Current Events > rewatching the office, the last couple seasons are a real train wreck spoilers

Topic List	Page List: 1
Balrog0 11/29/17 4:49:54 PM #1:	they never offer an explanation for how phillip is dwight's son despite the paternity test saying otherwise -- the only fan theory I've seen is that dwight accidentally took another baby's diaper (like jim and pam's) instead of phillip's but that makes basically no sense at all lots of time spent on dwights unentertaining family since they were attempting to create a spinoff michael scott in the finale is pointless -- he could have been greenscreened in and had the same impact still a good show though --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891286692] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>they never offer an explanation for how phillip is dwight's son despite the paternity test saying otherwise -- the only fan theory I've seen is that dwight accidentally took another baby's diaper (like jim and pam's) instead of phillip's but that makes basically no sense at all lots of time spent on dwights unentertaining family since they were attempting to create a spinoff michael scott in the finale is pointless -- he could have been greenscreened in and had the same impact still a good show though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 4:58:53 PM #2:	you ce plebs probably never even watched the office honestly I didnt either until the last season was airing so i get it --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891287269] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>you ce plebs probably never even watched the office honestly I didnt either until the last season was airing so i get it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Callixtus 11/29/17 5:00:41 PM #3:	The final season wasn't great but it slightly redeemed the show after the disasters tjat preceded it --- It will be more bearable for Tyre and Sidon on the day of judgment than for you. \| I did not come to bring peace to the earth, but the sword. -Jesus <cite>Callixtus posted [p:891287397] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>The final season wasn't great but it slightly redeemed the show after the disasters tjat preceded it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/29/17 5:01:18 PM #4:	Balrog0 posted... the only fan theory I've seen is that dwight accidentally took another baby's diaper (like jim and pam's) instead of phillip's but that makes basically no sense at all Why doesn't that make sense? --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:891287440] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> the only fan theory I've seen is that dwight accidentally took another baby's diaper (like jim and pam's) instead of phillip's but that makes basically no sense at all</quote> Why doesn't that make sense?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Veggeta X 11/29/17 5:05:23 PM #5:	The only thing good about the show was the outrageous awkward shit they did. When they tried to be serious the show got fucking stupid. The show literally tried to tell the audience it's cool to steal an engaged woman. --- Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple Capcom Defense Force <cite>Veggeta X posted [p:891287681] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>The only thing good about the show was the outrageous awkward shit they did. When they tried to be serious the show got fucking stupid. The show literally tried to tell the audience it's cool to steal an engaged woman.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/29/17 5:08:03 PM #6:	Veggeta X posted... The only thing good about the show was the outrageous awkward shit they did. When they tried to be serious the show got fucking stupid. The show literally tried to tell the audience it's cool to steal an engaged woman. Please. The Office is nothing. Frasier had the audience rooting for ~~someone who left his wife of four days to get with a woman who left her fiancee at the altar.~~ --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:891287837] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Veggeta X posted...</cite> <quote>The only thing good about the show was the outrageous awkward shit they did. When they tried to be serious the show got fucking stupid. The show literally tried to tell the audience it's cool to steal an engaged woman.</quote> Please. The Office is nothing. Frasier had the audience rooting for someone who left his wife of four days to get with a woman who left her fiancee at the altar.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kirby 11/29/17 5:08:07 PM #7:	Its best to just stop watching when Steve Carrell leaves the show, and then start back up on Season 1. Rinse and repeat. --- Bender: You know, I was God once. God: Yes, I saw. You were doing well until everyone died. <cite>Kirby posted [p:891287846] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>Its best to just stop watching when Steve Carrell leaves the show, and then start back up on Season 1. Rinse and repeat.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:09:32 PM #8:	Callixtus posted... The final season wasn't great but it slightly redeemed the show after the disasters tjat preceded it I used to feel that way, too, but after several rewatches the fourth wall breaking stuff doesn't land as well as it did live (which already wasn't very well) pegusus123456 posted... Why doesn't that make sense? there isnt any evidence that they ever changed other phillips diapers at the office for one thing, especially not on that day where we see them arrive and leave with their kids --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891287946] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Callixtus posted...</cite> <quote>The final season wasn't great but it slightly redeemed the show after the disasters tjat preceded it</quote> I used to feel that way, too, but after several rewatches the fourth wall breaking stuff doesn't land as well as it did live (which already wasn't very well) <cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>Why doesn't that make sense? </quote> there isnt any evidence that they ever changed other phillips diapers at the office for one thing, especially not on that day where we see them arrive and leave with their kids</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:10:13 PM #9:	Kirby posted... Its best to just stop watching when Steve Carrell leaves the show, and then start back up on Season 1. Rinse and repeat. the downward trend starts before he leaves, though, and imo there are plenty of scenes that are worthwhile afterwards --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891287975] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kirby posted...</cite> <quote>Its best to just stop watching when Steve Carrell leaves the show, and then start back up on Season 1. Rinse and repeat.</quote> the downward trend starts before he leaves, though, and imo there are plenty of scenes that are worthwhile afterwards</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/29/17 5:11:20 PM #10:	Balrog0 posted... there isnt any evidence that they ever changed other phillips diapers at the office for one thing, especially not on that day where we see them arrive and leave with their kids You really think they didn't change a single diaper when they were at work with two kids for eight hours --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:891288040] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> there isnt any evidence that they ever changed other phillips diapers at the office for one thing, especially not on that day where we see them arrive and leave with their kids</quote> You really think they didn't change a single diaper when they were at work with two kids for eight hours</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:11:51 PM #11:	pegusus123456 posted... You really think they didn't change a single diaper when they were at work with two kids for eight hours there isnt any evidence they were there for 8 hours, pam was still on maternity leave adn you see here come in after everyone else is already at work... --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288078] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>You really think they didn't change a single diaper when they were at work with two kids for eight hours</quote> there isnt any evidence they were there for 8 hours, pam was still on maternity leave adn you see here come in after everyone else is already at work...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:14:04 PM #12:	by which I mean to say, not only does the show not show them being there all day, it strongly implies they are only there for the photo shoot --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288200] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>by which I mean to say, not only does the show not show them being there all day, it strongly implies they are only there for the photo shoot</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 11/29/17 5:18:30 PM #13:	Balrog0 posted... they never offer an explanation for how phillip is dwight's son despite the paternity test saying otherwise -- the only fan theory I've seen is that dwight accidentally took another baby's diaper (like jim and pam's) instead of phillip's but that makes basically no sense at all Then again, the fact that it was his baby fits in with the character behavior a lot better. There would be no reason for Angela to even care, not to mention stay with him waiting for the test results. It doesn't seem post hoc, but it seems like a plot point that they forgot to sort out. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:891288495] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>they never offer an explanation for how phillip is dwight's son despite the paternity test saying otherwise -- the only fan theory I've seen is that dwight accidentally took another baby's diaper (like jim and pam's) instead of phillip's but that makes basically no sense at all </quote> Then again, the fact that it was his baby fits in with the character behavior a lot better. There would be no reason for Angela to even care, not to mention stay with him waiting for the test results. It doesn't seem post hoc, but it seems like a plot point that they forgot to sort out.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Veggeta X 11/29/17 5:18:32 PM #14:	pegusus123456 posted... Veggeta X posted... The only thing good about the show was the outrageous awkward shit they did. When they tried to be serious the show got fucking stupid. The show literally tried to tell the audience it's cool to steal an engaged woman. Please. The Office is nothing. Frasier had the audience rooting for ~~someone who left his wife of four days to get with a woman who left her fiancee at the altar.~~ Why is it acceptable to tell an attached woman you're interested in her? Why is it completely acceptable and even encouraged in our Western world to tell a woman who has a boyfriend or a husband that you have feelings for her? Whenever I like a woman but realizes she has someone already then I completely close the door on trying to get with her unless or until she finds herself being single. I see this in movies, TV shows, IRL with friends and all over our current society. Why do it? Why attempt to home wreck? There's a very low chance she'll leave her dude for you. And even if she does some how leave her man for you, what makes you think she won't leave you for another person? Would you like it if someone tries to holler at your woman? --- Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple Capcom Defense Force <cite>Veggeta X posted [p:891288501] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Veggeta X posted...</cite> <quote>The only thing good about the show was the outrageous awkward shit they did. When they tried to be serious the show got fucking stupid. The show literally tried to tell the audience it's cool to steal an engaged woman.</quote> Please. The Office is nothing. Frasier had the audience rooting for someone who left his wife of four days to get with a woman who left her fiancee at the altar.</quote> Why is it acceptable to tell an attached woman you're interested in her? Why is it completely acceptable and even encouraged in our Western world to tell a woman who has a boyfriend or a husband that you have feelings for her? Whenever I like a woman but realizes she has someone already then I completely close the door on trying to get with her unless or until she finds herself being single. I see this in movies, TV shows, IRL with friends and all over our current society. Why do it? Why attempt to home wreck? There's a very low chance she'll leave her dude for you. And even if she does some how leave her man for you, what makes you think she won't leave you for another person? Would you like it if someone tries to holler at your woman?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 11/29/17 5:19:35 PM #15:	I stopped watching when Steve left and treated his last episode as the finale. Until of course the real finale happened since he came back. --- Oda break tracker 2017- 9 (3) \| THE Ohio State: 8-2 \| Oakland Raiders: 4-5 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:891288572] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>I stopped watching when Steve left and treated his last episode as the finale. Until of course the real finale happened since he came back.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:20:04 PM #16:	COVxy posted... Then again, the fact that it was his baby fits in with the character behavior a lot better. There would be no reason for Angela to even care, not to mention stay with him waiting for the test results. It doesn't seem post hoc, but it seems like a plot point that they forgot to sort out. I mean, they were sleeping together at the time and it seems plausible to think she would not want the Senator to know about that considering she wasn't aware of his homosexuality at that point --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288603] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>Then again, the fact that it was his baby fits in with the character behavior a lot better. There would be no reason for Angela to even care, not to mention stay with him waiting for the test results. It doesn't seem post hoc, but it seems like a plot point that they forgot to sort out.</quote> I mean, they were sleeping together at the time and it seems plausible to think she would not want the Senator to know about that considering she wasn't aware of his homosexuality at that point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/29/17 5:20:31 PM #17:	Balrog0 posted... pegusus123456 posted... You really think they didn't change a single diaper when they were at work with two kids for eight hours there isnt any evidence they were there for 8 hours, pam was still on maternity leave adn you see here come in after everyone else is already at work... Balrog0 posted... by which I mean to say, not only does the show not show them being there all day, it strongly implies they are only there for the photo shoot It's still way more believable that one of of the Halpert babies shit their britches rather than a paternity test being completely wrong. You're discounting a reasonable explanation solely because they didn't show Pam wiping a baby's ass. --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:891288625] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>You really think they didn't change a single diaper when they were at work with two kids for eight hours</quote> there isnt any evidence they were there for 8 hours, pam was still on maternity leave adn you see here come in after everyone else is already at work...</quote> <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>by which I mean to say, not only does the show not show them being there all day, it strongly implies they are only there for the photo shoot</quote> It's still way more believable that one of of the Halpert babies shit their britches rather than a paternity test being completely wrong. You're discounting a reasonable explanation solely because they didn't show Pam wiping a baby's ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:21:36 PM #18:	pegusus123456 posted... It's still way more believable that one of of the Halpert babies shit their britches rather than a paternity test being completely wrong. You're discounting a reasonable explanation solely because they didn't show Pam wiping a baby's ass. the most reasonable explanation would have been that the baby isn't dwights, that is my point --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288687] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>It's still way more believable that one of of the Halpert babies shit their britches rather than a paternity test being completely wrong. You're discounting a reasonable explanation solely because they didn't show Pam wiping a baby's ass.</quote> the most reasonable explanation would have been that the baby isn't dwights, that is my point</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:22:26 PM #19:	not for nothing but they do explicitly talk about phillip I shitting his pants and not phillip II so, you know, that part is kinda important too --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288729] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>not for nothing but they do explicitly talk about phillip I shitting his pants and not phillip II so, you know, that part is kinda important too</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/29/17 5:23:49 PM #20:	Balrog0 posted... the most reasonable explanation would have been that the baby isn't dwights, that is my point Except it is so the most reasonable explanation is that he grabbed the wrong diaper. --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:891288813] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote> the most reasonable explanation would have been that the baby isn't dwights, that is my point</quote> Except it is so the most reasonable explanation is that he grabbed the wrong diaper.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:24:30 PM #21:	pegusus123456 posted... Except it is so the most reasonable explanation is that he grabbed the wrong diaper. why not just assume someone else at dunder mifflin has a baby if you're just gonna make shit (get it?) up? --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288861] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>Except it is so the most reasonable explanation is that he grabbed the wrong diaper.</quote> why not just assume someone else at dunder mifflin has a baby if you're just gonna make shit (get it?) up?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 11/29/17 5:25:26 PM #22:	Balrog0 posted... I mean, they were sleeping together at the time and it seems plausible to think she would not want the Senator to know about that considering she wasn't aware of his homosexuality at that point How would the Senator find out in that scenario? Why would Dwight go around telling people if it weren't his baby? Idk, it just doesn't really make any sense unless Angela already knew that the baby was his, or strongly suspected. I feel like they just forgot to sort it out. Any number of explanations are reasonable, given the range of things possible in the world of The Office. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:891288913] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>I mean, they were sleeping together at the time and it seems plausible to think she would not want the Senator to know about that considering she wasn't aware of his homosexuality at that point </quote> How would the Senator find out in that scenario? Why would Dwight go around telling people if it weren't his baby? Idk, it just doesn't really make any sense unless Angela already knew that the baby was his, or strongly suspected. I feel like they just forgot to sort it out. Any number of explanations are reasonable, given the range of things possible in the world of The Office.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:25:38 PM #23:	or sure, the dna test was off because schrute dna has too much beat juice in it or whatever ltierally anything makes sense at that point! --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891288937] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>or sure, the dna test was off because schrute dna has too much beat juice in it or whatever ltierally anything makes sense at that point!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 11/29/17 5:26:19 PM #24:	Legally if the father gets a paternity test done by bringing in DNA the mother can tell the hospital to lie if it comes out positive and the hospital has to comply. That's likely the simplest explanation for the discrepancy: Angela told them to say it was false because she didn't consent to the test being done. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:891288968] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>Legally if the father gets a paternity test done by bringing in DNA the mother can tell the hospital to lie if it comes out positive and the hospital has to comply. That's likely the simplest explanation for the discrepancy: Angela told them to say it was false because she didn't consent to the test being done.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 11/29/17 5:26:30 PM #25:	Robert California is worse than trying to make the series about Andy which was already terrible <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:891288977] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>Robert California is worse than trying to make the series about Andy which was already terrible</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:27:17 PM #26:	COVxy posted... How would the Senator find out in that scenario? Why would Dwight go around telling people if it weren't his baby? how would angela know whose baby it was if she was sleeping with two men? COVxy posted... Idk, it just doesn't really make any sense unless Angela already knew that the baby was his, or strongly suspected. what if she didn't know whose baby it was but did suspect it was dwights? then doesnt it make perfect sense? COVxy posted... I feel like they just forgot to sort it out. Any number of explanations are reasonable, given the range of things possible in the world of The Office. I guess, I'm just saying you can pretend any number of things if you want. Why not just assume Angela lied in season 9, and the baby really is the Senator's? The onyl reason not to is that in the last episode or two they make the baby eat paper and look at dwights battlestar galactica ship so it has to be his right? --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891289029] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>How would the Senator find out in that scenario? Why would Dwight go around telling people if it weren't his baby? </quote> how would angela know whose baby it was if she was sleeping with two men? <cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote>Idk, it just doesn't really make any sense unless Angela already knew that the baby was his, or strongly suspected. </quote> what if she didn't know whose baby it was but did suspect it was dwights? then doesnt it make perfect sense? <cite>COVxy posted...</cite> <quote> I feel like they just forgot to sort it out. Any number of explanations are reasonable, given the range of things possible in the world of The Office.</quote> I guess, I'm just saying you can pretend any number of things if you want. Why not just assume Angela lied in season 9, and the baby really is the Senator's? The onyl reason not to is that in the last episode or two they make the baby eat paper and look at dwights battlestar galactica ship so it has to be his right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:28:19 PM #27:	s0nicfan posted... Legally if the father gets a paternity test done by bringing in DNA the mother can tell the hospital to lie if it comes out positive and the hospital has to comply. he did the test without her knowing where or how due to mose's deception and they contacted him, not her how would the hospital know? is angela's dna "in the system"? --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891289085] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>Legally if the father gets a paternity test done by bringing in DNA the mother can tell the hospital to lie if it comes out positive and the hospital has to comply. </quote> he did the test without her knowing where or how due to mose's deception and they contacted him, not her how would the hospital know? is angela's dna "in the system"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:31:38 PM #28:	CruelBuffalo posted... Robert California is worse than trying to make the series about Andy which was already terrible yeah, there is a reason he and Gabe werent in the final portrait even though the new guys are spoilers: the new guys are lame but not that lame --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891289269] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Robert California is worse than trying to make the series about Andy which was already terrible</quote> yeah, there is a reason he and Gabe werent in the final portrait even though the new guys are spoilers: the new guys are lame but not that lame</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 11/29/17 5:32:22 PM #29:	Balrog0 posted... how would angela know whose baby it was if she was sleeping with two men? Perhaps she wasn't at the time of conception, which is how she would know. A guy might not notice a month out, but the woman would. The baby was also born "prematurely". Balrog0 posted... what if she didn't know whose baby it was but did suspect it was dwights? then doesnt it make perfect sense? Yeah, but that still fits within the possibility that it was Dwight's baby. She did say she "lied" to him about the baby, when it was revealed that it really was, so it might have been written but not expanded on: s0nicfan posted... Legally if the father gets a paternity test done by bringing in DNA the mother can tell the hospital to lie if it comes out positive and the hospital has to comply. That's likely the simplest explanation for the discrepancy: Angela told them to say it was false because she didn't consent to the test being done. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:891289305] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>how would angela know whose baby it was if she was sleeping with two men?</quote> Perhaps she wasn't at the time of conception, which is how she would know. A guy might not notice a month out, but the woman would. The baby was also born "prematurely". <cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>what if she didn't know whose baby it was but did suspect it was dwights? then doesnt it make perfect sense? </quote> Yeah, but that still fits within the possibility that it was Dwight's baby. She did say she "lied" to him about the baby, when it was revealed that it really was, so it might have been written but not expanded on: <cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>Legally if the father gets a paternity test done by bringing in DNA the mother can tell the hospital to lie if it comes out positive and the hospital has to comply. That's likely the simplest explanation for the discrepancy: Angela told them to say it was false because she didn't consent to the test being done. </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 11/29/17 5:32:58 PM #30:	I never could watch it because I hated Carell's character so much. I mean I get that was the point but he was just so insufferable that it wasn't worth putting up with him for all the other great characters <cite>Axiom posted [p:891289338] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>I never could watch it because I hated Carell's character so much. I mean I get that was the point but he was just so insufferable that it wasn't worth putting up with him for all the other great characters</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 11/29/17 5:33:29 PM #31:	CruelBuffalo posted... Robert California is worse than trying to make the series about Andy which was already terrible I thought Robert California's character was great, idk. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:891289372] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Robert California is worse than trying to make the series about Andy which was already terrible</quote> I thought Robert California's character was great, idk.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MC_BatCommander 11/29/17 5:35:28 PM #32:	The show is great up until the Sabre stuff starts up. Like season 3-6 is when it's at its absolute best. Once they introduce Nelly and Gabe it just falls off a cliff. I kind of like to think of Jim and Pam's wedding as my own series finale for the show. --- The Legend is True! <cite>MC_BatCommander posted [p:891289477] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>The show is great up until the Sabre stuff starts up. Like season 3-6 is when it's at its absolute best. Once they introduce Nelly and Gabe it just falls off a cliff. I kind of like to think of Jim and Pam's wedding as my own series finale for the show.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/29/17 5:40:25 PM #33:	Balrog0 posted... or sure, the dna test was off because schrute dna has too much beat juice in it or whatever ltierally anything makes sense at that point! You're really up in arms about them not showing Pam wiping a baby's ass. --- http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif http://i.imgur.com/Er6TT.gif So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:891289775] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote>or sure, the dna test was off because schrute dna has too much beat juice in it or whatever ltierally anything makes sense at that point!</quote> You're really up in arms about them not showing Pam wiping a baby's ass.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Balrog0 11/29/17 5:44:46 PM #34:	pegusus123456 posted... You're really up in arms about them not showing Pam wiping a baby's ass. I'm not up in arms lol it just isn't an explanation that carries any heft at all sorry I'm not super into whatever fan explanation you're a fan of bud --- He would make his mark, if not on this tree, then on that wall; if not with teeth and claws, then with penknife and razor. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:891290015] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote><cite>pegusus123456 posted...</cite> <quote>You're really up in arms about them not showing Pam wiping a baby's ass. </quote> I'm not up in arms lol it just isn't an explanation that carries any heft at all sorry I'm not super into whatever fan explanation you're a fan of bud</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ReD_ToMaTo 11/29/17 5:59:08 PM #35:	Meh, I thought the show was pretty solid all the way through. Some seasons are better than others obviously. And I loved the ending. --- PSN: ReD_ToMaTo <cite>ReD_ToMaTo posted [p:891290838] in rewatching... [t:76044320]...</cite> <quote>Meh, I thought the show was pretty solid all the way through. Some seasons are better than others obviously. And I loved the ending.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > rewatching the office, the last couple seasons are a real train wreck *spoilers* (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > rewatching the office, the last couple seasons are a real train wreck spoilers