Poll of the Day > 30 y/o SPARED DEATH after he EXECUTED his FAMILY who told him to get a JOB!!!

(+) Yeah! (+)

30 y/o Mannequin, Grant Amato was SPARED the DEATH PENALTY after a jury did NOT unanimously choose the death penalty for the Nurse who murdered his family EXECUTION style because they forced him to get a job to pay back 200K he paid to a BULGARIAN CAM GIRL!! Instead, it was an automatic life sentence since no unanimous decision in the 12 person jury

He was angry when they cut off his relationship with a model he met on a adult website after he stole 60,000 and guns from his brother so he can keep talking to a bulgarian women he met online

He also stole 150,000 smackers from his DAD, including a LOAN taken out on his parent's HOUSE!!

He sent her over 200,000 smackers to the heifer in 3 MONTHS!!

He planned out a murder on his parents, Margaret and Chad, along with his brother, Cody, one by one as they arrived back home following a stint in SEX ADDICTION REHAB and being told to get a job to pay them back. As each of them arrived back home, he SHOT THEM DEAD after just stepping inside

Surviving brother, Jason cried and hugged loved ones after the verdict

Grant was arrested for stealing propofol from his nursing job last June before he made contact with Sylvia Ventsislavova last July as he would send her lingerie in exchange for seeing her wear other items

He used a IWI Jericho 941 handgun owned by him and his brother Cody's best friend, Blake Turpin

2 friends testified against him after seeing a note Grant said he wrote on but appeared to be written from his brother, Cody's point of view.

Images of Sylvia were projected on screen in court and DA. Domenick Leo told the jury "I know some of you looked at him. I know what some of you saw, because i saw the same thing. He was transfixed on that woman. Grant efll in love with a woman named Silvie. Not only did he fall in love with her, he became obsessed with her, to the point that she's all that mattered"

Grant presented himself as financially successful and devised a way to get her back but they blew his plan and exposed his lies to to her about him

He used his dead dad's fingerprint to access a USAA banking app on his dead brother's phone and add his own PNC bank account.

His medical job at adventhealth orlando helped him cover up and stage a murder-suicide

The family had to cut off his Wifi connection but he used a Publix login to speak to Sylvia even AFTER he killed his family!! His brother and dad were the obstacles in his life as his mom was simply following along

It was his plan to fly to Bulgaria and escape the murders before it was all foiled

Do you think the death penalty should be unanimous decision?.

Grant - Going to the Big House









Surviving Brother -



Amato Family - Deceased





Sylvia - Money Drainer





Evidence -




---

It shouldn't even be up to a jury to choose the level of punishment. Just convict on the charges or not, and then the judge determines the punishment based on the charges the accused is convicted of.

But no, having one staunchly anti-capital punishment person on a 12 person jury who refuses to ever agree to the death penalty in any circumstance shouldn't be enough to save a mass murderer from death row.
Makes a joke of even having capital punishment. People who commit less heinous murders get executed, and ones who commit some of the worst atrocities in history can potentially skate free of it, all based on the random whims of who ends up on their juries.

streamofthesky posted...

It shouldn't even be up to a jury to choose the level of punishment. Just convict on the charges or not, and then the judge determines the punishment based on the charges the accused is convicted of.

I think it's because it could traumatize people to learn they killed someone, even indirectly... Probably... Which means they were forced into a traumatic situation. Though, if they decided to do what you say, it could help people get off of jury duty in some cases. Because they might let people who don't want to suffer a traumatic situation go... But I think that might be the reason...
---

Hmm, I haven't seen ico post in a little while...
---

"Do you think a death penalty sentence should be a unanimous decision?"

No, because I don't think the death penalty should exist in a justice system prone to convicting innocent people, and I don't think the State should have that power regardless. Beyond that, it's expensive- even more expensive than life imprisonment-, it doesn't actually work as a deterrent like people assume, and it also complicates and bogs up our judicial system unnecessarily.
---

Death penalty costs more than life in prison so no I don't support it.
---

Revelation34 posted...

Death penalty costs more than life in prison so no I don't support it.

Not when it's done properly. Death penalty costs more than even 6 months prison only when they're allowed to endlessly appeal without new evidence.
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Not when it's done properly. Death penalty costs more than even 6 months prison only when they're allowed to endlessly appeal without new evidence.

Ok that's not a good argument still then.
---

What was his username

---

I mean death can be granted for nothing. Just saying.
Still with that said being as the jury have to vote it should be a unanimous decision whatever the case.
---

This is senseless, death is the only option this man deserved.
---

Full Throttle posted...

a jury did NOT unanimously choose the death penalty for the Nurse who murdered his family EXECUTION style because they forced him to get a job to pay back 200K he paid to a BULGARIAN CAM GIRL!!

This is the most confusing part of the story. Why is the jury forcing him to get a job in order to pay a cam girl for them? An if he's a nurse doesn't that mean he's already employed?
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

This is the most confusing part of the story. Why is the jury forcing him to get a job in order to pay a cam girl for them? An if he's a nurse doesn't that mean he's already employed?

I dont think the money is going to the cam girl, I think he has to repay the money he stole that he gave to her

---

Mead posted...

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

This is the most confusing part of the story. Why is the jury forcing him to get a job in order to pay a cam girl for them? An if he's a nurse doesn't that mean he's already employed?

I dont think the money is going to the cam girl, I think he has to repay the money he stole that he gave to her

Did the jury pay a cam girl during the course of the trial? So now they want to be reimbursed.
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

Mead posted...

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

This is the most confusing part of the story. Why is the jury forcing him to get a job in order to pay a cam girl for them? An if he's a nurse doesn't that mean he's already employed?

I dont think the money is going to the cam girl, I think he has to repay the money he stole that he gave to her

Did the jury pay a cam girl during the course of the trial? So now they want to be reimbursed. I don't get how a jury can decide that someone needs to pay them 200K before that person will be allowed to die.

The jury isnt forcing him to get a job. He killed his family because his family was forcing him to get a job to pay back the $200,000 he stole from them to give to cam girl. I think they wanted him to work more or something. Or maybe get a second job.

Ducky wrote it kind of weird. But it makes a little more sense if you had read the first story...
---

Mead posted...

I dont think the money is going to the cam girl, I think he has to repay the money he stole that he gave to her

How's he going to repay money he stole from people he murdered?
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

Did the jury pay a cam girl during the course of the trial? So now they want to be reimbursed. I don't get how a jury can decide that someone needs to pay them 200K before that person will be allowed to die.

---

streamofthesky posted...

It shouldn't even be up to a jury to choose the level of punishment. Just convict on the charges or not, and then the judge determines the punishment based on the charges the accused is convicted of.

But no, having one staunchly anti-capital punishment person on a 12 person jury who refuses to ever agree to the death penalty in any circumstance shouldn't be enough to save a mass murderer from death row.
Makes a joke of even having capital punishment. People who commit less heinous murders get executed, and ones who commit some of the worst atrocities in history can potentially skate free of it, all based on the random whims of who ends up on their juries.

...which would just lead to hung juries because rational objectors would refuse to pass a guilty verdict if the death penalty was the likely outcome afterward.

Otherwise, capital punishment is already a very bad joke and hopefully one that America will stop telling.
---

Did she just eat a lemon?

---