Poll of the Day > SJW Girl is OUTRAGED she has to REMOVE her F*** NAZI'S Sign!! Is She Hot???

(+) Yeah! (+)

Nicole Parsons, a student at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst was shocked when her university asked her to take down her sign that said "F*** Nazis. You are not welcome here"..and they said it was because it WASN'T INCLUSIVE!!

She was living at the dorms when she was frustrated when several hate crimes happened on campus, especially from neo-nazis who parade around campus spreading hate.

An RA had a "Happy Hanukkah" sign on their door that was defaced with a swastika and she was so angered she responded with her own sign

Nicole then got an email asking her to remove the sign and now she says "i was in absolute shock. This email tells me the university cares more about the feelings of Nazis than the safety of their students. I thought maybe if i hang the sign up, maybe the person who drew the swastika will see it and see someone condemning their actions, even if the administration doesn't do it"

Eddie Papazoni said while the sign is permitted under freedom of speech, he wanted to discuss the "impact" her sign had and said "There are some in the community that have expressed that the sign should be taken down as it has created mixed emotions in the community on how to proceed, issues of inclusion and the ability to be active members of their community. What belief of theirs should have ban them from being included in our community"

He wanted all students to be part of the residential experience, whether they have neo-nazi views or not..

She did remove the sign to avoid negative attention and made plans to MOVE out of the campus building.

The University has also backtracked on what they said according to dailymail who now say it was "poorly worded" and should never have sent that to her as now they say they emphatically REJECT Nazis and other hate group and they are sensitive to the use of profanity that some could find inappropriate

Is Nicole Hot?

Her sign -

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/23/23/7770130-6525565-image-a-1_1545608715685.jpg

Nicole -

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/23/22/7770140-6525565-image-a-6_1545604876047.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/23/22/7770134-6525565-image-a-11_1545604989929.jpg

Her email -

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/23/22/7770138-6525565-image-a-12_1545604997709.jpg
---

Careful, some take offence to anything negative said about nazis
---

Full Throttle posted...

Nicole Parsons, a student at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst was shocked when her university asked her to take down her sign that said "F*** Nazis. You are not welcome here"..and they said it was because it WASN'T INCLUSIVE!!

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so fuck her.

Full Throttle posted...

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/23/22/7770134-6525565-image-a-11_1545604989929.jpg

Also, fuck her. >_>
---

Every single person involved in that story is a shitty person.
---

Would bang, ok?
---

Fight fire with fire. A few more creative uses of their BS should shut down ALL these morons so they wouldn't give us material to use against them.

the nazi's are like 95 year old men, what is she saying!??!
---

Full Throttle posted...

SJW Girl is OUTRAGED

When aren't they outraged?

Full Throttle posted...

REMOVE her F*** NAZI'S Sign

Is that a possessive apostrophe?
The general rule is that the possessive of a singular noun is formed by adding an apostrophe and s, whether the singular noun ends in s or not. The possessive of a plural noun is formed by adding only an apostrophe when the noun ends in s, and by adding both an apostrophe and s when it ends in a letter other than s.

She owns the F*** sign.
And the F*** sign is owned by a singular Nazi.
Therefore...
---

To be fair, I don't see an apostrophe on the actual sign. That's some duckbearspeak.

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

not sjw

Are F*** Nazis anything like Grammar Nazis?
---

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

Are F*** Nazis anything like Grammar Nazis?

Roaming the dorms, pedantically criticizing any suboptimal sex habits they find.

How about the actual answer to your question?

She looks good. I would throw a shot into her.

Politics dont apply when you give her booze.
---

_AdjI_ posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

Zoose gets really offended when people tarnish the reputation of original Nazis with current day ones.
---

SJWs: fighting hate with hate since forever.
---

I'd smash
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

SJWs: fighting hate with hate since forever.

Shes right. Fuck nazis

But with something hard and sandpapery
---

I'd bang her, but she's still just another brain-dead Amherst sjw fighting white supremacist nazi windwills, I live like 20 minutes from there, there are alot of them, so paranoid about 'white supremacy' while living in a 90% white area, but it's nice here, you'd think they'd actually have some appreciation for white people, but nope

Her sign says welccme. Also she's not an SJW.
---

Just replace the word Nazis with something like jews, black people or sjws and the sign its self would cause outrage.

That alone is a good enough reason to have it removed.

Her outrage is unjustified.
---

DrCidd posted...

Just replace the word Nazis with something like jews, black people or sjws and the sign its self would cause outrage.

That's pretty reasonable. Being jewish, black, or an SJW isn't inherently a bad thing. Being a Nazi is. When did we start forgetting that Nazis are bad people?

_AdjI_ posted...

DrCidd posted...

Just replace the word Nazis with something like jews, black people or sjws and the sign its self would cause outrage.

That's pretty reasonable. Being jewish, black, or an SJW isn't inherently a bad thing. Being a Nazi is. When did we start forgetting that Nazis are bad people?

When everybody was labelled one.
---

_AdjI_ posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

lolwut? No. A troll vandalizing a poster has no comparable value with actual Nazis. And no, not even the neo portion here is necessarily applicable because you don't know if it was being done on the basis of racial hatred or just to provoke a negative reaction.

HelIWithoutSin posted...

Zoose gets really offended when people tarnish the reputation of original Nazis with current day ones.

Equating Nazis with trolls makes the Nazis look less evil. Do you like Nazis looking less evil? When you wrongly overuse labels, all you do is blur the lines.

_AdjI_ posted...

an SJW isn't inherently a bad thing.

No, SJWs are inherently a bad thing. They're wannabe fascists.

_AdjI_ posted...

When did we start forgetting that Nazis are bad people?

Maybe it was when idiots started calling everybody under the sun a Nazi so the word gradually started to lose shock value.
---

people are so offended by nazi's we can't even show them in videogames
have to replace them with teddy bears and gum drops
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

_AdjI_ posted...

DrCidd posted...

Just replace the word Nazis with something like jews, black people or sjws and the sign its self would cause outrage.

That's pretty reasonable. Being jewish, black, or an SJW isn't inherently a bad thing. Being a Nazi is. When did we start forgetting that Nazis are bad people?

When everybody was labelled one.

That's idiotic. Nazis are still bad, and the label being misused doesn't change that.

Zeus posted...

lolwut? No. A troll vandalizing a poster has no comparable value with actual Nazis. And no, not even the neo portion here is necessarily applicable because you don't know if it was being done on the basis of racial hatred or just to provoke a negative reaction.

Painting a swastika on a hannukah poster identifies you with Nazis. Your motivations don't change that identification. Anyone who doesn't want to be associated with Nazis shouldn't paint swastikas on hannukah posters, and anyone who thinks they're being funny by doing so deserves every bit of hate they get for being so clueless.

_AdjI_ posted...

That's idiotic. Nazis are still bad, and the label being misused doesn't change that.

If only Nazis are nazis, then the average nazi is pretty bad. If you include everything down to a fat scot doing dog tricks as a nazi, the average nazi is an eyerolling nuisance.
---

_AdjI_ posted...

Painting a swastika on a hannukah poster identifies you with Nazis. Your motivations don't change that identification.

It does though, what with it identifying beliefs.

_AdjI_ posted...

Anyone who doesn't want to be associated with Nazis shouldn't paint swastikas on hannukah posters

This also applies to transgenders, double standard much?

_AdjI_ posted...

and anyone who thinks they're being funny by doing so deserves every bit of hate they get for being so clueless.

Your bile is what makes it funny, stop being unpleasant and it won't be funny to wind you up.
---

_AdjI_ posted...

Painting a swastika on a hannukah poster identifies you with Nazis. Your motivations don't change that identification. Anyone who doesn't want to be associated with Nazis shouldn't paint swastikas on hannukah posters.

Except for the fact that motivation is the sole thing that matters when you're trying to compare them to Neo-Nazis and even motivation isn't enough when it comes to actual Nazis. After all, spray painting "MARINE" on something doesn't make somebody a marine.

_AdjI_ posted...

anyone who thinks they're being funny by doing so deserves every bit of hate they get for being so clueless.

Do you have absolutely no clue with how trolls work in the first place? They want that reaction. It encourages them.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

_AdjI_ posted...

That's idiotic. Nazis are still bad, and the label being misused doesn't change that.

If only Nazis are nazis, then the average nazi is pretty bad. If you include everything down to a fat scot doing dog tricks as a nazi, the average nazi is an eyerolling nuisance.

Plus wrong accusations only serves to muddy the waters and thereby makes people more susceptible to extremism.
---

everyone who got invaded by russia is?was a nazi
you see how confusing that is to just hate all nazis

there are plenty of war criminals to hate, not just every nazi or every soviet for being in the army at the time
there was so much propaganda and stuff going on with poland most of the nazi's thought they were the good guys or at least better than the soviets
---

Kyuubi4269 posted...

If only Nazis are nazis, then the average nazi is pretty bad. If you include everything down to a fat scot doing dog tricks as a nazi, the average nazi is an eyerolling nuisance.

But why would you include non-Nazis in your assessment of the term "Nazi"? That means you're just doing exactly the same thing you're criticizing them of. The intelligent, non-Nazi-accepting response would be "yes, Nazis do suck. Good thing the guy you're complaining about isn't Nazi-like at all." Saying "nah, Nazis are okay" is just saying that Nazis are okay.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

It does though, what with it identifying beliefs.

If the motivation is explicitly stated beforehand, maybe, but otherwise painting swastikas very clearly associates you with Nazis and their hatred. That's one of the strongest symbolic associations in today's world.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

This also applies to transgenders, double standard much?

In that somebody who doesn't wanted to be identified as a male shouldn't actively present themselves in masculine ways? Duh. That's not much of a double standard.

Kyuubi4269 posted...

Your bile is what makes it funny, stop being unpleasant and it won't be funny to wind you up.

Anyone who finds it funny to terrorize people with hate crimes is a piece of shit and should be treated accordingly until such a time as they clue in to what they've done and stop doing it forever. There are no exceptions to this.

RoboXgp89 posted...

everyone who got invaded by russia is?was a nazi
you see how confusing that is to just hate all nazis

there are plenty of war criminals to hate, not just every nazi or every soviet for being in the army at the time
there was so much propaganda and stuff going on with poland most of the nazi's thought they were the good guys or at least better than the soviets

You can indeed make an argument against demonizing the Nazi soldiers in WWII. They were just fighting in a war they played no part in starting, and which they had to fight in in order to survive. The ones that actually carried out the genocide, not so much. They were unambiguously doing something terrible, and can only possibly defend their actions by claiming duress (where applicable). It's that latter group that's typically associated with the Nazis when people refer to them retrospectively, hence the unilateral disdain from all the non-awful people.

In the modern day, however, there are no Nazi soldiers caught up in their country's warmongering. Neo-Nazis are people who look back on everything we now know about the big picture of WWII and feel that Hitler was the good guy there. There's no confusion involved in designating those Nazis as bad people.

RoboXgp89 posted...

everyone who got invaded by russia is?was a nazi
you see how confusing that is to just hate all nazis

there are plenty of war criminals to hate, not just every nazi or every soviet for being in the army at the time
there was so much propaganda and stuff going on with poland most of the nazi's thought they were the good guys or at least better than the soviets

Ukraine and Afghanistan were Nazis?
---

Revelation34 posted...

RoboXgp89 posted...

everyone who got invaded by russia is?was a nazi
you see how confusing that is to just hate all nazis

there are plenty of war criminals to hate, not just every nazi or every soviet for being in the army at the time
there was so much propaganda and stuff going on with poland most of the nazi's thought they were the good guys or at least better than the soviets

Ukraine and Afghanistan were Nazis?

of course not afgani's were muslim, but muslims DID fight alongside germany for resources
people in ukraine DID help out the nazi's do some of the most terrible crimes, but so did some of the jews there to fight russia, they jus didn't tell anyone because nazi's in the german army weren't supposed to fight along side most jewish people especially eastern jews
so you had the finnish army with jews fighting off russia and helping germany/giving them access until 1944

that's my main problem with schools
they gloss over a lot of stuff and make everything seem one way or another
some people will tell you the coastal regions of china didn't identify with inner china and they'd be right on a form of government/trading scale, but wrong on a historical scale
ww2 was basically a 20 year civil war, it was a war specifically because of the versailles and a couple of ego maniacs
---

RoboXgp89 posted...

of course not afgani's were muslim, but muslims DID fight alongside germany for resources
people in ukraine DID help out the nazi's do some of the most terrible crimes, but so did some of the jews there to fight russia, they jus didn't tell anyone because nazi's in the german army weren't supposed to fight along side most jewish people especially eastern jews
so you had the finnish army with jews fighting off russia and helping germany/giving them access until 1944

that's my main problem with schools
they gloss over a lot of stuff and make everything seem one way or another
some people will tell you the coastal regions of china didn't identify with inner china and they'd be right on a form of government/trading scale, but wrong on a historical scale

I was being sarcastic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet%E2%80%93Afghan_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_military_intervention_in_Ukraine_(2014%E2%80%93present)
---

oh no dude when hitler said aryan he was appropriating it from iran and the ottoman empire

they wanted to make a super race of dark skinnned blonde haired women

the swaztica was a celtic symbol and a backwards budda symbol
---

She's not hot but those tits are alright so I'd hate fuck her, ok?
---

Nazis are the gangsters who destroyed my beloved home. They are to be insulted.

HelIWithoutSin posted...

_AdjI_ posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

Zoose gets really offended when people tarnish the reputation of original Nazis with current day ones.

He's a strong advocate in keeping things, pure - and don't get him started on Hanukah, ok?
---

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so fuck her.

Don't defend neo-nazis.

_AdjI_ posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

Extreme right wingers can't debate substance so they argue over semantics. I can't recall right off hand if Zeus has ever done so but I know I have seen extreme right attempt to make the argument that there hasn't been nazis since the 1940s and have arguments about that rather than addressing people marching through the streets under swastikas chanting nazi slogans.

BlackScythe0 posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so fuck her.

Don't defend neo-nazis.

_AdjI_ posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

Extreme right wingers can't debate substance so they argue over semantics. I can't recall right off hand if Zeus has ever done so but I know I have seen extreme right attempt to make the argument that there hasn't been nazis since the 1940s and have arguments about that rather than addressing people marching through the streets under swastikas chanting nazi slogans.

That's because that statement is true. The Nazi Party is required for there to be Nazis. "Extremists" is the proper term for them today. Just because they're using slogans or symbols of the party doesn't mean that party magically exists again.
---

zebatov posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so fuck her.

Don't defend neo-nazis.

_AdjI_ posted...

Zeus posted...

That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f*** her.

I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.

Extreme right wingers can't debate substance so they argue over semantics. I can't recall right off hand if Zeus has ever done so but I know I have seen extreme right attempt to make the argument that there hasn't been nazis since the 1940s and have arguments about that rather than addressing people marching through the streets under swastikas chanting nazi slogans.

That's because that statement is true. The Nazi Party is required for there to be Nazis. Extremists is the proper term for them today. Just because they're using slogans or symbols of the party doesn't mean that party magically exists again.

Jesus christ.

BlackScythe0 posted...

Jesus christ.

I know. Facts are tough to refute.

I would bet some people also don't know the difference between Liberal and liberal.
---

BlackScythe0 posted...

Extreme right wingers can't debate substance so they argue over semantics. I can't recall right off hand if Zeus has ever done so but I know I have seen extreme right attempt to make the argument that there hasn't been nazis since the 1940s and have arguments about that rather than addressing people marching through the streets under swastikas chanting nazi slogans.

That was 100% Zeus after Charlottesville. He very deliberately danced around ever actually criticizing the Nazis in favour of the "you're all idiot SJW's for calling them Nazis because it's not 1940" approach. It was pretty alarming. And then we also had Kyubi there saying "The 'neo-' means they have new and improved ideologies so they shouldn't be criticized so harshly for adopting it," and I honestly don't know what to think of that except to be very, very concerned.

zebatov posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Jesus christ.

I know. Facts are tough to refute.

I would bet some people also don't know the difference between Liberal and liberal.

It was an expression of exasperation and absolute disgust. Don't try to paint it any other way.

BlackScythe0 posted...

It was an expression of exasperation and absolute disgust. Don't try to paint it any other way.

The left doesn't handle facts well. They also misuse words such as "nazi" when people simply have different opinions than them.

It's like that word has some deep meaning for them. "Extremist" simply isn't good enough. No. Anyone who does anything to fight the left's agenda must be labelled a nazi.

All that was said is that Nazis don't exist, they are "extremists". Nobody even defended them, and that ("Nazis don't exist") was enough to disgust someone. Lol. Sounds like a YP, not an MP. Like I said, the left and using that word... some crazy attachment to it.
---

zebatov posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

It was an expression of exasperation and absolute disgust. Don't try to paint it any other way.

The left doesn't handle facts well. They also misuse words such as "nazi" when people simply have different opinions than them.

It's like that word has some deep meaning for them. "Extremist" simply isn't good enough. No. Anyone who does anything to fight the left's agenda must be labelled a nazi.

Look at the way this thing makes weak semantics based arguments and tries to turn it into some absolutely insane bull shit.

Who cares when you want an ethnic cleansing, as long as you stand against the left you're fine and don't deserve a "negative" label!

BlackScythe0 posted...

Look at the way this thing makes weak semantics based arguments and tries to turn it into some absolutely insane bull shit.

Who cares when you want an ethnic cleansing, as long as you stand against the left you're fine and don't deserve a "negative" label!

I think "right-wing extremist" does a pretty fine job of labelling them. I prefer to use correct terminology versus erroneous terminology, myself. There's nothing semantic about it. Stop using the wrong words for things and you'll stop getting called out. Also, the more you use a word in general, the less meaning it has.
---

zebatov posted...

BlackScythe0 posted...

Look at the way this thing makes weak semantics based arguments and tries to turn it into some absolutely insane bull shit.

Who cares when you want an ethnic cleansing, as long as you stand against the left you're fine and don't deserve a "negative" label!

I think "right-wing extremist" does a pretty fine job of labelling them. I prefer to use correct terminology versus erroneous terminology, myself. There's nothing semantic about it. Stop using the wrong words for things and you'll stop getting called out. Also, the more you use a word in general, the less meaning it has.

When have I been called out?

BlackScythe0 posted...

When have I been called out?

The left in general.
---