Poll of the Day > KKK Leader turned PRIEST asks a Black Couple for FORGIVENESS..but they REFUSED!

(+) Yeah! (+)

Mead posted...

Hes incorrect(redundant) in acting like it is only an act of vandalism

The fact that he cant wrap his head about how threatened and shaken a family would feel about an organization essentially declaring that they wanted them dead in such a racially turbulent time would be astonishing if we were talking about any other user

You're incorrect in somehow believing vandalism can't constitute a threat or, technically speaking, a hate crime. You're also incorrect in believing that vandalism is worse than physical injury or destruction of actual property. Granted, you'll never know how wrong you are, mostly because you have me blocked.

Frankly, there have been at least three people on this board who have threatened death upon me in some form (Arctic, Evray, and Kana) and I've forgiven all of them. Hell, it didn't even take 40 days let alone 40 years to get over it.
---

Classic Zeus. Coming in days after the last post in a topic, hoping everyone has forgotten about it so he can post the same incorrect bullshit hes been spewing the entire time in an effort to get in the last word so he can feel like he won the argument.

For someone who harps on gimmicks so much, this has become quite the gimmick of your own.
---

Far-Queue posted...

Classic Zeus. Coming in days after the last post in a topic, hoping everyone has forgotten about it so he can post the same incorrect bullshit hes been spewing the entire time in an effort to get in the last word so he can feel like he won the argument.

Topic was at the bottom of my alerts and I've gradually worked my way down my alerts the past few days. And, while there was a lull in the conversation, I'm more than happy to continue it. More importantly, what exactly do I "win" if people aren't involved at all? And what do I "win" at all?

Any rational person knows that I'm right. I may not be able to win over zealots, but it's important that they at least hear reason before they reject it. I understand that, for many of you, I'm the *only* person who might voice a dissenting opinion to things you automatically accept as absolute, gospel truth and, to a large extent, I partly stop PotD from becoming even more of an echo chamber.

Far-Queue posted...

For someone who harps on gimmicks so much, this has become quite the gimmick of your own.

And for somebody who wants to be taken seriously you certainly try to write off normal things as gimmicks pretty often.
---

Zeus posted...

Any rational person knows that I'm right. I may not be able to win over zealots, but it's important that they at least hear reason before they reject it. I understand that, for many of you, I'm the *only* person who might voice a dissenting opinion to things you automatically accept as absolute, gospel truth and, to a large extent, I partly stop PotD from becoming even more of an echo chamber.

okay maybe im starting to see the charm of the newest over the top iteration of zues
---