Poll of the Day > Why don't more movies have action scenes like Kingsman?

(+) Yeah! (+)

The action scenes are so goddamn clean and more importantly, fun. I mean, I do enjoy the Bourne action sequences, but so many people try to rip it off while failing miserably at it. Why don't more people try to rip off the style Kingsman's action sequences have?

I just hope the sequel's action sequences are just as clean and fun. I watched the trailer for it and the fact that they brought in Channing Tatum and the fact that Galahad is alive again is alarming. I mean, I loved Galahad, but a series starts losing agency when you start bringing back dead characters.
---

Simple and clean is the way
---

It is a lot more money to choreograph a scene as intricate as that then it is to just have a dude wiggle and fall over.
---

The sequel is fun as fuck and spoilers about Channing Tatum he's in the movie for like 5-10 minutes
---

because it's hard and people are lazy
---

Mead posted...

Simple and clean is the way

is the way that you're making me feel tonight
---

Damn, the sequel was disappointing as fuck. I feel like the action scenes weren't clean as they were in the first one. Still cleaner than most action movies out there, but it felt like they were way more cut way worse than the first one. Still fun though, definitely.
Also, the asspull they did to bring back Galahad was pretty stupid. Like they did some dumbass asspull to bring back Galahad, but killed off another perfectly good supporting character in Lancelot. Why not just use her instead of pulling a dumbass asspull? Story seemed worse, campy as fuck, but I think they went too far in this one. First one was fun while still remaining a serious enough tone for the movie to not just be straight up stupid, but this one just tried too hard to be campy and quirky.
---

Elton John was fucking hilarious though
---