Poll of the Day > Disney FIRES ESPN Blonde cause she said the VACCINE causes INFERTILITY!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

ESPN has fired 37 y/o Allison Williams who REFUSED to comply with the company to get a COVID-19 vaccine because she's trying to get PREGNANT again and has DEFENDED not getting it cause of the vaccine that would cause her to be INFERTILE!!

She was initially barred from working on the sidelines of a college football game because she refused the vaccine mandate while she and her husband were trying to have a second child.

She posted an instagram video on the termination and stated she has worked there since 2011 and works college and basketball games but missed the first week before making an announcement.

She requested accomodation instead of the vaccine and was denied who said "Belief is a word i've been thinking about alot lately, because in addition to the medical apprehensions regarding my desire to have another child in regards to receiving this injection, i am also so morally and ethically not aligned with this. And i've had to really dig deep and analyze my values and my morals and ultimately i need to put them first. And the irony in all this is that a lot of those same values and principals i hold so dear are what made me a really good employee and probably helped with the success that i've been to do in my career.".

She cited her FERTILITY SPECIALIST on NOT getting the vaccine cause it will cause her to be infertile and not have kids as she said her role as a mother is more important than her career

The CDC said there is no evidence that says the vaccine causes infertility as Disney, which owns ESPN has mandated all salaried and non-union hourly employees to be vaccinated

It got backlash such as Sage Steele but eventually they DID get it.

Allison however refuses and said she will not apologize for making this decision and says they live in a country of freedom and people out to respect that.

She didn't take this decision lightly as she had a lot of PRAYER and discussions with GOD on thsi but she ultimately put her family first and thanked ESPN for the job she loved and will miss but she can't wait to be a mother again too

Do you know more pro or anti-vaxxers irl?

https://i.imgur.com/U4Um30Q.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/BBeEyw7.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/wyk4E8D.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/N8KxznD.png
https://i.imgur.com/RZBnY1l.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/s86w5mP.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/epvUxfz.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/LWKpXRN.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/zRp8GJ0.jpg
---

She should do her research.

there is not only no indication in any study that the vaccines are harmful when pregnant but not taking it could expose her baby and her to complications more severe.

pregnant women or women who want to get pregnant who dont get it are likely to be unfit mothers.

---

Didn't ask 'Is She Hot?'...

I'm a big sports person and I've never heard of her so she really is only notable for being an idiot. She just got hired at Ben Shapiro's nutjob news place the Daily Wire so it's pretty clear it was never about pregnancy or infertility

Also the daily wire has over 100 employees so she'll be required to get vaxxed there anyway

---

Where is the option "I am neither pro-vax nor anti-vax, but pro people making their own decisions?"

---

SantaKhala posted...

Where is the option "I am neither pro-vax nor anti-vax, but pro people making their own decisions?"

Are you in favour of people making their own decisions about whether or not to stop at red lights?

---

adjl posted...

Are you in favour of people making their own decisions about whether or not to stop at red lights?

The comparison does not have anything to do with the topic. You have the right to smoke or do weed, and no one is preventing you from it, but you cannot force me to consume it. Likewise, you have the right to inject yourself with the experimental vaccine, and no one will deny you that right. But at the same time no one should force you to take double and triple booster jabs.

If you have had the virus, your natural immune system is superior to what any experimental vaccine can do for you. And if you are healthy and not afraid to get sick of the common cold, the flu virus, the coronavirus, or any other virus, keep healthy, eat healthy, and exercise regularly. The flu used to kill 40,000 people in the US each year, mostly immunodeficient, morbidly obese, or elderly.

Sadly, too many people who have taken the vaccine have had bad side effects of severe injuries or even deaths. It is a sad tragedy that is easily preventable.

---

SantaKhala posted...

If you have had the virus, your natural immune system is superior to what any experimental vaccine can do for you.

Urhhh.. sorry, but I guess you're really confused about how vaccines work, because this statement is a doozy.

Someone who has not had covid will, all else held equal, if they are vaccinated, tend to fare better against covid than if they were unvaccinated. That's demonstrable fact. Full stop.

---

SantaKhala posted...

The comparison does not have anything to do with the topic.

It has everything to do with the claim that you are "pro people making their own decisions." Or are you suggesting that you're picking and choosing instances in which you are "pro people making their own decisions," thereby completely eliminating any argumentative value your position might have had?

---

Clench281 posted...

Someone who has not had covid will, all else held equal, if they are vaccinated, tend to fare better against covid than if they were unvaccinated. That's demonstrable fact. Full stop.

This is what Fauci and the media tell us. But they have proven time and again that they are not to be trusted.

https://vaccinedeaths.com/2021-10-25-majority-of-covid-deaths-are-fully-vaccinated.html

https://openvaers.com/index.php

And anyone who dares to question that gets censored. If you use the Google search engine, they hide the search results that do not fit their narrative. That is why many are moving toward more honest search engines. Likewise, if you make such post on most social media, your post will get censored, and your account may get suspended or terminated. The voices of opposition are effectively getting silence. It is clear to many that they are colluding together to hide something, and that they are worried sick that the truth will one day get exposed.

---

Most of the people I know support the vaccines.

---

SantaKhala posted...

This is what Fauci and the media tell us. But they have proven time and again that they are not to be trusted.

https://vaccinedeaths.com/2021-10-25-majority-of-covid-deaths-are-fully-vaccinated.html

https://openvaers.com/index.php

And anyone who dares to question that gets censored. If you use the Google search engine, they hide the search results that do not fit their narrative. That is why many are moving toward more honest search engines. Likewise, if you make such post on most social media, your post will get censored, and your account may get suspended or terminated. The voices of opposition are effectively getting silence. It is clear to many that they are colluding together to hide something, and that they are worried sick that the truth will one day get exposed.

Your "vaccine deaths" link is only reporting the raw counts of deaths between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. You cannot ascertain whether the vaccine reduces mortality using raw death counts alone.

The fact you're linking that info as supporting your view tells us you don't actually have the education necessary to research this on your own.

---

SantaKhala posted...

This is what Fauci and the media tell us. But they have proven time and again that they are not to be trusted.

---

SantaKhala posted...

And anyone who dares to question that gets censored. If you use the Google search engine, they hide the search results that do not fit their narrative. That is why many are moving toward more honest search engines. Likewise, if you make such post on most social media, your post will get censored, and your account may get suspended or terminated. The voices of opposition are effectively getting silence. It is clear to many that they are colluding together to hide something, and that they are worried sick that the truth will one day get exposed.

That, or it's dangerous misinformation that has literally caused millions of deaths and every responsible platform is trying to prevent that from spreading. This assumption that "they don't want me saying this" means you're speaking the truth is not logically defensible at all.

SantaKhala posted...

https://vaccinedeaths.com/2021-10-25-majority-of-covid-deaths-are-fully-vaccinated.html

Protip: If you're going to compare rates, it's a good idea to include a denominator. Without it, you aren't actually comparing rates, which means whatever you're saying becomes completely devoid of semantic value.

---

i could go into vaers and say that the vaccine made my ass explode

and then vaers would say that the vaccine makes your ass explode

open vaers is really not at all what people think it is
---

Notably, VAERS is useful primarily as a starting point for research. Researchers treat it as a list of possible associations that may exist, then work from there to discover if an association exists, how strong it is, and try to infer a causal mechanism if possible. For laypersons, its usefulness mostly consists of saying "maybe there's an association there, I should look for actual publications on that subject in the coming months." It does pretty much nothing to facilitate informed risk analysis.

---

i submitted to vaers that the vaccine caused me to turn into chris evans
---

Ehh I don't like your phrasing of the choices.

Should say freedom of choice instead of anti-vaxxer

I'm not an anti-vaxer, but I'm staying the hell away from this one. which is my freedom of choice to do so.

---

^ That's the way. It is okay that some people do not want to do their own research, and would rather follow the corrupt politicians blindly like sheep. I am not wishing them death, and I hope they treat us with the same civility.

---

SantaKhala posted...

^ That's the way. It is okay that some people do not want to do their own research, and would rather follow the corrupt politicians blindly like sheep. I am not wishing them death, and I hope they treat us with the same civility.

... Says the person who proved they are incapable of doing their own research.

---

SantaKhala posted...

^ That's the way. It is okay that some people do not want to do their own research, and would rather follow the corrupt politicians blindly like sheep. I am not wishing them death, and I hope they treat us with the same civility.

Except everyone that does their own research arrives at the conclusion that being vaccinated is significantly safer than not. That is, after all, what literally all available evidence and data indicate. Anyone that arrives at a different conclusion either hasn't finished doing their research or was never doing it properly in the first place, because that conclusion is objectively wrong.

Arriving at the same conclusion as corrupt politicians doesn't mean you're blindly following them. It just means water boils at 100 C (at sea level) regardless of how corrupt you are.

---

Adam_Savage posted...

i submitted to vaers that the vaccine caused me to turn into chris evans

I submitted that it caused me to turn into Jessica Alba.

If it makes people infertile, I highly suggest she gets it.

---

It's really very clear that the people thinking the vaccine causes infertility have never tried to get a tubal ligation. If there were any chance that this vaccine would sterilize (white) women under age 40, you'd have to search high and low for a doctor that would even consider giving it to them, and even then they'd still be expected to sign a bunch of paperwork absolving them of liability if they later decided infertility was a dealbreaker and regretted getting it.

---