Poll of the Day > Demi Lovato's nudes were leaked

(+) Yeah! (+)

Oh so that's who she is.
Meh.

---

One of the innate male abilities is to imagine females naked anyways so in the words of kenshiro; you are already nude.

dedbus posted...

One of the innate male abilities is to imagine females naked anyways so in the words of kenshiro; you are already nude.

nani?

---

Yuck, no thanks.

Isn't she the one who did a bunch of drugs but never got in trouble for it?

---

She's pretty hot, tbh. We all like looking at naked people. Celebrities (who don't usually get naked) have a kind of taboo allure. Don't be such prudes.

---

AllstarSniper32 posted...

Uhm...people in porn give their consent.

Not all. Plus what if one participant in an amateutr porn didnt know the other uploaded it. Guess we should ask all them too.

---

Jen0125 posted...

Anybody that looks at leaked nudes has no or a low moral compass

Lmao. Just because no one would wanna look at your leaks doesn't mean you have to get butthurt about it.

Where they actually leaked or is TC making stuff up?

---

ColdOne666 posted...

Where they actually leaked or is TC making stuff up?

Google maybe? Geez it's almost 2020...

They exist and they're not bad.

---

xjayguyx posted...

Lmao. Just because no one would wanna look at your leaks doesn't mean you have to get butthurt about it.

That's got absolutely nothing to do with anything but nice try at insulting me to feel better about your moral failings.

---

Jen0125 posted...

That's got absolutely nothing to do with anything but nice try at insulting me to feel better about your moral failings.

I'd look at Jen's nudes.

---

SpaceBear_ posted...

I'd look at Jen's nudes.

I bet you would.

Yeah I don't get why people are going crazy to say there's nothing wrong with looking at leaked nudes. It's like basic human interaction. You don't go out of your way to look at someone's naked body when they don't want you to.

Just because everyone's doing it... means everyone's a horrible person.

---

Nice

Yellow posted...

Yeah I don't get why people are going crazy to say there's nothing wrong with looking at leaked nudes. It's like basic human interaction. You don't go out of your way to look at someone's naked body when they don't want you to.

Just because everyone's doing it... means everyone's a horrible person.

I'm not saying it's not wrong, I'm just saying that it doesn't make you a bad person to do it like jen implied

---

Muscles posted...

I'm not saying it's not wrong, I'm just saying that it doesn't make you a bad person to do it like jen implied

it certainly doesnt make you a good person

---

Mead posted...

it certainly doesnt make you a good person

I didn't say that, you can be good in spite of that or bad regardless of it

---

xjayguyx posted...

Lmao. Just because no one would wanna look at your leaks doesn't mean you have to get butthurt about it.

Now listen here son. Some people will look at absolutely any and all nude leaks. Don't forget the men in this topic are terrible people!

Mead posted...

it certainly doesnt make you a good person

Depends how good the arse is you know?

---

I havent read all the post yet. But, I know what we need. More nude male celebrities!
---

LinkPizza posted...

I havent read all the post yet. But, I know what we need. More nude male celebrities!

I mean males nudes probably do leak too. I don't hear much about those though. I believe the last I saw was Seth Rollins nude shot. For research obv.

---

Jen0125 posted...

No, because they're repeat offenders.

Thats called assuming...

wwinterj25 posted...

I mean males nudes probably do leak too. I don't hear much about those though. I believe the last I saw was Seth Rollins nude shot. For research obv.

They do. It seems like less, though...
---

LinkPizza posted...

They do. It seems like less, though...

True.


---

Zangulus posted...

Ive never understood the need, nor the need to justify to oneself or others, to look at celebrity leaked nudes.

Exactly. What I look at is my own business. Don't like it? I don't care. Talk about kink shaming.

---

LMAO at all this white knighting. After hearing all these other stories of celebs getting leaked you would have to be stupid taking digital nudes. Take polaroids if you dont want to get leaked.

---

wwinterj25 posted...

I mean males nudes probably do leak too. I don't hear much about those though. I believe the last I saw was Seth Rollins nude shot. For research obv.

Now Now Dad I looked at your browser history and there sure was a lot of Seth Rollins in there.

Zangulus posted...

It absolutely is a violation of their privacy and you are not a good person for doing so.

I dont think thats what theyre saying. Theyre saying theyre not total trash because they looked at nudes online. Which is true. Doing that one thing doesnt make you total trash. Actual nonconsensual sex or the act of murder for reasons other than accidental or self-defense would probably make you a total trash person, though...
---

Grindcorp9000 posted...

LMAO at all this white knighting. After hearing all these other stories of celebs getting leaked you would have to be stupid taking digital nudes. Take polaroids if you dont want to get leaked.

Victim blaming is stupid.

---

Jen0125 posted...

Victim blaming is stupid.

So is taking a bunch of nudes and sending them out to people thinking they will be total safe.

Jen0125 posted...

Grindcorp9000 posted...

LMAO at all this white knighting. After hearing all these other stories of celebs getting leaked you would have to be stupid taking digital nudes. Take polaroids if you dont want to get leaked.

Victim blaming is stupid.

Victim blaming is bad. But he does have a point. Celebrities (esepcially) should be careful. Taking nude pictures on a phone or device that can be easily hacked without needed the physical device is dangerous. And with The Fappening happening multiple times, theyre likely to be next if they do take those nude pics. Victim blaming is bad, though...
---

xjayguyx posted...

So is taking a bunch of nudes and sending them out to people thinking they will be total safe.

Jen0125 posted...

Victim blaming is stupid.

---

I don't know anything about this chick so I couldn't be assed to look up her nudes, but I've definitely looked at the nudes of other celebs. Even dudes and I'm the straightest guy here.

But then again, I don't give a fuck. I think the only real problem here is that it hurts their own image and brand. Otherwise, I don't think it's a big deal for them to have nudes out there. Get naked and send em to your SO's. That's p cool.

---

Jen0125 posted...

Victim blaming is stupid.

At what point does saying someone made bad decisions that led to their victimization turn into victim blaming? Are darwin award winners protected too?

---

xjayguyx posted...

Now Now Dad I looked at your browser history and there sure was a lot of Seth Rollins in there.

That's...erm.... for your mum, ok? >.>

Jen0125 posted...

Victim blaming is stupid.

So is uploading your personal shit to the internet, even more so when you're a celebrity. Don't put on the internet what you don't want to be shared.

---

Zangulus posted...

Its their fault their private images were released without their consent.

Dat fucking logic. Lol

Again when uploading them to the cloud or any internet service it kinda is. I don't expect any "logic" from someone who cries when personal stuff gets leaked that they have put on a public service on the internet. Reminds me of those facebook posts where folk basically fish for attention.

On a side note: Why do so many celebs upload these things to the cloud anyway? Wouldn't it be better to keep them private?

---

wwinterj25 posted...

Again when uploading them to the cloud or any internet service it kinda is. I don't expect any "logic" from someone who cries when personal stuff gets leaked that they have put on a public service on the internet. Reminds me of those facebook posts where folk basically fish for attention.

On a side note: Why do so many celebs upload these things to the cloud anyway? Wouldn't it be better to keep them private?

You tell em Pops.

Muscles posted...

Are darwin award winners protected too?

sometimes

sometimes those stories are absolutely about someone dying after they were doing something stupid, but sometimes theyre just stories of something awful happening to a person

Ill never forget hearing about one story where a guy working at a zoo was cleaning up an elephant exhibit, and the zookeepers had apparently given the animal stool softeners to help with constipation. While cleaning up the enclosure the animal ended up pooping and it knocked the guy over and he hit his head on a rock, losing consciousness and then suffocating under the animals poop.

Obviously there are some people who are gonna find that funny but it in no way was the guys fault. He was just doing his job and a random accident happened.

The whole darwin awards thing is pretty twisted and most of the people that enjoy reading those stories have some gross need to feel superior to other people that they feel deserved the bad things that happened to them

---

A celebrity having nude photos on their phone like millions of other people doesn't mean they should be blamed if they get leaked. The fault is with the hacker and people who view the photos.

---

wwinterj25 posted...

Again when uploading them to the cloud or any internet service it kinda is.

doing something that increases your chance of being a victim of crime does not decriminalize the criminal act

---

xjayguyx posted...

So is taking a bunch of nudes and sending them out to people thinking they will be total safe.

Jen0125 posted...

Victim blaming is stupid.

This is hardly the same as saying a woman who wears a skirt is asking for it which is obviously wrong. In this case it's just people being stupid.

---

Mead posted...

sometimes

sometimes those stories are absolutely about someone dying after they were doing something stupid, but sometimes theyre just stories of something awful happening to a person

Ill never forget hearing about one story where a guy working at a zoo was cleaning up an elephant exhibit, and the zookeepers had apparently given the animal stool softeners to help with constipation. While cleaning up the enclosure the animal ended up pooping and it knocked the guy over and he hit his head on a rock, losing consciousness and then suffocating under the animals poop.

Obviously there are some people who are gonna find that funny but it in no way was the guys fault. He was just doing his job and a random accident happened.

The whole darwin awards thing is pretty twisted and most of the people that enjoy reading those stories have some gross need to feel superior to other people that they feel deserved the bad things that happened to them

That doesn't sound like it should be a Darwin award honestly, I thought they were about people dying due to their own stupidity?

---

It's fucking 2020 almost.. hackers are smarter than ever. Too stupid to know that and take the risk of having nudes on your phone or sending them out to people is their fault. Yes the hacker is a worse person obviously BUT the hacker is apparently smarter.

xjayguyx posted...

It's fucking 2020 almost.. hackers are smarter than ever. Too stupid to know that and take the risk of having nudes on your phone or sending them out to people is their fault. Yes the hacker is a worse person obviously BUT the hacker is apparently smarter.

ideally that very smart person will be identified and charged

---

Sahuagin posted...

doing something that increases your chance of being a victim of crime does not decriminalize the criminal act

You're right. But it's the same as leaving your door unlocked while you're not home to stop home invaders. If you wanna protect your stuff, lock your door. If you don't want you nudes getting out (then either don't take them, or store them somewhere actual safe. Or something similar. When any of us take nudes, we know there's a chance it can get around...

Mead posted...

xjayguyx posted...

It's fucking 2020 almost.. hackers are smarter than ever. Too stupid to know that and take the risk of having nudes on your phone or sending them out to people is their fault. Yes the hacker is a worse person obviously BUT the hacker is apparently smarter.

ideally that very smart person will be identified and charged

Maybe... Though, if they're smart enough, they may escape...
---

LinkPizza posted...

You're right. But it's the same as leaving your door unlocked while you're not home to stop home invaders. If you wanna protect your stuff, lock your door. If you don't want you nudes getting out (then either don't take them, or store them somewhere actual safe. Or something similar. When any of us take nudes, we know there's a chance it can get around...

so?

---

Sahuagin posted...

doing something that increases your chance of being a victim of crime does not decriminalize the criminal act

Not sure where you're getting I'm implying that. I'm simply saying if you run through a fire you're going to get burnt.

Jen0125 posted...

A celebrity having nude photos on their phone like millions of other people doesn't mean they should be blamed if they get leaked. The fault is with the hacker and people who view the photos.

However if said personal stuff was not left on said phone then you've no danger of it getting leaked as there is nothing to hack. It's like having your pin code for your bank saved on your phone. You just wouldn't do it because you know hackers are a thing. I would say it's common sense these days. Ah well. Some folk will never learn and I would say these celebs that get stuff leaked still continue to do the same thing.

---

wwinterj25 posted...

Not sure where you're getting I'm implying that. I'm simply saying if you run through a fire you're going to get burnt.

why is it that when anyone says Im just saying or Im simply saying its always something thats a pretty shitty justification for some awful viewpoint

---