Poll of the Day > Who are you Voting for?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Fazeo13 11/05/18 1:08:28 PM #1:	Who are you Voting for? - Results (16 votes) Democrat 37.5% (6 votes) 6 Republican 18.75% (3 votes) 3 Other 25% (4 votes) 4 Don't Vote 18.75% (3 votes) 3 Who are you Voting for? --- You aren't even really reading my posts; you're just staring at your e-mail client and fondly reminiscing about that hobo you stabbed to death. :P <cite>Fazeo13 posted [p:911855205] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote> Who are you Voting for? - Results (16 votes) Democrat 37.5% (6 votes) 6 Republican 18.75% (3 votes) 3 Other 25% (4 votes) 4 Don't Vote 18.75% (3 votes) 3 Who are you Voting for?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/05/18 1:16:19 PM #2:	The Draculas --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:911855636] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>The Draculas</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jsb0714 11/05/18 1:19:04 PM #3:	Anyone not an incumbent. --- Switch: SW-3960-1748-8688, PSN: jsbtheITguy, Steam: jsb0714 <cite>jsb0714 posted [p:911855776] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Anyone not an incumbent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InfestedAdam 11/05/18 1:19:29 PM #4:	I tend to vote only on propositions and whatnot while skipping candidates. I have an easier time understanding the various propositions than I do with the candidates. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:911855793] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>I tend to vote only on propositions and whatnot while skipping candidates. I have an easier time understanding the various propositions than I do with the candidates.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten 11/05/18 1:19:37 PM #5:	nobody. I'm in a new state that i have not paid any attention to. and I just don't care. I usually only vote for presidents anyway <cite>Zikten posted [p:911855799] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>nobody. I'm in a new state that i have not paid any attention to. and I just don't care. I usually only vote for presidents anyway</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 11/05/18 1:29:38 PM #6:	I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. You're a regular Jack Kerouac <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:911856333] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/05/18 1:42:56 PM #7:	Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. Thatll show em --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:911857035] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> Thatll show em</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 11/05/18 2:05:46 PM #8:	Douche or Turd... hmmmm --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:911858287] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Douche or Turd... hmmmm</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Far-Queue 11/05/18 2:07:10 PM #9:	Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be. --- https://imgur.com/ZwO4qO2 Bluer than velvet was the night... Softer than satin was the light... From the stars... <cite>Far-Queue posted [p:911858357] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Yellow 11/05/18 2:16:56 PM #10:	Any publically funded Democrat. --- https://soundcloud.com/jamie-yello/as_a_tool <cite>Yellow posted [p:911858904] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Any publically funded Democrat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fazeo13 11/05/18 2:42:43 PM #11:	Looks like a Blue wave? --- You aren't even really reading my posts; you're just staring at your e-mail client and fondly reminiscing about that hobo you stabbed to death. :P <cite>Fazeo13 posted [p:911860279] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Looks like a Blue wave?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 11/05/18 2:44:22 PM #12:	Far-Queue posted... Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be. You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. You're a regular Jack Kerouac <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:911860373] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be.</quote> You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GanglyKhan 11/05/18 2:51:35 PM #13:	Fazeo13 posted... Looks like a Blue wave? And 16 years from now, there will be a red wave and everyone will have magically forgotten that the majority is always shifting every 2 to 3 election cycles. --- Now Playing: KHII, The Binding of Isaac, MHGU SFV: Ed \| Kolin SCVI: Groh \| Mitsurugi <cite>GanglyKhan posted [p:911860803] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Fazeo13 posted...</cite> <quote>Looks like a Blue wave?</quote> And 16 years from now, there will be a red wave and everyone will have magically forgotten that the majority is always shifting every 2 to 3 election cycles.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 11/05/18 2:53:25 PM #14:	Judgmenl posted... Far-Queue posted... Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be. You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn. Seems like you know as much about this as you do any other subject --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:911860924] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be.</quote> You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn.</quote> Seems like you know as much about this as you do any other subject</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/05/18 2:58:31 PM #15:	Depends on the race. Amusing, most of CT's races seem to be "Malloy vs Trump," with less attention to the actual candidates running. I've had coworkers and friends save me some of their flyers since, as a Democrat, I don't get nearly the mix that independents receive. My favorite flyer this season is the Kevin Lembo mailer where he and Malloy are escaping CT on a life raft. The governor's race is between two multi-millionaires who have never held political office. This year would have been an easy win for Republicans had anybody but Stefanowski won the nomination. And if virtually anybody other than Lamont was running (because Lamont is still an improvement over Joe Ganim and Dan Malloy), Stefanowski wouldn't even be close in the polls. Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. And just think: One of these days goofy Elizabeth Warren is going to be our first female president. Far-Queue posted... Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be. Pretty much. Judgmenl posted... The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn. Uh, what? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:911861257] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Depends on the race. Amusing, most of CT's races seem to be "Malloy vs Trump," with less attention to the actual candidates running. I've had coworkers and friends save me some of their flyers since, as a Democrat, I don't get nearly the mix that independents receive. My favorite flyer this season is the Kevin Lembo mailer where he and Malloy are escaping CT on a life raft. The governor's race is between two multi-millionaires who have never held political office. This year would have been an easy win for Republicans had anybody but Stefanowski won the nomination. And if virtually anybody other than Lamont was running (because Lamont is still an improvement over Joe Ganim and Dan Malloy), Stefanowski wouldn't even be close in the polls. <cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> And just think: One of these days goofy Elizabeth Warren is going to be our first female president. <cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be.</quote> Pretty much. <cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn.</quote> Uh, what?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fazeo13 11/05/18 2:59:12 PM #16:	Mead posted... Judgmenl posted... Far-Queue posted... Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be. You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn. Seems like you know as much about this as you do any other subject lazy ad hominem --- You aren't even really reading my posts; you're just staring at your e-mail client and fondly reminiscing about that hobo you stabbed to death. :P <cite>Fazeo13 posted [p:911861300] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be.</quote> You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn.</quote> Seems like you know as much about this as you do any other subject</quote> lazy ad hominem</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 11/05/18 2:59:21 PM #17:	Democrats: Looks like a Blue wave Republicans: Looks like a Red wave Happens all of the time. Also I feel like nobody remembers the Tea Party back after Barry was elected and how annoying they were. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. You're a regular Jack Kerouac <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:911861311] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Democrats: Looks like a Blue wave Republicans: Looks like a Red wave Happens all of the time. Also I feel like nobody remembers the Tea Party back after Barry was elected and how annoying they were.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 11/05/18 3:29:53 PM #18:	i'm voting yes on 6 --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:911863139] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>i'm voting yes on 6</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Krazy_Kirby 11/05/18 3:32:01 PM #19:	Judgmenl posted... Far-Queue posted... Judgmenl posted... I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent. How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be. You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn. so you want an idiot who didn't go to school? --- Kill From The Shadows. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot <cite>Krazy_Kirby posted [p:911863269] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Far-Queue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>I refuse to participate in an election system that is so corrupt that they will re-elect Elizabeth Warren and refuse to even nominate a competent opponent.</quote> How can a competent candidate win if people don't vote? Are you familiar with Massachusetts politics? Warren is very popular here, but not unbeatable. Jeff Diehl has as good a chance as anyone to win against her. He has a considerable amount of support. Did you vote during the primary? Warren ran unopposed on the Dem ticket but Diehl had opponents. If you didn't like Diehl, or thought one of the other candidates might have a better chance against Warren, you and people like you may have made a difference. There's still an independent in the running in Shiva. If you don't want Warren to win, vote. That's the absolute shittiest argument against voting - being disenfranchised with the process because you assume the incumbent is a shoe-in to win - and then refusing to vote... that's just lazy and irresponsible. The only way you and the rest of the lazy slobs out there can hope to change anything is to vote. Saying voting won't make a difference is a cop-out. More than 50% of the voting population don't vote during midterms. If even half of those people got off their ass and did their civic duty, these elections may not be as predictable as they tend to be.</quote> You know as well as I do that nobody is going to vote against Warren, Diehl has no chance and was only nominated so that Warren would win unopposed. Also Shiva is a liar, and woman beater. None of this matters because Warren is popular due to "standing for progress" despite doing nothing but acting like she is a progressive politician. I don't want anyone with an Ivy League or Law background representing me, but that is not going to change, corruption breeds corruption and people don't care because they follow the "as usual" politics based on sensationalism, identity politics, fake progressivism and lies. The same thing happened in the 2016 election, nobody went against Hillary in the primaries for the same exact reasons. There was no chance of victory due to it being her turn.</quote> so you want an idiot who didn't go to school?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/05/18 3:35:19 PM #20:	Judgmenl posted... Democrats: Looks like a Blue wave Republicans: Looks like a Red wave Happens all of the time. Also I feel like nobody remembers the Tea Party back after Barry was elected and how annoying they were. They never really went away (well... depending on how you look at it), they just stopped making the news as often. Granted, some of the movement's key figures -- like Bachman -- no longer hold office. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:911863466] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Judgmenl posted...</cite> <quote>Democrats: Looks like a Blue wave Republicans: Looks like a Red wave Happens all of the time. Also I feel like nobody remembers the Tea Party back after Barry was elected and how annoying they were.</quote> They never really went away (well... depending on how you look at it), they just stopped making the news as often. Granted, some of the movement's key figures -- like Bachman -- no longer hold office.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InfestedAdam 11/05/18 3:36:39 PM #21:	Krazy_Kirby posted... i'm voting yes on 6 Is that the gas tax repeal? I'm still looking into that. I want to know what funding would go into the transportation infrastructure before I consider cutting additional funds. I don't doubt the funding is misused but between the two choices, I'd rather direct extra funds even if some of it is misused than not direct any extra funds at all. Of course if I want the funds to be used properly, I probably should look into voting for the right candidates who hopefully would use it properly. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:911863558] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>i'm voting yes on 6</quote> Is that the gas tax repeal? I'm still looking into that. I want to know what funding would go into the transportation infrastructure before I consider cutting additional funds. I don't doubt the funding is misused but between the two choices, I'd rather direct extra funds even if some of it is misused than not direct any extra funds at all. Of course if I want the funds to be used properly, I probably should look into voting for the right candidates who hopefully would use it properly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NPCightengale 11/05/18 3:37:14 PM #22:	Anyone but orange man! Literally hitler would be better! <cite>NPCightengale posted [p:911863588] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Anyone but orange man! Literally hitler would be better!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OrangeDawn 11/05/18 3:38:08 PM #23:	Democrats way ahead? Trolls must be asleep --- 3DS Friend Code: 3308-5843-0863 Town: Virginia <cite>OrangeDawn posted [p:911863634] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Democrats way ahead? Trolls must be asleep</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 11/05/18 3:41:47 PM #24:	InfestedAdam posted... Krazy_Kirby posted... i'm voting yes on 6 Is that the gas tax repeal? I'm still looking into that. I want to know what funding would go into the transportation infrastructure before I consider cutting additional funds. I don't doubt the funding is misused but between the two choices, I'd rather direct extra funds even if some of it is misused than not direct any extra funds at all. Of course if I want the funds to be used properly, I probably should look into voting for the right candidates who hopefully would use it properly. tbh, CT has a similar issue where we have one of the highest gas taxes in the nation yet the worst roads... which is leading to them talking about putting in tolls so we'll have the worst roads, among the worst bridges, highest gas taxes, and tolls. OrangeDawn posted... Democrats way ahead? Trolls must be asleep Irony or hypocrisy? You decide! NPCightengale posted... Anyone but orange man! Literally hitler would be better! Imitation Kana or actual Kana? You won't be able to tell the difference! --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:911863862] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>InfestedAdam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Krazy_Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>i'm voting yes on 6</quote> Is that the gas tax repeal? I'm still looking into that. I want to know what funding would go into the transportation infrastructure before I consider cutting additional funds. I don't doubt the funding is misused but between the two choices, I'd rather direct extra funds even if some of it is misused than not direct any extra funds at all. Of course if I want the funds to be used properly, I probably should look into voting for the right candidates who hopefully would use it properly.</quote> tbh, CT has a similar issue where we have one of the highest gas taxes in the nation yet the worst roads... which is leading to them talking about putting in tolls so we'll have the worst roads, among the worst bridges, highest gas taxes, and tolls. <cite>OrangeDawn posted...</cite> <quote>Democrats way ahead? Trolls must be asleep</quote> Irony or hypocrisy? You decide! <cite>NPCightengale posted...</cite> <quote>Anyone but orange man! Literally hitler would be better!</quote> Imitation Kana or actual Kana? You won't be able to tell the difference!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Judgmenl 11/05/18 3:42:40 PM #25:	Zeus posted... Imitation Kana or actual Kana? You won't be able to tell the difference! Probably just Ziggy role playing his favorite girl. --- Judge, Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. You're a regular Jack Kerouac <cite>Judgmenl posted [p:911863913] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Imitation Kana or actual Kana? You won't be able to tell the difference! </quote> Probably just Ziggy role playing his favorite girl.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InfestedAdam 11/05/18 3:44:37 PM #26:	Zeus posted... tbh, CT has a similar issue where we have one of the highest gas taxes in the nation yet the worst roads... which is leading to them talking about putting in tolls so we'll have the worst roads, among the worst bridges, highest gas taxes, and tolls. Majority of my civil engineering friends tend to be pro-infrastructure but I think some are at the end of their patience when it comes to California gas tax. Among some folks I know, they are not against taxes, they just want it to be used properly. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:911864040] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>tbh, CT has a similar issue where we have one of the highest gas taxes in the nation yet the worst roads... which is leading to them talking about putting in tolls so we'll have the worst roads, among the worst bridges, highest gas taxes, and tolls. </quote> Majority of my civil engineering friends tend to be pro-infrastructure but I think some are at the end of their patience when it comes to California gas tax. Among some folks I know, they are not against taxes, they just want it to be used properly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dancer62 11/05/18 3:46:08 PM #27:	I'm voting against every idiot who had volunteers spam phone calls and text messages, or banged on my door. I was undecided about a lot of them, but I'm definitely anti-spam. --- If ballet was easy, it would be pointe-less <cite>dancer62 posted [p:911864124] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>I'm voting against every idiot who had volunteers spam phone calls and text messages, or banged on my door. I was undecided about a lot of them, but I'm definitely anti-spam.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
InfestedAdam 11/05/18 3:48:00 PM #28:	dancer62 posted... I'm voting against every idiot who had volunteers spam phone calls and text messages, or banged on my door. I was undecided about a lot of them, but I'm definitely anti-spam. I recall reading that several states are banning to push the FFC to crack down on these telemarketers. They're not suppose to call cellphones but of course, that gets ignored and the national "Do not call" list is next to useless. --- "You must gather your party before venturing forth" "Go for the eyes Boo! Go for the eyes!" <cite>InfestedAdam posted [p:911864242] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>dancer62 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm voting against every idiot who had volunteers spam phone calls and text messages, or banged on my door. I was undecided about a lot of them, but I'm definitely anti-spam.</quote> I recall reading that several states are banning to push the FFC to crack down on these telemarketers. They're not suppose to call cellphones but of course, that gets ignored and the national "Do not call" list is next to useless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Fierce_Deity_08 11/05/18 7:28:54 PM #29:	Definitely Republican. Democrats have ruined California possibly beyond repair. --- Official Fierce Deity in my own mind. GT: OnikaraStar, PSN: Onikara, NNID: OnikaraStar <cite>Fierce_Deity_08 posted [p:911877866] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>Definitely Republican. Democrats have ruined California possibly beyond repair.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
zebatov 11/05/18 7:43:56 PM #30:	If I voted it would be for the equivalent of Republican because the Liberals have pretty much destroyed Canada. --- I'm right, as expected. <cite>zebatov posted [p:911878756] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote>If I voted it would be for the equivalent of Republican because the Liberals have pretty much destroyed Canada.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DPsx7 11/05/18 7:45:33 PM #31:	dancer62 posted... I'm voting against every idiot who had volunteers spam phone calls and text messages, or banged on my door. I was undecided about a lot of them, but I'm definitely anti-spam. Can I vote for you? Lol. If I voted this would be how I make my choice. Basically the more I see your name/face, the less I like you. And again, if they have the money to spam us so much then they don't need the job. It's SUCH a waste to litter the roadways with their signs. A waste for them to send flyers that go straight to the trash. --- Help the country - hurt a SJW. <cite>DPsx7 posted [p:911878846] in Who are yo... [t:77173096]...</cite> <quote><cite>dancer62 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm voting against every idiot who had volunteers spam phone calls and text messages, or banged on my door. I was undecided about a lot of them, but I'm definitely anti-spam.</quote> Can I vote for you? Lol. If I voted this would be how I make my choice. Basically the more I see your name/face, the less I like you. And again, if they have the money to spam us so much then they don't need the job. It's SUCH a waste to litter the roadways with their signs. A waste for them to send flyers that go straight to the trash.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Poll of the Day > Who are you Voting for? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Who are you Voting for?