Poll of the Day > Thanks for the memories.

(+) Yeah! (+)

DirtBasedSoap posted...

hes in his 30s, has never held a job in his life and is a virgin. seriously the last person to be commenting on almost anything here.

He's actually had jobs and being a virgin isn't a negative.

You should simmer down on the judgments.

---

AWinterJ posted...

She no doubt got the D elsewhere.

Probably still is

hes a fucking loser dude

he has no right to comment on anyone else's life


---

That applies to most other people, including you.

---

AWinterJ posted...

https://i.imgur.com/kvXhvMj.jpg

who is that cutie

also youre a virgin in your 30s lmao

---

SunWuKung420 posted...

Nah, winter knows it's his fault he can't form any relationship with a sexual interest.

I try so hard with you Sunny but you always reject me.

DirtBasedSoap posted...

seriously the last person to be commenting on almost anything here.

Oh you have unblocked me? Nice. Now sit your arse down snowflake.

DirtBasedSoap posted...

also youre a virgin in your 30s lmao

I'd rather be that than fuck you. I feel sorry for your "gf".

---

Far-Queue posted...

Baardmeester

Is that his account? Because I remember either that account or some other account starting with Bard being super pro-Nazi and anti-Semitic.

---

hahahahaha so mad 35 year old virgin

---

I don't understand the purpose of deleting a gamefaqs account.

i can give you advice with women if you wanna lose your virginity before you hit 40

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

hahahahaha so mad 35 year old virgin

At least get my age right.

DirtBasedSoap posted...

i can give you advice with women if you wanna lose your virginity before you hit 40

You can give me advise on how to not keep them happy so they fuck other dudes. I mean is it a surprise given how you look?


---

idk where youre getting this 'fuck other dudes' shit from but if it makes you feel better about being mr 37 y/o virgin then go for it

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

mr 37 y/o virgin then go for it

https://youtu.be/5A0hhsYVO1Q?t=280

I'm done with your pathetic arse.

---

wow posting wrestling videos

definitely a guy with a lot of relationship experience

if im pathetic what does that make you

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

wow posting wrestling videos

definitely a guy with a lot of relationship experience

Does not compute. You know as many wrestlers and fans have relationships. Why are you so obtuse? Is it the weed?

if im pathetic what does that make you

A god.


---

average wrestling fan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvd3aEsThbc

---

Who ARE you?

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

average wrestling fan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yvd3aEsThbc

That sure shown me.

---

good. now work on your social skills and maybe youll get laid

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

good. now work on your social skills and maybe youll get laid

Going to give your gal a call later. Do you think she can give me some pro tips?

---

idk shes pretty busy in grad school

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

idk shes pretty busy in grad school

Understandable. She deserves to better herself.

---

winter will go to the ends of the earth and back again to let you know that he totally doesnt care that you blocked him

---

I care very much that Mead posts about someone he blocked. It breaks my cold, black heart.

---

Mead posted...

winter will go to the ends of the earth and back again to let you know that he totally doesnt care that you blocked him

be careful he might start telling you that your wife is fucking other dudes

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

be careful he might start telling you that your wife is fucking other dudes

No man. Just your gal does that.

---

Why don't you guys fuck and get it over with

---

Metalsonic66 posted...

Why don't you guys fuck and get it over with

You'll have to be more specific.

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

be careful he might start telling you that your wife is fucking other dudes

I mean, I definitely wouldn't be surprised if mead's wife fucks other dudes. In fact, if there was anyone on this board that I would expect to get cucked, it's him

what makes you say that? the fact that your disagree with his politics?

---

OhhhJa posted...

I mean, I definitely wouldn't be surprised if mead's wife fucks other dudes. In fact, if there was anyone on this board that I would expect to get cucked, it's him

Psychological projection is a defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a bully may project their own feelings of vulnerability onto the target.

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

what makes you say that? the fact that your disagree with his politics?

Based on the fact he white knights most gals on here and likes to ride his white horse. He blocked me for suggesting such a thing so I believe I'm correct. Just as I struck a nerve with you friend.

---

lol got em'

---

Mead is McMurray from Letterkenny

---

AWinterJ posted...

Based on the fact he white knights most gals on here and likes to ride his white horse. He blocked me for suggesting such a thing so I believe I'm correct. Just as I struck a nerve with you friend.

just because someone doesn't want to engage you anymore does not mean you "won"

it means they're tired of dealing with stupidity.

---

likehelly posted...

just because someone doesn't want to engage you anymore does not mean you "won"

it means they're tired of dealing with stupidity.

It means they are a snowflake and I always win.


---

@likehelly

Sure, that COULD apply. But if you assume that applies all the time then you're making the assumption that 100% of mean things someone says about another person actually applies to themselves. For instance, if someone calls me a racist that must mean they're projecting their own racist feelings

OhhhJa posted...

then you're making the assumption that 100% of mean things someone says about another person actually applies to themselves.

not really? what a stupid statement lol

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

not really? what a stupid statement lol

agreed, maybe he needs some sleep, ok?

---

ClarkDuke posted...

agreed, maybe he needs some sleep, ok?

He's not the only one. I need it too, ok?

---

DirtBasedSoap posted...

not really? what a stupid statement lol

Ok not 100%. Just 100% of the mean things people you don't like say. If you agree with the person then they obviously aren't projecting

OhhhJa posted...

@likehelly

Sure, that COULD apply. But if you assume that applies all the time then you're making the assumption that 100% of mean things someone says about another person actually applies to themselves. For instance, if someone calls me a racist that must mean they're projecting their own racist feelings

that would work if it applied to anyone other than yourself




---

helly accidentally proving my point literally 30 seconds after my post lmao

you don't have a point because not everything applies to everyone equally you nonce

---

What'd I miss? Kinda feels like there had to be some extra build-up to this.

Shame to see him leave.

streamofthesky posted...

I asked him, but I really do want to know WTF happened to him.

A while back he complained that the douchebaggery of the far-left was driving him more right, but that was pretty the only context I had for him switching from consistently-left to more moderate or right.

streamofthesky posted...

He was previously a decent, rational poster for the most part,

After his swerve, he was more rational. He wasn't simply reposting debunked claims any more.

Otherwise he was as decent as he'd ever been. When he thought he'd lost his cool or went too far, he usually apologized. You don't really see people do that, at least not with any measure of sincerity.

streamofthesky posted...

but it seemed like suddenly one day he was a hard core Trumper posting fake news and lies.
I don't know how that happens to someone, and it's kind of terrifying that it's possible.
I recall at first when he made the radical shift that it was tongue-in-cheek. Like Onion style satire, to show how crazy the alt right and QAnon people are. But he kept doing it and (feebly) defending his posts, to the point it became clear it wasn't a joke at all.

lolwut? He never went that far. But yeah, when he started saying not-bad things about Trump, I wasn't sure if he was serious at first. And generally this board is so far to the left that anybody not firmly esconced in leftism all looks the same to them.

I don't remember him talking about any QAnon stuff. Do you have any examples?

LinkPizza posted...

I think it started slow. I remember in. Another topic. He mentioned that he might possibly vote for Trump. That he would fully try to understand both sides or something without bias. I dont remember the exact way he said it. But basically it was something like that. But I think that must have changed...

Yes, which was a very reasonable statement. I guess it also kinda goes to show how quickly *any* attempt at bipartisanship is quickly written off by the board's far-left radical elements as Trumpism. I recall how he made a topic about Trump's environmental support and the board jumped down his throat.

Entity13 posted...

See, once upon a time there were so many people who were against Trump but tried to excuse or forgive supporters. Then the supporters went full cultist and far too many became outright dangerous to any sane society. So no, there's tolerance and differences in opinion, and then there's throwing yourself behind a vile horde of cultists whose golden boy is a creepy, deranged narcissist that only accepts those people because they worship him; but he doesn't actually care about them. Many people tried to show proof of wrongdoing, to invite Trump supporters to see another way, but were met with the kind of resistance you'd expect from an obstinate toddler that doesn't want to eat their veggies, take a bath, or go to bed . . . but somehow made worse with decades of age. Of course people are done trying to help Trump followers see the light.

Did you expect people to not have their limits or put their foot down? If you're part of the Trump problem, you're not welcome any longer, because what we have seen and heard, from Trump himself AND his followers, is irreprehensible on a good day. Don't expect people to be "reasonable and tolerable" when you mean "stand aside and let you do whatever the fuck you want, no matter who it hurts."

...and that's exactly the kind of bullshit attitude he was talking about. And that far-leftist "You are the enemy and you must be destroyed" approach is pretty much what drives everybody except far-leftists from leftism. The rhetoric is also complete and utter nonsense, which the far-left has been consistently ramping up president after president when they see it can rile people up.


---

Zeus posted...

...and that's exactly the kind of bulls*** attitude he was talking about. And that far-leftist "You are the enemy and you must be destroyed" approach is pretty much what drives everybody except far-leftists from leftism.

The problem here is that the far right does the same thing, but with actual violence towards anyone who poses a threat to, well, whatever the cause is that particular day. The problem is that this division has gotten worse over the decades with "Us versus them" mentality. From what I have seen of the left, theirs is more reactionary to what they are seeing from the far right. What I mentioned in my post is their reaction to Trump and his avid followers.

---

Zeus posted...

I recall how he made a topic about Trump's environmental support and the board jumped down his throat.

what environmental support

rolling back offshore drilling rules?

promoting bernhardt?

greenlighting the keystone pipeline?

dismantling the sage grout conservation plans?

promoting wheeler to head of the epa?

issuing an executive order to increase logging?

forcing the epa to scale back regulations?

rolling back emissions restrictions for coal plants?

forcing the noaa to let companies violate the marine mammal protection act?

approving offshore drilling in the arctic?

forcing the epa to disband the air pollution review panel?

repealing the requirements that forced oil and gas companies to monitor and regulate methane released from their wells?

trying to roll back the endangered species act rules?

cutting the nasa climate monitoring program?

rolling back vehicle emission standards?

removing climate change from fema strategic plans?

proposing cuts to clean energy programs?

dropping the once in always in plan?

censoring climate change websites?

i can go on and on and on and fucking on.

this is why he was ridiculed. because the one or two minor things trump did do that was good for the environment is vastly outweighed by literally the piles of everything else he and his administration did against it.


---

Entity13 posted...

Any opinion that outright avoids the facts like Hillary avoided the middle states is malformed and subject to such scrutiny,

You mean things that the left itself claimed and media actively reported on? If NPR is slamming a leftist candidate with that claim, there's usually something to it. But feel free to explain your reasoning for feeling why that isn't the case.

Entity13 posted...

One worth discarding outright, like a flaming turd bag that had been left on the porch, is the idea of racism being OK, of rich people getting richer while everyone else is literally risking losing their homes during a pandemic is a good move for the country, that children should be separated from their families while women are forced to have hysterectomies without any semblance of consent (regardless of who started the general detainment program), that the post office should be shut down or mail-in ballots halted (especially during election year) when it's the number one method of voting for soldiers overseas, or attacks on veterans should be the norm.

Whole lot of BS right there.

Item 1 ("Racism being okay") is a mix of a vague strawman and a good ol' ad hominem. For somebody complaining about baseless opinions, it's funny that you'd immediately jump to nonsense like that. Specific complaints are worth mentioning, but generally these are arguments you fall back on when you don't have facts on your side.

Item 2 ("of rich people getting richer while everyone else is literally risking losing their homes during a pandemic is a good move for the country") is a silly strawman as well. I'm not sure who exactly is getting richer right now anyway, unless you're talking about the value of stock increasing which isn't so much "getting richer" anyway although people like to frame that claim as such. Nor does one thing have any connection to the other. It's a traditional bad faith argument.

Family separations is an intellectually deceitful claim, considering that people involved in other lawbreaking are also separated from their kids.... and you can be separated from your kids even without breaking the law (and I should mention that CPS disproportionately impacts minority families)

Then the "that the post office should be shut down" is a really shitty strawman. The talk about mail-in voter fraud *is* a legitimate concern, and one that Democrats had long pushed as a concern... until Republicans started talking about it. It's funny watching people get whiplash as they go from intensely criticizing the potential for mail-in fraud to ardently defending it.

And the idea that criticizing veterans shouldn't be condoned simply because they're veterans is a fucking stupid, indefensible opinion and the kind of flaming turd you should be attacking instead of defending. There are certainly some things are in poor taste, but NOTHING should give people a blank check.

---

Zeus posted...

Item 1 ("Racism being okay") is a mix of a vague strawman and a good ol' ad hominem. For somebody complaining about baseless opinions, it's funny that you'd immediately jump to nonsense like that. Specific complaints are worth mentioning, but generally these are arguments you fall back on when you don't have facts on your side.

"very fine people"

Zeus posted...

tem 2 ("of rich people getting richer while everyone else is literally risking losing their homes during a pandemic is a good move for the country") is a silly strawman as well. I'm not sure who exactly is getting richer right now anyway, unless you're talking about the value of stock increasing which isn't so much "getting richer" anyway although people like to frame that claim as such. Nor does one thing have any connection to the other. It's a traditional bad faith argument.

https://www.businessinsider.com/billionaires-net-worth-increases-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-7

someone else can do the rest of your garbage, i'm going to bed


---

Helly calling me a nonce is absolutely a great illustration of that projection point he was attempting to make lol