Current Events > Male Porn Stars rush to get vasectomies after Roe reversal to show solidarity

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://www.thedailybeast.com/male-porn-stars-rush-to-get-vasectomies-after-supreme-courts-roe-reversal

The radical Supreme Courts overruling of Roe v. Wade allowed numerous conservative states to ban abortion and strip women of their freedom. Right-wingers are already discussing plans to try to ban abortion in more statesand male porn stars arent taking any chances. All across porn valley, male adult performers are considering getting vasectomies to ensure they dont get co-stars pregnant on porn sets if anti-abortion legislation reaches California. When you work as a porn star, you have non-condom sex with numerous co-workers, so you run the risk of getting a scene partner pregnant. Adult performers work hard to avoid this scenariomany women take birth control or opt out of scenes that end with internal cum shots, but if you have ever had sex, you know accidents happen. Birth control occasionally fails. Ive never heard of a male performer impregnating his female co-star on set. We all know, though, those female performers could have abortions in emergencies. Now, theres a risk to all our worst-case-scenario plans. Some porn men dont want to run the risk of a pregnant colleague, so theyre snipping their baby-makers to make sure thats no longer a possibility. I never viewed abortion as birth control but as something to be used in a last-ditch if something went completely wronga break-in-case-of-emergency situation, says porn star Matt Slayer. The Supreme Court taking away the right to choose made me give a long hard look at my role in any potential situation. I realized I should just take my baby batter out of the mix. Anti-abortion activists are already voicing their plans to target blue states like California. The Los Angeles Times reports that Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser aims to get abortion outlawed in the Golden State.

Adult star Xander Corvus says he chose to get a vasectomy because its what he can do to help women avoid pregnancies during these scary times. I figured the most direct form of solidarity a cis man can give in this situation is to get snipped, so I am, Corvus says. After all, its not like Dannenfelser and company will support every unwanted baby after its born? Slayer agrees: Why traumatize a partner with having to make that hard decision when I can be in and out of a doctors office in less time than it takes to record a podcast? Of course, men have their own interest in getting vasectomies. For decades, abortion was the last measure that could prevent a dude from paying 18 years of child support. Male performers are financially incentivized to avoid getting women pregnant. The net savings on not having to buy condoms should have this little operation turning a profit by the end of the fiscal year 2023, Slayer admits.

Lebronwon posted...

if anti-abortion legislation reaches California

These dudes are dumb. California is safe.

DanHaren22Champ posted...

These dudes are dumb. California is safe.

cant be sure of anything anymore.

Uhh

Umm

So, before...

Porn dudes are low-IQ.

why the fuck haven't they gotten them already?

do porn stars just have abortions all the time..?

itachi15243 posted...

Uhh

Umm

So, before...

uhh yeah...seems that way...

famfam posted...

do porn stars just have abortions all the time..?

Only if contraception fails

DanHaren22Champ posted...

These dudes are dumb. California is safe.

Yeah. But a lot of porn chicks dont actually live in California. They fly in for work. I think Piper Perri lived in like Texas or Missouri when her son was murdered.

famfam posted...

do porn stars just have abortions all the time..?

Well, Ive posted that Riley Reid video where shes laughing and talking about mission abort. So yeah, apparently they do.

Fucking ridiculous they weren't already doing that.

MrWizardWorld posted...

Well, Ive posted that Riley Reid video where shes laughing and talking about mission abort. So yeah, apparently they do.

That's kind of lousy, honestly. Don't get me wrong, it's a right which women need to have. There are troubled pregnancies, people unable to provide for children, people who aren't ready for parenthood, and people who just shouldn't be parents.

But to me, laughing about an abortion reads like saying, "I had to put my dog down. lol."

<_<

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


A fetus is a baby.

Abortion is like euthanasia / physician-assisted suicide - something I also agree with people having the right to. It's not murder, but it is terminating a life and should carry weight with it.

FortuneCookie posted...

That's kind of lousy, honestly. Don't get me wrong, it's a right which women need to have. There are troubled pregnancies, people unable to provide for children, people who aren't ready for parenthood, and people who just shouldn't be parents.

But to me, laughing about an abortion reads like saying, "I had to put my dog down. lol."

<_<

Not at all.

It reads more like, "hey I ate a fertilized chicken egg today lol"

FortuneCookie posted...

A fetus is a baby.

Abortion is like euthanasia / physician-assisted suicide - something I also agree with people having the right to. It's not murder, but it is terminating a life and should carry weight with it.

A baby can survive in this world detached from its mother. A fetus can't and before 20-22ish weeks, a fetus can't survive even on maximum life support.

FortuneCookie posted...

Abortion is like euthanasia / physician-assisted suicide - something I also agree with people having the right to. It's not murder, but it is terminating a life and should carry weight with it.

Your viewpoint on this is inaccurate too. Euthanasia is not something thats done. Terminating a life is completely different than terminally withdrawing life support. One of those things is active murder, the other is letting nature take its course.

DanHaren22Champ posted...

Not at all.

It reads more like, "hey I ate a fertilized chicken egg today lol"

I do feel bad if a carton of eggs expires without all of them being cooked up. It means that chicken was terminated for nothing.

FortuneCookie posted...

That's kind of lousy, honestly. Don't get me wrong, it's a right which women need to have. There are troubled pregnancies, people unable to provide for children, people who aren't ready for parenthood, and people who just shouldn't be parents.

But to me, laughing about an abortion reads like saying, "I had to put my dog down. lol."

<_<

I think you're literally right. It should be a woman's choice whether she has a baby. But to laugh about it? That's unacceptable.

DanHaren22Champ posted...

Your viewpoint on this is inaccurate too. Euthanasia is not something thats done. Terminating a life is completely different than terminally withdrawing life support. One of those things is active murder, the other is letting nature take its course.

I get the active vs passive argument, but I can't see how allowing a still-living body to die of dehydration or suffocation is more ethical than peacefully putting someone to sleep.

FortuneCookie posted...

people who aren't ready for parenthood, and people who just shouldn't be parents.

out of all the things that could happen these are the worse 2 scenarios that could result that wouldn't benefit the child.
especially the last one.

DanHaren22Champ posted...

These dudes are dumb. California is safe.

Imagine believing that conservatives won't break the filibuster the instant they get a chance to pass a federal abortion ban.

FortuneCookie posted...

I get the active vs passive argument, but I can't see how allowing a still-living body to die of dehydration or suffocation is more ethical than peacefully putting someone to sleep.

Because you're not letting them suffer as it happens. You're treating pain and anxiety but not treating the untreatable, futile, medical condition. I do this for a living, I'm happy to explain in more detail.

ScazarMeltex posted...

Imagine believing that conservatives won't break the filibuster the instant they get a chance to pass a federal abortion ban.

manwich and cinema get to see the fruits of labor for blocking the filibuster for what conservatives love to do without it.

Vasectomies are not a good substitute for abortions, even in protest.

DanHaren22Champ posted...

Because you're not letting them suffer as it happens. You're treating pain and anxiety but not treating the untreatable, futile, medical condition. I do this for a living, I'm happy to explain in more detail.

When my dog's hips got to a point that she was unable to stand up, I'm glad that we were able to put her down peacefully in a matter of seconds instead of administering pain medication while waiting for nature to take its course.

As it stands, physician-assisted suicide is the only equivalent we have for humans. And that's only if the victim is in good enough shape to self-administer. If you give the injection for them, you have a homicide charge on your hands. That's how they got Dr. Kevorkian.

FortuneCookie posted...

When my dog's hips got to a point that she was unable to stand up

yeah that wouldn't be something i would want to let the dog suffer through.
my cat had to be put down because of abdominal cancer (i could've bought a few weeks but didn't want to see her suffer the whole time).

i have to keep my dog happy despite her arthiritis issue. if i can get at least 12 years with her it's all good.

Doesn't mean all the women they are fucking in the porn biz are from California, and they could move.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Vasectomies are not a good substitute for abortions, even in protest.

^^

And they're not as reversible as many seem to mistakenly think.

Nerevar791 posted...

they're not as reversible as many seem to mistakenly think.

thanks conservatives. now men have to cut their weiners off to not get women pregnant.

Kings

i just research vasectomies and only 2-3% of your ejaculate is actually sperm cells so there seems to be no downside. I'll probably get one in 2 years or so. Im 37, have no kids, want no kids.