Current Events > Police show up to black man's house, he excercises his legal rights and get shot

(+) Yeah! (+)

WingsOfGood posted...

You did not answer this.

How will they investigate? Explain.

yes I did. Youre just going to keep sealioning arent you.

Pretty Easy honestly. Sir we have a witness saying you committed x crime. We also observed it and saw you pull into your driveway. We now have probable cause to believe you committed x crime it. Now its either citr or jail depending on which state. But this gentlemen immediately started yelling at officers when he got out of the car instead of just calmly identifying himself

---

MabusIncarnate posted...

He was in his fucking HOUSE. Do you know the difference between a car and a house darkprince? He was not pulled over for reckless driving. He was not driving at all. How the hell does it go from random phonecall to this guy being shot 7 times in front of his own home?

If a random phone call is enough to create this kind of situation, there is a tremendously disturbing problem that continues to go ignored because pigs defend their sick behavior. Reminds me of the other video recently, kid is detained, cuffed behind his back, stands up, someone yells "he's going for my gun!" with his arms handcuffed behind his back, had 3+ cops pinning him against the wall, can't go anywhere, can't do anything, and random cop walks up and says "You're gonna die my friend" and shoots him in the side of the head and executes him on the spot. I guess that's justified too though because he resisted with both hands locked behind his back.

hes clearly outside and stayed outside the entire time. Police never left the public sidewalk


---

MabusIncarnate posted...

He was in his fucking HOUSE. Do you know the difference between a car and a house darkprince? He was not pulled over for reckless driving. He was not driving at all. How the hell does it go from random phonecall to this guy being shot 7 times in front of his own home?

If a random phone call is enough to create this kind of situation, there is a tremendously disturbing problem that continues to go ignored because pigs defend their sick behavior. Reminds me of the other video recently, kid is detained, cuffed behind his back, stands up, someone yells "he's going for my gun!" with his arms handcuffed behind his back, had 3+ cops pinning him against the wall, can't go anywhere, can't do anything, and random cop walks up and says "You're gonna die my friend" and shoots him in the side of the head and executes him on the spot. I guess that's justified too though because he resisted with both hands locked behind his back.

He defended that murder too just FYI

---

darkprince45 posted...

yes I did. Youre just going to keep sealioning arent you.

Pretty Easy honestly. Sir we have a witness saying you committed x crime. We also observed it and saw you pull into your driveway. We now have probable cause to believe you committed x crime it. Now its either citr or jail depending on which state. But this gentlemen immediately started yelling at officers when he got out of the car instead of just calmly identifying himself

Oh so they weren't going to investigate at all?
They just believe a phone call and throw the man straight to jail?

You kepy saying "investigation" but that was apparently a lie huh?

You also claim they witness it. Hmm. I know cops lie on reports but wow.

WingsOfGood posted...

Oh so they weren't going to investigate at all?
They just believe a phone call and throw the man straight to jail?

You kepy saying "investigation" but that was apparently a lie huh?

You also claim they witness it. Hmm. I know cops lie on reports but wow.

what are you even saying? What are you watching is them trying to investigate and hes just going berserk yelling. Just stop bro


---

DarthAragorn posted...

He defended that murder too just FYI

Shocking

---

darkprince45 posted...

what are you even saying? What are you watching is them trying to investigate and hes just going berserk yelling. Just stop bro

How will they investigate a crime they did not witness and whose witness is some random caller who may have been lying or gave the wrong info?

This all seems really dumb. Like I said, I can just find your address and tip cops off to you driving recklessly and they gonna show up to your house?
Hmm?

This was obviously racist.

Knock knock knock

Is darkprince home?
Yea we got a call saying you drove recklessly. You are now under arrest.

Im more bothered that they censor the F word but have no problem showing a black man getting shot by police.

---

Credit to the one officer that was seemingly actually trying to do his job and de-escalate the situation, but then the woman officer stepped in because we can't have none of that peaceful stuff. It's also reported that she was on his lawn, not the sidewalk, and he told her to step back off of his property and she went off the handle like a crazy woman and told him to get on the ground? For whatever reason. Nothing but scared little children seeking a position of power so they can abuse their authority. Nothing new here.

---

Cops can't stand it when people defy them. It drives them crazy

Missing half the posts in this topic.

Guessing someone is soaking some boots with their saliva?


---

But he was shot with a bean bag first!!!

if a cop is allowed to think a phone is a gun then an untrained citizen cant be expected to think a bean bag is just a bean bag. Those things dont hit softly. They hurt.

Not to mentionhe shouldnt have been shot with anything. He was on his own property, the cops didnt witness him doing anything wrong, he had every right to tell them to get fucked and leave. Why was their first reaction to shoot at him?

---

WingsOfGood posted...

How will they investigate a crime they did not witness and whose witness is some random caller who may have been lying or gave the wrong info?

This all seems really dumb. Like I said, I can just find your address and tip cops off to you driving recklessly and they gonna show up to your house?
Hmm?

This was obviously racist.

You are reaching so fucking hard it hurts.

If an officer cant be there to witness a crime themselves they have no reason to investigate it because someone else calls it in?

Do you have to be related to the person youre calling the cops on or know their DOB, SSN, and middle initial for it to be legit?

MabusIncarnate posted...

Tomorrow i'm gonna go to the local police station and ask them to blindfold me, then shoot me with a bullet in one arm, and shoot me with a bean bag in the other, so I know in a tense situation in the dark what police are shooting me with.

Id watch that.

Ive always wondered what that would feel like, but yeah Im kinda scared to do it, Lol.

---

gamer167 posted...

If an officer cant be there to witness a crime themselves they have no reason to investigate it because someone else calls it in?

If you call in a drunk driver the cops have to follow the driver for a bit before they can pull them over for a DUI.

What makes this different?

---

gamer167 posted...

You are reaching so fucking hard it hurts.

If an officer cant be there to witness a crime themselves they have no reason to investigate it because someone else calls it in?

Do you have to be related to the person youre calling the cops on or know their DOB, SSN, and middle initial for it to be legit?

i think the call was for erratic driving? They didnt need to speak with him right then. He was clearly agitated. Leave and come back. Itll be fine. They most definitely did not need to speak with him so badly that they needed to continue to piss him off and then shoot him with a bean bag. Why did they even have that equipment and so much back up for all that. Again, theyre not trained to de-escalate when they should be. Thats a problem. And if they suspected him of being drunk there is nothing they can do. He could have downed a bottle of whisky as soon as he stepped inside. They cant prove his driving was due to intoxication right then and there. The entire thing was bull shit.

---

I4NRulez posted...

If you call in a drunk driver the cops have to follow the driver for a bit before they can pull them over for a DUI

Huh? If someone drives drunk and ditched the car and you have probable cause that the person was in that car you Can arrest them. IE witnesses, video, dna, etc

---

His mistake was opening the door, unless those cops had a warrant he could've just told them to fuck off and get a warrant at 10pm.

---

I4NRulez posted...

If you call in a drunk driver the cops have to follow the driver for a bit before they can pull them over for a DUI.

What makes this different?

You know that they didnt?

Everyone in this topic just seems to think that this guy was already home in his house when they arrived. If that was the case why is he at his front door and the officers are all the way on the street/sidewalk? He must have already been outside, no? They obviously didnt knock on his door.

Why does his wife not have any idea whats going on if he was already home?

gamer167 posted...

If an officer cant be there to witness a crime themselves they have no reason to investigate it because someone else calls it in?

@gamer167

How ll they investigate reckless driving phone tip when man is out of his vehicle and home?

What if I called and reported you as recklessly driving? They should knock on your door and detain you? And what will happen? What would they find?

VipaGTS posted...

i think the call was for erratic driving? They didnt need to speak with him right then. He was clearly agitated. Leave and come back. Itll be fine. They most definitely did not need to speak with him
so badly that they needed to continue to piss him off and then shoot him with a bean bag. Why did they even have that equipment and so much back up for all that. Again, theyre not trained to de-escalate when they should be. Thats a problem. And if they suspected him of being drunk there is nothing they can do. He could have downed a bottle of whisky as soon as he stepped inside. They cant prove his driving was due to intoxication right then and there. The entire thing was bull shit.

Dun dun dun

But you know a certain someone would never admit this.

gamer167 posted...

You know that they didnt?

If they witnessed him doing anything he would have been pulled over.

They did not arrive till he was already at his door.

It is basic logic.

i guess you love asking the same questions. If you read the article. The police saw him and he quickly drove into the driveway and tried to walk in back inside his house. He didnt go home, sat down and ate a sandwich then cops pulled him out of the house.

I explained this to you

---

The cop that fired the beanbag almost got people killed

darkprince45 posted...

If you read the article. The police saw him and he quickly drove into the driveway

Wait so your story now is, he had arrived on his home street and drove so wrecklessly the police did not turn on their lights and just followed him to his house and let him get out of the car and walk to his door?

Lmao

No. The man shooting a firearm did

---

darkprince45 posted...

i guess you love asking the same questions. If you read the article. The police saw him and he quickly drove into the driveway and tried to walk in back inside his house. He didnt go home, sat down and ate a sandwich then cops pulled him out of the house.

I explained this to you

They say

If you notice they're not releasing their videos of the incident, are they?

---

darkprince45 posted...

No. The man shooting a firearm did

He didn't pull out his gun until he got shot for no reason by a beanbag

Zikten posted...

He didn't pull out his gun until he got shot for no reason by a beanbag

After threatening police that he had a firearm and charges them. It is a good use of force he escalated to deadly force

---

How are you guys still feeding darkprince after all these years lol
---

Literal Eric Andre Show meme shit in this case

---

ShyOx posted...

They say

If you notice they're not releasing their videos of the incident, are they?

You gotta remember he thinks if a cop said it, it is fact.
The funny thing though is we know this is a lie as it contradicts actual fact that we see in the video.

WingsOfGood posted...

If they witnessed him doing anything he would have been pulled over.

They did not arrive till he was already at his door.

It is basic logic.

DP has already made you look foolish 10 times over in your own flopic and you keep charging forward so I know at this point youre trolling.

But yeah youre right, theres no way anyone could keep driving if a cop attempted to pull them over. /s

gamer167 posted...

DP has already made you look foolish 10 times over in your own flopic and you keep charging forward so I know at this point youre trolling.

But yeah youre right, theres no way anyone could keep driving if a cop attempted to pull them over. /s

Lmao nice alt

If he kept driving then they wouldn't just want to talk fyi. He would have been tackled as soon as he exited the vehicle.

This did not happen because clearly he was home and out of the vehicle before the officer came. Ie, they saw nothing.

Also calling 100+ post thread a flopic.

darkprince45 posted...

After threatening police that he had a firearm and charges them. It is a good use of force he escalated to deadly force

For the 3rd time, being you keep dodging it, give me a timestamp when he "charged" police officers. I saw him take one step down off his porch, and another half step before being shot, without a firearm in his hand.

---

WingsOfGood posted...

@gamer167

How ll they investigate reckless driving phone tip when man is out of his vehicle and home?

What if I called and reported you as recklessly driving? They should knock on your door and detain you? And what will happen? What would they find?

Are you just completely ignorant to everything police do? It's pretty simple.

"Hello I'm Officer Hank and we got a report about someone driving recklessly and we wanted to ask you some questions. What's your name? Do you live here? Is this your vehicle? Where are you coming from? Did you drive straight home from there or did you take any detours? Have you had any alcohol or marijuana today? Would you mind taking a sobriety test? Is there a number we can reach you at if we have any additional questions?"

Then cross-reference security or traffic cameras if you want to get real ambitious.

---

Pogo_Marimo posted...

Are you just completely ignorant to everything police do? It's pretty simple.

"Hello I'm Officer Hank and we got a report about someone driving recklessly and we wanted to ask you some questions. What's your name? Do you live here? Is this your vehicle? Where are you coming from? Did you drive straight home from there or did you take any detours? Have you had any alcohol or marijuana today? Would you mind taking a sobriety test? Is there a number we can reach you at if we have any additional questions?"

Then cross-reference security or traffic cameras if you want to get real ambitious.

Where in all this was the bean bag projectile necessary. That was before he stepped down or charged the officers. Again its weird how cops are allowed to act on fear in the heat of the moment but if an untrained civilian does its he should have known better.

---

Pogo_Marimo posted...

Are you just completely ignorant to everything police do? It's pretty simple.

"Hello I'm Officer Hank and we got a report about someone driving recklessly and we wanted to ask you some questions. What's your name? Do you live here? Is this your vehicle? Where are you coming from? Did you drive straight home from there or did you take any detours? Have you had any alcohol or marijuana today? Would you mind taking a sobriety test? Is there a number we can reach you at if we have any additional questions?"

Then cross-reference security or traffic cameras if you want to get real ambitious.

In other words, harassing a man on his own property for no reason as that would not prove a crime.
So why are these questions important enough to break the law and take a dump on a man's property rights?

WingsOfGood posted...

In other words, harassing a man on his own property for no reason as that would not prove a crime.
So why are these questions important enough to break the law and take a dump on a man's property rights?

Likely because he's a black man in Texas.

---

not gonna waste my time arguing with the bootlickers, just poppin in to say all cops

---

metallica846 posted...

Hopefully the guy who got shot gets 20 years.

Why? He feared for his life.

---

VipaGTS posted...

Why? He feared for his life.

That excuse only works for little piggies

---

VipaGTS posted...

Why? He feared for his life.

For not waiting for a reason for police to murder him on his front steps.

Crazy too that all this happened in February, he obviously went right to the hospital, they absolutely took blood work along with checking his vitals, but zero reports or any comments about him having alcohol or anything in his system. Funny how that part just kind of goes away, if he was drunk or high, the first thing that would have hit the news was his toxicology report. If his sobriety during the incident was in question, which it was, first thing they would have done is check for alcohol in his system. Zero information about that tells me he wasn't.

---

darkprince45 posted...

i guess you love asking the same questions. If you read the article. The police saw him and he quickly drove into the driveway and tried to walk in back inside his house. He didnt go home, sat down and ate a sandwich then cops pulled him out of the house.

I explained this to you

Wait so was he in the house or not?

---

darkprince45 posted...

After threatening police that he had a firearm and charges them. It is a good use of force he escalated to deadly force

Texas state law permits open carry on a person if they are on their own private property. This is a rather infamous right granted by our laws that stirred other states in the nation due to its tenacity.

You can verify it here:
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.46.htm#46.02

---

metallica846 posted...

He didnt look scared.

Was he supposed to be timid and scared to intruders on his property?