Current Events > I don't think a cop would ever lie.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 1:14:57 AM #201:	I already said multiple times that it's irrelevant so what does it even matter. Your country is stupid for having illegal weed in the first place, it should never be a factor whether or not he was high but you keep going back to this point --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893630800] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>I already said multiple times that it's irrelevant so what does it even matter. Your country is stupid for having illegal weed in the first place, it should never be a factor whether or not he was high but you keep going back to this point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 1:15:59 AM #202:	Darklit_Minuet posted... I already said multiple times that it's irrelevant so what does it even matter. Your country is stupid for having illegal weed in the first place, it should never be a factor whether or not he was high but you keep going back to this point No you made a claim.and now you have to back it. And idc what laws are stupid you can't be high and have a gun. Its common sense and it's the law --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893630834] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote>I already said multiple times that it's irrelevant so what does it even matter. Your country is stupid for having illegal weed in the first place, it should never be a factor whether or not he was high but you keep going back to this point</quote> No you made a claim.and now you have to back it. And idc what laws are stupid you can't be high and have a gun. Its common sense and it's the law</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 1:20:33 AM #203:	You never backed up any of your claims so why should I? You proved he had weed in his system, which stays in your system for months, and that the cop claimed he smelled weed which neither proves that he was smoking it (could have been his "trashy girlfriend" you kept mentioning) nor that he was high at the time. Innocent until proven guilty. Why is this such a difficult concept for you to comprehend? I also reject your latter claim that this is common sense, because being high on marijuana should have no bearing on whether you can carry a gun. Everyone should be able to unless they harm someone and he never harmed someone. What exactly do you think a weed high is like? Do you get your knowledge from Reefer Madness? While I am neither a stoner nor a gun owner, I know enough to know that they're not mutually exclusive. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893631004] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>You never backed up any of your claims so why should I? You proved he had weed in his system, which stays in your system for months, and that the cop claimed he smelled weed which neither proves that he was smoking it (could have been his "trashy girlfriend" you kept mentioning) nor that he was high at the time. Innocent until proven guilty. Why is this such a difficult concept for you to comprehend? I also reject your latter claim that this is common sense, because being high on marijuana should have no bearing on whether you can carry a gun. Everyone should be able to unless they harm someone and he never harmed someone. What exactly do you think a weed high is like? Do you get your knowledge from Reefer Madness? While I am neither a stoner nor a gun owner, I know enough to know that they're not mutually exclusive.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Twin3Turbo 01/08/18 8:13:10 AM #205:	Below is direct footage of TC, immediately after posting successful troll topic --- https://i.imgur.com/PHWbltB.gifv <cite>Twin3Turbo posted [p:893639435] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>Below is direct footage of TC, immediately after posting successful troll topic </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 8:41:48 AM #206:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay? 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol If a cop reached for his gun, I wouldn't be justified in killing him. If he pointed his gun at me, I wouldn't be justified in killing him either. Shouldn't be true in reverse either. Nobody should get killed until they actually hurt someone Lmfao Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893640148] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun </quote> First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay?</quote> 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol</quote> If a cop reached for his gun, I wouldn't be justified in killing him. If he pointed his gun at me, I wouldn't be justified in killing him either. Shouldn't be true in reverse either. Nobody should get killed until they actually hurt someone</quote> Lmfao</quote> Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 8:44:23 AM #207:	Darklit_Minuet posted... You never backed up any of your claims so why should I? . I was never asked to. Good job Trollol --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893640211] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote>You never backed up any of your claims so why should I? .</quote> I was never asked to. Good job Trollol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
myzz7 01/08/18 8:44:56 AM #208:	chill02 posted... --- http://s10.postimage.org/mxioonsd1/gildavatar.gif http://gifgifs.com/res/0916/57ebaeea6c7a9047727112.gif <cite>myzz7 posted [p:893640229] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 8:47:30 AM #209:	Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893640299] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote> Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 10:23:09 AM #210:	KingCrabCake posted... Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior I know nothing about the case, after reading every local news report on it.... Makes sense. And, no - there isn't anything 'more' to it. A nonviolent, unarmed man was shot to death by a police officer with no physical provocation whatsoever. Anyone who respects individual freedom and limited government should have a problem with that. Being high isn't a capital crime. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893643334] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior</quote> I know nothing about the case, after reading every local news report on it.... Makes sense. And, no - there isn't anything 'more' to it. A nonviolent, unarmed man was shot to death by a police officer with no physical provocation whatsoever. Anyone who respects individual freedom and limited government should have a problem with that. Being high isn't a capital crime.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 10:31:55 AM #211:	darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior I know nothing about the case, after reading every local news report on it.... Makes sense. And, no - there isn't anything 'more' to it. A nonviolent, unarmed man was shot to death by a police officer with no physical provocation whatsoever. Anyone who respects individual freedom and limited government should have a problem with that. Being high isn't a capital crime. Makes sense why you didnt know they had 6 grams of pot in the car. I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893643683] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior</quote> I know nothing about the case, after reading every local news report on it.... Makes sense. And, no - there isn't anything 'more' to it. A nonviolent, unarmed man was shot to death by a police officer with no physical provocation whatsoever. Anyone who respects individual freedom and limited government should have a problem with that. Being high isn't a capital crime.</quote> Makes sense why you didnt know they had 6 grams of pot in the car. I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 10:54:53 AM #212:	KingCrabCake posted... Makes sense why you didnt know they had 6 grams of pot in the car. IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF HE HAD 6 GRAMS OF A HARMLESS SUBSTANCE IN THE CAR STOP HARPING ON ABOUT THE POT KingCrabCake posted... I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally So it's comply or die, and you're okay with this? <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893644632] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Makes sense why you didnt know they had 6 grams of pot in the car. </quote> IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF HE HAD 6 GRAMS OF A HARMLESS SUBSTANCE IN THE CAR STOP HARPING ON ABOUT THE POT <cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally </quote> So it's comply or die, and you're okay with this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 11:19:17 AM #213:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior I know nothing about the case, after reading every local news report on it.... Makes sense. And, no - there isn't anything 'more' to it. A nonviolent, unarmed man was shot to death by a police officer with no physical provocation whatsoever. Anyone who respects individual freedom and limited government should have a problem with that. Being high isn't a capital crime. Makes sense why you didnt know they had 6 grams of pot in the car. I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally If there was 6 ounces of pot in the car, why was Castille's girlfriend never arrested? Why was it not offered as evidence in the trial? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893645710] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did nothing but sit in a chair. Good thing theres more to it than that. Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who hurt precisely zero people. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man who did not have any weapons on his person. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to arm a policeman as well as we arm the United States military, but not enforce the same rules of engagement. More to it than that Imagine thinking it's okay to kill a man solely because he smoked pot. More to it than that. Nowww imagine being such an ignorant little boy you spend hours arguing about a case that you clearly do not know the facts of. And when proven wrong you resort to blanket statements in a drastic attempt to come off right and superior</quote> I know nothing about the case, after reading every local news report on it.... Makes sense. And, no - there isn't anything 'more' to it. A nonviolent, unarmed man was shot to death by a police officer with no physical provocation whatsoever. Anyone who respects individual freedom and limited government should have a problem with that. Being high isn't a capital crime.</quote> Makes sense why you didnt know they had 6 grams of pot in the car. I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally</quote> If there was 6 ounces of pot in the car, why was Castille's girlfriend never arrested? Why was it not offered as evidence in the trial?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 11:19:58 AM #214:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally So it's comply or die, and you're okay with this? Some people are, unfortunately. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893645743] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I have no problem with a cop shooting a man who wasnt following orders and may have been reaching for his gun that he was carrying illegally </quote> So it's comply or die, and you're okay with this?</quote> Some people are, unfortunately.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 11:34:59 AM #215:	darkjedilink posted... If there was 6 ounces of pot in the car, why was Castille's girlfriend never arrested? Why was it not offered as evidence in the trial? It was 6 grams. If you knew about the case you would know this Darklit_Minuet posted... IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF HE HAD 6 GRAMS OF A HARMLESS SUBSTANCE IN THE CAR STOP HARPING ON ABOUT THE POT So it's comply or die, and you're okay with this? The pot is important cause it made his gun possession illegal. And im okay with a cop shooting a potential threat --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893646414] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> If there was 6 ounces of pot in the car, why was Castille's girlfriend never arrested? Why was it not offered as evidence in the trial?</quote> It was 6 grams. If you knew about the case you would know this <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote> IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF HE HAD 6 GRAMS OF A HARMLESS SUBSTANCE IN THE CAR STOP HARPING ON ABOUT THE POT So it's comply or die, and you're okay with this?</quote> The pot is important cause it made his gun possession illegal. And im okay with a cop shooting a potential threat</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 11:35:32 AM #216:	Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893646435] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 11:42:42 AM #217:	Prove he was a potential threat. And legality isn't morality or threat as my orange example proves --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893646732] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>Prove he was a potential threat. And legality isn't morality or threat as my orange example proves</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 11:43:10 AM #218:	KingCrabCake posted... Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893646759] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 11:56:44 AM #219:	darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail? Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh? --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893647392] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail?</quote> Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 12:14:10 PM #220:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail? Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh? Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893648251] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail?</quote> Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh?</quote> Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 12:17:30 PM #221:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail? Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh? Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense Troll im asking for a source that the THC levels were low --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893648401] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail?</quote> Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh?</quote> Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense</quote> Troll im asking for a source that the THC levels were low</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 12:29:45 PM #222:	KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT... --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893649034] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 12:30:59 PM #223:	darkjedilink posted... KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT... I was never asked to....ive been asking for a source to the claim he had low thc levels since page 2 (i think) --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893649096] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT...</quote> I was never asked to....ive been asking for a source to the claim he had low thc levels since page 2 (i think)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DoctorVader 01/08/18 12:32:16 PM #224:	A cop lied to me just last week when he said he was bringing liquor to the meet up and he came empty handed. --- It all just disappears, doesn't it? Everything you are, gone in a moment, like breath on a mirror. - The Doctor <cite>DoctorVader posted [p:893649164] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>A cop lied to me just last week when he said he was bringing liquor to the meet up and he came empty handed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 12:45:57 PM #225:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT... I was never asked to....ive been asking for a source to the claim he had low thc levels since page 2 (i think) True. However, I have asked you numerous times about why the girlfriend never was arrested for possession, and why the pot wasn't admitted as evidence at trial. You've dodged both questions. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893649839] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT...</quote> I was never asked to....ive been asking for a source to the claim he had low thc levels since page 2 (i think)</quote> True. However, I have asked you numerous times about why the girlfriend never was arrested for possession, and why the pot wasn't admitted as evidence at trial. You've dodged both questions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkphoenix181 01/08/18 12:48:29 PM #226:	frozenshock posted... I've been to court enough times to know that when you say anything that contradicts something a cop said, the judge automatically concludes that you're a liar. That is because the judge and cop work together. The cop is actually the judge's lackey. This is conflict of interest. How can the judge be a 3rd party arbitraitor when he is working for the interests of the state and the cop who is the one against you also works for the state. The means an agent of the state has taken you to court and another agent of the state judges you. This is why you can rarely win a case of speeding ticket. Also this is the argument certain people make that can actually work or get your contempt of court. --- chill02 to me: you are beautiful <cite>darkphoenix181 posted [p:893649957] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>I've been to court enough times to know that when you say anything that contradicts something a cop said, the judge automatically concludes that you're a liar.</quote> That is because the judge and cop work together. The cop is actually the judge's lackey. This is conflict of interest. How can the judge be a 3rd party arbitraitor when he is working for the interests of the state and the cop who is the one against you also works for the state. The means an agent of the state has taken you to court and another agent of the state judges you. This is why you can rarely win a case of speeding ticket. Also this is the argument certain people make that can actually work or get your contempt of court.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 12:49:26 PM #227:	darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT... I was never asked to....ive been asking for a source to the claim he had low thc levels since page 2 (i think) True. However, I have asked you numerous times about why the girlfriend never was arrested for possession, and why the pot wasn't admitted as evidence at trial. You've dodged both questions. 1. I been asking you for a source before that question was ever brought up. 2. Im not sure if she was or wasnt. And if she wasnt i am not sure why. 3. No idea if it was used in trial or not. Doesnt change the fact that 6 grams were found in a jar in the car --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893650008] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>KCC asking for sources while never showing any to back up his own claims ITT...</quote> I was never asked to....ive been asking for a source to the claim he had low thc levels since page 2 (i think)</quote> True. However, I have asked you numerous times about why the girlfriend never was arrested for possession, and why the pot wasn't admitted as evidence at trial. You've dodged both questions.</quote> 1. I been asking you for a source before that question was ever brought up. 2. Im not sure if she was or wasnt. And if she wasnt i am not sure why. 3. No idea if it was used in trial or not. Doesnt change the fact that 6 grams were found in a jar in the car</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 12:52:14 PM #228:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail? Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh? Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense Troll im asking for a source that the THC levels were low My argument has always been what does it matter what his levels were at. Weed should never be a reason to kill someone. People on weed are not more likely to be dangerous. It doesn't make you lose inhibition like alcohol does. It makes you more passive, which is the opposite of making him want to grab his gun and shoot someone. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893650165] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail?</quote> Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh?</quote> Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense</quote> Troll im asking for a source that the THC levels were low</quote> My argument has always been what does it matter what his levels were at. Weed should never be a reason to kill someone. People on weed are not more likely to be dangerous. It doesn't make you lose inhibition like alcohol does. It makes you more passive, which is the opposite of making him want to grab his gun and shoot someone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 12:58:24 PM #229:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail? Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh? Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense Troll im asking for a source that the THC levels were low My argument has always been what does it matter what his levels were at. Weed should never be a reason to kill someone. People on weed are not more likely to be dangerous. It doesn't make you lose inhibition like alcohol does. It makes you more passive, which is the opposite of making him want to grab his gun and shoot someone. You made the claim his levels were low...i asked for a source. Do not make claims you cannot back up. I also never said smoking pot is the reason he died i said that him being high made his gun possession illegal. Please stop trolling and develop the ability to understand what you read instead of constantly and purposely putting incorrect words in my mouth. Thank you --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893650479] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Still waiting for your source @Darklit_Minuet</quote> Still waiting for your answer about the mysteriously-disappearing, never-reported-on pot you claim was found in the car. That you didn't even mention until two-thirds of the way through this thread. If it was there, why wasn't it produced as evidence at trial? Why did the girlfriend not go to jail?</quote> Because while searching for his thc levels i came across that information about the 6 grams. And hmm @Darklit_Minuet have no source to your claim then huh?</quote> Exactly what "source" are you looking for? The fact that people should not be killed if they haven't harmed anyone? I thought that was common sense</quote> Troll im asking for a source that the THC levels were low</quote> My argument has always been what does it matter what his levels were at. Weed should never be a reason to kill someone. People on weed are not more likely to be dangerous. It doesn't make you lose inhibition like alcohol does. It makes you more passive, which is the opposite of making him want to grab his gun and shoot someone.</quote> You made the claim his levels were low...i asked for a source. Do not make claims you cannot back up. I also never said smoking pot is the reason he died i said that him being high made his gun possession illegal. Please stop trolling and develop the ability to understand what you read instead of constantly and purposely putting incorrect words in my mouth. Thank you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 01/08/18 1:25:26 PM #230:	Twin3Turbo posted... Below is direct footage of TC, immediately after posting successful troll topic How did you get that footage of me? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Howl posted [p:893651982] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote> Below is direct footage of TC, immediately after posting successful troll topic </quote> How did you get that footage of me?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 1:35:54 PM #231:	KingCrabCake posted... I also never said smoking pot is the reason he died i said that him being high made his gun possession illegal. And I said multiple times that this is irrelevant. Doing something illegal does not make one a threat. He wasn't a threat. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893652556] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I also never said smoking pot is the reason he died i said that him being high made his gun possession illegal. </quote> And I said multiple times that this is irrelevant. Doing something illegal does not make one a threat. He wasn't a threat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 1:38:23 PM #232:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... I also never said smoking pot is the reason he died i said that him being high made his gun possession illegal. And I said multiple times that this is irrelevant. Doing something illegal does not make one a threat. He wasn't a threat. Nope but failing to listen to an order while maybe or maybe not reaching for a gun he had illegally is a threat --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893652679] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I also never said smoking pot is the reason he died i said that him being high made his gun possession illegal. </quote> And I said multiple times that this is irrelevant. Doing something illegal does not make one a threat. He wasn't a threat.</quote> Nope but failing to listen to an order while maybe or maybe not reaching for a gun he had illegally is a threat</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 1:39:26 PM #233:	KingCrabCake posted... Nope but failing to listen to an order while maybe or maybe not reaching for a gun he had illegally is a threat He wasn't failing to listen to an order, and wasn't reaching for his gun. He was simultaneously following both orders he was given - pulling out his license, and not reaching for his gun. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893652748] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Nope but failing to listen to an order while maybe or maybe not reaching for a gun he had illegally is a threat </quote> He wasn't failing to listen to an order, and wasn't reaching for his gun. He was simultaneously following both orders he was given - pulling out his license, and not reaching for his gun.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LittleRoyal 01/08/18 1:39:35 PM #234:	Howl posted... They are the most trustworthy members of society tbh. --- I-I really needed this~~ Why does everyone think I like girls? <cite>LittleRoyal posted [p:893652761] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>They are the most trustworthy members of society tbh.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 1:39:59 PM #235:	Also having a gun on you u illegally is extremely relevant to the case troll --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893652784] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>Also having a gun on you u illegally is extremely relevant to the case troll</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 1:41:06 PM #236:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Nope but failing to listen to an order while maybe or maybe not reaching for a gun he had illegally is a threat He wasn't failing to listen to an order, and wasn't reaching for his gun. He was simultaneously following both orders he was given - pulling out his license, and not reaching for his gun. Nope he wasnt listening to an order. AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. Please keep up troll Also i am waiting for ur source --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893652853] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Nope but failing to listen to an order while maybe or maybe not reaching for a gun he had illegally is a threat </quote> He wasn't failing to listen to an order, and wasn't reaching for his gun. He was simultaneously following both orders he was given - pulling out his license, and not reaching for his gun.</quote> Nope he wasnt listening to an order. AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. Please keep up troll Also i am waiting for ur source</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 1:44:06 PM #237:	KingCrabCake posted... AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893653003] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. </quote> He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 1:47:47 PM #238:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for. You dont know what he was reaching for because the cop shot him before he could pull it out. Still waiting for source btw --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893653218] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. </quote> He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for.</quote> You dont know what he was reaching for because the cop shot him before he could pull it out. Still waiting for source btw</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/08/18 1:51:16 PM #239:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for. You dont know what he was reaching for because the cop shot him before he could pull it out. Still waiting for source btw Why would he be reaching for the gun? That's illogical. Logically he was obviously reaching for his license which he was told to get. If he even was reaching for something. I reviewed the footage and he clearly said he wasn't reaching right before the cop shot him Why do you not believe in innocent until proven guilty? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893653392] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. </quote> He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for.</quote> You dont know what he was reaching for because the cop shot him before he could pull it out. Still waiting for source btw</quote> Why would he be reaching for the gun? That's illogical. Logically he was obviously reaching for his license which he was told to get. If he even was reaching for something. I reviewed the footage and he clearly said he wasn't reaching right before the cop shot him Why do you not believe in innocent until proven guilty?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
3khc 01/08/18 1:53:01 PM #240:	nexigrams posted... Cops are taught to lie to get you to incriminate yourself. It well established fact. There have been Supreme Court rulings saying its OK for cops to lie, cheat, manipulate, do whatever it takes to charge you with a crime. This is true. First hand experience. Got me when I was a young adult. It's pretty dirty, but people will say "you shouldn't have done it in the first place". --- ---- ----- <cite>3khc posted [p:893653494] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>nexigrams posted...</cite> <quote>Cops are taught to lie to get you to incriminate yourself. It well established fact. There have been Supreme Court rulings saying its OK for cops to lie, cheat, manipulate, do whatever it takes to charge you with a crime.</quote> This is true. First hand experience. Got me when I was a young adult. It's pretty dirty, but people will say "you shouldn't have done it in the first place".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 1:59:28 PM #241:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for. You dont know what he was reaching for because the cop shot him before he could pull it out. Still waiting for source btw Why would he be reaching for the gun? That's illogical. Logically he was obviously reaching for his license which he was told to get. If he even was reaching for something. I reviewed the footage and he clearly said he wasn't reaching right before the cop shot him Why do you not believe in innocent until proven guilty? Criminals arent logical. Why would you smoke weed and drive around with your 3 yr old in the car? Thats illogical. And ya criminals never lie ever. Still waiting for a source --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893653837] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> AGAIN once he said he had s gun the officer told him to stop reaching MULTIPLE times because the situation changed. </quote> He said to stop reaching for his gun, which he was not reaching for.</quote> You dont know what he was reaching for because the cop shot him before he could pull it out. Still waiting for source btw</quote> Why would he be reaching for the gun? That's illogical. Logically he was obviously reaching for his license which he was told to get. If he even was reaching for something. I reviewed the footage and he clearly said he wasn't reaching right before the cop shot him Why do you not believe in innocent until proven guilty?</quote> Criminals arent logical. Why would you smoke weed and drive around with your 3 yr old in the car? Thats illogical. And ya criminals never lie ever. Still waiting for a source</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
not__shawn__z 01/08/18 4:16:26 PM #242:	Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time <cite>not__shawn__z posted [p:893661061] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 4:39:55 PM #243:	not__shawn__z posted... Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893662376] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
not__shawn__z 01/08/18 4:54:50 PM #244:	darkjedilink posted... not__shawn__z posted... Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens? There isn't. Join the military. And then become a cop. <cite>not__shawn__z posted [p:893663198] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens?</quote> There isn't. Join the military. And then become a cop.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 5:15:01 PM #245:	darkjedilink posted... not__shawn__z posted... Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens? Completely irrelevant. --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893664249] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens?</quote> Completely irrelevant.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 5:16:12 PM #246:	not__shawn__z posted... darkjedilink posted... not__shawn__z posted... Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens? There isn't. Join the military. And then become a cop. We've already had this discussion, dude. You don't even know what the rules are. Soldiers and Marines need to witness a hostile act to fire. Cops don't. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893664315] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens?</quote> There isn't. Join the military. And then become a cop.</quote> We've already had this discussion, dude. You don't even know what the rules are. Soldiers and Marines need to witness a hostile act to fire. Cops don't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/08/18 5:17:32 PM #247:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... not__shawn__z posted... Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens? Completely irrelevant. You think RoE is irrelevant when discussing a police officer killing a non-violent, unarmed man with no criminal history whatsoever? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893664386] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> What is the legal basis for allowing police officers in the United states more leeway to use deadly force than the military or private citizens?</quote> Completely irrelevant.</quote> You think RoE is irrelevant when discussing a police officer killing a non-violent, unarmed man with no criminal history whatsoever?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/08/18 5:18:36 PM #248:	not__shawn__z posted... Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time You're unfortunately right. But it was fun to constantly crap on his reasons and watch him make a fool out of himself. Also @darkjedilink you're just not going to post a source? So we can throw out your claim that he had low THC levels --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893664436] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>Crab why are you bothering with this. I explained this situation to that guy, from a legal perspective, and he's still arguing "why would he do that" and hindsight. You're wasting your time</quote> You're unfortunately right. But it was fun to constantly crap on his reasons and watch him make a fool out of himself. Also @darkjedilink you're just not going to post a source? So we can throw out your claim that he had low THC levels</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > I don't think a cop would ever lie. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > I don't think a cop would ever lie.