Poll of the Day > Trump officials demand Mueller return thousands of emails II: No Take Backs!

(+) Yeah! (+)

PuddingBoy posted...

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1007376361101582336

I almost cackled at my desk after seeing this.

That's gold, ok?
---

Why did Cohen try and file a restraining order against Avenatti?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cohen-order/cohen-loses-bid-for-immediate-restraining-order-against-avenatti-idUSKBN1JB2H5/

As of today new evidence from the paper shredder, encrypted messaging platforms, and a blackberry have been put forward

Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) Tweeted:

See below - just filed in the search warrant case. The second and third bullets could pose a huge problem for Mr. Cohen and ultimately Mr. Trump (especially the third bullet)!!BTW, so much for encryption protection! #Basta https://t.co/RwdYjLAEp2

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1007693742873202689?s=17

Points two and three are what I'd be really worried about
---

Hm.. I'm insanely curious as to how screwed the people Cohen fixed things for are.
---

Katsutomai posted...

Hm.. I'm insanely curious as to how screwed the people Cohen fixed things for are.

Don't think that Cohen appreciates Trump saying the things he has. He sees what's going on.

Word is Hannity may be one of the next targets for the pile of subpoenas

Which makes this tweet very sweet

https://mobile.twitter.com/seanhannity/status/766819052656340993
---

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/16/breitbart-traffic-declining-trump-bannon-649571

Hey, MAGA might actually be working.

Roger Stone also met with Russian agents for dirt on Hilary.
---

Katsutomai posted...

Well Manafort is in for a verrrry long Prison stay now. Money Laundering was bad enough. Witness Tampering is going to absolutely screw him.

But theres no evidence of any wrongdoing!

Witchhunt! Sad!
---

https://wapo.st/2t7gNXl/

Trump associate Roger Stone reveals new contact with Russian national during 2016 campaign

Read the article it's way too long

The Russian trolls are out in droves right now over this article. Damn
---

Trump is trying to blame the Democrats for his Nazi policy. Saying they need to change the law.
Only problem is this isn't the law.
Watching his supporters twist themselves into knots defending the next Hitler is pretty fucking infuriating.

knivesX2004 posted...

Trump is trying to blame the Democrats for his Nazi policy. Saying they need to change the law.
Only problem is this isn't the law.
Watching his supporters twist themselves into knots defending the next Hitler is pretty fucking infuriating.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-administration-policy-separating-children-border-cbp-dhs-2018-6

It's entirely his policy and the Democrats have nothing to do with it. Even giving credence to his claims that it's not him helps his deflection. Trump's administration is the only party involved in separating children and families
---

Doctor Foxx posted...

knivesX2004 posted...

Trump is trying to blame the Democrats for his Nazi policy. Saying they need to change the law.
Only problem is this isn't the law.
Watching his supporters twist themselves into knots defending the next Hitler is pretty fucking infuriating.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-administration-policy-separating-children-border-cbp-dhs-2018-6

It's entirely his policy and the Democrats have nothing to do with it. Even giving credence to his claims that it's not him helps his deflection. Trump's administration is the only party involved in separating children and families

This is a lie and liberal propaganda. these laws were created in the 90s, with bipartisan support, passing with a veto proof majority

The current administration is enforcing the law, as they should be, as opposed to the previous administration that picked and chose what laws it wants to follow. Which is an executive overreach and is unconstitutional

This whole thing is so overblown, ridiculous, and fake. It's selective outrage and no one is really mad at it, they just want to shit on President Trump. There's like 50x more american kids who get put into foster care because their parents go to jail. How strange there isn't outrage about that. How very strange.

Who would have thought you couldn't bring your kids to jail with you? Don't come into our country illegally and you don't have to worry about it

not__shawn__z posted...

Doctor Foxx posted...

knivesX2004 posted...

Trump is trying to blame the Democrats for his Nazi policy. Saying they need to change the law.
Only problem is this isn't the law.
Watching his supporters twist themselves into knots defending the next Hitler is pretty fucking infuriating.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-administration-policy-separating-children-border-cbp-dhs-2018-6

It's entirely his policy and the Democrats have nothing to do with it. Even giving credence to his claims that it's not him helps his deflection. Trump's administration is the only party involved in separating children and families

This is a lie and liberal propaganda. these laws were created in the 90s, with bipartisan support, passing with a veto proof majority

The current administration is enforcing the law, as they should be, as opposed to the previous administration that picked and chose what laws it wants to follow. Which is an executive overreach and is unconstitutional

This whole thing is so overblown, ridiculous, and fake. It's selective outrage and no one is really mad at it, they just want to shit on President Trump. There's like 50x more american kids who get put into foster care because their parents go to jail. How strange there isn't outrage about that. How very strange.

Who would have thought you couldn't bring your kids to jail with you? Don't come into our country illegally and you don't have to worry about it

This. The same shit was happening during the Obama administration and they didn't care then

not__shawn__z posted...

Who would have thought you couldn't bring your kids to jail with you? Don't come into our country illegally and you don't have to worry about it

Guess what? Undocumented immigration is not necessarily a crime.

not__shawn__z posted...

The current administration is enforcing the law, as they should be, as opposed to the previous administration that picked and chose what laws it wants to follow. Which is an executive overreach and is unconstitutional

No, they're claiming to be enforcing parts of the law as a way to justify inhumane treatment. Please tell me exactly what laws have been broken when someone is in the US. It's not illegal to enter the country to seek asylum, with or without your children. And when laws are broken, there are typically steps to enforcement that aren't just taking children away indefinitely. Why aren't you fighting for these people to have a fair trial or to not suffer unlawful detention? They are humans in America even if they weren't both there.

There's also the deportation of adults that have been in America nearly their entire lives. Why? Because their original adoptive parents didn't file a form correctly.

Not all laws are just and not all laws should be enforced as they are. This would be a prime example. Just doing my job/enforcing the law has been the justification for so many human rights abuses in history.

These immigration officials are also detaining and jailing citizens for looking brown. This is a serious issue.

Please don't defend this path. This is how the Nazis started.

Jeff Sessions signed this order:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1049751/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
---

OhhhJa posted...

This. The same shit was happening during the Obama administration and they didn't care then

If you feel this is the same at all you're far beyond delusional and have ignored the sharp increase in people treated this way.
---

Kindly asking the Nazi shills to gtfo of this topic.

knivesX2004 posted...

Kindly asking the Nazi shills to gtfo of this topic.

Lmao are you taking on the role of Erik p now?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXNC9t6KlnQ" data-time="

INB4 "lmao thats fake news"

OhhhJa posted...

shitty video
INB4 "lmao thats fake news"

You already know it's bullshit. This is an anti abortion conservative channel please keep your Trump fellating elsewhere thanks
---

I expected the Trump shilling to be hardcore with Strzok asking to testify without his fifth amendment rights or any immunity. I am still disappointed to see people defending Nazi policies.

https://wapo.st/2tjtH3I

Giuliani continues to be a particularly useless tool

https://wapo.st/2JLJy69
---

Doctor Foxx posted...

You already know it's bulls***. This is an anti abortion conservative channel please keep your Trump fellating elsewhere thanks

But CNN is ok right? And because they may be anti abortion that automatically discredits any factual information that abortion is completely irrelevant to? You cant disprove what she is saying so you just get mad and tell me I'm fellating trump. Real mature

Lol the shill uses profanity filter.

http://www.businessinsider.com/immigration-children-diapers-2018-6

There is no defending this
---

knivesX2004 posted...

Lol the shill uses profanity filter.

Says the guy who tells people to leave so he can have his echo chamber back. I know it's tough when someone challenges your narrow white liberal worldview but if you really believe strongly in your ideology it shouldn't be so offensive to hear another perspective. Hopefully, your ideology isn't so flimsy that seeing posts on here would cause it to crumble

People must be ignoring him in every other topic he shills in so he has to come here to trigger the libs and drink our tears.

OhhhJa posted...

Doctor Foxx posted...

You already know it's bulls***. This is an anti abortion conservative channel please keep your Trump fellating elsewhere thanks

But CNN is ok right? And because they may be anti abortion that automatically discredits any factual information that abortion is completely irrelevant to? You cant disprove what she is saying so you just get mad and tell me I'm fellating trump. Real mature

Whatever she's saying isn't what we're talking about. CNN isn't great but yes it's significantly better than that hack you posted. I'm also not linking CNN here, but at least they have journalists and can be held accountable for spouting nonsense

https://www.gq.com/story/stephen-miller-wants-credit-families-border

The administration has happily taken credit for changing policy to begin breaking up these families

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/392757-trump-doubles-down-on-family-separation-policy

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44518942

But please keep defending putting children in cages and leaving them to be neglected. It really speaks to you character
---

Doctor Foxx posted...

Guess what? Undocumented immigration is not necessarily a crime.

Sorry but you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Yes, it is. It breaks federal law. By definition, it is a crime. Idk what you're going for here, but it's very wrong

Doctor Foxx posted...

No, they're claiming to be enforcing parts of the law as a way to justify inhumane treatment. Please tell me exactly what laws have been broken when someone is in the US. It's not illegal to enter the country to seek asylum, with or without your children. And when laws are broken, there are typically steps to enforcement that aren't just taking children away indefinitely. Why aren't you fighting for these people to have a fair trial or to not suffer unlawful detention? They are humans in America even if they weren't both there

Asylum claims are done legally at ports of entry. This is, for the most part, illegal crossings. So they are being prosecuted for it. As they should be.

Doctor Foxx posted...

There's also the deportation of adults that have been in America nearly their entire lives. Why? Because their original adoptive parents didn't file a form correctly.

Because they are here illegally. We don't pick and choose, based on emotions, who gets to stay. You have to do it legally. Sucks and may seem harsh, but that's how it is. There are rules. We can't have a country and a society for too long if we continue to ignore them

Doctor Foxx posted...

Not all laws are just and not all laws should be enforced as they are. This would be a prime example. Just doing my job/enforcing the law has been the justification for so many human rights abuses in history.

No. Here you are with emotions again. Look, doc, we can absolutely find common ground saying not all laws are just. They're not all fair. Iabsolutely agree with you on that. HOWEVER, that is not the job of the executive branch of government to decide. That's completely unconstitutional. That is an overreach of power. Their job is to enforce laws. Not enforce whatever law they like

I want to really hammer this point home right now. I love President Trump. I voted for him. I made 4 grand on the election because I knew he would win. I'm extremely happy with the job he's doing and he has my vote in 2020. But I wouldn't be comfortable giving him the power you're asking me to grant him. Now, I'm going to go out a limb here and say you're the common internet liberal who thinks Trump is Hitler and all that nonsense. Even if you're not, I've seen the argument of "don't enforce this one" all week with liberals of similar mindsets.

Using your argument, your belief that he shouldn't enforce this law. You guys are, literally, advocating for the guy who you think is Hitler to pick and choose what laws he wants to enforce. How could anyone think that's a good idea. You have to see the problem here. You have to see the double standard, the irony, the hypocrisy. You have to. It's black and white.

Doctor Foxx posted...

These immigration officials are also detaining and jailing citizens for looking brown. This is a serious issue.

It's not. It's the media telling you to act offended, open your hearts and let everyone in. And they got you good.

I think a lot of you really need to do a little research as to what a Nazi is and who Hitler was. I've never seen a word thrown around so haphazardly before. Another thing they've managed to trick people into.

https://pics.me.me/leaked-email-from-john-podesta-compare-your-opponent-to-adolf-15303697.png

not__shawn__z posted...

I think a lot of you really need to do a little research as to what a Nazi is and who Hitler was. I've never seen a word thrown around so haphazardly before.

That's because we've never had a Nazi president before.

knivesX2004 posted...

That's because we've never had a Nazi president before.

That's 100% correct. We haven't. Nice job, progress is being made!

Using your argument, your belief that he shouldn't enforce this law. You guys are, literally, advocating for the guy who you think is Hitler to pick and choose what laws he wants to enforce. How could anyone think that's a good idea. You have to see the problem here. You have to see the double standard, the irony, the hypocrisy. You have to. It's black and white.

You do realize that police do this all the time when they decide to issue warnings when they think it is appropriate?

Its called using judgement. Its why we have humans in charge and not automatons.
---

not__shawn__z posted...

knivesX2004 posted...

That's because we've never had a Nazi president before.

That's 100% correct. We haven't. Nice job, progress is being made!

Having a Nazi President is not progress
---

Mead posted...

Having a Nazi President is not progress

Depends on who you ask.
If you ask the minority of the country that voted for Trump I guarantee you some would say yes.
(Huehuehue get over the rigged election already, you lost!)

Mead posted...

You do realize that police do this all the time when they decide to issue warnings when they think it is appropriate?

Its called using judgement. Its why we have humans in charge and not automatons.

Police are not apart of the executive branch of government. Speeding violations is not federal law. Policemen are not the commander in chief.

Realize what you're saying. You really want TRUMP to pick and choose what he wants to enforce??? Cmon, that's so dishonest. I LOVE President Trump and I'm not comfortable with that at all!!

Lmao a Nazi president. Isreali is literally sucking Trump's dick after this whole Jerusalem thing. Trump's administration has defended isreali more than every administration I've ever seen in my life combined.

But, as Obama and Hilary's number 1 guy said, call them Nazis and Hitler when you're completely wrong and they're right.

not__shawn__z posted...

Mead posted...

You do realize that police do this all the time when they decide to issue warnings when they think it is appropriate?

Its called using judgement. Its why we have humans in charge and not automatons.

Police are not apart of the executive branch of government. Speeding violations is not federal law. Policemen are not the commander in chief.

Realize what you're saying. You really want TRUMP to pick and choose what he wants to enforce??? Cmon, that's so dishonest. I LOVE President Trump and I'm not comfortable with that at all!!

He already picks and chooses what he wants to enforce

How many EPA policies is he fighting to strip away rather than following established law
---

Mead posted...

He already picks and chooses what he wants to enforce

How many EPA policies is he fighting to strip away rather than following established law

Mead, you seem nice and I don't mean any offense by this, but I really think you need to look into these things before you come on here and try to have an argument

Policy is not law. The President is free to disregard policy, and create his own. He is unable to do that with laws. Congress creates laws.

not__shawn__z posted...

Sorry but you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Yes, it is. It breaks federal law. By definition, it is a crime. Idk what you're going for here, but it's very wrong

Many (almost most) so-called illegal immigrants in the US are people that have legally entered but stayed past their welcome. Overstaying a visa is only punishable by deportation. No federal statute defines it as a crime.

What is different and wrong (and in violation of human rights) at this time are that children are now separated from the families. It used to be that everyone was sent back together. Now children are taken and held after parents are deported. If it's about removing people that aren't supposed to be here, why on earth would anyone keep the children behind? yet they are...

not__shawn__z posted...

Asylum claims are done legally at ports of entry. This is, for the most part, illegal crossings. So they are being prosecuted for it. As they should be.

These applications can be done by people that do not have permission to enter. Now when people try to enter to claim asylum the family is separated and the parent is deported--without children--without being given a chance to apply. This is not what was done before. This is a new approach headed by this administration alone

not__shawn__z posted...

Because they are here illegally. We don't pick and choose, based on emotions, who gets to stay. You have to do it legally. Sucks and may seem harsh, but that's how it is. There are rules. We can't have a country and a society for too long if we continue to ignore them

"it's the law" is not justification.

How was a 4 year old supposed to file these papers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORAGvfeGrqc" data-time="

This man killed himself due to deportation.

not__shawn__z posted...

HOWEVER, that is not the job of the executive branch of government to decide. That's completely unconstitutional. That is an overreach of power. Their job is to enforce laws. Not enforce whatever law they like

the executive branch of the government is not law enforcement.

not__shawn__z posted...

You guys are, literally, advocating for the guy who you think is Hitler to pick and choose what laws he wants to enforce. How could anyone think that's a good idea. You have to see the problem here. You have to see the double standard, the irony, the hypocrisy. You have to. It's black and white.

...what?

I don't think he is hitler. I do think he is consistently promoting Nazi policies and that is a dangerous path for the US. Difference.

The Nazis did in fact separate families and not allow children to be reunited. it wasn't long after that before they were OK with killing "other" people en masse.

not__shawn__z posted...

It's not. It's the media telling you to act offended, open your hearts and let everyone in. And they got you good.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-citizens-ice-20180427-htmlstory.html

Open. your. fucking. eyes.

And this? This happened under Obama initially. That doesn't make it OK. Immigrants are in for drastically worse treatment already.

Here's a more recent one: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/06/ice-detained-a-50-year-u-s-resident-outside-the-home-he-owns-now-its-trying-to-deport-him.html

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/18/17449150/family-separation-policy-immigration-dhs-orr-health-records-undocumented-kids
---

Doctor Foxx posted...

Whatever she's saying isn't what we're talking about.

"I watched the first 30 seconds of the video"

And yes it is. Quit deflecting

Doctor Foxx posted...

But please keep defending putting children in cages and leaving them to be neglected. It really speaks to you character

But please... keep acting like this is something entirely new

OhhhJa posted...

But please... keep acting like this is something entirely new

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1049751/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

On April 11, 2017, I issued a memorandum to all federal prosecutors entitled "Renewed
Commitment to Criminal Immigration Enforcement," in which I directed the prioritization of the
prosecution of certain criminal immigration offenses. I further directed each United States
Attorney's Office along the Southwest Border to work with the Department ofHomeland Security
to develop guidelines for prosecuting offenses under 8 U.S.C. 1325(a).

Those seeking to further an illegal goal constantly alter their tactics to take advantage of
weak points. That means we must effectively respond with smart changes also. The recent increase
in aliens illegally crossing our Southwest Border requires an updated approach. Past prosecution
initiatives in certain districts-such as Operation Streamline-led to a decrease in illegal activities
in those districts. We must continue to execute effective policies to meet new challenges.
Accordingly, I direct each United States Attorney's Office along the Southwest Border to
the extent practicable, and in consultation with DHS- to adopt immediately a zero-tolerance
policy for all offenses referred for prosecution under section 1325(a). This zero-tolerance policy
shall supersede any existing policies. If adopting such a policy requires additional resources, each
office shall identify and request such additional resources.

You are on the front lines of this battle. I respect you and your team. Your dedication and
insight into border reality is invaluable. Keep us informed, and don't hesitate to give us suggestions
for improvement. Remember, our goal is not simply more cases. It is to end the illegality in our
immigration system.

This guidance is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to create, any right
or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United
States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

---

not__shawn__z posted...

Mead posted...

He already picks and chooses what he wants to enforce

How many EPA policies is he fighting to strip away rather than following established law

Mead, you seem nice and I don't mean any offense by this, but I really think you need to look into these things before you come on here and try to have an argument

Policy is not law. The President is free to disregard policy, and create his own. He is unable to do that with laws. Congress creates laws.

Im not nice at all

Use whichever argument you want but there is no justification for splitting families apart and treating young children like criminals
---

OhhhJa posted...

And yes it is. Quit deflecting

Lmao

not__shawn__z posted...

Lmao a Nazi president. Isreali is literally sucking Trump's dick after this whole Jerusalem thing. Trump's administration has defended isreali more than every administration I've ever seen in my life combined.

Knives has proven himself to be an loud mouthed idiot who throws that word at anyone he disagrees with. I prefer to just laugh at liberals like him

OhhhJa posted...

. I prefer to just laugh at liberals like him

I'm glad I can bring joy to what is clearly a miserable life you live :)

knivesX2004 posted...

OhhhJa posted...

. I prefer to just laugh at liberals like him

I'm glad I can bring joy to what is clearly a miserable life you live :)

I'm not the one obsessing over trump on a daily basis. The regular posters in this topic are the epitome of pathetic

Doctor Foxx posted...

Many (almost most) so-called illegal immigrants in the US are people that have legally entered but stayed past their welcome. Overstaying a visa is only punishable by deportation. No federal statute defines it as a crime.

Many are, and this isn't dealing with this. This is coming from the majority of crossings

Doctor Foxx posted...

These applications can be done by people that do not have permission to enter. Now when people try to enter to claim asylum the family is separated and the parent is deported--without children--without being given a chance to apply. This is not what was done before. This is a new approach headed by this administration alone

Very wrong. Former president Barack Obama had some pretty crazy numbers. But since he's black and a democrat, it wasn't an issue to the left
https://migration.ucdavis.edu/mn/more.php?id=3929

Doctor Foxx posted...

"it's the law" is not justification.

It's the definition of justification

Doctor Foxx posted...

How was a 4 year old supposed to file these papers?

They're not. They're fucking 4.

Doctor Foxx posted...

..what?

I'm unsure how my point wasn't clear to you. How does someone who hates President Trump so much think it's a good idea to let him have free reign over what laws he wants to enforce. Isn't it weird that, despite me loving President Trump, I think that's the worst thing imaginable? And you don't?

Doctor Foxx posted...

Open. your. f***ing. eyes.

You don't get to say this while you advocate to let President Trump follow whatever law he chooses

Thank you for linking me to most left leaning outlets there is. But most of my adult life has been dealing with immigration, so I'll pass on their usual "trump is evil" rhetoric

Mead posted...

Im not nice at all

Use whichever argument you want but there is no justification for splitting families apart and treating young children like criminals

You are nicer than a lot of people I've talked to lol

If you honestly believed that, which you don't, you should have been outraged your entire life at all the American kids going into foster care because their parents are jailed.

You can't bring your kids to jail with you. Crazy idea huh?

OhhhJa posted...

Knives has proven himself to be an loud mouthed idiot

Heh

I'm not the one obsessing over trump on a daily basis. The regular posters in this topic are the epitome of pathetic

Says the person who reads this topic every day. (Also your post history betrays you)

But hey, believe whatever you want if it makes you go away. You did it. You triggered the libs in their safe space. Good job dude.

Lmao I didn't realize this topic was so old. I checked this board because I liked the daily poll about smash. And saw this

not__shawn__z posted...

I'm unsure how my point wasn't clear to you. How does someone who hates President Trump so much think it's a good idea to let him have free reign over what laws he wants to enforce. Isn't it weird that, despite me loving President Trump, I think that's the worst thing imaginable? And you don't?

I don't advocate for that. That's why his change in policy, choosing to enforce this law (and not others) is so bothersome.

It's not up to him to pick which laws are enforced or ignored (like gutting the EPA), or how strictly. That is exactly why this policy change is an issue.

not__shawn__z posted...

Because they are here illegally. We don't pick and choose, based on emotions, who gets to stay. You have to do it legally. Sucks and may seem harsh, but that's how it is. There are rules. We can't have a country and a society for too long if we continue to ignore them

not__shawn__z posted...

They're not. They're fucking 4.

So it was OK to deport that 41 year old that lived in the US for 37 years, because of a paperwork oversight? you said so...

not__shawn__z posted...

You don't get to say this while you advocate to let President Trump follow whatever law he chooses

Thank you for linking me to most left leaning outlets there is. But most of my adult life has been dealing with immigration, so I'll pass on their usual "trump is evil" rhetoric

I don't advocate for that at all. I'm also a US green card holder with immigration experience. these policies are fucked up and they are new.
---

knivesX2004 posted...

OhhhJa posted...

Knives has proven himself to be an loud mouthed idiot

Heh

I'm not the one obsessing over trump on a daily basis. The regular posters in this topic are the epitome of pathetic

Says the person who reads this topic every day. (Also your post history betrays you)

But hey, believe whatever you want if it makes you go away. You did it. You triggered the libs in their safe space. Good job dude.

Every day? I post in this topic maybe once every week or two.

But yeah, you guys are pretty easily triggered. You guys go though. You almost have trump! Be sure to keep spreading the news through this topic to ensure victory over those damn Hitler worshipping right wing nazis. One of these days you guys will have your glory when he's sentenced to prison time. That will totally be reality and not some leftist fantasy world

Doctor Foxx posted...

It's not up to him to pick which laws are enforced or ignored (like gutting the EPA), or how strictly. That is exactly why this policy change is an issue.

You, like mead, seem to be confused between policy and law

The previous administration decided to not follow the law to it's fullest extent. They implemented a policy where they looked the other way (yet they still did this exact thing under different sets of circumstances). This adminstration had decided to follow the law accordingly, and refer every single crossing for prosecution in an attempt to deter crossings

Just so you know, I don't agree with it. Not because of the separation issue like you guys are harping on, but because so much money is being wasted by going to court, feeding, jailing, etc. That's our money. That's my taxpayer money. Shit like this is why our government is so bloated. I want new immigration laws entirely. But we both know how fucked congress is right now

Doctor Foxx posted...

So it was OK to deport that 41 year old that lived in the US for 37 years, because of a paperwork oversight? you said so...

I'm not saying that doesn't suck. It does. It absolutely does and there's no arguing that. But we can't argue things based on emotion. If you're here illegally, you have to go back.