Poll of the Day > How come it was anti-science to not follow CDC guidelines a year ago but

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
adjl 05/15/21 12:21:06 PM #51:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... But not stolen. Actually, he pretty explicitly did say that the only reason he didn't win the popular vote was because of fraud (which, as is par for the course, he had absolutely no proof of). The overall election may not have been "stolen," but in Trump's eyes, the popular vote was, and I have every reason to expect that he would have responded the same way if he had lost overall. SKARDAVNELNATE posted... any time the matter was taken before a judge it was met with cowardice and the judges shirked their duty. The judges were cowards who shirked their duty because they... asked the lawyers presenting the case if they had any evidence? Is that really what I'm reading here? --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:953932625] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>But not stolen.</quote> Actually, he pretty explicitly did say that the only reason he didn't win the popular vote was because of fraud (which, as is par for the course, he had absolutely no proof of). The overall election may not have been "stolen," but in Trump's eyes, the popular vote was, and I have every reason to expect that he would have responded the same way if he had lost overall. SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>any time the matter was taken before a judge it was met with cowardice and the judges shirked their duty.</quote> The judges were cowards who shirked their duty because they... asked the lawyers presenting the case if they had any evidence? Is that really what I'm reading here? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/15/21 12:29:16 PM #52:	Theres actually a bunch of proof that Biden stole the election buried on Oak Island --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953932859] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Theres actually a bunch of proof that Biden stole the election buried on Oak Island </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 05/15/21 12:31:54 PM #53:	Oak Island is actually less than a 1-hour drive from here, but I can't go check because travelling is ill-advised due to the current outbreak (thanks, Ontario). --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:953932935] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Oak Island is actually less than a 1-hour drive from here, but I can't go check because travelling is ill-advised due to the current outbreak (thanks, Ontario). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 05/15/21 12:35:13 PM #54:	adjl posted... Oak Island is actually less than a 1-hour drive from here, but I can't go check because travelling is ill-advised due to the current outbreak (thanks, Ontario). How suspiciously convenient! --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:953933050] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Oak Island is actually less than a 1-hour drive from here, but I can't go check because travelling is ill-advised due to the current outbreak (thanks, Ontario).</quote>How suspiciously convenient! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas 05/15/21 12:38:25 PM #55:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I think we don't have enough information to say since any time the matter was taken before a judge it was met with cowardice and the judges shirked their duty. This is the guy that thinks child porn is okay, so I really would take what he's says with a grain of salt. --- The first person to be fully vaccinated on GameFaQs. You are getting this discount. <cite>EvilMegas posted [p:953933140] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I think we don't have enough information to say since any time the matter was taken before a judge it was met with cowardice and the judges shirked their duty.</quote>This is the guy that thinks child porn is okay, so I really would take what he's says with a grain of salt. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas 05/15/21 12:39:56 PM #56:	Mead posted... Theres actually a bunch of proof that Biden stole the election buried on Oak Island It's in Hunter Bidens other laptop, with all of the other heinous stuff they've been up to. --- The first person to be fully vaccinated on GameFaQs. You are getting this discount. <cite>EvilMegas posted [p:953933189] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Theres actually a bunch of proof that Biden stole the election buried on Oak Island</quote>It's in Hunter Bidens other laptop, with all of the other heinous stuff they've been up to. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 05/15/21 12:43:56 PM #57:	Sarcasthma posted... Do you have an immunization schedule set for your baby, Sunny? That's none of your business. --- My theme song - https://youtu.be/uYjM-BuE3Cs <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:953933328] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Sarcasthma posted... </cite> <quote>Do you have an immunization schedule set for your baby, Sunny?</quote>That's none of your business. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 05/15/21 12:46:51 PM #58:	I'll take that as a no. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:953933417] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>I'll take that as a no. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/15/21 12:55:28 PM #59:	adjl posted... The overall election may not have been "stolen," but in Trump's eyes, the popular vote was Looking back through Mead's posts the subject was "politicians that want people to believe the election was stolen?" This is not the same as it being unfair as Mead later changed it to, nor does discussing the 2016 election a reflection on all elections. Trump may have wanted people to believe an aspect of that election was stolen or a different election was stolen. But we're discussing something else. adjl posted... Is that really what I'm reading here? Unless you put it through Google translate into 4 different languages and back into english, then no, that's not what you're reading. EvilMegas posted... This is the guy that thinks child porn is okay I never said that. I asked how you demonstrate the legal concept of harm against a drawing? --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953933687] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>The overall election may not have been "stolen," but in Trump's eyes, the popular vote was</quote>Looking back through Mead's posts the subject was "politicians that want people to believe the election was stolen?" This is not the same as it being unfair as Mead later changed it to, nor does discussing the 2016 election a reflection on all elections. Trump may have wanted people to believe an aspect of that election was stolen or a different election was stolen. But we're discussing something else. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>Is that really what I'm reading here?</quote>Unless you put it through Google translate into 4 different languages and back into english, then no, that's not what you're reading. EvilMegas posted... </cite> <quote>This is the guy that thinks child porn is okay</quote>I never said that. I asked how you demonstrate the legal concept of harm against a drawing? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/15/21 1:22:12 PM #60:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Looking back through Mead's posts the subject was "politicians that want people to believe the election was stolen?" This is not the same as it being unfair as Mead later changed it to, nor is discussion of the 2016 election a reflection on all elections. Trump may have wanted people to believe an aspect of that election was stolen or a different election was stolen. But we're discussing something else. dude can you see your own posts? --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953934487] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>Looking back through Mead's posts the subject was "politicians that want people to believe the election was stolen?" This is not the same as it being unfair as Mead later changed it to, nor is discussion of the 2016 election a reflection on all elections. Trump may have wanted people to believe an aspect of that election was stolen or a different election was stolen. But we're discussing something else.</quote> dude can you see your own posts? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvilMegas 05/15/21 1:53:31 PM #61:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I never said that. I asked how you demonstrate the legal concept of harm against a drawing? No, you didn't ~ --- The first person to be fully vaccinated on GameFaQs. You are getting this discount. <cite>EvilMegas posted [p:953935482] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I never said that. I asked how you demonstrate the legal concept of harm against a drawing?</quote>No, you didn't ~ </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 05/15/21 1:59:08 PM #62:	SunWuKung420 posted... That's none of your business. That's everybody's business. Everybody should be vaccinated unless allergic. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:953935662] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SunWuKung420 posted...</cite> <quote> That's none of your business. </quote> That's everybody's business. Everybody should be vaccinated unless allergic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/15/21 2:05:41 PM #63:	Mead posted... dude can you see your own posts? Yes. Most of them are in reply to you because you're obsessed with contradicting everything I post. EvilMegas posted... No, you didn't ~ Yeah, I did. It was a discussion about someone arrested for possession. I thought the news article was light on details such as whether the person was suspected of producing it them self, if it was actual people depicted, or if it was just a depiction of cartoon characters. My position was that each of those deserved a different level of severity and the topic devolved into an argument about why they should all be treated the same. Me thinking that one form is more or less severe than another doesn't mean that I think it's okay in general and your statement is a mischaracterization of the arguments made in that discussion. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953935839] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>dude can you see your own posts?</quote>Yes. Most of them are in reply to you because you're obsessed with contradicting everything I post. EvilMegas posted... </cite> <quote>No, you didn't ~</quote>Yeah, I did. It was a discussion about someone arrested for possession. I thought the news article was light on details such as whether the person was suspected of producing it them self, if it was actual people depicted, or if it was just a depiction of cartoon characters. My position was that each of those deserved a different level of severity and the topic devolved into an argument about why they should all be treated the same. Me thinking that one form is more or less severe than another doesn't mean that I think it's okay in general and your statement is a mischaracterization of the arguments made in that discussion. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JOExHIGASHI 05/15/21 2:07:55 PM #64:	Revelation34 posted... That's everybody's business. Everybody should be vaccinated unless allergic. Is the vaccine clear for children yet? --- Next Xbox will be named Xbox1 2 <cite>JOExHIGASHI posted [p:953935890] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>That's everybody's business. Everybody should be vaccinated unless allergic.</quote>Is the vaccine clear for children yet? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Revelation34 05/15/21 2:18:20 PM #65:	JOExHIGASHI posted... Is the vaccine clear for children yet? We're talking about immunizations. --- Gamertag: Kegfarms, BF code: 2033480226, Treasure Cruise code 318,374,355, Steam: Kegfarms <cite>Revelation34 posted [p:953936219] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>JOExHIGASHI posted...</cite> <quote> Is the vaccine clear for children yet? </quote> We're talking about immunizations.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 05/15/21 2:23:52 PM #66:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Looking back through Mead's posts the subject was "politicians that want people to believe the election was stolen?" This is not the same as it being unfair as Mead later changed it to, nor is discussion of the 2016 election a reflection on all elections. Trump may have wanted people to believe an aspect of that election was stolen or a different election was stolen. But we're discussing something else. I really don't see much point in creating a logical distinction between "Trump openly lied about a part of the 2016 election being stolen with no basis because he couldn't handle losing" and "Trump openly lied about the 2020 election being stolen with no basis because he couldn't handle losing." The obsessive, infantile narcissism is identical in both cases, as is the commitment to undermining the fair democratic process with abject falsehoods. Quite simply, in Trump's eyes, the 2016 election was also stolen from him, he just believes that he was amazing enough and inspired such devotion among his followers that he still managed to attain an electoral victory despite that theft. Then, from his perspective, the thieves just worked harder to take the actual victory away from him in 2020. SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Unless you put it through Google translate into 4 different languages and back into English, then no, that's not what you're reading. Oh, I didn't know Google added Crackpot to Reality translation capabilities. That's new. I'll have to keep that in mind to save myself some effort next time I read such nonsense. The judges did not "shirk their duties." They were presented with cases whose entire basis was that Trump said something illegal must have happened, they asked the lawyers responsible if there was any actual evidence, and the lawyers said there was not because actual perjury carries much more significant consequences than lying outside of court. The judges did not accept the cases because there were no cases. Period. If a judge were presented with significant evidence and still rejected the case? Then you might have a basis for claiming that they shirked their duties. But that's not at all what happened, so you shouldn't believe that that's what happened. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:953936402] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>Looking back through Mead's posts the subject was "politicians that want people to believe the election was stolen?" This is not the same as it being unfair as Mead later changed it to, nor is discussion of the 2016 election a reflection on all elections. Trump may have wanted people to believe an aspect of that election was stolen or a different election was stolen. But we're discussing something else.</quote> I really don't see much point in creating a logical distinction between "Trump openly lied about a part of the 2016 election being stolen with no basis because he couldn't handle losing" and "Trump openly lied about the 2020 election being stolen with no basis because he couldn't handle losing." The obsessive, infantile narcissism is identical in both cases, as is the commitment to undermining the fair democratic process with abject falsehoods. Quite simply, in Trump's eyes, the 2016 election was also stolen from him, he just believes that he was amazing enough and inspired such devotion among his followers that he still managed to attain an electoral victory despite that theft. Then, from his perspective, the thieves just worked harder to take the actual victory away from him in 2020. SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>Unless you put it through Google translate into 4 different languages and back into English, then no, that's not what you're reading.</quote> Oh, I didn't know Google added Crackpot to Reality translation capabilities. That's new. I'll have to keep that in mind to save myself some effort next time I read such nonsense. The judges did not "shirk their duties." They were presented with cases whose entire basis was that Trump said something illegal must have happened, they asked the lawyers responsible if there was any actual evidence, and the lawyers said there was not because actual perjury carries much more significant consequences than lying outside of court. The judges did not accept the cases because there were no cases. Period. If a judge were presented with significant evidence and still rejected the case? Then you might have a basis for claiming that they shirked their duties. But that's not at all what happened, so you shouldn't believe that that's what happened. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/15/21 2:24:35 PM #67:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... you're obsessed with contradicting everything I post. dont post misinformation and I wont have to do it --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953936431] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>you're obsessed with contradicting everything I post.</quote> dont post misinformation and I wont have to do it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 05/15/21 2:56:19 PM #68:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... you're obsessed with contradicting everything I post. You're obsessed with trolling and lying --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:953937414] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>you're obsessed with contradicting everything I post.</quote>You're obsessed with trolling and lying </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/15/21 3:13:33 PM #69:	adjl posted... I really don't see much point in creating a logical distinction One provided the context I responded to, the other provided a different context. adjl posted... The judges did not accept the cases because there were no cases. The reason given was first, the election hadn't happened yet so there were no damages to sue over and second, the election is over and they should have brought their case before the election took place. Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953937947] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>I really don't see much point in creating a logical distinction</quote>One provided the context I responded to, the other provided a different context. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>The judges did not accept the cases because there were no cases.</quote>The reason given was first, the election hadn't happened yet so there were no damages to sue over and second, the election is over and they should have brought their case before the election took place. Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SunWuKung420 05/15/21 3:14:33 PM #70:	Revelation34 posted... That's everybody's business. Everybody should be vaccinated unless allergic. A person's medical history is considered private information. --- My theme song - https://youtu.be/uYjM-BuE3Cs <cite>SunWuKung420 posted [p:953937978] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Revelation34 posted... </cite> <quote>That's everybody's business. Everybody should be vaccinated unless allergic.</quote>A person's medical history is considered private information. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 05/15/21 3:21:41 PM #71:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... The reason given was first, the election hadn't happened yet so there were no damages to sue over and second, the election is over and they should have brought their case before the election took place. Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court. What evidence? --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:953938193] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>The reason given was first, the election hadn't happened yet so there were no damages to sue over and second, the election is over and they should have brought their case before the election took place. Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court.</quote> What evidence? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SirPikachu 05/15/21 3:26:08 PM #72:	If anyone thinks people were more manipulated in the 2016 than the 2020 election, they need serious help. All the major news and social media outlets actively working to get Trump out of office is way bigger than the bullshit "Russian trolls" --- 3DS FC: 4656 9282 1616 Everyone call me elf monster <cite>SirPikachu posted [p:953938331] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>If anyone thinks people were more manipulated in the 2016 than the 2020 election, they need serious help. All the major news and social media outlets actively working to get Trump out of office is way bigger than the bullshit "Russian trolls" </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 05/15/21 3:30:50 PM #73:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court. More lies --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:953938467] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court.</quote>More lies </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CoorsLight 05/15/21 3:37:04 PM #74:	Between SKARDAVNELNATE, Icoyar, and NateMac (totally not OhhhJa), I think we have a strong case that you should never, EVER name your kid Nate/Nathan <cite>CoorsLight posted [p:953938667] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Between SKARDAVNELNATE, Icoyar, and NateMac (totally not OhhhJa), I think we have a strong case that you should never, EVER name your kid Nate/Nathan </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/15/21 3:38:10 PM #75:	adjl posted... What evidence? I don't know. I wasn't on Trump's legal team. There were stories about observers being blocked from observing. Maybe testimonies related to that. However my understanding is that the judges were not willing to consider the cases based on criteria that precedes the examination of evidence. Metalsonic66 posted... More lies From what I recall, there was one case where Trump's team was told they weren't the injured party, the voting public was. So regardless of what evidence they would have presented they weren't the right people to argue the case. CoorsLight posted... Between SKARDAVNELNATE, Icoyar, and NateMac (totally not OhhhJa), I think we have a strong case that you should never, EVER name your kid Nate/Nathan My user name doesn't incorporate my given name. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953938707] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>What evidence?</quote>I don't know. I wasn't on Trump's legal team. There were stories about observers being blocked from observing. Maybe testimonies related to that. However my understanding is that the judges were not willing to consider the cases based on criteria that precedes the examination of evidence. Metalsonic66 posted... </cite> <quote>More lies</quote>From what I recall, there was one case where Trump's team was told they weren't the injured party, the voting public was. So regardless of what evidence they would have presented they weren't the right people to argue the case. CoorsLight posted... </cite> <quote>Between SKARDAVNELNATE, Icoyar, and NateMac (totally not OhhhJa), I think we have a strong case that you should never, EVER name your kid Nate/Nathan</quote>My user name doesn't incorporate my given name. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 05/15/21 3:46:56 PM #76:	--- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:953938995] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/15/21 4:00:59 PM #77:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court They were allowed an abundance of opportunities. In every instance Trumps lawyers clarified in court that they had no actual evidence. --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953939453] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>Trump's team was never allowed to present their evidence to the court</quote> They were allowed an abundance of opportunities. In every instance Trumps lawyers clarified in court that they had no actual evidence. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/15/21 4:02:21 PM #78:	SirPikachu posted... If anyone thinks people were more manipulated in the 2016 than the 2020 election, they need serious help. All the major news and social media outlets actively working to get Trump out of office is way bigger than the bullshit "Russian trolls" dude you are so far down the wingnut rabbit hole splash some water on your face --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953939503] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SirPikachu posted... </cite> <quote>If anyone thinks people were more manipulated in the 2016 than the 2020 election, they need serious help. All the major news and social media outlets actively working to get Trump out of office is way bigger than the bullshit "Russian trolls"</quote> dude you are so far down the wingnut rabbit hole splash some water on your face </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
IronBornCorps 05/15/21 4:18:05 PM #79:	Also, the observers who were denied observation where just random people who wanted to enter the counting rooms to "observe" despite having no qualification or certification to be an election observer. <cite>IronBornCorps posted [p:953939973] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Also, the observers who were denied observation where just random people who wanted to enter the counting rooms to "observe" despite having no qualification or certification to be an election observer. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 05/15/21 4:46:35 PM #80:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... However my understanding is that the judges were not willing to consider the cases based on criteria that precedes the examination of evidence. An understanding that's based on what, exactly? Because everything I've heard on the matter has consisted largely of exchanges amounting roughly to this: Judge: Do you have any evidence supporting the claims you are trying to make? Lawyer: No Judge: K lol SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I don't know. I wasn't on Trump's legal team. There were stories about observers being blocked from observing. Maybe testimonies related to that. You don't need to be on Trump's legal team to know about evidence beyond "maybe they found somebody that was going to say something I dunno." If it's out there, you should be able to find it. That you haven't found it either means you aren't looking (which is odd for somebody that wants to believe it) or that nothing meaningful exists (which is a whole lot more consistent with the fact that literally no cases have made it into court). --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:953940749] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>However my understanding is that the judges were not willing to consider the cases based on criteria that precedes the examination of evidence.</quote> An understanding that's based on what, exactly? Because everything I've heard on the matter has consisted largely of exchanges amounting roughly to this: Judge: Do you have any evidence supporting the claims you are trying to make? Lawyer: No Judge: K lol SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I don't know. I wasn't on Trump's legal team. There were stories about observers being blocked from observing. Maybe testimonies related to that.</quote> You don't need to be on Trump's legal team to know about evidence beyond "maybe they found somebody that was going to say something I dunno." If it's out there, you should be able to find it. That you haven't found it either means you aren't looking (which is odd for somebody that wants to believe it) or that nothing meaningful exists (which is a whole lot more consistent with the fact that literally no cases have made it into court). </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/15/21 6:51:49 PM #81:	IronBornCorps posted... Also, the observers who were denied observation where just random people who wanted to enter the counting rooms to "observe" despite having no qualification or certification to be an election observer. I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials? --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953944368] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>IronBornCorps posted... </cite> <quote>Also, the observers who were denied observation where just random people who wanted to enter the counting rooms to "observe" despite having no qualification or certification to be an election observer.</quote>I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/15/21 6:56:10 PM #82:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials? Do you seriously not realize how pathetic you sound right now? --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953944504] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials?</quote> Do you seriously not realize how pathetic you sound right now? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 05/15/21 6:59:56 PM #83:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials? --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:953944605] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials?</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/15/21 7:04:42 PM #84:	Mead posted... Do you seriously not realize how pathetic you sound right now? Do you not realize the irony? --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953944744] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Do you seriously not realize how pathetic you sound right now?</quote>Do you not realize the irony? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
adjl 05/15/21 9:24:18 PM #85:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials? Do you really believe that that's the standard you've set for proof? That "I've heard there were observers blocked from observing" needs anything more than "I haven't seen any reason to believe that" to completely strip it of what little argumentative value it might have had? If you believe that there is a significant possibility that the election was tampered with to enough of an extent to affect the outcome, you should have evidence of that. If you don't have evidence of that, then you shouldn't believe it and especially should not go around trying to convince others that it is a significant possibility. Otherwise, you're just being intellectually dishonest and speculating irresponsibly. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:953948825] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I'm afraid that's not enough to meet the high bar for proof that adji has set. Have you personally interviewed these individuals and determined that they lacked the proper credentials?</quote> Do you really believe that that's the standard you've set for proof? That "I've heard there were observers blocked from observing" needs anything more than "I haven't seen any reason to believe that" to completely strip it of what little argumentative value it might have had? If you believe that there is a significant possibility that the election was tampered with to enough of an extent to affect the outcome, you should have evidence of that. If you don't have evidence of that, then you shouldn't believe it and especially should not go around trying to convince others that it is a significant possibility. Otherwise, you're just being intellectually dishonest and speculating irresponsibly. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/16/21 12:37:06 AM #86:	adjl posted... the standard you've set Are you and I the same person? I'm so confused right now. You just quoted me saying "adji has set". adjl posted... should not go around trying to convince others that it is a significant possibility. I'm not even the one who brought it up. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953953795] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>adjl posted... </cite> <quote>the standard you've set</quote>Are you and I the same person? I'm so confused right now. You just quoted me saying "adji has set". adjl posted... </cite> <quote>should not go around trying to convince others that it is a significant possibility.</quote>I'm not even the one who brought it up. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 05/16/21 12:57:10 AM #87:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I'm not even the one who brought it up. oh then by all means spread a whole bunch of lies unchecked --- YOU control the numbers of leches. -Sal Vulcano <cite>Mead posted [p:953954310] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I'm not even the one who brought it up.</quote> oh then by all means spread a whole bunch of lies unchecked </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 05/16/21 1:31:06 AM #88:	Are trollfaces making a comeback for some reason --- https://imgur.com/1XbPahR <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:953955100] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Are trollfaces making a comeback for some reason </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sarcasthma 05/16/21 1:36:35 AM #89:	Blightzkrieg posted... Are trollfaces making a comeback for some reason I think it's just Metalsonic66. --- What's the difference between a pickpocket and a peeping tom? A pickpocket snatches your watch. <cite>Sarcasthma posted [p:953955201] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Blightzkrieg posted... </cite> <quote>Are trollfaces making a comeback for some reason</quote>I think it's just Metalsonic66. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 05/16/21 2:28:14 AM #90:	Blightzkrieg posted... Are trollfaces making a comeback for some reason They never left --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:953956170] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Blightzkrieg posted... </cite> <quote>Are trollfaces making a comeback for some reason</quote>They never left </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/16/21 3:06:18 AM #91:	Mead posted... oh then by all means spread a whole bunch of lies unchecked I wasn't spreading anything. I was discussing people making up their own minds regarding masks when you brought up the elections. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953956812] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>oh then by all means spread a whole bunch of lies unchecked</quote>I wasn't spreading anything. I was discussing people making up their own minds regarding masks when you brought up the elections. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Metalsonic66 05/16/21 3:14:09 AM #92:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I wasn't spreading anything. I was discussing people making up their own minds regarding masks when you brought up the elections. And along the way, you spread a bunch of lies --- PSN/Steam ID: Metalsonic_69 Big bombs go kabang. <cite>Metalsonic66 posted [p:953956920] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted... </cite> <quote>I wasn't spreading anything. I was discussing people making up their own minds regarding masks when you brought up the elections.</quote>And along the way, you spread a bunch of lies </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SKARDAVNELNATE 05/16/21 9:24:42 AM #93:	Metalsonic66 posted... And along the way, you spread a bunch of lies To the best of my knowledge everything I said was true. Though I didn't spread anything until prompted to do so. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:953961084] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Metalsonic66 posted... </cite> <quote>And along the way, you spread a bunch of lies</quote>To the best of my knowledge everything I said was true. Though I didn't spread anything until prompted to do so. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blightzkrieg 05/16/21 9:41:44 AM #94:	Metalsonic66 posted... They never left They most certainly fucking did sir --- https://imgur.com/1XbPahR <cite>Blightzkrieg posted [p:953961399] in How come i... [t:79459370]...</cite> <quote>Metalsonic66 posted... </cite> <quote>They never left</quote>They most certainly fucking did sir </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > How come it was anti-science to not follow CDC guidelines a year ago but (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > How come it was anti-science to not follow CDC guidelines a year ago but