Lurker > UnfairRepresent

Doom_Art posted...

where their water bottles were confiscated by security —

I hate that this is implied to be a bad thing.

This is common because people throw bottles at the speaker/performer.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Damn

Donatello is DONimating.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

kingdrake2 posted...

its more of a price problem.... ostrich meat would be more expensive than buffalo meat which happens to be more expensive then beef. no commoner would be able to afford it.

Supply and demand

If the demand for Ostrich meat was as high as the demand for Beef, we would be farming it all over and it would be little more than beef.

It's only so expensive because so few eat it.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Unpopular opinion: A lot of this is Trump's fault.

Don't get me wrong, everyone is responsible for their own actions and these guys are to blame for what they do.

But Trump esclated everything instead of bringing people together. He made dividing lines and defended violence and stupidity. Now everyone is being violent and stupid.

Trump's done his "Trayvon could have been my son" fuck early, I hope he learns from this and never does it again
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Yaridovich posted...

Hanging out with Michelangelo IRL seems like it would just devolve to smoking a grocery bag's worth of merch weed and then trying to order fucking gross pizzas from locals pizza places

Equally while Raphael is probably the most interesting Turtle he'd be a dick to hang around with IMO
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Unpopular opinion: A lot of this is Trump's fault.

Don't get me wrong, everyone is responsible for their own actions and these guys are to blame for what they do.

But Trump esclated everything instead of bringing people together. He made dividing lines and defended violence and stupidity. Now everyone is being violent and stupid.

Trump's done his "Trayvon could have been my son" fuck early, I hope he learns from this and never does it again.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

That's Teenage Mutant Hero Turtles in Europe.

The foot clan are suspected of potentially targeting you and 3 other people as your rare blood type + Brainwave pattern could power up Shredder's new doomsday machine if conducted during the Eclispe tonight. In order to keep you all safe Splinter has decided to delegate one turtle to guard each person for the day.

And you get to choose which you want.

For those who don't know who the turtles are, here's a quick run down:

Leonardo leads.
Donatello does machines.
Raphael is cool but rude
Michelangelo is a party dude

https://www.balloonparty.ie/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/tmnt-300x225.png

Unfortunately Casey Jones can't help because he's feeling sick.

Who would you pick?
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Mal_Fet posted...

Meanwhile, on leftist news sites,

Creepy
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Yaridovich posted...

Irony posted...

Penguins are the most useless birds

Ostrich

Ostrich meat is literally one of the most healthy red meats in the world. Extremely high in protein, low in fat, calories, and cholesterol but high in Iron.

It's literally more healthy than chicken.

On top of all that, it's meat tastes like beef. So basically Ostrich is the same as cow meat in terms of flavor but twice as healthy.

If the entirity of America switched from eating beef to eating Ostrich we'd put a massive dent in the obesity problem inside a decade.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Fact is, humanity are humans are great
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

"If a man sucks another man's dick that means he wants to fuck children."


Erm... i er... i don't follow
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Mal_Fet posted...

Right, which is why asians, indians

Fun fact: In the UK Indians are refered to as Asians
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Yeah but they don't usually discuss 15 year olds having orgasms with random people.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Sylph posted...

Snap, and go crazy. Re-enact the scene with yourself as the villain this time, and your remaining family members as the collateral. Then after they pick yet again, you just kill them all. One at a time.

Jeez..
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

VectorChaos posted...

Damn_Underscore posted...

The Kardashian Decade

time to leave this planet

Last one out, launch the nukes.

Jeez
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

darkjedilink posted...

And liberals literally believe that only white people can be racist.

wut
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

emblem boy posted...

You make good points. Do you think there's no reason at all to ever remove a statue or monument(assuming it's not damaged or something?)

Yeah if it's a hazard and about to fall down or something.

Or if there is some reason why it's super inconvient. Like if they were building a hospital and statue blocked a direct road to it. Or there was a huge pile of oil directly under the statue.

You need something to justify destroying the history and "I dont like that history" is just not good enough

Also, do you feel the same about how we added In God we trust to money after WW2 due to communism scare? I'm guessing you do.

Yes although that's a completely different situation.

And I agree completely that if they are going to remove the statues it shouldn't be done through mob rule and non majority agreement.

Problem is while magority agreement is better than mob rule it still doesn't justify much. Don't forget the Nazis had majority agreement.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Callixtus posted...

What is a "slavery absolutionist"?

Someone who wants to abolish slavery.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

I was gonna say, there's very little actual bait across these images
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

emblem boy posted...

It's not really about hurt feelings in all situations right?

Cities and people are just reanalyzing the reasons why they initially put up those statues, and they're realizing those reasons weren't good, so they're changing.

That's a reason to not erect new statues of history you don't like and not create new art of history you dislike. Today.

Not "changing" history to replace things you don't like with things you do. That's the part you intentionally pretend not to understand.

I would have no issue with a collective shift in society going from Christian and Atheist and no longer having Crucifixes everywhere. But I would utterly oppose them "Realizing the reasons werent good." and running around knocking down Christian monuments and cross gravestones to "Change" them

And this is before you even touch upon the fact most of these "changes" aren't even being done with majority or in many cases Government approval. Just mobs of angry people who don't like parts of history so they destroy it.

That is a bad thing, not something to be protected with honeyed words and doublethink.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Nubcake13 posted...

TIL: moving statues to a museum is destroying history,

For starters, yes it is.

Removing monuments is destroying history, even if put them somewhere else, you still removed them.

You woudn't be singing the same tune if Russia took the Statue of liberty down and said "Oh don't worry we're putting it in Nikolai's shed over there. It's not destroyed."

Several of the books the Nazis destroyed still exist with some copies, there are documents and photos Stalin and the Soviets didn't succeed in altering, some knowledge from the library of Alexandria lived on.

It's still destroying history.


For two, most of the statues being torn down now on a daily basis across America are not being moved, they are being flat out oblierated.

Your defense is asinine and a lazy pedantic evasion of the point raised at you.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Because destroying history always ends badly for society and if you actually looked at history instead of destroying it, you'd realize the people who advocate the destrution of history are the worst people.

The Nazis, the Islamic State, Stalin, The Mad Kings/Rulers of Europe, the Barbarian Hordes. Even Donald Trump is on that list.

Boko Haram literally means Western Education is a sin and they want to eradicate from history.

And you're throwing your hat in with them going "I AGREE WITH ALL THOSE GUYS!"


Once you tell people it's okay to destroy history that you don't like, you can no longer be surprised when they destroy history that you DO like. It always ends badly.

Nothing is gained from the destruction of knowlegde and art, only pain
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Thans Noob Noob
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

LethalAffinity posted...

“F- Abe Lincoln,” responded Quintin Mitchell, whose comment was “liked” or deemed “funny” by 160 others.

What the fuck is wrong with people

De Evolution posted...

"I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position."

- Abraham Lincoln

---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

s0nicfan posted...

Do you really find it so incredulous that someone would assume a modern liberal (or even conservative, for that matter) holds inconsistent standards? It's not an issue of being simple-minded. It's an issue of people not applying their internal logic to other opinions to see if it holds up or if they're just parroting talking points.

Moral relativism is stupid.

There were slavery absolutionists during the Roman Empire.

"Well it was past" isn't a defense of horrible attitudes.

What matters is how you justifiy and explain your attitude. If you've reached the conclusion with sound logic and pragmatism, odds are your views are going to be great or at least coherant no matter what the time period is.

Going "Well lots of people were dicks back then so it's okay" is no more of a defense than it is now to justify horribleness.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

frozenshock posted...

Well, the far right and the far left have the word "far" in common

*takes off glasses*

My God
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

TheVipaGTS posted...

Darkman124 posted...

so someone made a news article reacting to people's twitter reactions?

must be a slow news day

Happens all the time...and the usual suspects on CE think it means the majority of the world's population are being represented in that article.

what a dumb post
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

pinky0926 posted...

LittleRoyal posted...

Pepsi controversy was stupid

That wasn't so much a controversy as it was her making a complete laughing stock out of herself

Controversy means a lot of mixed opinions.

The commercial had that. People in 7 figures each thought it was hilarious, offensive, bad, good,

That's what controversy is.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Fony posted...

Jesus Christ. They're thick bitches who fuck and marry black men, can black women move the fuck on already? Holy shit.

they got a fat ass - appropriation
they suck black dick - appropriation
they wear braids - appropriation
they make shirts - appropriation

hoooooooly shit

erm
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Sephiroth1288 posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

controversy on Twitter for her use of an emoji

So

This is what the End Times look like.

---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

darkphoenix181 posted...

well if we look at Communist China, Communist North Korea, Communist Cuba, and on and on

we know the answer

can you admit what that answer is?

I don't think those 3 countries an Russia are all that comparable. They are all super different....

Not sure what your point here is unless it's just "communism is bad"
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

ThyCorndog posted...

ahnuld is based

lol
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Go_Totodile posted...

We need more stories like this. Good on him and congratulations to him.

Why not go make some of your own?

Nothing will change if everyone just exepts everyone else to take action
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

weapon_d00d816 posted...

"We're sorry [weapon] but you are the most depressed and unwilling to live and your sisters have a much brighter future ahead of them."

"I understand."

This sounds very anime
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

electricbugs2 posted...

I have theee girly girl female cousins. Keeping up with the Kardashians is their favourite show. I lived with them for six months. Still didn't hear shit about them unless I happened to come home while they were watching.

You just destroyed your own point.

"No one cares about them, they're just my families favorite show and I ignore my family."

Well then you just proved that people DO care about them
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

AlisLandale posted...

2. To say that magic can just "turn someone gay"

I can understand the reasoning behind 1 but...this is a dumb thing to have against it. "Magic" does whatever magic wants, because it's not real. And if it can force them to dance against their will, it can force them to make out against their will. They don't need to be gay to magically make out with each other. <_<

Yeah that's odd to me too.

If magic can override free will then of course it can make them gay.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Hey surprise surprise a topic insulting me and the Lead Mod Error is doing his job setting the example by... joining in on the bullying as per usual.

Says it all right there
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

TheVipaGTS posted...

DreadedWave posted...

TheVipaGTS posted...

the only time i hear about them is mostly when someone on CE

It must be nice living in a hole in the ground with internet that only connects to CE

..i don't. sure i hear about the Kardashians here and there but you act like they control the world and you can't go outside without hearing about them...Probably because you have an irrational hatred for them and let any mention of them upset you way more than it should...I'll see mentions on Facebook or whatever, overhear coworkers or friends talk about something they did here and there...its not a big deal lol...

The Kardashians like them or not are a big deal and popular. People talk about them all the time.

Pretending no one cares about them either makes you a liar or a social outcast.

Getting really angry on the internet makes the latter the most likely.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton reportedly wants to preach her Methodist faith in an informal capacity. Clinton's longtime pastor revealed the former Democratic nominee's religious ambitions while promoting a book containing the scriptures he sent her during the 2016 presidential race.

On Aug. 6, Methodist pastor Bill Shillady of the United Methodist City Society disclosed that Clinton had told him of her desire to preach during her presidential campaign. Shillady asserted that Clinton would "make a great pastor."

The Clinton confidant clarified that the former first lady was unlikely to pursue becoming a deaconess.

"I think it would be more of ... her guest preaching at some point," Shillady said. "We have a long history of lay preachers in the United Methodist Church." Shillady is set to publish a book containing the daily devotionals that he had sent Clinton during her presidential campaign, titled "Strong for a Moment Like This."

"I do not believe that she encouraged me to write this book in any way to change the image of her," Shillady added.

Clinton became deeply involved in Bible study and the First United Methodist Church during her childhood in Park Ridge, Illinois. The future secretary of state was strongly influenced by Methodist youth minister Don Jones.

"[Jones] took Hillary and the youth group into the slums of Chicago, had them interact with poor blacks and Puerto Ricans, and brought them to hear [Martin Luther King Jr.] preach," history professor William Chafe of Duke University told PolitiFact.

Clinton later attributed Jones' religious teachings to her conversion from a Goldwater Republican to a Democrat.

While Clinton's religious life is well-documented, a large portion of the general public has been skeptical of her religiosity. In January 2016, a Pew Research Center poll found that 48 percent of national adults viewed Clinton as religious while 43 percent did not.

Professor Kristin Du Mez of Calvin College, a Clinton biographer, said it was "baffling to me that so many other Americans not only didn't know she was Methodist, but didn't accept that she was Christian."

Clinton fared poorly among Christian voters during the 2016 presidential election. Based on 2016 exit polling, Pew found that only 39 percent of Protestants voted for Clinton while 58 percent voted for President Donald Trump. Among Catholics, 45 percent voted for Clinton while 52 percent sided with Trump.

White evangelicals were the biggest boosters of Trump, with 81 percent casting a vote for him and only 16 percent preferring Clinton.

In October 2016, Ed Stetzer, executive director of the Billy Graham Center for Evangelism explained that the majority of evangelicals doubted Clinton's religiosity because she supported abortion rights and was a vocal feminist.

Mark Tooley, president of the conservative think tank Religion and Democracy, asserted that Clinton's political critics crossed a line when they questioned her Methodist faith.

"Too often conservatives have been too dismissive of her religious beliefs, which are sincere," Tooley said. "She was shaped by the church and is still committed to it, and you can't understand her political framework without understanding her Methodist background."


Full Article: http://www.opposingviews.com/i/religion/hillary-clinton-reportedly-considering-becoming-methodist-preacher



Trump beat her so bad she literally turned to God.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

gafemaqs posted...

Who

Kendall Jenner
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Kendall Jenner sparked some controversy on Twitter for her use of an emoji.

The 21-year-old supermodel took to Twitter to celebrate the cover of The Hollywood Reporter, which features her, her sister Kylie Jenner, her mother Kris Jenner and her half-sisters Kim, Khloe and Kourtney Kardashian, the Daily Mail reported. The cover celebrated 10 years of the hit reality television show "Keeping Up With The Kardashians" on E!

"Sister power...girl power," Kendall tweeted, adding a tanned fist bump emoji. The choice of emoji had some Twitter users accusing the model of once again attempting to appropriate black culture.

Many fans defended Kendall and the Kardashians. "Her sisters are Armenian... she has a right to use that emoji just as we all do," wrote one Twitter user. "The tone she used it literally called medium... not black!"

"Can everyone like calm down with the hand thing it is an emoji so what if it is a different colour like who cares," wrote another. "Legit cannot believe the comments on this people are so stupid and ridiculous legit shut up what has she ever done to you," added another user.

Kendall did not respond to the accusations. In the magazine interview, Kim revealed that it isn't unlike Kendall to keep her emotions private. She spoke about how the widespread criticism over her controversial Pepsi commercial affected her half-sister behind the scenes.

"We're not perfect, but you see these things in the media, like Kendall and her Pepsi ad, where I see her at home crying," Kim told the magazine. "But in the media she looks another way because she's not addressing it."

"I'm the most private one. If there's a moment I don't want anyone to hear, I talk to myself or talk to someone in another room," Kendall added.

Kim revealed that she tried encouraging Kendall to speak out after the backlash, or to at least allow E! to use emotional scenes on the show.

"I'm just like, 'This is wrong. You need to speak up.' She [Kendall] was like, 'I don't ever want to show that footage of me crying,'" Kim explained. "She was trying to not make excuses or be dramatic, but that was what she was going through at the time."

"There are moments when it's hard to leave something in because it's vulnerable and it exposes us to a deeper level of emotion, and sometimes that's hard to share," Kris added.

The Pepsi ad was pulled within 24 hours of its premiere in April after facing severe scrutiny for trivializing Black Lives Matter demonstrations.


Full Article: http://www.opposingviews.com/i/social/kendall-jenner-accused-cultural-appropriation

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DHW8IxYV0AA5iy5.jpg

Liberals seem to be sleeplessly angry at this woman.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Twinmold posted...

I like how no care or attention at all is put into how men are depicted in porn or how porn affects men, just women.

Lmao, how shut-in do you have to be to feel marginalized by porn as a man?

Equally as much as any girl I would say
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

RE_expert44 posted...

It's because they do

Interesting because the far left Russians fought the Nazis
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

National broadcaster NRK’s P3 channel will be debuting a show in November aimed at giving teenagers a healthier relationship with their own bodies and sexual desires.
The programme, ‘Line fikser kroppen’ (Line fixes her body), will feature host Line Elvsåshagen taking on issues like body positivity and unrealistic expectations for sex.

Elvsåshagen recently starred in the reality TV show ‘Line dater Norge’ (Line dates Norway), in which she travelled across the country in search of the perfect man, with help from her 130,000-plus followers on Instagram.

P3’s editorial director said the new Elvsåshagen programme will offer a counter narrative to the way sex and the female body are portrayed in porn.

“Just showing surgically-enhanced bodies and overly-choreagrophed sex creates false hopes and misperceptions. We hope that by showing sex in its entirety, rather than just merely as penetration, we can provide the target group with the right approach,” Håkon Moslet.

This will be done in part by showing regular people having actual sex.

As part of P3’s attempt to reach its target group of 17-year-old girls, the channel has been searching for couples who are willing to engage in intimate acts in front of the rolling cameras.

“The idea is not to show sexual organs in action but rather to move away from a glorified image and show that sex is a nice and intimate situation that can often be a bit clumsy without being dangerous,” Elvsåshagen said.

P3 has been reaching out to blogs and hanging posters throughout the country in an effort to recruit couples willing to have sex for the show. Moslet said that there have already been a number of couples expressing their willingness to participate.

Norwegian television has a history of approaching sex in a straightforward manner that would be unthinkable in other parts of the world. The children’s science programme ‘Newton’ received international attention in 2015 after Facebook censored a clip showing presenter Line Jansrud drawing female sexual organs on the naked body of her assistant.

Other episodes of the popular programme’s series on puberty featured Jansrud demonstrating how to use half a tomato to practice kissing and using rubber models to show how masturbation and penetrative sex work.

Even the wildly popular Norwegian TV series Skam faced initial resistance from foreign buyers who were put off by the show’s frank approach to sex and excessive drinking.


Full Article: https://www.thelocal.no/20170801/wanted-norwegians-willing-to-have-sex-on-tv



I like how no care or attention at all is put into how men are depicted in porn or how porn affects men, just women.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

"He was a man of his time" is such bullshit
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg has come in for sharp criticism after being quoted as saying the Nazis and the extreme left had “much in common”.

The comments by Solberg were published by the Dagbladet newspaper on August 11th in response to a neo-Nazi demonstration in Kristiansand – not to last weekend’s events in Charlottesville, USA in which a woman was killed by a far right demonstrator.

US President Donald Trump was widely criticised by both Democrats and members of the Republican party for seeking to draw a parallel between Nazi demonstrators in Charlottesville and left wing counter protesters including the Antifa group.

Taken in the overall context of the Dagbladet article, Solberg’s comments are intended to support her position that the government would fight all kinds of extremism. “Right wing extremists and neo-Nazis have a lot in common with the extreme left or religious extremism. They seek to whip up hate, division and conflict within Norwegian society,” Solberg wrote.

The comments have been strongly criticised by some of Norway’s left-wing politicians. Snorre Valen of the Socialist Left Party (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) called Solberg’s comments “completely irresponsible and amateur” in a post on Twitter. The PM should condemn Nazism clearly, Valen wrote.

“When uniformed Nazis are marching in our streets, Norwegian Jews and gay people are *actually* threatened. This is not an academic debate,” the MP wrote.

Valen cited the response by Republicans to Trump’s statements on the US extreme right in his criticism of Solberg.

“We need you to say ‘we’ve fought Nazism before and we’ll fight it again’, not weak distractions like ‘the others are also bad’," he wrote. In a tweet posted in response to Valen, Solberg cited violence by protesters at July’s G20 summit in Hamburg as an example of left wing extremism

Bjørnar Moxnes, leader of the far-left Red Party, which does not hold any seats in parliament, said Solberg should apologise for her comments.

“This is bringing Trump rhetoric into the Norwegian election campaign. Being extreme against racism is not the same as wanting to wipe out minorities. I think it is harsh, provocative and disappointing that Solberg makes this kind of comparison,” Moxnes told NRK.

“It should be quite easy to condemn terror by neo-Nazis and jihadists without bringing up us on the far left,” he added.

The Red leader said that his party “naturally rejects terror of any kind”.

Solberg’s Høyre (Conservative) party colleague Henrik Asheim called the parallels drawn by the opposition parties a “nadir”.

“It’s disappointing that otherwise sincere politicians such as Snorre Valen are bringing themselves down to this level in the election campaign. It is completely uncontroversial to point out common characteristics between right wing extremists and left wing radicals in this context,” he said to NRK.

“I think that the Red Party, the Socialist Left and voters can all see that it is weak to compare Erna Solberg, who is running an election campaign from Bergen, with Donald Trump in the USA,” he added.

Full Article: https://www.thelocal.no/20170818/norways-pm-criticised-for-comparing-neo-nazis-to-far-left



It's interesting that European politicians use Trump being compared to Trump politics as an insult.

You'd think that would be bad for relations. It's hard to imagine France going "We don't need that Obama Rhetoric here!" 7 years ago.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

NihilistTurian posted...

Depends on whether or not the characters casting the spell called it a punishment or not, I suppose.

They didn't "call it" a punishment but they were clearly humiliating the guys because they were being overbearing

That is a punishment
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

Did TC just assume no one would read anything but the topic title?
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

ChromaticAngel posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Sephiroth1288 posted...

This story is as stupid as that time people got upset with Obama over saying "We tortured some folks."

I disagree.

It was bad of Obama to be so flippant about America torturing people.

I'll take a president who is flippant about people we tortured previously over one that says "I'd bring back waterboarding and a whole lot worse." and then also lies about military operations that kill us military forces for no fucking reason.

It's literally Benghazi 2.0 except in the ocean and this time it's the president's fault and not a figurehead Secretary of State.

Good for you but in my eyes "Well this guy isn't as bad as that guy!" isn't a defense.

I'm against torture sure so I am biased but even those who are pro-torture cannot downplay it by being so flippantly childish as if it doesn't matter. That's horrible.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg

lilORANG posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

When you're only means if conveying how bad people are, is using means and devices said people have created, shared and given to you. The your message has destroyed itself.

that is a poorly constructed argument

Ur face is a poorly constructed argument.
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg