Current Events > Supreme Court allows full enforcement of Trump travel ban

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
ThePrinceFish 12/04/17 4:27:58 PM #1:	https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-allows-full-enforcement-of-trump-travel-ban/ WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to fully enforce a ban on travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries. The justices say in an order Monday that the policy can take full effect even as legal challenges against it make their way through the courts. The ban applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. Lower courts had said people from those nations with a claim of a "bona fide" relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country. Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have left the lower court orders in place. It's almost like the President of the United States is well within his rights. --- Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that." <cite>ThePrinceFish posted [p:891585277] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-allows-full-enforcement-of-trump-travel-ban/ <quote>WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to fully enforce a ban on travel to the United States by residents of six mostly Muslim countries. The justices say in an order Monday that the policy can take full effect even as legal challenges against it make their way through the courts. The ban applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. Lower courts had said people from those nations with a claim of a "bona fide" relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country. Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have left the lower court orders in place.</quote> It's almost like the President of the United States is well within his rights.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
John_Galt 12/04/17 4:28:47 PM #2:	#winning --- Who is John Galt? <cite>John_Galt posted [p:891585334] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>#winning</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 12/04/17 4:29:25 PM #3:	Great news. --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:891585369] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Great news.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Going_Deep_08 12/04/17 4:29:47 PM #4:	Also North Korea...who has nukes and ICBMs...which is serious. --- DO NOT DEFY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://i.imgur.com/LokFB.jpg <cite>Going_Deep_08 posted [p:891585398] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Also North Korea...who has nukes and ICBMs...which is serious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 12/04/17 4:30:23 PM #5:	When has anything the SC said ever been enforced? --- I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics. http://i.imgtc.com/tHc3mIo.png http://i.imgtc.com/PYxw8Lm.png <cite>Irony posted [p:891585445] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>When has anything the SC said ever been enforced?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 12/04/17 4:30:40 PM #6:	yay for xenophobia! --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:891585459] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>yay for xenophobia!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Giant_Aspirin 12/04/17 4:30:41 PM #7:	Repulsive. --- Now Playing: South Park: FbW (PC), Cuphead (PC) *(~);} - Get out the pans, don't just stand there dreamin' - {;(~)* <cite>Giant_Aspirin posted [p:891585462] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Repulsive.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 12/04/17 4:31:08 PM #8:	ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:891585494] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sir Will 12/04/17 4:32:05 PM #9:	Guess they're consistent. Islamaphobia ok, homophopbia ok. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-04/houston-rebuffed-by-supreme-court-on-same-sex-benefits-policy --- River Song: Well, I was off to this gay gypsy bar mitzvah for the disabled when I thought 'Gosh, the Third Reich's a bit rubbish, I think i'll kill the Fuhrer' <cite>Sir Will posted [p:891585551] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Guess they're consistent. Islamaphobia ok, homophopbia ok. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-04/houston-rebuffed-by-supreme-court-on-same-sex-benefits-policy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HiddenRoar 12/04/17 4:35:18 PM #10:	Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. That's more of an issue with CBS, ABC, etc. than with TC, since it's just copy and pasting. I mean, unless you're going to contact those news orgs. that put it out like that, it seems moot to blame TC. <cite>HiddenRoar posted [p:891585758] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> That's more of an issue with CBS, ABC, etc. than with TC, since it's just copy and pasting. I mean, unless you're going to contact those news orgs. that put it out like that, it seems moot to blame TC.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
cerealbox760 12/04/17 4:37:52 PM #11:	Less religion=winning. --- Clevo P775 QHD 120hz / i7 7700k 4.5GHZ / GTX 1070 8GB / DDR4 16GB/ 256gb m.2 SSD /Magni-Modi DAC_AMP combo/ ie800. Laptop on the outside. Desktop on the inside. <cite>cerealbox760 posted [p:891585915] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Less religion=winning.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Waluigi7 12/04/17 4:38:07 PM #12:	Why those six countries? --- Gonna go out on a limb and guess that you are a trump supporter -UnfairRepresent <cite>Waluigi7 posted [p:891585937] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Why those six countries?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThePrinceFish 12/04/17 4:38:35 PM #13:	Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists. --- Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that." <cite>ThePrinceFish posted [p:891585964] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 12/04/17 4:39:05 PM #14:	HiddenRoar posted... Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. That's more of an issue with CBS, ABC, etc. than with TC, since it's just copy and pasting. I mean, unless you're going to contact those news orgs. that put it out like that, it seems moot to blame TC. A little critical thinking from anyone(news orgs/TC) isn't too much to ask. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:891585985] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>HiddenRoar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> That's more of an issue with CBS, ABC, etc. than with TC, since it's just copy and pasting. I mean, unless you're going to contact those news orgs. that put it out like that, it seems moot to blame TC.</quote> A little critical thinking from anyone(news orgs/TC) isn't too much to ask.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 12/04/17 4:41:02 PM #15:	Waluigi7 posted... Why those six countries? becuz mooselimbs --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:891586102] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Waluigi7 posted...</cite> <quote>Why those six countries?</quote> becuz mooselimbs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 12/04/17 4:41:07 PM #16:	Waluigi7 posted... Why those six countries? Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. EDIT: That is why the Obama administration selected those 6 countries originally. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:891586106] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Waluigi7 posted...</cite> <quote>Why those six countries?</quote> Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. EDIT: That is why the Obama administration selected those 6 countries originally.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 12/04/17 4:41:27 PM #17:	ThePrinceFish posted... Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists. Oh, so that was struck down? You chose a weird portion to quote. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:891586126] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists.</quote> Oh, so that was struck down? You chose a weird portion to quote.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThePrinceFish 12/04/17 4:44:03 PM #18:	Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists. Oh, so that was struck down? You chose a weird portion to quote. I quoted the entirety of what was in the breaking article when I accessed it. It's not my fault you read the challenges from the lower courts after being told that the challenges will not apply and fail to square that away in your head. Maybe some critical thinking? --- Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that." <cite>ThePrinceFish posted [p:891586281] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists.</quote> Oh, so that was struck down? You chose a weird portion to quote.</quote> I quoted the entirety of what was in the breaking article when I accessed it. It's not my fault you read the challenges from the lower courts after being told that the challenges will not apply and fail to square that away in your head. Maybe some critical thinking?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 12/04/17 5:04:24 PM #19:	ThePrinceFish posted... Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Webmaster4531 posted... ThePrinceFish posted... Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded. That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong. If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists. Oh, so that was struck down? You chose a weird portion to quote. I quoted the entirety of what was in the breaking article when I accessed it. It's not my fault you read the challenges from the lower courts after being told that the challenges will not apply and fail to square that away in your head. Maybe some critical thinking? Got em. --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:891587439] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote>Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those courts said could not be excluded.</quote> That's different from the original, if I remember correctly, making your title wrong.</quote> If Ginsburg and Sotomayor got their way, you would be correct. Luckily they are just two ultra liberal obstructionists.</quote> Oh, so that was struck down? You chose a weird portion to quote.</quote> I quoted the entirety of what was in the breaking article when I accessed it. It's not my fault you read the challenges from the lower courts after being told that the challenges will not apply and fail to square that away in your head. Maybe some critical thinking?</quote> Got em.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 12/04/17 5:07:11 PM #20:	mario2000 posted... Waluigi7 posted... Why those six countries? becuz mooselimbs You realize you're making fun of how many Muslims pronounce their own religion, right? Very intolerant --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:891587610] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Waluigi7 posted...</cite> <quote>Why those six countries?</quote> becuz mooselimbs</quote> You realize you're making fun of how many Muslims pronounce their own religion, right? Very intolerant</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DifferentialEquation 12/04/17 5:07:52 PM #21:	Capn Circus posted... Great news. --- There's no business to be taxed. <cite>DifferentialEquation posted [p:891587654] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>Great news.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
P4wn4g3 12/04/17 5:10:59 PM #22:	Are you trying to say that a republican hijacked supreme Court would support the Republican ideals of racism and xenophobia? Oh my. The surprise I am feeling right now. --- Hive Mind of Dark Aether, the unofficial Metroid Social Private board. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/851-dark-aether <cite>P4wn4g3 posted [p:891587854] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Are you trying to say that a republican hijacked supreme Court would support the Republican ideals of racism and xenophobia? Oh my. The surprise I am feeling right now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Letron_James 12/04/17 5:12:25 PM #23:	Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea --- Ask me if I would eat da booty. <cite>Letron_James posted [p:891587943] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
_RETS_ 12/04/17 5:13:35 PM #24:	Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Please explain how this is a step in that direction. <cite>_RETS_ posted [p:891588007] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Please explain how this is a step in that direction.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhlavicLanguage 12/04/17 5:14:12 PM #25:	s0nicfan posted... Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. as far as iran goes you're literally clueless <cite>KhlavicLanguage posted [p:891588040] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. </quote> as far as iran goes you're literally clueless</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThePrinceFish 12/04/17 5:15:03 PM #26:	P4wn4g3 posted... Are you trying to say that a republican hijacked supreme Court would support the Republican ideals of racism and xenophobia? Oh my. The surprise I am feeling right now. Odd that Kagan and Breyer didn't stand with Sotomayor and Ginsburg if this is what you're going with. --- Dielman on Rivers: "I've tried to get him to say s--- or f--- and all he'll ever do is say, 'Golly gee, I can't do that." <cite>ThePrinceFish posted [p:891588092] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>P4wn4g3 posted...</cite> <quote>Are you trying to say that a republican hijacked supreme Court would support the Republican ideals of racism and xenophobia? Oh my. The surprise I am feeling right now.</quote> Odd that Kagan and Breyer didn't stand with Sotomayor and Ginsburg if this is what you're going with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/04/17 5:16:14 PM #27:	KhlavicLanguage posted... s0nicfan posted... Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. as far as iran goes you're literally clueless Iran is a dictatorship --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:891588168] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>KhlavicLanguage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. </quote> as far as iran goes you're literally clueless</quote> Iran is a dictatorship</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
P4wn4g3 12/04/17 5:19:14 PM #28:	ThePrinceFish posted... P4wn4g3 posted... Are you trying to say that a republican hijacked supreme Court would support the Republican ideals of racism and xenophobia? Oh my. The surprise I am feeling right now. Odd that Kagan and Breyer didn't stand with Sotomayor and Ginsburg if this is what you're going with. I mean, they have to save face where they can you know. --- Hive Mind of Dark Aether, the unofficial Metroid Social Private board. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/851-dark-aether <cite>P4wn4g3 posted [p:891588356] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote><cite>P4wn4g3 posted...</cite> <quote>Are you trying to say that a republican hijacked supreme Court would support the Republican ideals of racism and xenophobia? Oh my. The surprise I am feeling right now.</quote> Odd that Kagan and Breyer didn't stand with Sotomayor and Ginsburg if this is what you're going with.</quote> I mean, they have to save face where they can you know.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Re-iNcarnated 12/04/17 5:20:56 PM #29:	The ban applies to travelers from Chad Trump confirmed afraid of Chad. <cite>Re-iNcarnated posted [p:891588447] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><quote>The ban applies to travelers from Chad</quote> Trump confirmed afraid of Chad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 12/04/17 5:22:10 PM #30:	Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:891588521] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ChainedRedone 12/04/17 5:22:44 PM #31:	Tropicalwood posted... KhlavicLanguage posted... s0nicfan posted... Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. as far as iran goes you're literally clueless Iran is a dictatorship L-o-l So that makes it justifiable? Do you know how many dictatorships aren't banned, ya ignant? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.3 <cite>ChainedRedone posted [p:891588568] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KhlavicLanguage posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote> Because they have no functional central government with which the US can verify and vet potential refugees. Those countries are such pits of lawlessness that it's effectively impossible to prove that someone claiming to be from there is, in fact, from there. </quote> as far as iran goes you're literally clueless</quote> Iran is a dictatorship</quote> L-o-l So that makes it justifiable? Do you know how many dictatorships aren't banned, ya ignant?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 12/04/17 5:22:50 PM #32:	I'll take this ban seriously as soon as Saudi Arabia becomes a part of it. I guess Syria and Chad just need to become valuable to us and they'll find their way off the list. This is just half-assed virtue signaling trying to score brownie points with some of our worst and dullest. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:891588578] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>I'll take this ban seriously as soon as Saudi Arabia becomes a part of it. I guess Syria and Chad just need to become valuable to us and they'll find their way off the list. This is just half-assed virtue signaling trying to score brownie points with some of our worst and dullest.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tropicalwood 12/04/17 5:25:43 PM #33:	ChainedRedone posted... L-o-l So that makes it justifiable? Do you know how many dictatorships aren't banned, ya ignant? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis Let's not forget that North Korea was banned by Trump. But please, continue defending Iran, it really helps your cause. --- ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya ayy lmao ayy lmao \|\| oaml oaml yya yya <cite>Tropicalwood posted [p:891588775] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote>L-o-l So that makes it justifiable? Do you know how many dictatorships aren't banned, ya ignant?</quote> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis Let's not forget that North Korea was banned by Trump. But please, continue defending Iran, it really helps your cause.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KhlavicLanguage 12/04/17 5:29:09 PM #34:	Tropicalwood posted... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks Yet no Saudi ban. <cite>KhlavicLanguage posted [p:891588970] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tropicalwood posted...</cite> <quote>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis </quote> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks Yet no Saudi ban.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 12/04/17 5:34:26 PM #35:	Capn Circus posted... Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:891589312] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics</quote> http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 12/04/17 5:42:19 PM #36:	mario2000 posted... Capn Circus posted... Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:891589731] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics</quote> http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html</quote> Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 12/05/17 11:30:38 AM #37:	Capn Circus posted... mario2000 posted... Capn Circus posted... Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking Point out specifically what you disagree with. --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:891631865] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics</quote> http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html</quote> Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking</quote> Point out specifically what you disagree with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#38	Post #38 was unavailable or deleted.
_Near_ 12/05/17 11:38:37 AM #39:	Asherlee10 posted... I saw on Reddit that this isn't the actual SCOTUS ruling, but a temporary "okay" while the travel ban is in litigation (or is it junction?). You are correct. The Supreme Court lifted an injunction, it didn't rule on the constitutionality of the case per se. Injunctions have an extremely high burden of proof (with the notion that irreparable damage will be done if the law isn't stopped prematurely). Honestly, the fact that the original travel ban was struck down this way is a testament to how shitty it was. Most requests for injunctions don't succeed. So, the travel ban isn't out of the woods yet. The legal challenges will make their way through the proper channels and the constitutionality of the travel ban will be litigated in full. --- https://i.imgur.com/WyFIJkF.gif This is America, where a lying, cheating degenerate can prosper. <cite>_Near_ posted [p:891632284] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>I saw on Reddit that this isn't the actual SCOTUS ruling, but a temporary "okay" while the travel ban is in litigation (or is it junction?).</quote> You are correct. The Supreme Court lifted an injunction, it didn't rule on the constitutionality of the case per se. Injunctions have an extremely high burden of proof (with the notion that irreparable damage will be done if the law isn't stopped prematurely). Honestly, the fact that the original travel ban was struck down this way is a testament to how shitty it was. Most requests for injunctions don't succeed. So, the travel ban isn't out of the woods yet. The legal challenges will make their way through the proper channels and the constitutionality of the travel ban will be litigated in full.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#40	Post #40 was unavailable or deleted.
Bloodychess 12/05/17 11:44:37 AM #41:	Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have left the lower court orders in place. A 7-2 decision is pretty convincing. I'd love to see a summary of the dissenting side's judgment. --- Sweet dreams are made of cheese Who am I to diss a brie? <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:891632618] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><quote>Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have left the lower court orders in place.</quote> A 7-2 decision is pretty convincing. I'd love to see a summary of the dissenting side's judgment.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 12/05/17 11:46:26 AM #42:	mario2000 posted... Capn Circus posted... mario2000 posted... Capn Circus posted... Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking Point out specifically what you disagree with. Why not start with the part where the article calls it Trump's "Muslim Ban"? --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:891632710] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics</quote> http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html</quote> Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking</quote> Point out specifically what you disagree with.</quote> Why not start with the part where the article calls it Trump's "Muslim Ban"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OpheliaAdenade 12/05/17 11:51:36 AM #43:	the travel ban is probably for the best all things considered. :v it just peeves me that Trump intentionally left his business partner's countries off the list despite them being just as risky. --- http://imgur.com/Q6Qj55q <cite>OpheliaAdenade posted [p:891632950] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>the travel ban is probably for the best all things considered. :v it just peeves me that Trump intentionally left his business partner's countries off the list despite them being just as risky.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 12/05/17 11:59:49 AM #44:	s0nicfan posted... mario2000 posted... Capn Circus posted... mario2000 posted... Capn Circus posted... Letron_James posted... Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking Point out specifically what you disagree with. Why not start with the part where the article calls it Trump's "Muslim Ban"? What is incorrect about that statement? --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:891633365] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Letron_James posted...</cite> <quote>Nice One step closer to having a full blown Fascist government, maybe one Trump cans Mueller and beheads him in Public we can go full blown North Korea</quote> Its in the constitution that presidents can decide who comes in. No need for theatrics</quote> http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/here_are_all_the_parts_of_the_constitution_trump_s_muslim_ban_violates.html</quote> Lol, you want me to believe Slate over the Supreme Court? You've got to be joking</quote> Point out specifically what you disagree with.</quote> Why not start with the part where the article calls it Trump's "Muslim Ban"?</quote> What is incorrect about that statement?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 12/05/17 12:14:16 PM #45:	OpheliaAdenade posted... the travel ban is probably for the best all things considered. :v it just peeves me that Trump intentionally left his business partner's countries off the list despite them being just as risky. He didn't leave them out. The countries on the ban were all listed by the Obama administration as being especially prone to produce terrorists. Ain't Trump's fault the countries with his property weren't included in Obama's list --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:891634090] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>OpheliaAdenade posted...</cite> <quote>the travel ban is probably for the best all things considered. :v it just peeves me that Trump intentionally left his business partner's countries off the list despite them being just as risky.</quote> He didn't leave them out. The countries on the ban were all listed by the Obama administration as being especially prone to produce terrorists. Ain't Trump's fault the countries with his property weren't included in Obama's list</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OpheliaAdenade 12/05/17 12:24:24 PM #46:	Mal_Fet posted... OpheliaAdenade posted... the travel ban is probably for the best all things considered. :v it just peeves me that Trump intentionally left his business partner's countries off the list despite them being just as risky. He didn't leave them out. The countries on the ban were all listed by the Obama administration as being especially prone to produce terrorists. Ain't Trump's fault the countries with his property weren't included in Obama's list why didn't he revise the list instead of just copying Obama's homework? :u --- http://imgur.com/Q6Qj55q <cite>OpheliaAdenade posted [p:891634616] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>OpheliaAdenade posted...</cite> <quote>the travel ban is probably for the best all things considered. :v it just peeves me that Trump intentionally left his business partner's countries off the list despite them being just as risky.</quote> He didn't leave them out. The countries on the ban were all listed by the Obama administration as being especially prone to produce terrorists. Ain't Trump's fault the countries with his property weren't included in Obama's list</quote> why didn't he revise the list instead of just copying Obama's homework? :u</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
marc55 12/05/17 12:24:55 PM #47:	is this the ban that prevented a woman from traveling to the US to save her sister s life with a transplant ? she was a 100% match maybe this was solved by now it was a long time ago --- There is no sound, no voice, no cry in all the world that can be heard... until someone listens. <cite>marc55 posted [p:891634637] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>is this the ban that prevented a woman from traveling to the US to save her sister s life with a transplant ? she was a 100% match maybe this was solved by now it was a long time ago</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 12/05/17 12:46:42 PM #48:	mario2000 posted... What is incorrect about that statement? The part where it includes non-muslims. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:891635794] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>What is incorrect about that statement?</quote> The part where it includes non-muslims.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 12/05/17 12:58:23 PM #49:	s0nicfan posted... mario2000 posted... What is incorrect about that statement? The part where it includes non-muslims. What does that have to do with the travel ban's intent? --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:891636438] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>What is incorrect about that statement?</quote> The part where it includes non-muslims.</quote> What does that have to do with the travel ban's intent?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NINExATExSEVEN 12/05/17 1:02:26 PM #50:	Sweeeeeet! Good on him. --- Listen to my story... This... May be our last chance... <cite>NINExATExSEVEN posted [p:891636678] in Supreme Co... [t:76061898]...</cite> <quote>Sweeeeeet! Good on him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > Supreme Court allows full enforcement of Trump travel ban (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Supreme Court allows full enforcement of Trump travel ban