LogFAQs


Poll of the Day > Goldeneye 64 vs Halo Combat Evolved

Topic List
Page List: 1
sketchturner
10/23/17 9:02:52 PM
#1:


Which do you prefer?




View Results
Which do you prefer and why?
---
My top 5:Shadow of the Colossus, Pikmin 3, Donkey Kong Country 2, Horizon Zero Dawn, Timesplitters 2
... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE
10/23/17 9:04:47 PM
#2:


Halo is still playable. 007 has aged horribly
... Copied to Clipboard!
darcandkharg31
10/23/17 9:04:49 PM
#3:


Halo, GE was awesome for its day but Halo 1 shits on it's grave.
---
This is my signature, there are many others like it, but this one is mine.
If you take 110% of what I say seriously then you're gonna have a bad time.
... Copied to Clipboard!
FourthDimension
10/23/17 9:05:47 PM
#4:


Goldeneye is not a good game.
... Copied to Clipboard!
AllstarSniper32
10/23/17 9:06:06 PM
#5:


Halo was actually good. Goldeneye was always a terrible game.
---
If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking systems, there would be a revolution before morning - Andrew Jackson
... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE
10/23/17 10:10:00 PM
#6:


AllstarSniper32 posted...
Halo was actually good. Goldeneye was always a terrible game.

Disagree
... Copied to Clipboard!
funkyfritter
10/23/17 10:12:07 PM
#7:


Both had a big impact at the time and have aged terribly. I wouldn't touch either of them now.
---
And with that...pow! I'm gone!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Sahuagin
10/23/17 10:32:16 PM
#8:


Halo probably has better combat, while Goldeneye has better scenarios/missions.
---
The truth basks in scrutiny.
http://i.imgur.com/GMouTGs.jpg http://projecteuler.net/profile/Sahuagin.png
... Copied to Clipboard!
xjayguyx
10/23/17 10:32:31 PM
#9:


MICHALECOLE posted...
Halo is still playable. 007 has aged horribly


This
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/23/17 10:33:51 PM
#10:


Goldeneye solidified the genre, Halo made the gameplay what it is today.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa
10/23/17 10:34:34 PM
#11:


As much as I love goldeneye, halo has a far better campaign (with an awesome story) and multiplayer and still holds up well to this day
... Copied to Clipboard!
papercup
10/23/17 10:38:42 PM
#12:


Have you tried playing GoldenEye? It's unplayable garbage. Even back then it was terrible.
---
Nintendo Network ID: papercups
3DS FC: 4124 5916 9925
... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah
10/23/17 10:39:48 PM
#13:


Goldeneye was a better game for its time than Halo was for its time. Halo has always been tremendously overrated as a FPS. Everything on PC at the time was way, way better than what Halo was at.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Kyuubi4269
10/23/17 10:40:11 PM
#14:


papercup posted...
Have you tried playing GoldenEye? It's unplayable garbage. Even back then it was terrible.

Sounds like you're mad oddjob hatted your cock off.
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa
10/23/17 10:42:46 PM
#15:


wah_wah_wah posted...
Goldeneye was a better game for its time than Halo was for its time. Halo has always been tremendously overrated as a FPS. Everything on PC at the time was way, way better than what Halo was at.

I disagree. It had innovative gameplay and an epic story. Oh yeah... and an amazing soundtrack
... Copied to Clipboard!
DirtBasedSoap
10/23/17 10:43:54 PM
#16:


MICHALECOLE posted...
Halo is still playable. 007 has aged horribly

This. Especially if youre playing the Anniversary edition.
---
http://i.imgur.com/anU2AWL.png
... Copied to Clipboard!
wah_wah_wah
10/23/17 10:52:03 PM
#17:


Also I felt like Goldeneye 007 was trying to be a console FPS, whereas Halo was trying to be a PC FPS on a console. And god, Halo sucked. When you think that Battlefield 1942 came out on PC around the same time, holy shit was Halo inadequate.
... Copied to Clipboard!
J_Dawg983
10/23/17 10:54:00 PM
#18:


Gotta go with golden eye, only played halo a few times at a friends house and I did not care for it at all.
---
RSN: Pridefc
PSN: Jaosin
... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa
10/23/17 10:58:36 PM
#19:


wah_wah_wah posted...
Also I felt like Goldeneye 007 was trying to be a console FPS, whereas Halo was trying to be a PC FPS on a console. And god, Halo sucked. When you think that Battlefield 1942 came out on PC around the same time, holy shit was Halo inadequate.

Apples and oranges. Halo is a sci fi shooter and battlefield isn't
... Copied to Clipboard!
#20
Post #20 was unavailable or deleted.
Rockies
10/23/17 11:23:00 PM
#21:


Halo for both. If it was Halo vs. Perfect Dark, it would be a bit harder of a question. PD has the same control and framerate issues as GE, but the campaign is great, it has really cool weapons, and you can use bots in multiplayer. I never played GE that much when I was younger, so PD has more nostalgia value too. Though at this point, the first Halo is also nostalgic.
... Copied to Clipboard!
LeetCheet
10/23/17 11:53:37 PM
#22:


Goldeneye was fun to play when I was a kid, but Halo CE is still fun to play today.
---
https://i.imgur.com/eQrRxik.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
sketchturner
10/24/17 9:10:34 AM
#23:


For me, there's a lack of weight to Halo controls. It feels like I'm just zipping a cursor around the screen to shoot.

Goldeneye, on the other hand, feels like you're actually moving a character.

For me, that tactile difference alone makes me much prefer Goldeneye.
---
My top 5:Shadow of the Colossus, Pikmin 3, Donkey Kong Country 2, Horizon Zero Dawn, Timesplitters 2
... Copied to Clipboard!
pikey87
10/24/17 11:32:58 AM
#24:


Halo was arguable more influential.
---
25+ years of gaming taught me one important life lesson. You normally don't have to push start at the main menu.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Rockies
10/24/17 1:03:06 PM
#25:


sketchturner posted...
For me, there's a lack of weight to Halo controls. It feels like I'm just zipping a cursor around the screen to shoot.

Goldeneye, on the other hand, feels like you're actually moving a character.

For me, that tactile difference alone makes me much prefer Goldeneye.


Eh, I think the Goldeneye controls work okay because of the stiff N64 joystick, and Halo controls work with the modern joysticks that center well. Each one's style wouldn't have worked well with the other's controller. However, the Halo style is definitely much better overall. I don't really care about "weight", I just want it to be easy to shoot things, and the Halo aiming is so much smoother.
... Copied to Clipboard!
OhhhJa
10/24/17 1:05:40 PM
#26:


Rockies posted...
sketchturner posted...
For me, there's a lack of weight to Halo controls. It feels like I'm just zipping a cursor around the screen to shoot.

Goldeneye, on the other hand, feels like you're actually moving a character.

For me, that tactile difference alone makes me much prefer Goldeneye.


Eh, I think the Goldeneye controls work okay because of the stiff N64 joystick, and Halo controls work with the modern joysticks that center well. Each one's style wouldn't have worked well with the other's controller. However, the Halo style is definitely much better overall. I don't really care about "weight", I just want it to be easy to shoot things, and the Halo aiming is so much smoother.

Plus, the controls for halo were pretty much the basis for every modern console fps. That control scheme was an inevitability regardless but at the time it was revolutionary
... Copied to Clipboard!
ReggieTheReckless
10/24/17 2:17:37 PM
#27:


Perfect dark n64 for campaign and multiplayer

Duh
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1