Poll of the Day > I got modded for posting a scientific study from the CDC.

Topic List	Page List: 1
MartianManchild 11/03/21 7:06:46 PM #1:	Guess the mods are against science <cite>MartianManchild posted [p:959665747] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Guess the mods are against science </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 11/03/21 7:08:41 PM #2:	Are you sure you didnt get modded for, you know, being you? <cite>Cacciato posted [p:959665808] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Are you sure you didnt get modded for, you know, being you? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 11/03/21 7:14:35 PM #3:	Did you merely post it, or did you strip it of all context and use it to draw conclusions that it does not actually support? --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:959665977] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Did you merely post it, or did you strip it of all context and use it to draw conclusions that it does not actually support? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MartianManchild 11/03/21 7:17:06 PM #4:	adjl posted... Did you merely post it, or did you strip it of all context and use it to draw conclusions that it does not actually support? It was the study about myocarditis. I guess I got modded for saying not many people would pay attention to it. It was up for nearly two weeks before some butthurt mod deleted it knowing you cant contest them anymore. <cite>MartianManchild posted [p:959666058] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Did you merely post it, or did you strip it of all context and use it to draw conclusions that it does not actually support?</quote>It was the study about myocarditis. I guess I got modded for saying not many people would pay attention to it. It was up for nearly two weeks before some butthurt mod deleted it knowing you cant contest them anymore. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 11/03/21 7:20:15 PM #5:	Oh. So it was for you being you. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:959666130] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Oh. So it was for you being you. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MartianManchild 11/03/21 7:20:16 PM #6:	Cacciato posted... Are you sure you didnt get modded for, you know, being you? I know the rules of this site. I might walk a fine line but I know what Im doing to stay within the TOU. Why do you think Im still around? This was a clear example of mod abuse with the mod taking advantage of the new system. <cite>MartianManchild posted [p:959666132] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Cacciato posted... </cite> <quote>Are you sure you didnt get modded for, you know, being you?</quote>I know the rules of this site. I might walk a fine line but I know what Im doing to stay within the TOU. Why do you think Im still around? This was a clear example of mod abuse with the mod taking advantage of the new system. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 11/03/21 7:20:51 PM #7:	Cacciato posted... Oh. So it was for you being you. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:959666161] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Cacciato posted... </cite> <quote>Oh. So it was for you being you.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 11/03/21 7:22:59 PM #8:	MartianManchild posted... It was the study about myocarditis. I guess I got modded for saying not many people would pay attention to it. It was up for nearly two weeks before some butthurt mod deleted it knowing you cant contest them anymore. So... kinda. Studies without denominators don't mean much for assessing risks, which means that a denominator is critical context for posting a study with the intent of discussing what it means for risks. Leaving that out can mislead people into thinking the risks involved are greater than they are, which in this case of Covid vaccines is significantly impairing the public health response to the pandemic. Fair, next. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:959666230] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>MartianManchild posted... </cite> <quote>It was the study about myocarditis. I guess I got modded for saying not many people would pay attention to it. It was up for nearly two weeks before some butthurt mod deleted it knowing you cant contest them anymore.</quote> So... kinda. Studies without denominators don't mean much for assessing risks, which means that a denominator is critical context for posting a study with the intent of discussing what it means for risks. Leaving that out can mislead people into thinking the risks involved are greater than they are, which in this case of Covid vaccines is significantly impairing the public health response to the pandemic. Fair, next. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MartianManchild 11/03/21 7:24:43 PM #9:	Feel free to look up the topic in question on the archive site. It was not a TOU violation. The person who deleted the topic was obviously bias and shouldnt be a moderator or at least shouldnt handle marked messages against me. <cite>MartianManchild posted [p:959666273] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Feel free to look up the topic in question on the archive site. It was not a TOU violation. The person who deleted the topic was obviously bias and shouldnt be a moderator or at least shouldnt handle marked messages against me. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 11/03/21 10:40:37 PM #10:	MartianManchild posted... Feel free to look up the topic in question on the archive site. I don't need to. I participated in it and have a near-eidetic memory. The study in question summarized OpenVAERS data pertaining to myo(peri)carditis following Covid vaccinations, generally finding that there were more reports post-vaccine than would normally be expected. The study did not, however, indicate the number of vaccinations that took place to produce those results, which is understandable because that's just a limitation inherent in OpenVAERS (nobody reports negative results), but nonetheless must be considered in interpreting the data. What that means is that the data presented there is useless for actual risk analysis, and should be shared with caution because presenting the raw numbers instead of rates stands a high chance of causing the readers to overestimate the risks associated with the vaccines. You were moderated for that reason: Posting misleading information in a manner that supports a dangerous anti-vaxx viewpoint. In the future, if you wish to share similar studies, make sure you include some sort of denominator so you're indicating rates, rather than raw numbers. That way, you enable the people reading your topic to make informed comparisons instead of being confused and misled by incomplete data. Incidentally, I already told you all of this when you asked my opinion in the original topic, so I really shouldn't have to repeat it here. Feel free to look up the topic in question on the archive site if you want my original explanation, which covered a few additional details (like VAERS' value for researchers and what should actually be done with studies like this). MartianManchild posted... It was not a TOU violation. The epidemic of misinformation surrounding this pandemic has necessitated some more liberal interpretations of the ToU. Things which would not previously have been considered violations are now frequently being moderated if they're felt to comprise dangerous misinformation, though the ToU have not explicitly been updated to spell that out. Irresponsibly posting studies like that without the appropriate context falls under that umbrella, so you were modded. Simple as that. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:959672014] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>MartianManchild posted... </cite> <quote>Feel free to look up the topic in question on the archive site.</quote> I don't need to. I participated in it and have a near-eidetic memory. The study in question summarized OpenVAERS data pertaining to myo(peri)carditis following Covid vaccinations, generally finding that there were more reports post-vaccine than would normally be expected. The study did not, however, indicate the number of vaccinations that took place to produce those results, which is understandable because that's just a limitation inherent in OpenVAERS (nobody reports negative results), but nonetheless must be considered in interpreting the data. What that means is that the data presented there is useless for actual risk analysis, and should be shared with caution because presenting the raw numbers instead of rates stands a high chance of causing the readers to overestimate the risks associated with the vaccines. You were moderated for that reason: Posting misleading information in a manner that supports a dangerous anti-vaxx viewpoint. In the future, if you wish to share similar studies, make sure you include some sort of denominator so you're indicating rates, rather than raw numbers. That way, you enable the people reading your topic to make informed comparisons instead of being confused and misled by incomplete data. Incidentally, I already told you all of this when you asked my opinion in the original topic, so I really shouldn't have to repeat it here. Feel free to look up the topic in question on the archive site if you want my original explanation, which covered a few additional details (like VAERS' value for researchers and what should actually be done with studies like this). MartianManchild posted... </cite> <quote>It was not a TOU violation.</quote> The epidemic of misinformation surrounding this pandemic has necessitated some more liberal interpretations of the ToU. Things which would not previously have been considered violations are now frequently being moderated if they're felt to comprise dangerous misinformation, though the ToU have not explicitly been updated to spell that out. Irresponsibly posting studies like that without the appropriate context falls under that umbrella, so you were modded. Simple as that. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#11	Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
jsb0714 11/04/21 12:02:43 AM #12:	MartianManchild posted... Why do you think Im still around? Who knows? No one likes you so you just come to GameFAQs and post shit? <cite>jsb0714 posted [p:959674210] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>MartianManchild posted... </cite> <quote>Why do you think Im still around?</quote>Who knows? No one likes you so you just come to GameFAQs and post shit? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReturnOfFa 11/04/21 12:05:07 AM #13:	You were probably moderated for misrepresenting it. --- girls like my fa <cite>ReturnOfFa posted [p:959674259] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>You were probably moderated for misrepresenting it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 11/04/21 12:36:56 AM #14:	I tagged you in that other thread you had about fauchi and you never responded. Why do you act like you care about your shit posts now? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:959674965] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>I tagged you in that other thread you had about fauchi and you never responded. Why do you act like you care about your shit posts now? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReturnOfFa 11/04/21 2:41:33 AM #15:	BlackScythe0 posted... I tagged you in that other thread you had about fauchi and you never responded. Why do you act like you care about your shit posts now? MartianManchild --- girls like my fa <cite>ReturnOfFa posted [p:959677123] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>I tagged you in that other thread you had about fauchi and you never responded. Why do you act like you care about your shit posts now?</quote>MartianManchild </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FatalAccident 11/04/21 2:42:56 AM #16:	Bruh who the f cares lol grown man crying about being moderated wow guess u are a manchild --- walks away <cite>FatalAccident posted [p:959677149] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Bruh who the f cares lol grown man crying about being moderated wow guess u are a manchild </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Grinderpug 11/04/21 3:00:50 AM #17:	Lmao get wrecked Manchild --- Grrr <cite>Grinderpug posted [p:959677346] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Lmao get wrecked Manchild </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 11/04/21 5:31:55 AM #18:	adjl posted... The epidemic of misinformation surrounding this pandemic has necessitated some more liberal interpretations of the ToU. That should never happen. Rules should be taken as literally as possible. Anything else would be mods making up their own rules. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:959679133] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted...</cite> <quote>The epidemic of misinformation surrounding this pandemic has necessitated some more liberal interpretations of the ToU. </quote> That should never happen. Rules should be taken as literally as possible. Anything else would be mods making up their own rules.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ozmose 11/04/21 5:54:11 AM #19:	Revelation34 posted... That should never happen. Rules should be taken as literally as possible. Anything else would be mods making up their own rules. That sounds an awful lot like "wrong think" to me. You act like there's some kind free speech. Better get with the times. Only terrorists speak their mind without following the pre-approved narrative. Are you a terrorist? --- Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation. - Oscar Wilde <cite>Ozmose posted [p:959679383] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>That should never happen. Rules should be taken as literally as possible. Anything else would be mods making up their own rules.</quote>That sounds an awful lot like "wrong think" to me. You act like there's some kind free speech. Better get with the times. Only terrorists speak their mind without following the pre-approved narrative. Are you a terrorist? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 11/04/21 8:50:08 AM #20:	Revelation34 posted... That should never happen. Rules should be taken as literally as possible. Anything else would be mods making up their own rules. There's precedent for moderating people for trolling for encouraging people to do dangerous things. This really isn't any different. Some subjective interpretation is always going to be necessary, since human behaviour is too diverse for the rules' wording to ever hope to explicitly cover everything that's needed, so I'd say that's good enough. Fortunately, being moderated on GameFAQs is one of the most trivial consequences possible, so erring a bit on the side of caution isn't exactly a big deal. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:959681644] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>That should never happen. Rules should be taken as literally as possible. Anything else would be mods making up their own rules.</quote> There's precedent for moderating people for trolling for encouraging people to do dangerous things. This really isn't any different. Some subjective interpretation is always going to be necessary, since human behaviour is too diverse for the rules' wording to ever hope to explicitly cover everything that's needed, so I'd say that's good enough. Fortunately, being moderated on GameFAQs is one of the most trivial consequences possible, so erring a bit on the side of caution isn't exactly a big deal. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 11/04/21 10:53:11 AM #21:	MartianManchild posted... Guess the mods are against science where have you been? they have been against it for years. just try talking about science as it relates to gender --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:959684692] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>MartianManchild posted...</cite> <quote>Guess the mods are against science </quote> where have you been? they have been against it for years. just try talking about science as it relates to gender</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 11/04/21 10:56:16 AM #22:	Krazy_Kirby posted... where have you been? they have been against it for years. just try talking about science as it relates to gender You understand gender science about as well as you understand body temperature, so... --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:959684768] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Krazy_Kirby posted... </cite> <quote>where have you been? they have been against it for years. just try talking about science as it relates to gender</quote> You understand gender science about as well as you understand body temperature, so... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InfernalFive 11/04/21 11:12:25 AM #23:	username checks out --- http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyfabsU4xH1qzy531o1_500.jpg https://imgur.com/ggCrHk8 <cite>InfernalFive posted [p:959685206] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>username checks out </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 11/04/21 11:16:23 AM #24:	adjl posted... You understand gender science about as well as you understand body temperature, so... Lmao <cite>Cacciato posted [p:959685321] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>You understand gender science about as well as you understand body temperature, so...</quote>Lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 11/04/21 11:29:35 AM #25:	Cacciato posted... Lmao --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:959685670] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Cacciato posted... </cite> <quote>Lmao</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 11/04/21 12:15:04 PM #26:	adjl posted... You understand gender science about as well as you understand body temperature, so... I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:959686969] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted...</cite> <quote> You understand gender science about as well as you understand body temperature, so... </quote> I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lorthremar 11/04/21 12:20:33 PM #27:	lmao get rolled --- the 9/11 buildings got destroyed in the 9/11 thing - xyphilia <cite>Lorthremar posted [p:959687166] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>lmao get rolled </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
helIy 11/04/21 12:27:36 PM #28:	Krazy_Kirby posted... I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination must be, cuz that's not how it works lmao --- save me, chainsaw man <cite>helIy posted [p:959687380] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Krazy_Kirby posted... </cite> <quote>I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination</quote>must be, cuz that's not how it works lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 11/04/21 1:13:18 PM #29:	Krazy_Kirby posted... I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination It wasn't your imagination, but it does mean you don't understand body temperature very well. If you did, you'd give people a chance to warm up so superficial temperature readings were a more accurate reflection of their core temperature. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:959688863] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Krazy_Kirby posted... </cite> <quote>I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination</quote> It wasn't your imagination, but it does mean you don't understand body temperature very well. If you did, you'd give people a chance to warm up so superficial temperature readings were a more accurate reflection of their core temperature. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 11/04/21 1:31:11 PM #30:	Krazy_Kirby posted... I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination Thank you for at least being direct and proving his point. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:959689420] in I got modd... [t:79742248]...</cite> <quote>Krazy_Kirby posted... </cite> <quote>I guess seeing over 100 readings on numerous days that were all low when it was cold out was my magination</quote>Thank you for at least being direct and proving his point. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > I got modded for posting a scientific study from the CDC. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > I got modded for posting a scientific study from the CDC.