LogFAQs > #914671034

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	SJW Girl is OUTRAGED she has to REMOVE her F*** NAZI'S Sign!! Is She Hot???
Zeus 12/24/18 11:13:14 PM #24:	_AdjI_ posted... Zeus posted... That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f* her. I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept. lolwut? No. A troll vandalizing a poster has no comparable value with actual Nazis. And no, not even the neo portion here is necessarily applicable because you don't know if it was being done on the basis of racial hatred or just to provoke a negative reaction. HelIWithoutSin posted... Zoose gets really offended when people tarnish the reputation of original Nazis with current day ones. Equating Nazis with trolls makes the Nazis look less evil. Do you like Nazis looking less evil? When you wrongly overuse labels, all you do is blur the lines. _AdjI_ posted... an SJW isn't inherently a bad thing. No, SJWs are inherently a bad thing. They're wannabe fascists. _AdjI_ posted... When did we start forgetting that Nazis are bad people? Maybe it was when idiots started calling everybody under the sun a Nazi so the word gradually started to lose shock value. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:914671034] in SJW Girl i... [t:77329377]...</cite> <quote><cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>That said, "Nazis" doesn't mean Nazis anyway, it's just an insult used against anybody they disagree with so f* her.</quote> I'm pretty sure "Nazi" is an appropriate and accurate label for somebody who spray-paints a swastika over a "Happy Hannukah" sign, and not just being used as a blanket term for people she disagrees with. Well, unless you're just being really anal about people treating the "neo-" as being implicit when the context strongly supports that assumption, which wouldn't surprise me because you seem to have trouble with that concept.</quote> lolwut? No. A troll vandalizing a poster has no comparable value with actual Nazis. And no, not even the neo portion here is necessarily applicable because you don't know if it was being done on the basis of racial hatred or just to provoke a negative reaction. <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>Zoose gets really offended when people tarnish the reputation of original Nazis with current day ones.</quote> Equating Nazis with trolls makes the Nazis look less evil. Do you like Nazis looking less evil? When you wrongly overuse labels, all you do is blur the lines. <cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>an SJW isn't inherently a bad thing.</quote> No, SJWs are inherently a bad thing. They're wannabe fascists. <cite>_AdjI_ posted...</cite> <quote>When did we start forgetting that Nazis are bad people?</quote> Maybe it was when idiots started calling everybody under the sun a Nazi so the word gradually started to lose shock value. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1