Current Events > another school shooting, in LA

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
darkjedilink 02/01/18 4:31:55 PM #52:	Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... It literally isn't a higher bar, dude. Like, do you even know what's involved in order to legally purchase a firearm? Yeah, I own more than one gun, including a mossberg I bought at Walmart. It is a much higher bar, you don't need to do anything to buy a gun except pay for it. With the driving test you need to pass at least two tests, one written and one skills So, you bought a gun at Walmart without a background check? That isn't legal anywhere in America... --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895262617] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>It literally isn't a higher bar, dude. Like, do you even know what's involved in order to legally purchase a firearm?</quote> Yeah, I own more than one gun, including a mossberg I bought at Walmart. It is a much higher bar, you don't need to do anything to buy a gun except pay for it. With the driving test you need to pass at least two tests, one written and one skills</quote> So, you bought a gun at Walmart without a background check? That isn't legal anywhere in America...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 02/01/18 4:34:26 PM #53:	darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... It literally isn't a higher bar, dude. Like, do you even know what's involved in order to legally purchase a firearm? Yeah, I own more than one gun, including a mossberg I bought at Walmart. It is a much higher bar, you don't need to do anything to buy a gun except pay for it. With the driving test you need to pass at least two tests, one written and one skills So, you bought a gun at Walmart without a background check? That isn't legal anywhere in America... Wtf do background checks have to do with teaching gun owners to be more responsible Oh wait didn't see who posted this. You're just shitposting <cite>Axiom posted [p:895262740] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>It literally isn't a higher bar, dude. Like, do you even know what's involved in order to legally purchase a firearm?</quote> Yeah, I own more than one gun, including a mossberg I bought at Walmart. It is a much higher bar, you don't need to do anything to buy a gun except pay for it. With the driving test you need to pass at least two tests, one written and one skills</quote> So, you bought a gun at Walmart without a background check? That isn't legal anywhere in America...</quote> Wtf do background checks have to do with teaching gun owners to be more responsible Oh wait didn't see who posted this. You're just shitposting</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/01/18 4:36:35 PM #54:	darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... It literally isn't a higher bar, dude. Like, do you even know what's involved in order to legally purchase a firearm? Yeah, I own more than one gun, including a mossberg I bought at Walmart. It is a much higher bar, you don't need to do anything to buy a gun except pay for it. With the driving test you need to pass at least two tests, one written and one skills So, you bought a gun at Walmart without a background check? That isn't legal anywhere in America... Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test? --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:895262864] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>It literally isn't a higher bar, dude. Like, do you even know what's involved in order to legally purchase a firearm?</quote> Yeah, I own more than one gun, including a mossberg I bought at Walmart. It is a much higher bar, you don't need to do anything to buy a gun except pay for it. With the driving test you need to pass at least two tests, one written and one skills</quote> So, you bought a gun at Walmart without a background check? That isn't legal anywhere in America...</quote> Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/01/18 4:37:45 PM #55:	I mean yes they did do one but I didn't have to do anything special to pass it. I also already owned a gun I had purchased from a family member! --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:895262928] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>I mean yes they did do one but I didn't have to do anything special to pass it. I also already owned a gun I had purchased from a family member!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 02/01/18 4:43:10 PM #56:	you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:895263267] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 4:47:00 PM #57:	TheVipaGTS posted... you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer. When cars kill more people every year than guns - by a HUGE margin, why does the bar need to be higher for guns? And, for the millionth time, what law can you pass that won't violate the Second Amendment would have prevented any mass shooting in this country that we don't already have? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895263488] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer.</quote> When cars kill more people every year than guns - by a HUGE margin, why does the bar need to be higher for guns? And, for the millionth time, what law can you pass that won't violate the Second Amendment would have prevented any mass shooting in this country that we don't already have?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 4:47:52 PM #58:	Balrog0 posted... Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test? You're kidding, right? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895263551] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test?</quote> You're kidding, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/01/18 4:50:32 PM #59:	darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test? You're kidding, right? No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right? --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:895263707] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test?</quote> You're kidding, right?</quote> No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 4:52:30 PM #60:	Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test? You're kidding, right? No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right? Literally 'but conservatives.' --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895263850] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test?</quote> You're kidding, right?</quote> No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right?</quote> Literally 'but conservatives.'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sami1000 02/01/18 4:53:25 PM #61:	Were_Wyrm posted... This wouldn't be a problem is we would just ban guns from school. What.the.fuck!? You don't already do that? --- Can't think any good sig <cite>Sami1000 posted [p:895263910] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Were_Wyrm posted...</cite> <quote>This wouldn't be a problem is we would just ban guns from school.</quote> What.the.fuck!? You don't already do that?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 4:54:35 PM #62:	Sami1000 posted... Were_Wyrm posted... This wouldn't be a problem is we would just ban guns from school. What.the.fuck!? You don't already do that? We do, actually. They literally created the 'gun free zone' for public schools. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895263973] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Sami1000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Were_Wyrm posted...</cite> <quote>This wouldn't be a problem is we would just ban guns from school.</quote> What.the.fuck!? You don't already do that?</quote> We do, actually. They literally created the 'gun free zone' for public schools.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/01/18 4:54:38 PM #63:	darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test? You're kidding, right? No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right? Literally 'but conservatives.' No, that's just part of it, but it is the easier part for you to highlight so you don't actually need to respond! --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:895263975] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test?</quote> You're kidding, right?</quote> No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right?</quote> Literally 'but conservatives.'</quote> No, that's just part of it, but it is the easier part for you to highlight so you don't actually need to respond!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Twin3Turbo 02/01/18 5:01:29 PM #64:	darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... darkjedilink posted... Balrog0 posted... Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test? You're kidding, right? No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right? Literally 'but conservatives.' Even though he literally typed "but conservatives", it's in no way the same context that people typically mock the "but liberals" or "but Hillary" meme. You're not even trying anymore. --- https://i.imgur.com/PHWbltB.gifv <cite>Twin3Turbo posted [p:895264431] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>Hmm why is passing a background check a. higher bar than passing a test?</quote> You're kidding, right?</quote> No, why would that be a joke? Pretty much everyone is born not being a felon or domestic abuser, and conservatives usually say not. being criminal is super simple in most contexts right?</quote> Literally 'but conservatives.'</quote> Even though he literally typed "but conservatives", it's in no way the same context that people typically mock the "but liberals" or "but Hillary" meme. You're not even trying anymore.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/01/18 5:02:08 PM #65:	Twin3Turbo posted... he literally typed "but conservatives" I actually said 'and conservatives' thank you! :p --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:895264477] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote>he literally typed "but conservatives"</quote> I actually said 'and conservatives' thank you! :p</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_Spiret 02/01/18 5:04:07 PM #66:	the problem with gun training is that theres not much to it. fallow the 4 basic rules (which are extremely common sense). thats it and make sure they know the dangers and workings of the device. after that its up to the individual how they use it. its a gun, theres only so much you can actually teach about it. and you really cant compare cars to guns. theres a LOT more involved with vehicles of which worse case scenario if you screw up then a hell of a more more people can die. mess up with a gun and at most 1 person is dead. of which there are double the amount of registered drivers than there are gun owners and yet there are something like 25x more vehicle accidents and deaths compared to firearms. --- Currently playing: Forza Horizon 3 - Dead Rising - Hitman <cite>Dark_Spiret posted [p:895264612] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>the problem with gun training is that theres not much to it. fallow the 4 basic rules (which are extremely common sense). thats it and make sure they know the dangers and workings of the device. after that its up to the individual how they use it. its a gun, theres only so much you can actually teach about it. and you really cant compare cars to guns. theres a LOT more involved with vehicles of which worse case scenario if you screw up then a hell of a more more people can die. mess up with a gun and at most 1 person is dead. of which there are double the amount of registered drivers than there are gun owners and yet there are something like 25x more vehicle accidents and deaths compared to firearms.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SapphireOfChaos 02/01/18 5:04:14 PM #67:	thoughts and prayers intensifies --- 3DS: 1590-4884-9269 \| Switch: SW-3337-1639-7884 Discord link: https://discord.gg/hDQ6rWb \| ''Don't forget me!'' ~ RIP Ardainian Soldier meme, Died 18 Jan, 2018 <cite>SapphireOfChaos posted [p:895264619] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>thoughts and prayers intensifies</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Stallion_Prime 02/01/18 5:04:24 PM #68:	Why cant you fucks go 1 minute without pushing your pos political agendas. Ugh --- -Hunter1534 http://abload.de/img/powercdkcb.gif <cite>Stallion_Prime posted [p:895264633] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>Why cant you fucks go 1 minute without pushing your pos political agendas. Ugh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 02/01/18 5:07:05 PM #69:	Thoughts and prayers --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:895264825] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>Thoughts and prayers</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Twin3Turbo 02/01/18 5:09:39 PM #70:	Balrog0 posted... Twin3Turbo posted... he literally typed "but conservatives" I actually said 'and conservatives' thank you! :p Damn you're right. Should have known I couldn't have trusted him to represent someone else's post without being disingenuous --- https://i.imgur.com/PHWbltB.gifv <cite>Twin3Turbo posted [p:895265002] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote>he literally typed "but conservatives"</quote> I actually said 'and conservatives' thank you! :p</quote> Damn you're right. Should have known I couldn't have trusted him to represent someone else's post without being disingenuous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 02/01/18 5:11:12 PM #71:	Why do people still respond to joke accounts like DE and darkjedilink. Even if youre right, theyll never admit it so its like talking to a brick wall. --- http://i.imgur.com/jWVrg9U.gif http://i.imgur.com/g2efUtT.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5dOwhaP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/LVdqu8J.gif Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:895265106] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>Why do people still respond to joke accounts like DE and darkjedilink. Even if youre right, theyll never admit it so its like talking to a brick wall.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 02/01/18 5:12:01 PM #72:	Dark_Spiret posted... the problem with gun training is that theres not much to it. fallow the 4 basic rules (which are extremely common sense) You would hope they are common sense, but the average person is dumb. In practice it's better to teach things that seem like common sense, because you never know if they actually are. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:895265156] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dark_Spiret posted...</cite> <quote>the problem with gun training is that theres not much to it. fallow the 4 basic rules (which are extremely common sense)</quote> You would hope they are common sense, but the average person is dumb. In practice it's better to teach things that seem like common sense, because you never know if they actually are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Twin3Turbo 02/01/18 5:12:07 PM #73:	Dark_Spiret posted... there are double the amount of registered drivers than there are gun owners and yet there are something like 25x more vehicle injurys compared to firearms. This is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison. Driving is a daily thing for most adults. Even if you own a gun, for most people it's not a daily thing they interact with. They tend to keep it locked up somewhere. --- https://i.imgur.com/PHWbltB.gifv <cite>Twin3Turbo posted [p:895265159] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dark_Spiret posted...</cite> <quote>there are double the amount of registered drivers than there are gun owners and yet there are something like 25x more vehicle injurys compared to firearms.</quote> This is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison. Driving is a daily thing for most adults. Even if you own a gun, for most people it's not a daily thing they interact with. They tend to keep it locked up somewhere.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 02/01/18 5:14:18 PM #74:	darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer. When cars kill more people every year than guns - by a HUGE margin, why does the bar need to be higher for guns? And, for the millionth time, what law can you pass that won't violate the Second Amendment would have prevented any mass shooting in this country that we don't already have? What are you not understanding here? Im just suggesting we have tests in place when purchasing a gun just as we do with driving. I never said anything about preventing mass shootings. I said it would make sense and could lead to safer gun use. You say cars kill more people. We as a nation understand the severity of that and have laws and rules in place to help diminish that. Without that it would be even worse. A guns main intent is to harm. Be it in rage or for fun/sport. It has one purpose. We should understand the severity of that and have similar tests in place. We know it wont completely Eliminate tragedy but what harm does it do? People can drive without a license technically. But regulating it does make the roads safer dont you think? --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:895265314] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer.</quote> When cars kill more people every year than guns - by a HUGE margin, why does the bar need to be higher for guns? And, for the millionth time, what law can you pass that won't violate the Second Amendment would have prevented any mass shooting in this country that we don't already have?</quote> What are you not understanding here? Im just suggesting we have tests in place when purchasing a gun just as we do with driving. I never said anything about preventing mass shootings. I said it would make sense and could lead to safer gun use. You say cars kill more people. We as a nation understand the severity of that and have laws and rules in place to help diminish that. Without that it would be even worse. A guns main intent is to harm. Be it in rage or for fun/sport. It has one purpose. We should understand the severity of that and have similar tests in place. We know it wont completely Eliminate tragedy but what harm does it do? People can drive without a license technically. But regulating it does make the roads safer dont you think?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Denzien_of_Sega 02/01/18 5:15:36 PM #75:	27_Sandman_40 posted... Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting. Hey.... let's not do that now. --- You were the Chosen One ArcSystem Works! It was said that you would save fighting games, not lead them further into darkness! <cite>Denzien_of_Sega posted [p:895265392] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote>Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting.</quote> Hey.... let's not do that now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 5:23:51 PM #76:	TheVipaGTS posted... darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer. When cars kill more people every year than guns - by a HUGE margin, why does the bar need to be higher for guns? And, for the millionth time, what law can you pass that won't violate the Second Amendment would have prevented any mass shooting in this country that we don't already have? What are you not understanding here? Im just suggesting we have tests in place when purchasing a gun just as we do with driving. I never said anything about preventing mass shootings. I said it would make sense and could lead to safer gun use. You say cars kill more people. We as a nation understand the severity of that and have laws and rules in place to help diminish that. Without that it would be even worse. A guns main intent is to harm. Be it in rage or for fun/sport. It has one purpose. We should understand the severity of that and have similar tests in place. We know it wont completely Eliminate tragedy but what harm does it do? People can drive without a license technically. But regulating it does make the roads safer dont you think? Roads are still more dangerous than guns, despite your assertion that it's easier to get a gun than to drive. Do you just not understand that this fact kills your narrative even BEFORE Contitutionality comes into play? Your test idea is literally against the Second AND Fourteenth Amendments, as it's constitutionally equivalent to a poll tax. Voting anf firearm ownership are FUNDAMENTAL rights as defined by the Constitution. Ergo, if a regulation wouldn't fly for one, it cannot constitutionally apply to the other. The Constitution is literally your enemy here. If you want to amend out the Second Amendment, I would love to see you try. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895265921] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>you still have to pass two tests and show that you can safely operate a vehicle by the law to be legally allowed to drive. Im suggesting something like that for guns. IMO the level set for that kind of test should be higher for guns. You did misrepresent what I said. Its the law deal with it! Is an argument I think is foolish in this case. Its a law we can change to be a safer and smarter nation. When I said stop hiding behind it Im talking about people who refuse to entertain suggestions like this one because the constitution!. Were several years removed from that law being created. It wont hurt anyone to look into it and add in some safety amendment (Hey...) to make things safer.</quote> When cars kill more people every year than guns - by a HUGE margin, why does the bar need to be higher for guns? And, for the millionth time, what law can you pass that won't violate the Second Amendment would have prevented any mass shooting in this country that we don't already have?</quote> What are you not understanding here? Im just suggesting we have tests in place when purchasing a gun just as we do with driving. I never said anything about preventing mass shootings. I said it would make sense and could lead to safer gun use. You say cars kill more people. We as a nation understand the severity of that and have laws and rules in place to help diminish that. Without that it would be even worse. A guns main intent is to harm. Be it in rage or for fun/sport. It has one purpose. We should understand the severity of that and have similar tests in place. We know it wont completely Eliminate tragedy but what harm does it do? People can drive without a license technically. But regulating it does make the roads safer dont you think?</quote> Roads are still more dangerous than guns, despite your assertion that it's easier to get a gun than to drive. Do you just not understand that this fact kills your narrative even BEFORE Contitutionality comes into play? Your test idea is literally against the Second AND Fourteenth Amendments, as it's constitutionally equivalent to a poll tax. Voting anf firearm ownership are FUNDAMENTAL rights as defined by the Constitution. Ergo, if a regulation wouldn't fly for one, it cannot constitutionally apply to the other. The Constitution is literally your enemy here. If you want to amend out the Second Amendment, I would love to see you try.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
flussence 02/01/18 5:24:58 PM #77:	ModLogic posted... so when is america gonna actually do something about their gun problems? dude what if we put guns on the blockchaaaaain --- u <cite>flussence posted [p:895266000] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>ModLogic posted...</cite> <quote>so when is america gonna actually do something about their gun problems?</quote> dude what if we put guns on the blockchaaaaain</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hexenherz 02/01/18 5:27:32 PM #78:	14 school shootings as of this last one: https://www.abc15.com/news/data/school-shootings-in-u-s-when-where-each-shooting-has-occurred-in-2018 --- RS3: UltimaSuende . On the quest to 99 WC. Currently at 96. <cite>Hexenherz posted [p:895266167] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>14 school shootings as of this last one: https://www.abc15.com/news/data/school-shootings-in-u-s-when-where-each-shooting-has-occurred-in-2018</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 02/01/18 5:27:58 PM #79:	darkjedilink posted... Roads are still more dangerous than guns, Wtf? Really? --- I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you. PSN-Bishop9800 <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:895266194] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Roads are still more dangerous than guns, </quote> Wtf? Really?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 5:28:47 PM #80:	Hexenherz posted... 14 school shootings as of this last one: https://www.abc15.com/news/data/school-shootings-in-u-s-when-where-each-shooting-has-occurred-in-2018 Most of those aren't actually school shootings... --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895266239] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Hexenherz posted...</cite> <quote>14 school shootings as of this last one: https://www.abc15.com/news/data/school-shootings-in-u-s-when-where-each-shooting-has-occurred-in-2018</quote> Most of those aren't actually school shootings...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dark_Spiret 02/01/18 5:30:52 PM #81:	Twin3Turbo posted... This is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison. Driving is a daily thing for most adults. Even if you own a gun, for most people it's not a daily thing they interact with. They tend to keep it locked up somewhere. and once again, a gun is a gun. keep your finger of the trigger and dont point it at anyone. thats basically it when you get down to it. it doesnt require years of practice to not be an idiot. --- Currently playing: Forza Horizon 3 - Dead Rising - Hitman <cite>Dark_Spiret posted [p:895266381] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote>This is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison. Driving is a daily thing for most adults. Even if you own a gun, for most people it's not a daily thing they interact with. They tend to keep it locked up somewhere.</quote>and once again, a gun is a gun. keep your finger of the trigger and dont point it at anyone. thats basically it when you get down to it. it doesnt require years of practice to not be an idiot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 02/01/18 6:01:34 PM #82:	Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:895268121] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#83	Post #83 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 02/01/18 6:09:46 PM #84:	TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Because: 1 - it hasn't made driving safer, so there's no reason to believe it would make firearm ownership safer. 2 - it's unconstitutional, so even the suggestion is absolutely stupid. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895268583] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> Because: 1 - it hasn't made driving safer, so there's no reason to believe it would make firearm ownership safer. 2 - it's unconstitutional, so even the suggestion is absolutely stupid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 02/01/18 6:11:27 PM #85:	27_Sandman_40 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test. This discussion has clearly evolved past that. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:895268692] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test.</quote> This discussion has clearly evolved past that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 6:14:11 PM #86:	TheVipaGTS posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test. This discussion has clearly evolved past that. No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895268874] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test.</quote> This discussion has clearly evolved past that.</quote> No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#87	Post #87 was unavailable or deleted.
Bishop9800 02/01/18 6:16:11 PM #88:	27_Sandman_40 posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting. This --- I don't have to insult you. I have proven that you are a hypocrite and a fool. That's not insulting you, that's exposing you. PSN-Bishop9800 <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:895269006] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote>Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting.</quote></quote> This</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 6:16:52 PM #89:	27_Sandman_40 posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting. Nobody can talk about gang violence without being called racist, so why bother? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895269041] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote>Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting.</quote></quote> Nobody can talk about gang violence without being called racist, so why bother?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RockLee94 02/01/18 6:17:42 PM #90:	Antifar posted... I'm glad that we're seeing young girls realize that they too can be school shooters. Another glass ceiling breaks! #Herstory --- Huck it chuck it football <cite>RockLee94 posted [p:895269098] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>I'm glad that we're seeing young girls realize that they too can be school shooters. Another glass ceiling breaks!</quote> #Herstory</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 02/01/18 6:17:50 PM #91:	darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test. This discussion has clearly evolved past that. No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes. The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:895269108] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test.</quote> This discussion has clearly evolved past that.</quote> No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes.</quote> The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 02/01/18 6:19:41 PM #92:	imo roads are very dangerous and we should do more to stop that, but from my perspective the big difference is that the gubmint owns most of the roads and the gubmint does not own most of the guns (and they exclude their guns from their regulations anyway) so the comparison is bad because the right way to fight road accidents is actually to just stop using gubmint money to build so many damn roads but hey --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:895269214] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>imo roads are very dangerous and we should do more to stop that, but from my perspective the big difference is that the gubmint owns most of the roads and the gubmint does not own most of the guns (and they exclude their guns from their regulations anyway) so the comparison is bad because the right way to fight road accidents is actually to just stop using gubmint money to build so many damn roads but hey</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 02/01/18 6:21:17 PM #93:	darkjedilink posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting. Nobody can talk about gang violence without being called racist, so why bother? maybe you shouldn't talk about it in a racist manner then --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:895269315] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote>Girl kills ex at a school - national news Black boy killed by gang member at a school - crickets Fucking disgusting.</quote></quote> Nobody can talk about gang violence without being called racist, so why bother?</quote> maybe you shouldn't talk about it in a racist manner then</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3deep5u 02/01/18 6:21:45 PM #94:	I will attempt to stack two perfectly spherical rocks on top of each other and then do ten laps of summersaults around the stack and send my realizations afterwards via telekinesis to the individuals affected by this. --- 2deep4u 7deep9all <cite>3deep5u posted [p:895269343] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote>I will attempt to stack two perfectly spherical rocks on top of each other and then do ten laps of summersaults around the stack and send my realizations afterwards via telekinesis to the individuals affected by this.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
I4NRulez 02/01/18 6:21:47 PM #95:	Tmaster148 posted... gatorsPENSbucs posted... Tmaster148 posted... A young girl is not buying a gun from anyone. Mostly likely their parents failed to properly secure their guns. Lol what fairy tale land did you grow up in. In what fairy tale do you live in that a 15 year old can go out and buy a gun? LA lol --- The night brims with defiled scum,and is permeated by their rotten stench. Just think. Now you're all set to hunt and kill to your heart's content. <cite>I4NRulez posted [p:895269346] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gatorsPENSbucs posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>A young girl is not buying a gun from anyone. Mostly likely their parents failed to properly secure their guns.</quote> Lol what fairy tale land did you grow up in.</quote> In what fairy tale do you live in that a 15 year old can go out and buy a gun?</quote> LA lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 6:27:13 PM #96:	TheVipaGTS posted... darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test. This discussion has clearly evolved past that. No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes. The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason. Because you have no clue where the gun came from, and you're advocating yet another way to infringe on someone's fundamental rights. How about this - if she used a car instead of a gun (which, just like a gun, she wouldn't legally own), would you still demand the person she got it from go to jail? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895269695] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test.</quote> This discussion has clearly evolved past that.</quote> No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes.</quote> The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason.</quote> Because you have no clue where the gun came from, and you're advocating yet another way to infringe on someone's fundamental rights. How about this - if she used a car instead of a gun (which, just like a gun, she wouldn't legally own), would you still demand the person she got it from go to jail?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 02/01/18 6:29:35 PM #97:	darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test. This discussion has clearly evolved past that. No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes. The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason. Because you have no clue where the gun came from, and you're advocating yet another way to infringe on someone's fundamental rights. Are you really this upset at the idea of teaching people proper gun safety as a prerequisite to buy a gun? And btw, my post on that wasn't as a require to buy a gun but as a requirement for everyone. If we want to live in a country with a gun culture, everyone (even those without guns) should understand how to properly handle a gun. --- http://i.imgur.com/BBcZDLJ.png <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:895269861] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test.</quote> This discussion has clearly evolved past that.</quote> No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes.</quote> The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason.</quote> Because you have no clue where the gun came from, and you're advocating yet another way to infringe on someone's fundamental rights.</quote> Are you really this upset at the idea of teaching people proper gun safety as a prerequisite to buy a gun? And btw, my post on that wasn't as a require to buy a gun but as a requirement for everyone. If we want to live in a country with a gun culture, everyone (even those without guns) should understand how to properly handle a gun.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 02/01/18 6:32:21 PM #98:	Tmaster148 posted... Are you really this upset at the idea of teaching people proper gun safety as a prerequisite to buy a gun? And btw, my post on that wasn't as a require to buy a gun but as a requirement for everyone. If we want to live in a country with a gun culture, everyone (even those without guns) should understand how to properly handle a gun. What part of "fundamental right" is so hard to understand? Would you also advocate for a knowledge test to vote? Or to get an abortion? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:895270042] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Are you really this upset at the idea of teaching people proper gun safety as a prerequisite to buy a gun? And btw, my post on that wasn't as a require to buy a gun but as a requirement for everyone. If we want to live in a country with a gun culture, everyone (even those without guns) should understand how to properly handle a gun.</quote> What part of "fundamental right" is so hard to understand? Would you also advocate for a knowledge test to vote? Or to get an abortion?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 02/01/18 6:33:01 PM #99:	darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... darkjedilink posted... TheVipaGTS posted... 27_Sandman_40 posted... TheVipaGTS posted... Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand? The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test. This discussion has clearly evolved past that. No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes. The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason. Because you have no clue where the gun came from, and you're advocating yet another way to infringe on someone's fundamental rights. The gun came from someone. If it was purchased illegally and she got it from someone who purchased it illegally and they can trace it back to them that person should face a punishment. If it was her parents and she took it from their house that person should face a punishment. Im not saying 25 to life. A fine that builds. Something that can be used as a deterrent. How is that infringing on someones rights? Why is basic accountability such a bad thing to you? If someone steals a gun and its found they stole it from someone who was careless with it and shot me then fuck their fundamental right. My right to not want to be shot is more important. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:895270076] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>27_Sandman_40 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Who cares if roads are still more dangerous? This isnt a game of who kills more. Im just suggesting that since guns require a lot of responsibility like driving we should create tests that allow users to demonstrate they have that responsibility before they can own one. Im using driving as a measure because its a common thing that we all know about and can be built off of and modified for owning weapons. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?</quote> The 15 year old girl would not be elligible for the test.</quote> This discussion has clearly evolved past that.</quote> No, it didn't. You, like every gun control liberal in America, just wanted to use a tragedy to decry gun ownership and discuss gun control, even though the policy suggested would do NOTHING to prevent gun crimes.</quote> The conversation about gun control started because people made posts sarcastically mocking Californias gun laws. Get over yourself. With regard to those case I suggested that its odd that a 15 year old had access to a gun and maybe the person who she got it from should also face some sort of consequences. That seemed to upset you for some reason.</quote> Because you have no clue where the gun came from, and you're advocating yet another way to infringe on someone's fundamental rights.</quote> The gun came from someone. If it was purchased illegally and she got it from someone who purchased it illegally and they can trace it back to them that person should face a punishment. If it was her parents and she took it from their house that person should face a punishment. Im not saying 25 to life. A fine that builds. Something that can be used as a deterrent. How is that infringing on someones rights? Why is basic accountability such a bad thing to you? If someone steals a gun and its found they stole it from someone who was careless with it and shot me then fuck their fundamental right. My right to not want to be shot is more important.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
flussence 02/01/18 6:33:12 PM #100:	darkjedilink posted... What part of "fundamental right" is so hard to understand? tell that to the families of the victims --- u <cite>flussence posted [p:895270085] in another sc... [t:76269889]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>What part of "fundamental right" is so hard to understand?</quote> tell that to the families of the victims</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#101	Post #101 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > another school shooting, in LA (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > another school shooting, in LA