Board 8 > Politics Containment Topic 133: Easy D's Democratic Dalliance

(+) Yeah! (+)

Corrik posted...

You have no other way to argue anything

I mean you're ignoring every other argument just so that you can play pity party here, dude. You're moving the goal posts and when called out for it you resort to "I'M NOT A BIGOT, YOU GUYS ARE!!!!!!!!!"
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Corrik posted...

scarletspeed7 posted...

I mean, humanity is a part of nature, so if humanity develops a system of gender change, it's natural.

Incorrect.

Until dna changes from xx to xy and dicks fall off and grow vaginas that can bear children on their own then it is unnatural.

No more unnatural than getting botox or a chin lift.

Natural is by defintion something that occurs in nature.

You really, REALLY don't understand what it means to be transgender.

You needed this book at age 5

You can argue all you want regarding this, but is a biological fact that changing from a male to a female or vice versa is not natural.
---

Peace___Frog posted...

Corrik posted...

You have no other way to argue anything

I mean you're ignoring every other argument just so that you can play pity party here, dude. You're moving the goal posts and when called out for it you resort to "I'M NOT A BIGOT, YOU GUYS ARE!!!!!!!!!"

It is a failure of reading on your part. I said you are bigoted against straight parents makes as much sense as what he was saying.

Meaning zero makes sense. It was me saying he is just saying words to say them when they had no actual merit.
---

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Corrik posted...

scarletspeed7 posted...

I mean, humanity is a part of nature, so if humanity develops a system of gender change, it's natural.

Incorrect.

Until dna changes from xx to xy and dicks fall off and grow vaginas that can bear children on their own then it is unnatural.

No more unnatural than getting botox or a chin lift.

Natural is by defintion something that occurs in nature.

You really, REALLY don't understand what it means to be transgender.

You needed this book at age 5

You can argue all you want regarding this, but is a biological fact that changing from a male to a female or vice versa is not natural.

2 things:

1. Would you be ok with them teaching the kids about the concept of gender dysphoria, which does occur naturally

2. who gives a shit about nature? nature sucks. I'm talking to you from hundreds of miles away right now which is completely unnatural. Schools themselves are unnatural.
---

Corrik posted...

a biological fact that changing from a male to a female or vice versa is not natural.

You don't understand science, please stop talking about it as though you do
---

Corrik posted...

but is a biological fact that changing from a male to a female or vice versa is not natural.

That is not what transgender means

Why do you never learn about this topic???
---

Jakyl25 posted...

Like, dude, this may shock and amaze you, but people have been transgender since gender began to exist as a concept

And this may shock and amaze you, but it has never been natural in humanity for all of existence by all accounts and proof available to us.
---

my goodness
---

Trans people: "acknowledge our existence"

Straight people: "no"

Corrik: Stop being bigoted to straight people!!
---

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Like, dude, this may shock and amaze you, but people have been transgender since gender began to exist as a concept

And this may shock and amaze you, but it has never been natural in humanity for all of existence by all accounts and proof available to us.

Pacemakers aren't natural but I don't see a rush for people to ban those.
---

GuessMyUserName posted...

Trans people: "acknowledge our existence"

Straight people: "no"

Corrik: Stop being bigoted to straight people!!

Actually though


And the reason corrik doesn't understand this is because learning about things that you can't directly experience is unnatural.
---

GuessMyUserName posted...

Trans people: "acknowledge our existence"

Straight people: "no"

Corrik: Stop being bigoted to straight people!!

Lol taking words out of context to twist things to try and argue. Who didn't see that coming in this topic?

Can any of you ever argue without trying to bring up race, bigotry, or literally misrepresenting what someone said? How hard is it?
---

Corrik posted...

Can any of you ever argue without trying to bring up race, bigotry, or literally misrepresenting what someone said? How hard is it?

... dude, you're literally the first person here to bring up bigotry
---

Suprak the Stud posted...

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Like, dude, this may shock and amaze you, but people have been transgender since gender began to exist as a concept

And this may shock and amaze you, but it has never been natural in humanity for all of existence by all accounts and proof available to us.

Pacemakers aren't natural but I don't see a rush for people to ban those.

They are not natural correct. And, no one said to ban transgenders. So what is the correlation here, Suprak? Because I hold you to more of a standard than literally far left babble that most in these topics resort to.
---

Corrik posted...

Suprak the Stud posted...

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Like, dude, this may shock and amaze you, but people have been transgender since gender began to exist as a concept

And this may shock and amaze you, but it has never been natural in humanity for all of existence by all accounts and proof available to us.

Pacemakers aren't natural but I don't see a rush for people to ban those.

They are not natural correct. And, no one said to ban transgenders. So what is the correlation here, Suprak? Because I hold you to more of a standard than literally far left babble that most in these topics resort to.

do you not want kids to learn about the existence of pacemakers
---

Corrik posted...

Suprak the Stud posted...

Corrik posted...

Jakyl25 posted...

Like, dude, this may shock and amaze you, but people have been transgender since gender began to exist as a concept

And this may shock and amaze you, but it has never been natural in humanity for all of existence by all accounts and proof available to us.

Pacemakers aren't natural but I don't see a rush for people to ban those.

They are not natural correct. And, no one said to ban transgenders. So what is the correlation here, Suprak? Because I hold you to more of a standard than literally far left babble that most in these topics resort to.

So you'd be against teachers talking about pacemakers then?
---

Well you seem to be using "unnatural" as a bad thing, unless I am misreading your posts. I don't think that is a very good argument because plenty of things are unnatural that we as a society accept as good.

Obviously you aren't saying people who are transgender should be banned. But do you think surgery for gender dysmorphia should be banned?
---

Corrik posted...

And I also believe there is absolutely no way a kindergartner should be having decisions made about their gender.

You uhhhh may want to rethink this point based on the rest of your argument because you are actually 100% in favor of kindergarteners having their gender dictated to them by others.
---

Jakyl25 posted...

And I hope "Fuck Bernie Bros" goes without saying

The fuck do "Bernie bros" have to do with this?
---

Suprak the Stud posted...

Well you seem to be using "unnatural" as a bad thing, unless I am misreading your posts. I don't think that is a very good argument because plenty of things are unnatural that we as a society accept as good.

Obviously you aren't saying people who are transgender should be banned. But do you think sexual recollective surgery should be banned?

I actually used unnatural matter of factly. It is unnatural. I do not think we teach 5 year olds actual natural sexual topics until around age 12 or 13 in most schools with prior permission slips going out. So, why would teaching an unnatural lifestyle be okay to be fed into the curriculum when it feeds into questions regarding sexuality that would not be touched until above mentioned ages with permission slips?

The obvious answer to me is that this sort of stuff should not be broached upon until the age when you actually do sex ed and with proper permission allowed to with an opt out clause just as normal sex ed is.
---

So transgender kids should be forced to think that they're fucked up and no one else like them exists, thus suppressing themselves and being ashamed of who they are



Got it
---

Corrik posted...

I do not think we teach 5 year olds actual natural sexual topics until around age 12 or 13 in most schools with prior permission slips going out.

.... did you not have sex ed in elementary school? wtf
---

GuessMyUserName posted...

Corrik posted...

I do not think we teach 5 year olds actual natural sexual topics until around age 12 or 13 in most schools with prior permission slips going out.

.... did you not have sex ed in elementary school? wtf

Uh no and most places don't???
---

I would go into debt right now for us to join hands and reunite around a Lemonberry Splash cameo.
---