropping thinky emoji, and leaving.

Good for her. :)

Wow geez you cruised through that one.

The important thing about fighting Nishikiyama goons is this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CIboBRoQb4

Yeah but it's still the same basic play. Fortunately they don't ask too much of you for it for completion.

It sure is.

You the best damn tech recruiter in the state.

That's awesome to hear