Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 154: A Very Special Election

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10
DeathChicken 12/12/17 12:53:04 AM #101:	Gmunnyz posted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ED3zvvKpN6k better quality "In the landmark vote 'Should pedophilia be legalized' of 2018, pedophilia was deemed to be just fine by a 51-50 tiebreaker. John McCain was deeply troubled by Roy Moore groping a 12 year old on the Senate floor but voted yes regardless." --- We are thought, and reality, and concept, and the unimaginable <cite>DeathChicken posted [p:892053136] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Gmunnyz posted...</cite> <quote> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ED3zvvKpN6k better quality</quote> "In the landmark vote 'Should pedophilia be legalized' of 2018, pedophilia was deemed to be just fine by a 51-50 tiebreaker. John McCain was deeply troubled by Roy Moore groping a 12 year old on the Senate floor but voted yes regardless."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 12:54:36 AM #102:	Lopen posted... Corrik posted... Sup, bud? "You guys care an awful lot about the Alabama senate race" very clown People should care about every senate race. The more contentious ones especially. The controversial ones doubly especially. What about it? You should have some minor care about it sure. It is very easy to compare the "care" between this race and every other race. And to act like you should care as much as a person from Alabama is a straight lack of common Sense across the board. They do not vote in the Alabama race. The Alabama Senator does not represent them. They are not his constituents. An Alabama Senator is charged with primarily looking out for his state and trying to do what he thinks is best for his state. Anyone saying the Alabama race is as important to them as an Alabama person is lacking common sense and just saying nonsense. This is just them doing as Ulti says in playing "Team Blue". There has been like 33 Senate Elections this past year. The care for those races boiled down to which one they thought they could win for their team. Little to do with positions, background of candidates, or otherwise. This is simply no different. The fact is the singular Alabama Senator spot is less than half a % of the process in making decisions in this country. It has no real significance over than an Alaska Senator spot. A Maine one. A California one. Etc. Which we can see just by before that all was cared about was if a seat was one for their party and not on background, political spots, or so on. Yes. The care of going on and on about it nonstop for what almost a month is a "You guys care a whole lot yadda yadda". And acting like their care should be equivalent to someone who lives in Alabama is illogical. It would be tantamount to someone living in Yemen saying they care as much about the Russian election as a Russian does. Illogical. I wonder how many of these people who even care even know what the Democrats stances are on positions. Hell, I don't even know the dude's name because I could care less. It is an Alabama Senate Race. I do not have a dog in the race. Who cares. I sure as fuck didn't care who won Senate or House seats on election day besides hoping for a majority. I sure as fuck am not going to care more than that now. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892053202] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Sup, bud?</quote> "You guys care an awful lot about the Alabama senate race" very clown People should care about every senate race. The more contentious ones especially. The controversial ones doubly especially.</quote> What about it? You should have some minor care about it sure. It is very easy to compare the "care" between this race and every other race. And to act like you should care as much as a person from Alabama is a straight lack of common Sense across the board. They do not vote in the Alabama race. The Alabama Senator does not represent them. They are not his constituents. An Alabama Senator is charged with primarily looking out for his state and trying to do what he thinks is best for his state. Anyone saying the Alabama race is as important to them as an Alabama person is lacking common sense and just saying nonsense. This is just them doing as Ulti says in playing "Team Blue". There has been like 33 Senate Elections this past year. The care for those races boiled down to which one they thought they could win for their team. Little to do with positions, background of candidates, or otherwise. This is simply no different. The fact is the singular Alabama Senator spot is less than half a % of the process in making decisions in this country. It has no real significance over than an Alaska Senator spot. A Maine one. A California one. Etc. Which we can see just by before that all was cared about was if a seat was one for their party and not on background, political spots, or so on. Yes. The care of going on and on about it nonstop for what almost a month is a "You guys care a whole lot yadda yadda". And acting like their care should be equivalent to someone who lives in Alabama is illogical. It would be tantamount to someone living in Yemen saying they care as much about the Russian election as a Russian does. Illogical. I wonder how many of these people who even care even know what the Democrats stances are on positions. Hell, I don't even know the dude's name because I could care less. It is an Alabama Senate Race. I do not have a dog in the race. Who cares. I sure as fuck didn't care who won Senate or House seats on election day besides hoping for a majority. I sure as fuck am not going to care more than that now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LapisLazuli 12/12/17 12:58:10 AM #103:	Man, Corrik sure likes making incredibly long nonsense posts with zero substance. --- H E Y W A S S H I L E T S E N J O Y K A G A W A L I F E <cite>LapisLazuli posted [p:892053367] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Man, Corrik sure likes making incredibly long nonsense posts with zero substance.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:02:11 AM #104:	LapisLazuli posted... Man, Corrik sure likes making incredibly long nonsense posts with zero substance. "Not what I wanted to hear". "zero substance" --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892053543] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>LapisLazuli posted...</cite> <quote>Man, Corrik sure likes making incredibly long nonsense posts with zero substance.</quote> "Not what I wanted to hear". "zero substance"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 12/12/17 1:03:53 AM #105:	This isn't about "teams" at all The reason we care so much about this race instead of shrugging and saying "of course a Republican is going to win in Alabama" is because Roy Moore is a fucking pedophile --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:892053611] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>This isn't about "teams" at all The reason we care so much about this race instead of shrugging and saying "of course a Republican is going to win in Alabama" is because Roy Moore is a fucking pedophile</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lopen 12/12/17 1:10:45 AM #106:	Well, even assuming that's true, you don't actually have to care as much as someone from Alabama to care about the race. In addition to the senate majority, the fact that the current political climate enables such a scandal to not really impact a guy's chances of winning to nearly the extent you'd ideally want it to because it's red (and blue) over all else. Also keep in mind that when there's nothing to talk about this topic will literally go for days on end just jabbing at Trump tweets. I mean if that's my alternative I'll take yapping about Moore for a year every time. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:892053902] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Well, even assuming that's true, you don't actually have to care as much as someone from Alabama to care about the race. In addition to the senate majority, the fact that the current political climate enables such a scandal to not really impact a guy's chances of winning to nearly the extent you'd ideally want it to because it's red (and blue) over all else. Also keep in mind that when there's nothing to talk about this topic will literally go for days on end just jabbing at Trump tweets. I mean if that's my alternative I'll take yapping about Moore for a year every time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:11:56 AM #107:	LordoftheMorons posted... This isn't about "teams" at all The reason we care so much about this race instead of shrugging and saying "of course a Republican is going to win in Alabama" is because Roy Moore is a fucking pedophile He is alleged to have gone on a date with an underage girl and alleged to have assaulted a legal aged girl. Nothing more. Neither has been proven. And neither is pedophilia. You care because you don't want a R to win the seat. Nothing more. You can't be taken serious in your supposed manufactured care when you cannot even properly label the person. You have branded someone you want to lose a pedophile when not even alleged to be one, let alone proven to be one. Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. The only reason you continue to brand this nonsense when completely and obviously clearly not factual is because you feel it vilifies the target more to make the person easier to root against and to supposedly make others not like the person. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892053950] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordoftheMorons posted...</cite> <quote>This isn't about "teams" at all The reason we care so much about this race instead of shrugging and saying "of course a Republican is going to win in Alabama" is because Roy Moore is a fucking pedophile</quote> He is alleged to have gone on a date with an underage girl and alleged to have assaulted a legal aged girl. Nothing more. Neither has been proven. And neither is pedophilia. You care because you don't want a R to win the seat. Nothing more. You can't be taken serious in your supposed manufactured care when you cannot even properly label the person. You have branded someone you want to lose a pedophile when not even alleged to be one, let alone proven to be one. Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. The only reason you continue to brand this nonsense when completely and obviously clearly not factual is because you feel it vilifies the target more to make the person easier to root against and to supposedly make others not like the person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 12/12/17 1:16:13 AM #108:	Moore assaulted a 14 year old Forgive me if I don't find much of a meaningful distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia or ephebophilia or whatever. --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:892054114] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Moore assaulted a 14 year old Forgive me if I don't find much of a meaningful distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia or ephebophilia or whatever.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:18:34 AM #109:	Lopen posted... Well, even assuming that's true, you don't actually have to care as much as someone from Alabama to care about the race. In addition to the senate majority, the fact that the current political climate enables such a scandal to not really impact a guy's chances of winning to nearly the extent you'd ideally want it to because it's red (and blue) over all else. Also keep in mind that when there's nothing to talk about this topic will literally go for days on end just jabbing at Trump tweets. I mean if that's my alternative I'll take yapping about Moore for a year every time. It is not the discussion. It is the absolute vitrol, "fuck xxxx", woe is me talk I am referring to specifically. If Alabama elects a piece of shit, so be it. That is their decision. Same as if Montana, Florida, New Jersey, Michigan, etc does it. I am from Pennsylvania. I cared about my Senate Race because it directly affects me. I didn't even know who ran in West Virginia, Ohio, New York, or mostly wherever else. Nor why should I have. Just like I doubt anyone here cared oh so much about them to be able to name them all now. Net Neutrality is probably going under, a terrorist attack was just attempted, and so on. And what has dominated this topic pretty soundly? Trump's tweeting and a Republican Alabama Senator hopeful supposedly being a pedophile 40 years ago which hasn't even ever been alleged. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892054201] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote>Well, even assuming that's true, you don't actually have to care as much as someone from Alabama to care about the race. In addition to the senate majority, the fact that the current political climate enables such a scandal to not really impact a guy's chances of winning to nearly the extent you'd ideally want it to because it's red (and blue) over all else. Also keep in mind that when there's nothing to talk about this topic will literally go for days on end just jabbing at Trump tweets. I mean if that's my alternative I'll take yapping about Moore for a year every time.</quote> It is not the discussion. It is the absolute vitrol, "fuck xxxx", woe is me talk I am referring to specifically. If Alabama elects a piece of shit, so be it. That is their decision. Same as if Montana, Florida, New Jersey, Michigan, etc does it. I am from Pennsylvania. I cared about my Senate Race because it directly affects me. I didn't even know who ran in West Virginia, Ohio, New York, or mostly wherever else. Nor why should I have. Just like I doubt anyone here cared oh so much about them to be able to name them all now. Net Neutrality is probably going under, a terrorist attack was just attempted, and so on. And what has dominated this topic pretty soundly? Trump's tweeting and a Republican Alabama Senator hopeful supposedly being a pedophile 40 years ago which hasn't even ever been alleged.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:20:53 AM #110:	Corrik posted... That is their decision. Yeah no fucking shit. And we have every right to condemn and mock that decision as stupid. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892054290] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>That is their decision. </quote> Yeah no fucking shit. And we have every right to condemn and mock that decision as stupid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:22:06 AM #111:	LordoftheMorons posted... Moore assaulted a 14 year old Forgive me if I don't find much of a meaningful distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia or ephebophilia or whatever. Moore was accused of assaulting a 16 year old. Not a 14 year old. You do not even know what you are talking about while "caring so much". He was accused of going on a date with a 14 year old, there being a small amount of intimate contact (which did not include any below the clothes or penetrating contact) the 14 year old asking him to drive her home and him doing so as asked. That was the entire allegation. There was zero assault claim on the 14 year old allegation. If you cannot even know the details of what you supposedly care so much about how the fuck are you going to tell me it is about what you supposedly care so much about and not the party they represent. Give me a fucking break. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892054322] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordoftheMorons posted...</cite> <quote>Moore assaulted a 14 year old Forgive me if I don't find much of a meaningful distinction between pedophilia and hebephilia or ephebophilia or whatever.</quote> Moore was accused of assaulting a 16 year old. Not a 14 year old. You do not even know what you are talking about while "caring so much". He was accused of going on a date with a 14 year old, there being a small amount of intimate contact (which did not include any below the clothes or penetrating contact) the 14 year old asking him to drive her home and him doing so as asked. That was the entire allegation. There was zero assault claim on the 14 year old allegation. If you cannot even know the details of what you supposedly care so much about how the fuck are you going to tell me it is about what you supposedly care so much about and not the party they represent. Give me a fucking break.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:22:15 AM #112:	BTW, we all knew net neutrality was gonna die the second Trump got into office, so there's not much point in discussing what was inevitable. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892054327] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>BTW, we all knew net neutrality was gonna die the second Trump got into office, so there's not much point in discussing what was inevitable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lopen 12/12/17 1:22:40 AM #113:	Well it has probably received more discussion than it deserves. I do agree with that much. Not really the topic's fault, though-- mainstream media is giving it a ton of attention too. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:892054349] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Well it has probably received more discussion than it deserves. I do agree with that much. Not really the topic's fault, though-- mainstream media is giving it a ton of attention too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:23:43 AM #114:	Corrik posted... Moore was accused of assaulting a 16 year old. Not a 14 year old. You do realize the actions he committed on a minor qualifies as sexual assault of a minor, right? --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892054372] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>Moore was accused of assaulting a 16 year old. Not a 14 year old.</quote> You do realize the actions he committed on a minor qualifies as sexual assault of a minor, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 12/12/17 1:24:50 AM #115:	On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear. I wanted it over with I wanted out, she remembers thinking. Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over. Corfman says she asked Moore to take her home, and he did. This is what I'm talking about. A 14 year old cannot consent to sexual contact with an adult. I don't care about your lawyering of my exact language. Roy Moore is a creepy piece of shit who should be in jail. --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:892054404] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><quote>On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear. I wanted it over with I wanted out, she remembers thinking. Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over. Corfman says she asked Moore to take her home, and he did.</quote> This is what I'm talking about. A 14 year old cannot consent to sexual contact with an adult. I don't care about your lawyering of my exact language. Roy Moore is a creepy piece of shit who should be in jail.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:26:06 AM #116:	On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear. That's sexual assault when you do that to a minor. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892054443] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear. That's sexual assault when you do that to a minor.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:26:33 AM #117:	Lopen posted... Well it has probably received more discussion than it deserves. I do agree with that much. Not really the topic's fault, though-- mainstream media is giving it a ton of attention too. Liberal outlets have yes, but news outlets literal job is to generate news that will make you go to their channel or website. I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some shit that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. Harping a news outlets for months at a time is just being a mouthpiece for a party's propaganda and is not a normal mindset. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892054457] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote>Well it has probably received more discussion than it deserves. I do agree with that much. Not really the topic's fault, though-- mainstream media is giving it a ton of attention too.</quote> Liberal outlets have yes, but news outlets literal job is to generate news that will make you go to their channel or website. I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some shit that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. Harping a news outlets for months at a time is just being a mouthpiece for a party's propaganda and is not a normal mindset.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 12/12/17 1:29:00 AM #118:	Corrik posted... Lopen posted... Well it has probably received more discussion than it deserves. I do agree with that much. Not really the topic's fault, though-- mainstream media is giving it a ton of attention too. Liberal outlets have yes, but news outlets literal job is to generate news that will make you go to their channel or website. I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some shit that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. Harping a news outlets for months at a time is just being a mouthpiece for a party's propaganda and is not a normal mindset. maybe they reported the appropriate on the failed terrorist attack and still had more time to fill. What would you have liked them to report about the attack that they didn't? --- For your BK_Sheikah00. At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:892054555] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote>Well it has probably received more discussion than it deserves. I do agree with that much. Not really the topic's fault, though-- mainstream media is giving it a ton of attention too.</quote> Liberal outlets have yes, but news outlets literal job is to generate news that will make you go to their channel or website. I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some shit that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. Harping a news outlets for months at a time is just being a mouthpiece for a party's propaganda and is not a normal mindset.</quote> maybe they reported the appropriate on the failed terrorist attack and still had more time to fill. What would you have liked them to report about the attack that they didn't?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 1:30:13 AM #119:	Would you like to talk about the Trump sexual assault allegations resurfacing? We can do that! --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892054595] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Would you like to talk about the Trump sexual assault allegations resurfacing? We can do that!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 12/12/17 1:31:51 AM #120:	also we're talking about more than we normally would about an Alabama senate race because it's literally the only active senate race . Usually there's a whole bunch at once so no one gets a ton of individual attention nationally, but this one gets the whole spotlight to itself. --- For your BK_Sheikah00. At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:892054659] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>also we're talking about more than we normally would about an Alabama senate race because it's literally the only active senate race . Usually there's a whole bunch at once so no one gets a ton of individual attention nationally, but this one gets the whole spotlight to itself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 1:32:00 AM #121:	Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892054661] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:33:15 AM #122:	LordoftheMorons posted... On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear. I wanted it over with I wanted out, she remembers thinking. Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over. Corfman says she asked Moore to take her home, and he did. This is what I'm talking about. A 14 year old cannot consent to sexual contact with an adult. I don't care about your lawyering of my exact language. Roy Moore is a creepy piece of shit who should be in jail. He is a creepy piece of shit who should be in jail because a crime was alleged to have been committed by him 40 some years ago, is not proven to be true, and has the dubious timing of coming out during a contested political election??? I mean, he very well could be. If so, he deserves to be ridiculed, scorned, and disavowed. But, he also could not be. The fact you are jumping to that conclusion is pretty telling. You want that to be the truth to support the result you want. Would I vote for him if he was running in PA? Probably not. Depends on the other option presented. His stances don't very well align with mine. But, I am not going to sit here and say a possibly innocent person should be lumped as a fucking pedophile because they do not run under the party tag I generally support. That's ludicrous. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892054709] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>LordoftheMorons posted...</cite> <quote><quote>On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear. I wanted it over with I wanted out, she remembers thinking. Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over. Corfman says she asked Moore to take her home, and he did.</quote> This is what I'm talking about. A 14 year old cannot consent to sexual contact with an adult. I don't care about your lawyering of my exact language. Roy Moore is a creepy piece of shit who should be in jail.</quote> He is a creepy piece of shit who should be in jail because a crime was alleged to have been committed by him 40 some years ago, is not proven to be true, and has the dubious timing of coming out during a contested political election??? I mean, he very well could be. If so, he deserves to be ridiculed, scorned, and disavowed. But, he also could not be. The fact you are jumping to that conclusion is pretty telling. You want that to be the truth to support the result you want. Would I vote for him if he was running in PA? Probably not. Depends on the other option presented. His stances don't very well align with mine. But, I am not going to sit here and say a possibly innocent person should be lumped as a fucking pedophile because they do not run under the party tag I generally support. That's ludicrous.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:34:32 AM #123:	Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892054763] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:35:24 AM #124:	Jakyl25 posted... Would you like to talk about the Trump sexual assault allegations resurfacing? We can do that! Sure. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892054802] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Would you like to talk about the Trump sexual assault allegations resurfacing? We can do that!</quote> Sure.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DeathChicken 12/12/17 1:36:24 AM #125:	"Fox News mocked for devoting article space to mocking some other news site instead of doing anything resembling actual journalism" --- We are thought, and reality, and concept, and the unimaginable <cite>DeathChicken posted [p:892054835] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>"Fox News mocked for devoting article space to mocking some other news site instead of doing anything resembling actual journalism"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:36:59 AM #126:	Corrik posted... I mean, he very well could be. If so, he deserves to be ridiculed, scorned, and disavowed. But, he also could not be. The fact you are jumping to that conclusion is pretty telling. You want that to be the truth to support the result you want. He's openly admitted to dating girls on a couple of years older in his 30's, had to reach a settlement with a mall he was stalking, and has another woman who came out that he attempted to assault her. Most of their stories are corroborated by others, too. There's enough evidence to support he's scummy as hell. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892054861] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>I mean, he very well could be. If so, he deserves to be ridiculed, scorned, and disavowed. But, he also could not be. The fact you are jumping to that conclusion is pretty telling. You want that to be the truth to support the result you want.</quote> He's openly admitted to dating girls on a couple of years older in his 30's, had to reach a settlement with a mall he was stalking, and has another woman who came out that he attempted to assault her. Most of their stories are corroborated by others, too. There's enough evidence to support he's scummy as hell.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 12/12/17 1:37:02 AM #127:	Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s*** that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. Fox News I can't believe Fox News would write an article about CNN airing a segment about Donald Trump drinking Diet Coke when they could have been writing more articles about the attempted terrorist attack. Such a petty attack on a competitor instead of providing valuable information. --- For your BK_Sheikah00. At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:892054862] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s*** that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> Fox News I can't believe Fox News would write an article about CNN airing a segment about Donald Trump drinking Diet Coke when they could have been writing more articles about the attempted terrorist attack. Such a petty attack on a competitor instead of providing valuable information.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LapisLazuli 12/12/17 1:38:01 AM #128:	Corrik when his party's morality is falling apart: "just.....stop caring bruuuuuh". Hippie. --- H E Y W A S S H I L E T S E N J O Y K A G A W A L I F E <cite>LapisLazuli posted [p:892054901] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Corrik when his party's morality is falling apart: "just.....stop caring bruuuuuh". Hippie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 1:39:50 AM #129:	Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892054972] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lopen 12/12/17 1:42:03 AM #130:	While I'm sure some people in this topic are jumping to conclusions on Moore I do think there's enough evidence out there that you don't have to jump to conclusions or even have a significant amount of bias to feel like you can take a stand on it. There's a lot more here than most of those accusatory cases-- just read into it a bit. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:892055053] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>While I'm sure some people in this topic are jumping to conclusions on Moore I do think there's enough evidence out there that you don't have to jump to conclusions or even have a significant amount of bias to feel like you can take a stand on it. There's a lot more here than most of those accusatory cases-- just read into it a bit.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:42:04 AM #131:	LapisLazuli posted... Corrik when his party's morality is falling apart: "just.....stop caring bruuuuuh". Hippie. Again you try to direct an angle that was never presented to try and slant an argument or insinuate something was said that wasn't. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055055] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>LapisLazuli posted...</cite> <quote>Corrik when his party's morality is falling apart: "just.....stop caring bruuuuuh". Hippie.</quote> Again you try to direct an angle that was never presented to try and slant an argument or insinuate something was said that wasn't.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:43:11 AM #132:	Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder What does New York Times on the 9th of December have to do with what CNN had on air on December 11th? Did you even read the article? --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055099] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder</quote> What does New York Times on the 9th of December have to do with what CNN had on air on December 11th? Did you even read the article?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 1:43:55 AM #133:	Lopen posted... While I'm sure some people in this topic are jumping to conclusions on Moore I do think there's enough evidence out there that you don't have to jump to conclusions or even have a significant amount of bias to feel like you can take a stand on it. There's a lot more here than most of those accusatory cases-- just read into it a bit. When youre Lawful Neutral like Corrik, you cant take a stand until a court has decided your stance for you --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892055127] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote>While I'm sure some people in this topic are jumping to conclusions on Moore I do think there's enough evidence out there that you don't have to jump to conclusions or even have a significant amount of bias to feel like you can take a stand on it. There's a lot more here than most of those accusatory cases-- just read into it a bit.</quote> When youre Lawful Neutral like Corrik, you cant take a stand until a court has decided your stance for you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MoogleKupo141 12/12/17 1:44:37 AM #134:	Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s*** that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder New York Times --- For your BK_Sheikah00. At least Kupo has class and doesn't MESSAGE the people -Dr Pizza <cite>MoogleKupo141 posted [p:892055152] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s*** that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder</quote> New York Times</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lopen 12/12/17 1:52:22 AM #135:	I mean I'm usually with him on waiting and seeing-- hell I even still give Trump the benefit of a doubt because I think the cases made against him had a lot of holes and people were just assuming the worst. But if you're still giving Moore the benefit of a doubt-- hell just looking at the "defense" of it presented by his camp should be a red flag-- and I am wondering what could possibly convince you on any sort of accusation. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:892055401] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>I mean I'm usually with him on waiting and seeing-- hell I even still give Trump the benefit of a doubt because I think the cases made against him had a lot of holes and people were just assuming the worst. But if you're still giving Moore the benefit of a doubt-- hell just looking at the "defense" of it presented by his camp should be a red flag-- and I am wondering what could possibly convince you on any sort of accusation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:54:07 AM #136:	I mean a lot of the defense is basically "well, if he did do it, it's ok because x" which an awful defense for molesting underage girls. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892055473] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>I mean a lot of the defense is basically "well, if he did do it, it's ok because x" which an awful defense for molesting underage girls.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 1:54:50 AM #137:	Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder What does New York Times on the 9th of December have to do with what CNN had on air on December 11th? Did you even read the article? CNN wrote their piece about it right after NYT first broke the news. When I posted this: https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/76047415/891913165 On the 9th, it was a response to the CNN article about it When you said ran a huge piece I assumed you meant in print. --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892055502] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder</quote> What does New York Times on the 9th of December have to do with what CNN had on air on December 11th? Did you even read the article?</quote> CNN wrote their piece about it right after NYT first broke the news. When I posted this: https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/76047415/891913165 On the 9th, it was a response to the CNN article about it When you said ran a huge piece I assumed you meant in print.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:56:22 AM #138:	THEDavyJones posted... Corrik posted... I mean, he very well could be. If so, he deserves to be ridiculed, scorned, and disavowed. But, he also could not be. The fact you are jumping to that conclusion is pretty telling. You want that to be the truth to support the result you want. He's openly admitted to dating girls on a couple of years older in his 30's, had to reach a settlement with a mall he was stalking, and has another woman who came out that he attempted to assault her. Most of their stories are corroborated by others, too. There's enough evidence to support he's scummy as hell. 1. True by all sides and accounts. 2. I do not think that is true. I believe that he was rumored to have been banned from a mall but there is no evidence to support that beyond rumors. Snopes does not have an answer to the veracity of it. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall 3. True. A woman has come out to say that and her allegation is at odds with ever single other story that has come out. She is the only one who has alleged an assault. Her story is debated in truth because it purportedly has holes in it and the evidence has allegedly been tampered with. The truth is, we may never know the truth of what happened. And, maybe the person is guilty or not. But jumping to label someone a pedophile is ludicrous. That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Especially when they are not even alleged to be one. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055546] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>THEDavyJones posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>I mean, he very well could be. If so, he deserves to be ridiculed, scorned, and disavowed. But, he also could not be. The fact you are jumping to that conclusion is pretty telling. You want that to be the truth to support the result you want.</quote> He's openly admitted to dating girls on a couple of years older in his 30's, had to reach a settlement with a mall he was stalking, and has another woman who came out that he attempted to assault her. Most of their stories are corroborated by others, too. There's enough evidence to support he's scummy as hell.</quote> 1. True by all sides and accounts. 2. I do not think that is true. I believe that he was rumored to have been banned from a mall but there is no evidence to support that beyond rumors. Snopes does not have an answer to the veracity of it. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall 3. True. A woman has come out to say that and her allegation is at odds with ever single other story that has come out. She is the only one who has alleged an assault. Her story is debated in truth because it purportedly has holes in it and the evidence has allegedly been tampered with. The truth is, we may never know the truth of what happened. And, maybe the person is guilty or not. But jumping to label someone a pedophile is ludicrous. That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Especially when they are not even alleged to be one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 1:58:23 AM #139:	Corrik posted... That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892055611] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. </quote> Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 1:58:29 AM #140:	Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder What does New York Times on the 9th of December have to do with what CNN had on air on December 11th? Did you even read the article? CNN wrote their piece about it right after NYT first broke the news. When I posted this: https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/76047415/891913165 On the 9th, it was a response to the CNN article about it When you said ran a huge piece I assumed you meant in print. ... Why would someone care what was written about and published during an event. It just gets relegated to a backpage if no longer a major story at the time? --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055615] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote> I mean CNN just ran a huge piece on how many diet Cokes or some s* that Trump consumes a day when they could have been reporting more on the failed terrorist attack today. </quote> This would be pretty hard considering the Diet Coke piece was published a day before the attempted terrorist attack happened</quote> http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/12/11/cnn-mocked-for-airing-segment-on-trumps-soda-consumption-while-nyc-faced-terror-attack.html Maybe so. Maybe not.</quote> https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html The 9th of December Please try harder</quote> What does New York Times on the 9th of December have to do with what CNN had on air on December 11th? Did you even read the article?</quote> CNN wrote their piece about it right after NYT first broke the news. When I posted this: https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/76047415/891913165 On the 9th, it was a response to the CNN article about it When you said ran a huge piece I assumed you meant in print.</quote> ... Why would someone care what was written about and published during an event. It just gets relegated to a backpage if no longer a major story at the time?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 2:00:04 AM #141:	THEDavyJones posted... Corrik posted... That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass. It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055662] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>THEDavyJones posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. </quote> Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass.</quote> It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 12/12/17 2:01:09 AM #142:	Not serious enough, apparently --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:892055690] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>Not serious enough, apparently</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 2:02:31 AM #143:	Lopen posted... I mean I'm usually with him on waiting and seeing-- hell I even still give Trump the benefit of a doubt because I think the cases made against him had a lot of holes and people were just assuming the worst. But if you're still giving Moore the benefit of a doubt-- hell just looking at the "defense" of it presented by his camp should be a red flag-- and I am wondering what could possibly convince you on any sort of accusation. I think a lot of the defense of his actions has been for dating 16 and 17 year olds which is legal there. The 14 year old and the 16 year old assault allegations have been denied pretty vehemently by Moore to my knowledge. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055742] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Lopen posted...</cite> <quote>I mean I'm usually with him on waiting and seeing-- hell I even still give Trump the benefit of a doubt because I think the cases made against him had a lot of holes and people were just assuming the worst. But if you're still giving Moore the benefit of a doubt-- hell just looking at the "defense" of it presented by his camp should be a red flag-- and I am wondering what could possibly convince you on any sort of accusation.</quote> I think a lot of the defense of his actions has been for dating 16 and 17 year olds which is legal there. The 14 year old and the 16 year old assault allegations have been denied pretty vehemently by Moore to my knowledge.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 2:03:18 AM #144:	Corrik posted... THEDavyJones posted... Corrik posted... That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass. It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something. Maybe he shouldnt have dated teenage girls then. Even the ones that are legal are still a scandal to many people I know youve called that idea dumb before but its reality --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892055768] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>THEDavyJones posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. </quote> Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass.</quote> It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something.</quote> Maybe he shouldnt have dated teenage girls then. Even the ones that are legal are still a scandal to many people I know youve called that idea dumb before but its reality</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 2:04:58 AM #145:	And really lets not let all his bigotry slide under the rug because of this scandal either --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892055816] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>And really lets not let all his bigotry slide under the rug because of this scandal either</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEDavyJones 12/12/17 2:05:18 AM #146:	Corrik posted... THEDavyJones posted... Corrik posted... That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass. It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something. He shouldn't have a Senate seat for multiple reasons. Dude wants religious tests to serve in congress, thinks America's greatest years were during slavery, wants to get rid of all the amendments beyond the 10th, and wants homosexuality to be illegal. Complaining about him being called a child diddler is just one of the many things that should disqualify him from office, so knock off the woe is him nonsense. --- TheRock ~ This rage is not your destiny, it's holding you down. <cite>THEDavyJones posted [p:892055834] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>THEDavyJones posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. </quote> Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass.</quote> It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something.</quote> He shouldn't have a Senate seat for multiple reasons. Dude wants religious tests to serve in congress, thinks America's greatest years were during slavery, wants to get rid of all the amendments beyond the 10th, and wants homosexuality to be illegal. Complaining about him being called a child diddler is just one of the many things that should disqualify him from office, so knock off the woe is him nonsense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Corrik 12/12/17 2:07:15 AM #147:	Jakyl25 posted... Corrik posted... THEDavyJones posted... Corrik posted... That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass. It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something. Maybe he shouldnt have dated teenage girls then. Even the ones that are legal are still a scandal to many people I know youve called that idea dumb before but its reality Well, something being a scandal which is explicitly legal there seems silly to me. It would be like being mad if a billionaire used legal loopholes to pay as little as in taxes as possible and ultimately less than a lesser class. Oh wait... The target of your morality arguments should be at the law if you feel it is wrong. Not at a person who followed the law. If he did nothing besides follow the law, then what did he do wrong. That's why the only two allegations that even matter at all to me are the 16 year old assault allegation and the 14 year old dating allegation. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:892055888] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote><cite>THEDavyJones posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Corrik posted...</cite> <quote>That is a very serious label with very serious implications and consequences. </quote> Is it? Last I checked dude is likely to become a sitting US Senator. Consequences my ass.</quote> It potentially could cost him a Senate seat he would have won in a landslide despite not being found guilty of any crime. That is a pretty serious consequence for something.</quote> Maybe he shouldnt have dated teenage girls then. Even the ones that are legal are still a scandal to many people I know youve called that idea dumb before but its reality</quote> Well, something being a scandal which is explicitly legal there seems silly to me. It would be like being mad if a billionaire used legal loopholes to pay as little as in taxes as possible and ultimately less than a lesser class. Oh wait... The target of your morality arguments should be at the law if you feel it is wrong. Not at a person who followed the law. If he did nothing besides follow the law, then what did he do wrong. That's why the only two allegations that even matter at all to me are the 16 year old assault allegation and the 14 year old dating allegation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LordoftheMorons 12/12/17 2:08:49 AM #148:	Jakyl25 posted... And really lets not let all his bigotry slide under the rug because of this scandal either Not to mention being twice impeached --- Congrats to BKSheikah for winning the BYIG Guru Challenge! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:892055946] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>And really lets not let all his bigotry slide under the rug because of this scandal either</quote> Not to mention being twice impeached</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jakyl25 12/12/17 2:10:23 AM #149:	CNN did nothing illegal by airing the Diet Coke segment, yet you seem to have no issue judging that as immoral --- Thank you, Eddie Guerrero. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large <cite>Jakyl25 posted [p:892056005] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>CNN did nothing illegal by airing the Diet Coke segment, yet you seem to have no issue judging that as immoral</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lopen 12/12/17 2:10:30 AM #150:	There are a lot of things that are technically allowed by the law that you probably shouldn't consider moral, quite frankly. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:892056009] in Politics C... [t:76086854]...</cite> <quote>There are a lot of things that are technically allowed by the law that you probably shouldn't consider moral, quite frankly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 10

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 154: A Very Special Election (+) Yeah! (+)

Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 154: A Very Special Election