Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 304: All Posts Are Bad

(+) Yeah! (+)

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

I dunno, get medical aid to a guy who says he can't breath?

In case you forgot, not only is he entitled to a fair trial, but none of the things you listed are punishable by death.

If everything hockeydude says is legit, then your stance is laughable, Tony. And, yes, resisting with a weapon is justified grounds to be shot or extra force used. This is an exact case, if described accurately, of someone who killed themselves by resisting with a weapon.

The reason George Floyd's death was so heinous is that he clearly is not resisting anymore for the majority of the duration of what happened. If he was actively resisting, this cop wouldn't be in jail.

---

I have never been more sure in my life that Trump did not write one of his tweets himself

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1271644265890942976?s=21
---

LordoftheMorons posted...

https://twitter.com/billkristol/status/1271525432572227584?s=21

And its gone.

---

muddersmilk posted...

And its gone.

? tweet and video still up for me...

---

Twitter videos can't play inside gamefaqs even though it lets you hit play, you have to actually go to the tweet.

This site is still ancient no matter what they try, lol.

---

UshiromiyaEva posted...

Twitter videos can't play inside gamefaqs even though it lets you hit play, you have to actually go to the tweet.

This site is still ancient no matter what they try, lol.

It's a Twitter issue mostly. Happens on a lot of sites

---

plays fine for me

---

Corrik7 posted...

If everything hockeydude says is legit, then your stance is laughable, Tony. And, yes, resisting with a weapon is justified grounds to be shot or extra force used. This is an exact case, if described accurately, of someone who killed themselves by resisting with a weapon.

The reason George Floyd's death was so heinous is that he clearly is not resisting anymore for the majority of the duration of what happened. If he was actively resisting, this cop wouldn't be in jail.

He resisted with a weapon in his pocket that he never drew on the officers. Does having a gun in your pocket mean you arent entitled to ethical treatment after youre cuffed?

Literally anti-2nd and 6th Amendment and would be a war crime in war, great stance.

---

Another cop murder, shot in the back.

https://www.tmz.com/2020/06/13/atlanta-police-fatally-shoot-black-man-wendys/

---

https://www.yahoo.com/news/investigation-ongoing-young-black-man-220540351.html

Literall lynching

---

KamikazePotato posted...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/investigation-ongoing-young-black-man-220540351.html

Literall lynching

Damn you got the autopsy report already?

---

UshiromiyaEva posted...

Another cop murder, shot in the back.

https://www.tmz.com/2020/06/13/atlanta-police-fatally-shoot-black-man-wendys/

That's definitely justified. Watch the video.

You guys are trying too hard to paint a picture that you are dabbling into supporting criminal behaviors.

Of course if you violently resist arrest and flee the scene with a weapon, the cops are going to shoot you to stop you. You are a violent criminal who can be a danger to Innocents at that point.

---

Corrik7 posted...

That's definitely justified. Watch the video.

You guys are trying too hard to paint a picture that you are dabbling into supporting criminal behaviors.

Of course if you violently resist arrest and flee the scene with a weapon, the cops are going to shoot you to stop you. You are a violent criminal who can be a danger to Innocents at that point.

A literal taser.

Jesus Christ Corrik, why are you working so hard to be on the opposite side of the dead black guys?


---

Corrik is beyond caring how hated he is on here.

---

It's incredible how brainwashed corrik is.

How do actual first world countries restrain people they believe to be violent? I wonder.

---

Fleeing the police or being drunk in your car aren't capital offense. They shot him not in the midst of the struggle, but after when he was running away.

---

His crime was literally "sleeping in his car while drunk" and "resisting arrest".

If he started firing his taser at the officer or started beating one of them, sure, shoot him.

But he just successfully resisted arrest and ran. There's no reason to assume he'd be a threat to the life of others.

Being a criminal alone does not justify the death penalty. They had fucking legs and actual deadly weapons. Fucking chase him instead of being lazy assholes. Surely they were in better shape than he was, hes a pretty big dude and their job necessitates some level of conditioning, I don't think they lose that race.

---

red13n posted...

If he started firing his taser at the officer or started beating one of them, sure, shoot him.

To be clear: No.

If a taser isnt a deadly weapon when used on civilians, its not a deadly weapon when used against the cops. He wasnt a deadly threat, theres zero reason to escalate it to that.

---

It does look like he fires the taser if you watch the video, red. But like Tony said that still isn't a deadly weapon and he was in the process of fleeing, not coming after them.

---

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

A literal taser.

Jesus Christ Corrik, why are you working so hard to be on the opposite side of the dead black guys?

I am not an idiot.

red13n posted...

His crime was literally "sleeping in his car while drunk" and "resisting arrest".

If he started firing his taser at the officer or started beating one of them, sure, shoot him.

But he just successfully resisted arrest and ran. There's no reason to assume he'd be a threat to the life of others.

Being a criminal alone does not justify the death penalty. They had fucking legs and actual deadly weapons. Fucking chase him instead of being lazy assholes. Surely they were in better shape than he was, hes a pretty big dude and their job necessitates some level of conditioning, I don't think they lose that race.

First of all, he was guilty of a DUI. As much as you all say you are against DUIs, it is weird how much you marginalize it now. You can tell me how I am the scum of the earth and should be in jail because I am a piece of shit, yet here we are marginalizing it in return. Really consistent there, bud. Don't let your bias show.

Anyways, so he is guilty of a DUI, probably some infractions, assault of a police officer, resisting arrest, definitely some sort of laws for taking the weapon, fleeing a crime scene, and etc.

He also has shown the propensity to commit violent crime in front of police officers, and you have to assume he is a violent criminal at that point and/or is a risk to cause injury/worse to innocents in the course of fleeing or after.

I am surprised the officers didn't shoot him earlier tbqh, but they apparently were trying their best to be non-lethal and thought they could detain him without having to do so. When they realized they couldn't, they shot a violent offender fleeing a scene.

It is open and shut. Not a single normal jury in the world will convict that. If they were charged, which I assume they weren't based on the evidence I have seen here based on videos, it would be laughable. I mean, you could charge to let justice play out to show them innocent, but there is no way a guilty conviction is coming back on that. If anything, they waited too long, and it could have been fatal to them or a bystander by waiting.

Not brainwashed because I can legally look at it? That isn't even a gray area case.

---

He at the very least pointed the taser at the main cop chasing him while running away, so he was threatening the cop with a weapon. It's after that point the cop shoots.

And we call tasers non lethal because they've a higher probability to not kill, not that they can't. It's well understood they absolutely can kill you, just significantly less than a gun.

---

Suprak the Stud posted...

It does look like he fires the taser if you watch the video, red. But like Tony said that still isn't a deadly weapon and he was in the process of fleeing, not coming after them.

Its a bit more complicated than this yes, to be fair, he'd have to be actively trying to harm them instead of just trying to get away.

---

The ATL police chief has resigned over this shooting
---

Kinglicious posted...

He at the very least pointed the taser at the main cop chasing him while running away, so he was threatening the cop with a weapon. It's after that point the cop shoots.

And we call tasers non lethal because they've a higher probability to not kill, not that they can't. It's well understood they absolutely can kill you, just significantly less than a gun.

He was not threatening them with anything when he was shot.

---

red13n posted...

He was not threatening them with anything when he was shot.

He is a threat to the public at that point.

---

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms called for the immediate termination of the police officer and said she did not believe that this was a justified use of deadly force."

From WaPo
---

Kinglicious posted...

And we call tasers non lethal because they've a higher probability to not kill, not that they can't. It's well understood they absolutely can kill you, just significantly less than a gun.

Can't police officers taze people for literally any reason

---

... it's right in the video when you see him turn and aim at a cop with it. He gets shot immediately after. Yes, that's threatening them before he gets shot.

---

Jakyl25 posted...

From WaPo

Surprising she would say that during rioting in the streets. Charge it if she wants. 0% chance of conviction.

---

Funny how when cops use a taser, it's fair because "it's non-lethal"

Yet in this case "you know, a taser isn't REALLY non-lethal..."

---

Corrik7 posted...

He is a threat to the public at that point.

On what grounds? None of the police officers were seriously injured and his crime was being drunk and sleeping in his car.

Why not chase him?

---

Jakyl25 posted...

The ATL police chief has resigned over this shooting

Jakyl25 posted...

Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms called for the immediate termination of the police officer and said she did not believe that this was a justified use of deadly force."

From WaPo

Excellent.

---

Corrik7 posted...

Surprising she would say that during rioting in the streets.

Is there rioting in the Atlanta streets right now?
---

KamikazePotato posted...

Can't police officers take people for literally any reason

I'm assuming you mean taze?
...if so, probably. They shouldn't though as it can be lethal, especially if you've got certain health conditions. They've definitely gotten away with more usage there than they should be allowed. I'm assuming tazers are under the same umbrella as their sticks, which despite causing more damage should be less lethal as it's not a literal electric current.

---

red13n posted...

On what grounds? None of the police officers were seriously injured and his crime was being drunk and sleeping in his car.

Why not chase him?

That's not his crime even though you keep trying to marginalize it to that to try and twist things.

"It's okay to assault police officers because none were seriously injured". That literally just came out of your mouth.

Now when Ulti says it is okay a guy drove his car into a crowd of protesters because " none were seriously injured" or whatever... You shouldn't even bitch in return. Cuz that's how dumb your comment was.

---

Corrik7 posted...

First of all, he was guilty of a DUI. As much as you all say you are against DUIs, it is weird how much you marginalize it now. You can tell me how I am the scum of the earth and should be in jail because I am a piece of shit, yet here we are marginalizing it in return. Really consistent there, bud. Don't let your bias show.

I have never called for you to be killed.

I do think you should never be allowed to drive at the very least for some lengthy period of time. And that your lack of remorse does in fact make you scum of the earth, yeah. We don't kill people just for being scum, this isn't mafia.

---

Kinglicious posted...

I'm assuming you mean taze?
...if so, probably. They shouldn't though as it can be lethal, especially if you've got certain health conditions. They've definitely gotten away with more usage there than they should be allowed. I'm assuming tazers are under the same umbrella as their sticks, which despite causing more damage should be less lethal as it's not a literal electric current.

I mean they can take people without any reason too but yeah that was probably a typo <_<
---

...also now getting bothered by the fact that it's not tazer but taser. Yet it's more often seen as taze instead of tase.

This is some language bullshit.

---

Kinglicious posted...

I'm assuming you mean taze?
...if so, probably. They shouldn't though as it can be lethal, especially if you've got certain health conditions. They've definitely gotten away with more usage there than they should be allowed. I'm assuming tazers are under the same umbrella as their sticks, which despite causing more damage should be less lethal as it's not a literal electric current.

Think that one officer got fired for taking that dude who was doing nothing wrong in Philly or whatever. You can't just taze someone. Fuck if they hit their head just the wrong way when falling they could die, let alone for heart reasons.

---

Corrik7 posted...

"It's okay to assault police officers because none were seriously injured". That literally just came out of your mouth.

No, I didn't say it was ok. Chase after the fucking dude, arrest him, and charge him with a fucking crime in a court of law.

Don't shoot him when hes not a threat.

---

red13n posted...

I have never called for you to be killed.

I do think you should never be allowed to drive at the very least for some lengthy period of time. And that your lack of remorse does in fact make you scum of the earth, yeah. We don't kill people just for being scum, this isn't mafia.

My lack of remorse? What? What are you even talking about now.

---

It was autocorrect but in all honesty the police can kidnap you and receive no punishment as well soooo

---

Corrik7 posted...

"It's okay to assault police officers because none were seriously injured". That literally just came out of your mouth.

I thought you said you werent an idiot
---

red13n posted...

No, I didn't say it was ok. Chase after the fucking dude, arrest him, and charge him with a fucking crime in a court of law.

Don't shoot him when hes not a threat.

He is a threat. He is a violent offender fleeing the police with a weapon. It's literally not even a debate. Zero percent chance of conviction. Charge it. Find them innocent. Then March the streets again for thinking something misguided I guess.

The problem is you guys try to lump so much bullshit in with legit stuff that people just roll their eyes when you produce a legitimate issue.

---

Corrik7 posted...

My lack of remorse? What? What are you even talking about now.

You have downplayed your actions here on multiple occasions.

---

red13n posted...

You have downplayed your actions here on multiple occasions.

Okay, bud. Keep thinking you maintain some moral superiority while defending literal violent criminals.

---

Corrik7 posted...

Zero percent chance of conviction. Charge it. Find them innocent. Then March the streets again

This is all accurate and will continue to happen until the justice system changes to convict cops like this of murder
---

Why do you people even try with this clown anymore?


---

Corrik7 posted...

Okay, bud. Keep thinking you maintain some moral superiority while defending literal violent criminals.

I didn't defend him. I want the police to use their fucking legs when someone was running away.

I want him arrested if at all possible.

I don't want people shot when course of action is clearly not a last resort.

---

Jakyl25 posted...

This is all accurate and will continue to happen until the justice system changes to convict cops like this of murder

You ain't gonna have cops if you are convicting them for doing their jobs correctly. Which I understand is your personal goal, but it isn't the general populace's.

---