Poll of the Day > It's funny. A small part of me hopes that Trump wins 2020.

Topic List	Page List: 1
WastelandCowboy 06/14/19 4:23:20 PM #1:	At least this way, the possibly of him being president again is gone, per the twenty-second amendment. Yeah, itll likely suck, but its for the greater good. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:923316342] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>At least this way, the possibly of him being president again is gone, per the twenty-second amendment. Yeah, itll likely suck, but its for the greater good.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 06/14/19 4:25:20 PM #2:	Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016. --- I am your shepherd cloaked in obscenity. Heed these sickening words: I worship only what you bleed. <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:923316455] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cacciato 06/14/19 4:27:34 PM #3:	Hey, they could also repeal the amendment and he could be president for 16 years. FDR was president for 16 years. <cite>Cacciato posted [p:923316549] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>Hey, they could also repeal the amendment and he could be president for 16 years. FDR was president for 16 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 06/14/19 4:29:23 PM #4:	Noop_Noop posted... Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016. [Citation needed] Cacciato posted... Hey, they could also repeal the amendment and he could be president for 16 years. FDR was president for 16 years. Wouldnt this invoke an almost immediate response from Congress? Like, if he declared this via an Executive Order, its still need to be approved, right? Personally, Im not too thrilled about the possibility of him being in office for another four years as theres much better candidates imo, but this way, hed be metaphorically banned from running again and itd (hopefully) shut up all the racist and intolerant followers who will likely cry foul otherwise. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:923316637] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016.</quote> [Citation needed] <cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote>Hey, they could also repeal the amendment and he could be president for 16 years. FDR was president for 16 years.</quote> Wouldnt this invoke an almost immediate response from Congress? Like, if he declared this via an Executive Order, its still need to be approved, right? Personally, Im not too thrilled about the possibility of him being in office for another four years as theres much better candidates imo, but this way, hed be metaphorically banned from running again and itd (hopefully) shut up all the racist and intolerant followers who will likely cry foul otherwise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/14/19 4:30:38 PM #5:	Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923316682] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 06/14/19 4:31:41 PM #6:	My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy? --- I am your shepherd cloaked in obscenity. Heed these sickening words: I worship only what you bleed. <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:923316746] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 06/14/19 4:37:31 PM #8:	Mead posted... Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. Noop_Noop posted... My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy? So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you? <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:923317018] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb</quote> Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. <cite> Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy?</quote> So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FiftyFour54 06/14/19 4:40:19 PM #9:	Noop_Noop posted... Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016. lmao --- "I'm touched by the arrow of God that left scars" - CYNE <cite>FiftyFour54 posted [p:923317128] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016.</quote> lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/14/19 4:43:36 PM #10:	The severity of schmens november 2020 frustration will be of such magnitude that it will be capable of providing the island nation of Samoa with all of its power needs for several years to come --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923317283] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>The severity of schmens november 2020 frustration will be of such magnitude that it will be capable of providing the island nation of Samoa with all of its power needs for several years to come</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 06/14/19 4:44:07 PM #11:	Mead posted... The severity of schmens november 2020 frustration will be of such magnitude that it will be capable of providing the island nation of Samoa with all of its power needs for several years to come Noop is Schmendrake? <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:923317301] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The severity of schmens november 2020 frustration will be of such magnitude that it will be capable of providing the island nation of Samoa with all of its power needs for several years to come</quote> Noop is Schmendrake?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/14/19 4:45:14 PM #12:	WastelandCowboy posted... Mead posted... The severity of schmens november 2020 frustration will be of such magnitude that it will be capable of providing the island nation of Samoa with all of its power needs for several years to come Noop is Schmendrake? I think so --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923317355] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The severity of schmens november 2020 frustration will be of such magnitude that it will be capable of providing the island nation of Samoa with all of its power needs for several years to come</quote> Noop is Schmendrake?</quote> I think so</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 06/14/19 4:46:21 PM #13:	WastelandCowboy posted... Mead posted... Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. Noop_Noop posted... My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy? So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you? Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie. --- I am your shepherd cloaked in obscenity. Heed these sickening words: I worship only what you bleed. <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:923317419] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb</quote> Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. <cite> Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy?</quote> So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you?</quote> Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 06/14/19 5:03:14 PM #14:	Noop_Noop posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Mead posted... Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. Noop_Noop posted... My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy? So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you? Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie. You told me to look at the past three years as proof of your claim that Democrats didnt learn anything. As Im sure you know, a lot has happened in these past three years so itd be impractical to glean over every political action and moment to prove this idea that Democrats didnt learn anything since Trumps election. The burden of proving your claim is on you as you should want to prove your statement instead of just throwing words around in an attempt to sound wise. <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:923318160] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb</quote> Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. <cite> Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy?</quote> So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you?</quote> Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie.</quote> You told me to look at the past three years as proof of your claim that Democrats didnt learn anything. As Im sure you know, a lot has happened in these past three years so itd be impractical to glean over every political action and moment to prove this idea that Democrats didnt learn anything since Trumps election. The burden of proving your claim is on you as you should want to prove your statement instead of just throwing words around in an attempt to sound wise.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ParanoidObsessive 06/14/19 5:35:36 PM #15:	The real problem is that the Democrats seem like they're lining up to make the same mistake they've made before (and which the Republicans have made at times too) - namely, they're so utterly convinced that Trump is so terrible and no one sane would ever vote for him again, so they don't need to try very hard or put up actual worthwhile candidates to run against him. But that's basically the mentality that lost the last election, and is the same reason Bush got a second term. People need to stop underestimating Trump's ability to get reelected as long as the opposition fields someone just as terrible. If the Democrats were smart enough to aim more centrist than doubling down on their own entrenched stalwarts, they'd easily win with a landslide. But instead, overconfidence may wind up being their undoing. --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:923319500] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>The real problem is that the Democrats seem like they're lining up to make the same mistake they've made before (and which the Republicans have made at times too) - namely, they're so utterly convinced that Trump is so terrible and no one sane would ever vote for him again, so they don't need to try very hard or put up actual worthwhile candidates to run against him. But that's basically the mentality that lost the last election, and is the same reason Bush got a second term. People need to stop underestimating Trump's ability to get reelected as long as the opposition fields someone just as terrible. If the Democrats were smart enough to aim more centrist than doubling down on their own entrenched stalwarts, they'd easily win with a landslide. But instead, overconfidence may wind up being their undoing. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 06/14/19 5:39:36 PM #16:	Why, though? if he loses in 2020, he isnt going to be nominated again or even run again. Im actually curious to see if he loses in 2020 how fast the GOP drop him and act like they never knew him. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:923319667] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>Why, though? if he loses in 2020, he isnt going to be nominated again or even run again. Im actually curious to see if he loses in 2020 how fast the GOP drop him and act like they never knew him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ssj4supervegeta 06/14/19 5:39:58 PM #17:	yeah sure i'll vote for him. for the lulz. --- LoL summoner: Vejitables Wanna know why me rogers so jolly? hehe <cite>ssj4supervegeta posted [p:923319684] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>yeah sure i'll vote for him. for the lulz.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
papercup 06/14/19 5:43:30 PM #18:	I mean, we all know either he wins reelection, or he loses and just doesn't leave office. --- Nintendo Network ID: papercups 3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925 <cite>papercup posted [p:923319813] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>I mean, we all know either he wins reelection, or he loses and just doesn't leave office.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 06/14/19 5:59:41 PM #19:	Trump will win 2020 because the Democrats are going to Walter Mondale for the third time in 40 years. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. I'm finally a Senior Software Engineer, but unlike Dikitain I don't file TPS reports. <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:923320468] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>Trump will win 2020 because the Democrats are going to Walter Mondale for the third time in 40 years.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 06/14/19 6:34:47 PM #20:	WastelandCowboy posted... Noop_Noop posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Mead posted... Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. Noop_Noop posted... My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy? So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you? Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie. You told me to look at the past three years as proof of your claim that Democrats didnt learn anything. As Im sure you know, a lot has happened in these past three years so itd be impractical to glean over every political action and moment to prove this idea that Democrats didnt learn anything since Trumps election. The burden of proving your claim is on you as you should want to prove your statement instead of just throwing words around in an attempt to sound wise. its not a burden though. like i said, i have 0 vested interest in "proving" anything to you. its YOUR feelings thatll be hurt in the end, while i find out the election results on south park the following day after an internet blackout --- I am your shepherd cloaked in obscenity. Heed these sickening words: I worship only what you bleed. <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:923321803] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb</quote> Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. <cite> Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy?</quote> So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you?</quote> Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie.</quote> You told me to look at the past three years as proof of your claim that Democrats didnt learn anything. As Im sure you know, a lot has happened in these past three years so itd be impractical to glean over every political action and moment to prove this idea that Democrats didnt learn anything since Trumps election. The burden of proving your claim is on you as you should want to prove your statement instead of just throwing words around in an attempt to sound wise.</quote> its not a burden though. like i said, i have 0 vested interest in "proving" anything to you. its YOUR feelings thatll be hurt in the end, while i find out the election results on south park the following day after an internet blackout</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrndNhbrHdCEman 06/14/19 6:36:11 PM #21:	ParanoidObsessive posted... The real problem is that the Democrats seem like they're lining up to make the same mistake they've made before (and which the Republicans have made at times too) - namely, they're so utterly convinced that Trump is so terrible and no one sane would ever vote for him again, so they don't need to try very hard or put up actual worthwhile candidates to run against him. But that's basically the mentality that lost the last election, and is the same reason Bush got a second term. People need to stop underestimating Trump's ability to get reelected as long as the opposition fields someone just as terrible. If the Democrats were smart enough to aim more centrist than doubling down on their own entrenched stalwarts, they'd easily win with a landslide. But instead, overconfidence may wind up being their undoing. Yup. --- Official nosy neighbor and gossip https://imgur.com/uGKwGsK <cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted [p:923321857] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote>The real problem is that the Democrats seem like they're lining up to make the same mistake they've made before (and which the Republicans have made at times too) - namely, they're so utterly convinced that Trump is so terrible and no one sane would ever vote for him again, so they don't need to try very hard or put up actual worthwhile candidates to run against him. But that's basically the mentality that lost the last election, and is the same reason Bush got a second term. People need to stop underestimating Trump's ability to get reelected as long as the opposition fields someone just as terrible. If the Democrats were smart enough to aim more centrist than doubling down on their own entrenched stalwarts, they'd easily win with a landslide. But instead, overconfidence may wind up being their undoing. </quote> Yup.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/14/19 6:41:13 PM #22:	ParanoidObsessive posted... The real problem is that the Democrats seem like they're lining up to make the same mistake they've made before (and which the Republicans have made at times too) - namely, they're so utterly convinced that Trump is so terrible and no one sane would ever vote for him again, so they don't need to try very hard or put up actual worthwhile candidates to run against him. But that's basically the mentality that lost the last election, and is the same reason Bush got a second term. People need to stop underestimating Trump's ability to get reelected as long as the opposition fields someone just as terrible. If the Democrats were smart enough to aim more centrist than doubling down on their own entrenched stalwarts, they'd easily win with a landslide. But instead, overconfidence may wind up being their undoing. I dont think youre right on this one. I think trying to be more centrist resulted in Hilary being the nominee over Bernie and there just wasnt excitement for her as a candidate to the point where people either chose not to vote at all or voted for trump to try to upturn the status quo. Biden would be a repeat of that mistake. Hes polling well now but once the debates start I think its gonna be obvious how unpopular a lot of centrist policies are nowadays. --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923322053] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>ParanoidObsessive posted...</cite> <quote>The real problem is that the Democrats seem like they're lining up to make the same mistake they've made before (and which the Republicans have made at times too) - namely, they're so utterly convinced that Trump is so terrible and no one sane would ever vote for him again, so they don't need to try very hard or put up actual worthwhile candidates to run against him. But that's basically the mentality that lost the last election, and is the same reason Bush got a second term. People need to stop underestimating Trump's ability to get reelected as long as the opposition fields someone just as terrible. If the Democrats were smart enough to aim more centrist than doubling down on their own entrenched stalwarts, they'd easily win with a landslide. But instead, overconfidence may wind up being their undoing. </quote> I dont think youre right on this one. I think trying to be more centrist resulted in Hilary being the nominee over Bernie and there just wasnt excitement for her as a candidate to the point where people either chose not to vote at all or voted for trump to try to upturn the status quo. Biden would be a repeat of that mistake. Hes polling well now but once the debates start I think its gonna be obvious how unpopular a lot of centrist policies are nowadays.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WastelandCowboy 06/14/19 6:49:31 PM #23:	Noop_Noop posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Noop_Noop posted... WastelandCowboy posted... Mead posted... Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. Noop_Noop posted... My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy? So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you? Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie. You told me to look at the past three years as proof of your claim that Democrats didnt learn anything. As Im sure you know, a lot has happened in these past three years so itd be impractical to glean over every political action and moment to prove this idea that Democrats didnt learn anything since Trumps election. The burden of proving your claim is on you as you should want to prove your statement instead of just throwing words around in an attempt to sound wise. its not a burden though. like i said, i have 0 vested interest in "proving" anything to you. its YOUR feelings thatll be hurt in the end, while i find out the election results on south park the following day after an internet blackout https://images.app.goo.gl/JfsDmftrifJKnz3E6 <cite>WastelandCowboy posted [p:923322389] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WastelandCowboy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Can you do me a favor and let that small part of you know that its being kinda dumb</quote> Sure. It told me to tell you to bite its shiny metal ass. <cite> Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>My citation is the last 3 and a half years, happy?</quote> So you have no source other than telling me to look it up? When the burden of proof should be on you?</quote> Burden of proof? Look it up? I literally said none of those things. I have no vested interest in "proving" anything to you. When you start crying next election it won't matter to me. You don't have to believe me, and you don't have to observe the world around you. It makes exactly 0 difference in my life homie.</quote> You told me to look at the past three years as proof of your claim that Democrats didnt learn anything. As Im sure you know, a lot has happened in these past three years so itd be impractical to glean over every political action and moment to prove this idea that Democrats didnt learn anything since Trumps election. The burden of proving your claim is on you as you should want to prove your statement instead of just throwing words around in an attempt to sound wise.</quote> its not a burden though. like i said, i have 0 vested interest in "proving" anything to you. its YOUR feelings thatll be hurt in the end, while i find out the election results on south park the following day after an internet blackout</quote> https://images.app.goo.gl/JfsDmftrifJKnz3E6</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 06/14/19 6:59:11 PM #24:	awww little guy is upset --- I am your shepherd cloaked in obscenity. Heed these sickening words: I worship only what you bleed. <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:923322772] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>awww little guy is upset</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/14/19 7:43:15 PM #25:	Noop_Noop posted... Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016. Trump's own poll numbers show him underwater right now. He trails Biden 16 points in Pennsylvania, 10 points in Wisconsin, and seven points in Flroida. Hell, he's actually put Texas in play for the Dems, as his lead there is now just two points. And, again, this is from a poll conducted by Trump's own campaign, which - after days of denying it - they have now confirmed is accurate. A year is an eternity in politics, so I fully expect these numbers will change, but to act like this election is a slam dunk for Trump is laughably inaccurate. Trump barely scraped out a win in 2016, with his margin of victory small enough to fit in half a football stadium; since then, he's done nothing to expand his appeal, has no major legislative accomplishments to his name (aside from an unpopular tax revamp that has given huge breaks to corporations while ballooning the federal deficit), is perpetually riddled with scandals, and his numbers have consistently been terrible even with a roaring economy and no major wars that the US is involved in. Unless there is a major reversal or the Dems commit an absolutely historic blunder, all signs point to Trump losing and losing hard. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923324589] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>Hey you might as well hope for it then since its for sure going to happen. Dems have learned exactly 0 lessons since 2016.</quote> Trump's own poll numbers show him underwater right now. He trails Biden 16 points in Pennsylvania, 10 points in Wisconsin, and seven points in Flroida. Hell, he's actually put Texas in play for the Dems, as his lead there is now just two points. And, again, this is from a poll conducted by Trump's own campaign, which - after days of denying it - they have now confirmed is accurate. A year is an eternity in politics, so I fully expect these numbers will change, but to act like this election is a slam dunk for Trump is laughably inaccurate. Trump barely scraped out a win in 2016, with his margin of victory small enough to fit in half a football stadium; since then, he's done nothing to expand his appeal, has no major legislative accomplishments to his name (aside from an unpopular tax revamp that has given huge breaks to corporations while ballooning the federal deficit), is perpetually riddled with scandals, and his numbers have consistently been terrible even with a roaring economy and no major wars that the US is involved in. Unless there is a major reversal or the Dems commit an absolutely historic blunder, all signs point to Trump losing and losing hard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 06/14/19 7:46:43 PM #26:	Texas is not a swing state. Wherever you're getting these stats has horrible polling methodology. Trump had 9% and nearly 1m votes on HRC in 2016. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. I'm finally a Senior Software Engineer, but unlike Dikitain I don't file TPS reports. <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:923324750] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>Texas is not a swing state. Wherever you're getting these stats has horrible polling methodology. Trump had 9% and nearly 1m votes on HRC in 2016.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/14/19 7:51:24 PM #27:	Judgmenl posted... Texas is not a swing state. Wherever you're getting these stats has horrible polling methodology. That would be the Trump campaign. Take it up with them. For what it's worth, most of the polls that have been conducted so far have seen similar numbers: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/tx/texas_trump_vs_biden-6818.html Calling individual results this far out from the actual election is a mug's game, and there's still plenty of opportunity that support for Trump in Texas will coalesce, but the state's demographics are changing and it's steadily been turning more purple over the last few elections. The days of Texas being a ruby-red bastion like Arkansas or Utah are long gone. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923324969] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>Texas is not a swing state. Wherever you're getting these stats has horrible polling methodology.</quote> That would be the Trump campaign. Take it up with them. For what it's worth, most of the polls that have been conducted so far have seen similar numbers: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/tx/texas_trump_vs_biden-6818.html Calling individual results this far out from the actual election is a mug's game, and there's still plenty of opportunity that support for Trump in Texas will coalesce, but the state's demographics are changing and it's steadily been turning more purple over the last few elections. The days of Texas being a ruby-red bastion like Arkansas or Utah are long gone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
argonautweakend 06/14/19 7:52:29 PM #28:	darkknight109 posted... with his margin of victory small enough to fit in half a football stadium I think people overlook this. His margin of victory, if you throw out EVs(obviously EVs determine the winner) his win was a) razor thin as pointed out already and b) got murdered in the popular votes. More people hate him now than before, i dont see a single poll or metric disputing that. The promises of him acting professional once the campaign trail was over were shit on(I cant recall if trump himself said this or people tried to justify their vote partly with this), and he isnt some new unknown entrant into the race, which certainly bought him votes last time. Thats not even getting into his actual policy, which in some cases, such as the wall(bar none his signature campaign idea), have been a total dud. The democrats could fuck this up, trump could get more popular in a year than i could even imagine. I'm just not sure looking at numbers(not really even polls for the most part) how he wins again. I could be 100% wrong, I do admit that. <cite>argonautweakend posted [p:923325007] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>with his margin of victory small enough to fit in half a football stadium</quote> I think people overlook this. His margin of victory, if you throw out EVs(obviously EVs determine the winner) his win was a) razor thin as pointed out already and b) got murdered in the popular votes. More people hate him now than before, i dont see a single poll or metric disputing that. The promises of him acting professional once the campaign trail was over were shit on(I cant recall if trump himself said this or people tried to justify their vote partly with this), and he isnt some new unknown entrant into the race, which certainly bought him votes last time. Thats not even getting into his actual policy, which in some cases, such as the wall(bar none his signature campaign idea), have been a total dud. The democrats could fuck this up, trump could get more popular in a year than i could even imagine. I'm just not sure looking at numbers(not really even polls for the most part) how he wins again. I could be 100% wrong, I do admit that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Noop_Noop 06/14/19 7:59:52 PM #29:	darkknight109 posted... Unless there is a major reversal or the Dems commit an absolutely historic blunder, all signs point to Trump losing and losing hard. huh... that sounds EXACTLY like 2016 --- I am your shepherd cloaked in obscenity. Heed these sickening words: I worship only what you bleed. <cite>Noop_Noop posted [p:923325306] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkknight109 posted...</cite> <quote>Unless there is a major reversal or the Dems commit an absolutely historic blunder, all signs point to Trump losing and losing hard.</quote> huh... that sounds EXACTLY like 2016</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 06/14/19 8:00:16 PM #30:	That's two polls. Also like I said the methodology sucks: https://poll.qu.edu/texas/release-detail?ReleaseID=2625 This poll does NOT show age and race breakdowns. This poll was done starting the day Biden Announced. https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/2020-texas-biden-and-beto-in-dead-heat-in-democratic-primary Notes: - This poll has more female voters and 70-30% Landline distribution. Who still has a landline???? It most likely HEAVILY favours 65+ voters. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. I'm finally a Senior Software Engineer, but unlike Dikitain I don't file TPS reports. <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:923325329] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote>That's two polls. Also like I said the methodology sucks: https://poll.qu.edu/texas/release-detail?ReleaseID=2625 This poll does NOT show age and race breakdowns. This poll was done starting the day Biden Announced. https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/2020-texas-biden-and-beto-in-dead-heat-in-democratic-primary Notes: - This poll has more female voters and 70-30% Landline distribution. Who still has a landline???? It most likely HEAVILY favours 65+ voters.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 06/14/19 8:11:25 PM #31:	he's basically just pandering to the 65+ crowd with his Medicare for All garbage. How the F is that pandering to the 65+ crowd. They already have medicare. Most Bernie supporters are millennials. Jfc --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:923325740] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><quote>he's basically just pandering to the 65+ crowd with his Medicare for All garbage.</quote> How the F is that pandering to the 65+ crowd. They already have medicare. Most Bernie supporters are millennials. Jfc</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkknight109 06/14/19 9:32:52 PM #32:	Noop_Noop posted... huh... that sounds EXACTLY like 2016 If you weren't paying attention, I'm sure it does. Hillary was given 70% odds to win by most reputable polling outlets and her margin of victory was not expected to be large. In essence, three outcomes were considered statistically possible: a slight Hillary victory, a slight Trump victory, or a significant Hillary victory. Trump won by the thinnest margin since the Bush Jr. elections, despite going up against the most unpopular candidate the Dems have ever put forward and having Democrat voter fatigue on his side. Since that time he's only gotten more unpopular. So far you haven't done anything in this topic but say, "Nuh uh, Trump's gonna win!" without giving any explanation as to why anyone should believe you or care about your opinion. Judgmenl posted... That's two polls. Three, counting the Trump campaign's polls. Which is three more than you have presented in support of your claim that Texas is not a swing state. Judgmenl posted... Please do not spout establishment propaganda. https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ShortRealisticCapybara-max-1mb.gif Judgmenl posted... I am not a Conservative, and I think that Joe Biden is a fucking joke Biden isn't my preferred choice of a Dem candidate either. That said, he is currently leading the pack, so if you want to spitball election outcomes a year and a half out, we're going to have to talk about him. My opinions on him - and yours, for that matter - are immaterial to the discussion. --- Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster. Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror! <cite>darkknight109 posted [p:923328838] in It's f... [t:77790748]...</cite> <quote><cite>Noop_Noop posted...</cite> <quote>huh... that sounds EXACTLY like 2016</quote> If you weren't paying attention, I'm sure it does. Hillary was given 70% odds to win by most reputable polling outlets and her margin of victory was not expected to be large. In essence, three outcomes were considered statistically possible: a slight Hillary victory, a slight Trump victory, or a significant Hillary victory. Trump won by the thinnest margin since the Bush Jr. elections, despite going up against the most unpopular candidate the Dems have ever put forward and having Democrat voter fatigue on his side. Since that time he's only gotten more unpopular. So far you haven't done anything in this topic but say, "Nuh uh, Trump's gonna win!" without giving any explanation as to why anyone should believe you or care about your opinion. <cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>That's two polls. </quote> Three, counting the Trump campaign's polls. Which is three more than you have presented in support of your claim that Texas is not a swing state. <cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>Please do not spout establishment propaganda.</quote> https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ShortRealisticCapybara-max-1mb.gif <cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I am not a Conservative, and I think that Joe Biden is a fucking joke</quote> Biden isn't my preferred choice of a Dem candidate either. That said, he is currently leading the pack, so if you want to spitball election outcomes a year and a half out, we're going to have to talk about him. My opinions on him - and yours, for that matter - are immaterial to the discussion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > It's funny. A small part of me hopes that Trump wins 2020. (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > It's funny. A small part of me hopes that Trump wins 2020.