Poll of the Day > lol i'm warned again

(+) Yeah! (+)

Joe_Biden posted...

Not for nothing, there's a lot of fucking morons on this board and sometimes you just gotta call 'em how you see 'em

---

JixHedgehog posted...

@Modest_Mouse
https://news.yahoo.com/more-1-500-coronavirus-positive-205500567.html

Gawd dang it Joe

lmao that's a fucking Washington Examiner article try finding a legitimate source instead of that biased "news for MAGA idiots"

---

wwinterj25 posted...

I mean you have to understand how that post reads and what it implies.

His implication seems to be towards the historical childbearing age which skewed way younger, which is why shows like GoT wound up aging characters because framing the show within the context of historical accuracy makes modern viewers incredibly uncomfortable because the paradigm has gradually shifted.

ReturnOfFa posted...

No sir, I do not need to dispute puberty in order to be able to dispute the 12-year old body being 'ready' for pregnancy. Defining a 12-year old as 'ready' for pregnancy ignores reality - that not all 12 - year olds will even be able to conceive (you mention puberty, have all girls had their period by 12???? likely most but not all by far + that is not the only thing that prepares the female reproductive system to be able to bear a child). Besides that, they are nowhere near the optimum level of development to carry a child. Do you or anyone seriously think that a 12-year old's body is ready to bear a child? Besides the physical limits here, we're also going to completely ignore the psychological limits? Oh, and also the most problematic part that most people seem to take issue with - impregnating a 12 year old? That's why everyone is so pissed off and grossed out. I decided to go into some mind-numbing detail because Sunny won't, because he's a coward.

That's a generally fallacious argument (riddled with bad faith assertions, including the fact that many girls who would have difficulty at early ages would *still* have difficulty at later ages, if they were able at all) that seems to rely more on modern social moors than actual biology. But at the same, I just don't care enough to break down where your arguments fall flat, particularly since I agree that in this day and age that preteens -- and teens in general (and even 18+ is iffy) -- shouldn't be getting pregnant within the current developed world. However, Sunny's assertion wasn't about the current developed world, so it doesn't line up there.

But from technical side, Sunny's argument reflects a general reality because we *have* seen stories about it, and he was discussing the idea from an absurd hypothetical stance that doesn't bear much relation to anything in our world today, which he was likely only doing to make an exaggerated point about our modern idea of adolescence (where adulthood has one from 14-16 to closer to 24 or 25, or even 30).


---

stop talking about pedophilia in my topic please thank you

---

Joe_Biden posted...

stop talking about pedophilia in my topic please thank you

Stop getting warned.

---

stop being a dumbass then

---

You're probably the last person who should try to insult anybody's intelligence. Kinda lulz, tbh, given it's you.

---

There is a permanent record. no matter how much sunny backtracks and tries to pretend he didnt say it, he did say it, and it is there for everyone to see.

Notschmendrake posted...

There is a permanent record. no matter how much sunny backtracks and tries to pretend he didnt say it, he did say it, and it is there for everyone to see.

Again, all Sunny did (except phrasing it as awkwardly as possible) was literally describe puberty. Nothing about that suggests he's advocating anything.

---

Zeus posted...

That's a generally fallacious argument that seems to rely more on modern social moors than actual biology.

i think you mean mores which is pronounced differently.

---

Zeus posted...

You're probably the last person who should try to insult anybody's intelligence. Kinda lulz, tbh, given it's you.

sorry, i don't take advice from the guy who gets shit on by everyone all the time~

Mead posted...

1500 had the vid

that is like some boomer jr shit

what is a boomer jr


---

Zeus posted...

His implication seems to be towards the historical childbearing age which skewed way younger, which is why shows like GoT wound up aging characters because framing the show within the context of historical accuracy makes modern viewers incredibly uncomfortable because the paradigm has gradually shifted.

It did not but nice try.

---

Joe_Biden posted...

i actually got warned, then suspended for calling sunny that repeatedly

and a few hours later it was entirely overturned without me even doing anything

so it is apparently fine to call him a dumbass

but this time it was for calling zeus a dumbass

Yup. Its sad but Zeus has shown over and over hes a racist whose openly bigoted and a compulsive liar. Mods wont do a thing if you say those cause hes given pages of evidence for it.

---

ReturnOfFa posted...

even having to post what I posted is stupid

but really, it isn't when you consider the state of sexual education in the USA (abysmal x1000000)

P sure Zeus doesnt have any experience in the area so its good youre breaking it down for him ELI5 style.

---

Have you ever considered not being a dick, OP?

how about you show me your vax card and i'll stop telling the truth

---

Joe_Biden posted...

how about you show me your vax card and i'll stop telling the truth

Why tf would I post my vax card here? Lol

First and second shot, nobody had to pay me to do it either.

---

OhhhJa posted...

Why tf would I post my vax card here? Lol

because no one believes you got the vaccine obvs

i'll post mine if you post yours

---

Joe_Biden posted...

because no one believes you got the vaccine obvs

i'll post mine if you post yours

You first

Zeus posted...

His implication seems to be towards the historical childbearing age which skewed way younger, which is why shows like GoT wound up aging characters because framing the show within the context of historical accuracy makes modern viewers incredibly uncomfortable because the paradigm has gradually shifted.

That's a generally fallacious argument (riddled with bad faith assertions, including the fact that many girls who would have difficulty at early ages would *still* have difficulty at later ages, if they were able at all) that seems to rely more on modern social moors than actual biology. But at the same, I just don't care enough to break down where your arguments fall flat, particularly since I agree that in this day and age that preteens -- and teens in general (and even 18+ is iffy) -- shouldn't be getting pregnant within the current developed world. However, Sunny's assertion wasn't about the current developed world, so it doesn't line up there.

But from technical side, Sunny's argument reflects a general reality because we *have* seen stories about it, and he was discussing the idea from an absurd hypothetical stance that doesn't bear much relation to anything in our world today, which he was likely only doing to make an exaggerated point about our modern idea of adolescence (where adulthood has one from 14-16 to closer to 24 or 25, or even 30).

He ought to learn to articulate himself a little more thoroughly than relying on you to come out and white-knight him. He can defend himself like an adult instead of being a brat and saying 'I'm right, shut up, anyone refuting me is silencing me!'

Also, 'we *have* seen stories' represents a a far smaller statistic. You have the smarts to say 'we have seen' instead of 'we regularly see' . It does not mean 12 year olds are ready for pregnancy.

---

I've discovered you can post anything so long as you say it rhetorically.

Like I've made topics like "I wish I could tell other users they're fucking soyboy manchildren shitheads," and not gotten in any trouble for doing so.

---

Solid Sonic posted...

I've discovered you can post anything so long as you say it rhetorically.

Like I've made topics like "I wish I could tell other users they're fucking soyboy manchildren shitheads," and not gotten in any trouble for doing so.

Calling people soyboy is dumb and plays into right-wing conspiracy, even directed at them.

---

@ReturnOfFa

It's not my job to educate you on the basics of human physiology, the differences between nature and nurture or how bad it is for society that 30 year old NEETs exist. I also have more going on in my life that requires my attention than the need to refute the words of "word twisting" keyboard trollers.

---

Yeah a lot of people are Almond Boys or Oat Boys now anyways

---

Up here you can get Mr. Big Boys, Mars Boys, and M & M Boys

---

Modest_Mouse posted...

where does it say they theyre illegal

If you break the law, you are illegal. Yeah, its hard for some people to comprehend that fact.

---

Fierce_Deity_08 posted...

If you break the law, you are illegal. Yeah, its hard for some people to comprehend that fact.

that isnt a fact, or even a thing

---

Fierce_Deity_08 posted...

If you break the law, you are illegal. Yeah, its hard for some people to comprehend that fact.

TIL Im illegal because I break city ordinances daily

---

MrMelodramatic posted...

TIL Im illegal because I break city ordinances daily

Yeah, thats a good example. Also if you rob a bank or kill someone. (Thats also a good way to tell if someone is not a nice person. Well, except in GTA where they teach that stuff in college so you can have it as a career.)

---

lol now im suspended

---

Fierce_Deity_08 posted...

Yeah, thats a good example. Also if you rob a bank or kill someone. (Thats also a good way to tell if someone is not a nice person. Well, except in GTA where they teach that stuff in college so you can have it as a career.)

They may not be a nice person, but they may be a good person. I grew up knowing a patch member who should have been dead a thousand times over but got to live long enough to meet his grand daughter; he was a good man, but he knew a lot of very bad men, and he had done some very bad things, but he was a good man.

The biggest objection I have to being warned, is the classification or misclassification of the offence as illegal activities, when it should be community standards; it would be a tort to call a legal action illegal, solely because another sees it as illegal in their own jurisdiction.


---

ReturnOfFa posted...

He ought to learn to articulate himself a little more thoroughly than relying on you to come out and white-knight him. He can defend himself like an adult instead of being a brat and saying 'I'm right, shut up, anyone refuting me is silencing me!'

Also, 'we *have* seen stories' represents a a far smaller statistic. You have the smarts to say 'we have seen' instead of 'we regularly see' . It does not mean 12 year olds are ready for pregnancy.

https://ibb.co/LzHY55z
https://ibb.co/ww2Xm2L

---

likehelly posted...

lol now im suspended

you are in trouble a lot lately young man

---