LogFAQs > #889018840

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Goldeneye 64 vs Halo Combat Evolved
OhhhJa 10/23/17 10:58:36 PM #19:	wah_wah_wah posted... Also I felt like Goldeneye 007 was trying to be a console FPS, whereas Halo was trying to be a PC FPS on a console. And god, Halo sucked. When you think that Battlefield 1942 came out on PC around the same time, holy shit was Halo inadequate. Apples and oranges. Halo is a sci fi shooter and battlefield isn't <cite>OhhhJa posted [p:889018840] in Goldeneye ... [t:75912538]...</cite> <quote><cite>wah_wah_wah posted...</cite> <quote>Also I felt like Goldeneye 007 was trying to be a console FPS, whereas Halo was trying to be a PC FPS on a console. And god, Halo sucked. When you think that Battlefield 1942 came out on PC around the same time, holy shit was Halo inadequate.</quote> Apples and oranges. Halo is a sci fi shooter and battlefield isn't</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1