Current Events > I don't think a cop would ever lie.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:02:12 PM #101:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black? Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893612448] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. </quote> Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black?</quote> Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race</quote> You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:02:15 PM #102:	KingCrabCake posted... Um. I think he was high because the reports where he had thc in his blood, videos of him going on blunt rides with a 3 yr old surfaced, & the cop smelled it. Literally none of those prove that he was high. THC stays in your blood for months, those videos were older, and cops always say they smelled pot to justify their horrible actions. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893612450] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Um. I think he was high because the reports where he had thc in his blood, videos of him going on blunt rides with a 3 yr old surfaced, & the cop smelled it. </quote> Literally none of those prove that he was high. THC stays in your blood for months, those videos were older, and cops always say they smelled pot to justify their horrible actions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/07/18 7:02:38 PM #103:	In other words, follow the cop's orders, except when they contradict and if so then you need to 100% know what they actually mean, or else you die and if you do lose that game of Simon says, you're dead and it'll be considered justified. --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:893612465] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>In other words, follow the cop's orders, except when they contradict and if so then you need to 100% know what they actually mean, or else you die and if you do lose that game of Simon says, you're dead and it'll be considered justified.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:02:57 PM #104:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black? Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race Even if that were true, which you have literally no proof of besides a tiny amount of it being in his system from god knows when, what's wrong with him being high? Laws against weed are wrong and should all be abolished Proof he only had a tiny bit in him? Agreed laws against weed need to be abolished. But i still want anyone with a CC permit to be sober when carrying. Its only logical --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612485] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. </quote> Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black?</quote> Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race</quote> Even if that were true, which you have literally no proof of besides a tiny amount of it being in his system from god knows when, what's wrong with him being high? Laws against weed are wrong and should all be abolished</quote> Proof he only had a tiny bit in him? Agreed laws against weed need to be abolished. But i still want anyone with a CC permit to be sober when carrying. Its only logical</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:03:51 PM #105:	darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black? Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight. Except the smell, videos showing he gets high all the time, & it being in his blood. Pretty clear he was high --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612536] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. </quote> Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black?</quote> Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race</quote> You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight.</quote> Except the smell, videos showing he gets high all the time, & it being in his blood. Pretty clear he was high</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:04:42 PM #106:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... not__shawn__z posted... The cop however is aware of the fact that he told this person to stop reaching, three times, all of which castilo unfortunately disobeyed. The cop gave him two orders One was to get his wallet, which he was obeying. The other was not to reach for his gun, which he was also obeying. Odds are he would have shot him either way because he was ignoring his demand to get his license. The audio shows that once he mentioned he had a gun he told him to stop moving...which he disobeyed Because if he stopped moving he'd be disobeying the previous order. It's literally impossible to obey all a cop's orders because they shout multiple contradictory ones. What about the classic don't move/get on the ground/hands on your head/crawl towards me/stay perfectly still crap they use to justify shooting people on the ground? Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. Dude, you think a chemical test proves he was high. The only law you argue is clearly in your mom's basement. Um. I think he was high because the reports where he had thc in his blood, videos of him going on blunt rides with a 3 yr old surfaced, & the cop smelled it. You can try to throw insults around but its clear you are only insulting me because you may be wrong here Again, the THC in his blood was such a low amount that it almost didn't register. Videos of him PREVIOUSLY being high don't prove he was high WHEN HE WAS KILLED. And, again, the cop didn't smell marijuana. There was no mention of this in his initial reports, or any of his statements. He didn't mention marijuana until he was already facing a jury trial for Manslaughter. And I know I'm not wrong, because I lived in Minnesota when this happened, and saw every fucking news report in print and on local TV about it, from beginning to his finding of Not Guilty. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893612581] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>The cop however is aware of the fact that he told this person to stop reaching, three times, all of which castilo unfortunately disobeyed.</quote> The cop gave him two orders One was to get his wallet, which he was obeying. The other was not to reach for his gun, which he was also obeying. Odds are he would have shot him either way because he was ignoring his demand to get his license.</quote> The audio shows that once he mentioned he had a gun he told him to stop moving...which he disobeyed</quote> Because if he stopped moving he'd be disobeying the previous order. It's literally impossible to obey all a cop's orders because they shout multiple contradictory ones. What about the classic don't move/get on the ground/hands on your head/crawl towards me/stay perfectly still crap they use to justify shooting people on the ground?</quote> Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there.</quote> Dude, you think a chemical test proves he was high. The only law you argue is clearly in your mom's basement.</quote> Um. I think he was high because the reports where he had thc in his blood, videos of him going on blunt rides with a 3 yr old surfaced, & the cop smelled it. You can try to throw insults around but its clear you are only insulting me because you may be wrong here</quote> Again, the THC in his blood was such a low amount that it almost didn't register. Videos of him PREVIOUSLY being high don't prove he was high WHEN HE WAS KILLED. And, again, the cop didn't smell marijuana. There was no mention of this in his initial reports, or any of his statements. He didn't mention marijuana until he was already facing a jury trial for Manslaughter. And I know I'm not wrong, because I lived in Minnesota when this happened, and saw every fucking news report in print and on local TV about it, from beginning to his finding of Not Guilty.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:05:14 PM #107:	KingCrabCake posted... Agreed laws against weed need to be abolished. But i still want anyone with a CC permit to be sober when carrying. Its only logical Proof that being high makes you more irresponsible with a gun? He didn't use the gun to kill anyone, didn't point it at anyone, didn't do anything with it. I don't see problems with people carrying guns while on a substance that doesn't make them more prone to using those guns. If you're carrying a gun while drunk on alcohol, that's a different story. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893612612] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Agreed laws against weed need to be abolished. But i still want anyone with a CC permit to be sober when carrying. Its only logical </quote> Proof that being high makes you more irresponsible with a gun? He didn't use the gun to kill anyone, didn't point it at anyone, didn't do anything with it. I don't see problems with people carrying guns while on a substance that doesn't make them more prone to using those guns. If you're carrying a gun while drunk on alcohol, that's a different story.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:05:26 PM #108:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black? Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight. Except the smell, videos showing he gets high all the time, & it being in his blood. Pretty clear he was high Drug tests don't prove someone is high. Especially drug tests that barely register positive. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893612626] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. </quote> Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black?</quote> Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race</quote> You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight.</quote> Except the smell, videos showing he gets high all the time, & it being in his blood. Pretty clear he was high</quote> Drug tests don't prove someone is high. Especially drug tests that barely register positive.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FigureOfSpeech 01/07/18 7:05:39 PM #109:	Why is it that every time this kingcrab goober says something, his entire posts appear only as his sig? --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>FigureOfSpeech posted [p:893612634] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>Why is it that every time this kingcrab goober says something, his entire posts appear only as his sig?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gafemage 01/07/18 7:06:14 PM #110:	chill02 posted... --- http://imgur.com/1EOFcjn http://imgur.com/epjd8zk <cite>Gafemage posted [p:893612662] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:07:36 PM #111:	darkjedilink posted... Again, the THC in his blood was such a low amount that it almost didn't register. Videos of him PREVIOUSLY being high don't prove he was high WHEN HE WAS KILLED. And, again, the cop didn't smell marijuana. There was no mention of this in his initial reports, or any of his statements. He didn't mention marijuana until he was already facing a jury trial for Manslaughter. And I know I'm not wrong, because I lived in Minnesota when this happened, and saw every fucking news report in print and on local TV about it, from beginning to his finding of Not Guilty. Again...im asking for a link to this claim because i cannot find it myseld. And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Paulsen said that while Reynolds indicated to officers that she and Castile smoked marijuana, he said it was a general statement that was not in reference to their marijuana use on the day of the shooting --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612728] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> Again, the THC in his blood was such a low amount that it almost didn't register. Videos of him PREVIOUSLY being high don't prove he was high WHEN HE WAS KILLED. And, again, the cop didn't smell marijuana. There was no mention of this in his initial reports, or any of his statements. He didn't mention marijuana until he was already facing a jury trial for Manslaughter. And I know I'm not wrong, because I lived in Minnesota when this happened, and saw every fucking news report in print and on local TV about it, from beginning to his finding of Not Guilty.</quote> Again...im asking for a link to this claim because i cannot find it myseld. And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Paulsen said that while Reynolds indicated to officers that she and Castile smoked marijuana, he said it was a general statement that was not in reference to their marijuana use on the day of the shooting</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FigureOfSpeech 01/07/18 7:07:59 PM #112:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black? Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight. Except the smell, videos showing he gets high all the time, & it being in his blood. Pretty clear he was high at some point within a month or so before the incident Ftfy --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>FigureOfSpeech posted [p:893612746] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Its pretty obvious why there was a second order given...because a gun came into play. A gun that shouldnt have been there. </quote> Why shouldn't it have been there? I thought you people were all for people having guns. Is it because he's black?</quote> Cause he was high. Im sorry you're racist and make everything about race</quote> You only think he was high because the cop argued about it in court. There is no evidence he was high when he was pulled over. For a broken taillight.</quote> Except the smell, videos showing he gets high all the time, & it being in his blood. Pretty clear he was high at some point within a month or so before the incident</quote> Ftfy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:08:24 PM #113:	darkjedilink posted... Especially drug tests that barely register positive. What link did u get that from --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612767] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> Especially drug tests that barely register positive.</quote> What link did u get that from</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:08:28 PM #114:	KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893612772] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:08:35 PM #115:	KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893612781] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:09:39 PM #116:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... Especially drug tests that barely register positive. What link did u get that from The St. Paul Pioneer Press newspaper article, printed three days after the cop's lawyer argued "but he was high, so my client had ABSOLUTELY NO CHOICE but to kill him with zero physical provocation!" You know, St. Paul, Minnesota? The city Mr. Castille was killed in by an irresponsible cop with an itchy trigger finger brought on by trying to bust a black man who robbed a convenience store at gunpoint? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893612833] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> Especially drug tests that barely register positive.</quote> What link did u get that from</quote> The St. Paul Pioneer Press newspaper article, printed three days after the cop's lawyer argued "but he was high, so my client had ABSOLUTELY NO CHOICE but to kill him with zero physical provocation!" You know, St. Paul, Minnesota? The city Mr. Castille was killed in by an irresponsible cop with an itchy trigger finger brought on by trying to bust a black man who robbed a convenience store at gunpoint?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:09:56 PM #117:	darkjedilink posted... KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you. That's not im arguing at all. Its pretty obvious you aren't capable of having an actual debate. Im not putting words in your mouth or insulting you. I even admitted i may be wrong about a fact in this case and been looking up the case to see if i was. --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612843] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you.</quote> That's not im arguing at all. Its pretty obvious you aren't capable of having an actual debate. Im not putting words in your mouth or insulting you. I even admitted i may be wrong about a fact in this case and been looking up the case to see if i was.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
not__shawn__z 01/07/18 7:10:07 PM #118:	Darklit_Minuet posted... not__shawn__z posted... You say you have a gun, and you do not move. You follow whatever directions they give you, and nothing else He was following the direction he was given, to get his license I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones <cite>not__shawn__z posted [p:893612853] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>You say you have a gun, and you do not move. You follow whatever directions they give you, and nothing else</quote> He was following the direction he was given, to get his license</quote> I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:10:32 PM #119:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612868] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FigureOfSpeech 01/07/18 7:11:11 PM #120:	darkjedilink posted... KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you. Fucking disgusting. I'm a liberal and I'm in favor of the second ammendment. KCC is a clown and should be ashamed to even call himself an American. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>FigureOfSpeech posted [p:893612906] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you.</quote> Fucking disgusting. I'm a liberal and I'm in favor of the second ammendment. KCC is a clown and should be ashamed to even call himself an American.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:11:19 PM #121:	FigureOfSpeech posted... Why is it that every time this kingcrab goober says something, his entire posts appear only as his sig? throws dog biscuit Run along b --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612913] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>FigureOfSpeech posted...</cite> <quote>Why is it that every time this kingcrab goober says something, his entire posts appear only as his sig?</quote> throws dog biscuit Run along b</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:11:46 PM #122:	FigureOfSpeech posted... darkjedilink posted... KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you. Fucking disgusting. I'm a liberal and I'm in favor of the second ammendment. KCC is a clown and should be ashamed to even call himself an American. hands FoS attention --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893612938] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>FigureOfSpeech posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>KCC is itt arguing that citizens with a Second Amendment right to keep and bare arms shouldn't have them, because merely having them in the vehicle is a good enough reason for the government to kill you.</quote> Fucking disgusting. I'm a liberal and I'm in favor of the second ammendment. KCC is a clown and should be ashamed to even call himself an American.</quote> hands FoS attention</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:11:57 PM #123:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf I believe the fact that an innocent man was killed while not doing anything wrong. I don't give a shit if he was high or not, because being high is not a reason to be killed. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893612945] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> I believe the fact that an innocent man was killed while not doing anything wrong. I don't give a shit if he was high or not, because being high is not a reason to be killed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FigureOfSpeech 01/07/18 7:12:17 PM #124:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf She cares more about the second amendment than you do. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>FigureOfSpeech posted [p:893612967] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> She cares more about the second amendment than you do.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:12:50 PM #125:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf Now there's smoke in the car, huh? Too bad no video evidence proves that statement. As a matter of fact, there's video evidence immediately after the shooting from INSIDE THE CAR with no smoke whatsoever. Funny, that... --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893612995] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> Now there's smoke in the car, huh? Too bad no video evidence proves that statement. As a matter of fact, there's video evidence immediately after the shooting from INSIDE THE CAR with no smoke whatsoever. Funny, that...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:12:59 PM #126:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf I believe the fact that an innocent man was killed while not doing anything wrong. I don't give a shit if he was high or not, because being high is not a reason to be killed. Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893613001] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> I believe the fact that an innocent man was killed while not doing anything wrong. I don't give a shit if he was high or not, because being high is not a reason to be killed.</quote> Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:14:12 PM #127:	darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf Now there's smoke in the car, huh? Too bad no video evidence proves that statement. As a matter of fact, there's video evidence immediately after the shooting from INSIDE THE CAR with no smoke whatsoever. Funny, that... I can smoke in my car right now and show theres no smoke. Esp after windows been down for 5 minutes. Im just asking for a link that i can read that shows his thc levels in his blood. Thats all im asking --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893613072] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> Now there's smoke in the car, huh? Too bad no video evidence proves that statement. As a matter of fact, there's video evidence immediately after the shooting from INSIDE THE CAR with no smoke whatsoever. Funny, that...</quote> I can smoke in my car right now and show theres no smoke. Esp after windows been down for 5 minutes. Im just asking for a link that i can read that shows his thc levels in his blood. Thats all im asking</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:18:20 PM #128:	This is what we know... Cop told him to dont reach...he reached anyway. He never made a mention of having a permit.. ThC was found in his blood.... Cop said he smelled marijuana... They found pot in the car...6 grams worth It sucks donkey dick that a man who was innocent was killed but he clearly unfortunately played a part in his own death --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893613337] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>This is what we know... Cop told him to dont reach...he reached anyway. He never made a mention of having a permit.. ThC was found in his blood.... Cop said he smelled marijuana... They found pot in the car...6 grams worth It sucks donkey dick that a man who was innocent was killed but he clearly unfortunately played a part in his own death</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:23:54 PM #129:	KingCrabCake posted... Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading Then why do you keep arguing that he was high? <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893613691] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading </quote> Then why do you keep arguing that he was high?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:25:01 PM #130:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading Then why do you keep arguing that he was high? Because he was illegally carrying --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893613753] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading </quote> Then why do you keep arguing that he was high?</quote> Because he was illegally carrying</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 01/07/18 7:25:12 PM #131:	KingCrabCake posted... darkjedilink posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial. Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf Now there's smoke in the car, huh? Too bad no video evidence proves that statement. As a matter of fact, there's video evidence immediately after the shooting from INSIDE THE CAR with no smoke whatsoever. Funny, that... I can smoke in my car right now and show theres no smoke. Esp after windows been down for 5 minutes. Im just asking for a link that i can read that shows his thc levels in his blood. Thats all im asking But you said he smelled smoke... How can he smell something that isn't there? And, no, there was no pot in the car, because if there was, his girlfriend would have been arrested for possession. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:893613763] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>And nope cop saw smoke and smelled marijuana in the car. I'm going to believe this cop especially </quote> There's your problem. Stop believing this cop especially. People will say anything to defend themselves once on trial.</quote> Well I'm not gonna believe the trashy gf</quote> Now there's smoke in the car, huh? Too bad no video evidence proves that statement. As a matter of fact, there's video evidence immediately after the shooting from INSIDE THE CAR with no smoke whatsoever. Funny, that...</quote> I can smoke in my car right now and show theres no smoke. Esp after windows been down for 5 minutes. Im just asking for a link that i can read that shows his thc levels in his blood. Thats all im asking</quote> But you said he smelled smoke... How can he smell something that isn't there? And, no, there was no pot in the car, because if there was, his girlfriend would have been arrested for possession.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:26:14 PM #132:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading Then why do you keep arguing that he was high? Because he was illegally carrying Why does that even remotely matter? I don't care if the law says it's okay or not, he wasn't hurting anybody <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893613826] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading </quote> Then why do you keep arguing that he was high?</quote> Because he was illegally carrying</quote> Why does that even remotely matter? I don't care if the law says it's okay or not, he wasn't hurting anybody</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:37:18 PM #133:	darkjedilink posted... But you said he smelled smoke... How can he smell something that isn't there? And, no, there was no pot in the car, because if there was, his girlfriend would have been arrested for possession. Ah you dont know the case? My apologies for having a discussion with you about something that you clearly dont have the facts for. My bad b --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893614473] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote> But you said he smelled smoke... How can he smell something that isn't there? And, no, there was no pot in the car, because if there was, his girlfriend would have been arrested for possession.</quote> Ah you dont know the case? My apologies for having a discussion with you about something that you clearly dont have the facts for. My bad b</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:38:39 PM #134:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading Then why do you keep arguing that he was high? Because he was illegally carrying Why does that even remotely matter? I don't care if the law says it's okay or not, he wasn't hurting anybody The law says also not to carry a gun when high. So if he was either sober he might have listen to the cops instructions...or be high but not illegally carrying....theres a good chance he'd still be alive --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893614540] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Okay i never said it was. Are you high now? Is that why you're having hard time comprehending what you are reading </quote> Then why do you keep arguing that he was high?</quote> Because he was illegally carrying</quote> Why does that even remotely matter? I don't care if the law says it's okay or not, he wasn't hurting anybody</quote> The law says also not to carry a gun when high. So if he was either sober he might have listen to the cops instructions...or be high but not illegally carrying....theres a good chance he'd still be alive</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
not__shawn__z 01/07/18 7:39:25 PM #135:	@Darklit_Minuet don't know if you missed it or you don't wanna talk to me now but not__shawn__z posted... I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones <cite>not__shawn__z posted [p:893614593] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>@Darklit_Minuet don't know if you missed it or you don't wanna talk to me now but <cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Burnt_Puke82 01/07/18 7:40:18 PM #136:	Gafemage posted... chill02 posted... --- Think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of them are stupider than that. ~ George Carlin https://i.imgur.com/SvbZh2N.gif <cite>Burnt_Puke82 posted [p:893614636] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gafemage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote></quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:41:14 PM #137:	not__shawn__z posted... @Darklit_Minuet don't know if you missed it or you don't wanna talk to me now but not__shawn__z posted... I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones I don't care about any of that. Ignoring orders is not a reason to kill someone. KingCrabCake posted... The law says also not to carry a gun when high. So if he was either sober he might have listen to the cops instructions...or be high but not illegally carrying....theres a good chance he'd still be alive Which doesn't remotely matter, he wasn't doing anything that justified being killed. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893614697] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>@Darklit_Minuet don't know if you missed it or you don't wanna talk to me now but <cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones</quote></quote> I don't care about any of that. Ignoring orders is not a reason to kill someone. <cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>The law says also not to carry a gun when high. So if he was either sober he might have listen to the cops instructions...or be high but not illegally carrying....theres a good chance he'd still be alive</quote> Which doesn't remotely matter, he wasn't doing anything that justified being killed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:42:34 PM #138:	Darklit_Minuet posted... not__shawn__z posted... @Darklit_Minuet don't know if you missed it or you don't wanna talk to me now but not__shawn__z posted... I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones I don't care about any of that. Ignoring orders is not a reason to kill someone. KingCrabCake posted... The law says also not to carry a gun when high. So if he was either sober he might have listen to the cops instructions...or be high but not illegally carrying....theres a good chance he'd still be alive Which doesn't remotely matter, he wasn't doing anything that justified being killed. Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893614773] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>@Darklit_Minuet don't know if you missed it or you don't wanna talk to me now but <cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>I honestly can't tell if you're joking with me now, or just ignoring what I'm saying, lol. No offense but I am going to explain this very slowly to you 1) You are right. Mr. Castilo was following orders. 2) Mr. Castilo rightfully informed the cop that he was legally carrying. He then continued to, presumably, follow the previous order in step 1 3) Mr. Castilo then received three different orders. These orders directly supercede step 1, as he is telling him to stop. Mr. Castilo heard these orders, yet chose to ignore them 4) It is a dishonest lie to claim he was following orders. He followed 1, and chose to ignore 3. The 3 he chose to ignore were the important ones</quote></quote> I don't care about any of that. Ignoring orders is not a reason to kill someone. <cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>The law says also not to carry a gun when high. So if he was either sober he might have listen to the cops instructions...or be high but not illegally carrying....theres a good chance he'd still be alive</quote> Which doesn't remotely matter, he wasn't doing anything that justified being killed.</quote> Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:43:17 PM #139:	KingCrabCake posted... Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay? <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893614813] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun </quote> First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
not__shawn__z 01/07/18 7:44:45 PM #140:	Darklit_Minuet posted... I don't care about any of that. Ignoring orders is not a reason to kill someone Okay so you're dropping the "he was following orders" schtick then right? Advice: blanket statements are very stupid. Yes, ignoring orders can be a reason to kill someone. If a bad guy has a gun, and he's going to reach for it, and he gets it and begins to aim at a cop. Ignoring orders is a reason to kill someone You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. <cite>not__shawn__z posted [p:893614916] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote> I don't care about any of that. Ignoring orders is not a reason to kill someone</quote> Okay so you're dropping the "he was following orders" schtick then right? Advice: blanket statements are very stupid. Yes, ignoring orders can be a reason to kill someone. If a bad guy has a gun, and he's going to reach for it, and he gets it and begins to aim at a cop. Ignoring orders is a reason to kill someone You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Patchwork 01/07/18 7:45:40 PM #141:	The Castille shooting was a bad shoot. --- The mind is its own place, and in itself Can make a heav'n of hell, a hell of heav'n. <cite>Patchwork posted [p:893614972] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote>The Castille shooting was a bad shoot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 7:46:35 PM #142:	not__shawn__z posted... You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. I am against killers. If Castille killed a cop, I would be for the cop and against Castille instead. <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893615030] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote>You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. </quote> I am against killers. If Castille killed a cop, I would be for the cop and against Castille instead.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:54:42 PM #143:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay? 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893615572] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun </quote> First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay?</quote> 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 7:58:37 PM #144:	not__shawn__z posted... You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. Yeah I'm starting to realize that --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893615798] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote> You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded.</quote> Yeah I'm starting to realize that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 8:03:26 PM #145:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay? 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol If a cop reached for his gun, I wouldn't be justified in killing him. If he pointed his gun at me, I wouldn't be justified in killing him either. Shouldn't be true in reverse either. Nobody should get killed until they actually hurt someone <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893616088] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun </quote> First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay?</quote> 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol</quote> If a cop reached for his gun, I wouldn't be justified in killing him. If he pointed his gun at me, I wouldn't be justified in killing him either. Shouldn't be true in reverse either. Nobody should get killed until they actually hurt someone</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 8:03:52 PM #146:	KingCrabCake posted... not__shawn__z posted... You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. Yeah I'm starting to realize that I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893616109] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote> You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded.</quote> Yeah I'm starting to realize that</quote> I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 8:06:47 PM #147:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay? 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol If a cop reached for his gun, I wouldn't be justified in killing him. If he pointed his gun at me, I wouldn't be justified in killing him either. Shouldn't be true in reverse either. Nobody should get killed until they actually hurt someone Lmfao --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893616273] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>Except reaching for whst the cop thought to be a gun </quote> First off, he wasn't. Second, it doesn't matter. Reaching for something should not be a reason to get killed. If I see a cop reaching for something and shot him, I would likely be given the death penalty. So why should the reverse be okay?</quote> 1. Thats called hindsight 2. Yes it does matter if you reach for a gun. Lol</quote> If a cop reached for his gun, I wouldn't be justified in killing him. If he pointed his gun at me, I wouldn't be justified in killing him either. Shouldn't be true in reverse either. Nobody should get killed until they actually hurt someone</quote> Lmfao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 8:07:12 PM #148:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... not__shawn__z posted... You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. Yeah I'm starting to realize that I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not You're anti-logic --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893616296] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote> You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded.</quote> Yeah I'm starting to realize that</quote> I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not</quote> You're anti-logic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darklit_Minuet 01/07/18 8:07:51 PM #149:	KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... not__shawn__z posted... You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. Yeah I'm starting to realize that I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not You're anti-logic Says the person defending the killing of an innocent person because he was technically breaking the law <cite>Darklit_Minuet posted [p:893616336] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote> You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded.</quote> Yeah I'm starting to realize that</quote> I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not</quote> You're anti-logic</quote> Says the person defending the killing of an innocent person because he was technically breaking the law</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 01/07/18 8:08:19 PM #150:	Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... Darklit_Minuet posted... KingCrabCake posted... not__shawn__z posted... You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded. Yeah I'm starting to realize that I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not You're anti-logic Says the person defending the killing of an innocent person because he was technically breaking the law See you proved me right. --- Waaaah. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:893616361] in I don't th... [t:76177569]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darklit_Minuet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>not__shawn__z posted...</cite> <quote> You are unreasonably against cops. You a very biased and jaded.</quote> Yeah I'm starting to realize that</quote> I'm anti killing, regardless if the killer is a cop or not</quote> You're anti-logic</quote> Says the person defending the killing of an innocent person because he was technically breaking the law</quote> See you proved me right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > I don't think a cop would ever lie. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > I don't think a cop would ever lie.