Current Events > US massacres 100 civilians in Raqqa; women and children among dead.

(+) Yeah! (+)

Axiom posted...

TheVipaGTS posted...

So whose alt is HashBrown? I refuse to believe someone new here can have an opinion as dumb as that.

HogRider/TheSexMachine

Makes sense. He's always been a "lol look at me guys I'm saying something dumb!" Kind of poster....when your gimmick gets to the point that "we need to hurt innocent children" becomes your go to for attention it's time to get a life, man...

Axiom posted...

TheVipaGTS posted...

So whose alt is HashBrown? I refuse to believe someone new here can have an opinion as dumb as that.

HogRider/TheSexMachine

Who the fuck is TheSexMachine?
---

ShiningFetus posted...

If the hostages were America/Euro, would America be so easily trigger happy? Doubt it.

Lol, did they skip the entire Europe campaign of World War II in your History classes? The Allies bombed and shelled the fuck out of white civilian populations.
---

Raqqa is isis capitol
---

All these guys bashing Hash sure as hell aren't coming up with better ideas.

Just moral exclamations like people who don't want to come up with solutions.
---

These terrorist use civilians as human shields innocent people will always be killed when you have an immoral enemy
---

What are they suppose to do when ISIS does shit like this?



This is just moments before she blew herself and her baby up.
---

cuttin_in_farm posted...

All these guys bashing Hash sure as hell aren't coming up with better ideas.

Just moral exclamations like people who don't want to come up with solutions.

Literally any idea is a better idea than "blow up all Muslims".
---

Bio1590 posted...

cuttin_in_farm posted...

All these guys bashing Hash sure as hell aren't coming up with better ideas.

Just moral exclamations like people who don't want to come up with solutions.

Literally any idea is a better idea than "blow up all Muslims".

If they really wanted to blow them all up, the Coalition forces would not bother with surgical strikes.
---

Bio1590 posted...

Literally any idea is a better idea than "blow up all Muslims".

Yet no one here has came up with even one.

Funny how that works.
---

HashBrownAgain posted...

Fam_Fam posted...

so kill all the women and children in terrorist strongholds to minimize damage?

No, unless they don't surrender. The point is to bomb them to submission.

You kill 100 innocent civilians, god knows how many people you will radicalize. Overwhelming firepower and airstrike after airstrike will only prolong the war and lead more once-innocent people to radicalize and join the ranks of ISIS.
---

HashBrownAgain posted...

Bio1590 posted...

Literally any idea is a better idea than "blow up all Muslims".

Yet no one here has came up with even one.

Funny how that works.

here's one

not doing it
---

Delirious_Beard posted...

HashBrownAgain posted...

Bio1590 posted...

Literally any idea is a better idea than "blow up all Muslims".

Yet no one here has came up with even one.

Funny how that works.

here's one

not doing it

So we just let the terrorist continue to use the city to carry out their attacks?
---

Russia and America have stayed away from isis home of raqqa to long they need to hit isis where they live
---

It's crazy that we live in a reality where Donald Trump gets to make decisions like this.
---

either the best or the worst timeline
---

Ray_Dorset posted...

HashBrownAgain posted...

Fam_Fam posted...

so kill all the women and children in terrorist strongholds to minimize damage?

No, unless they don't surrender. The point is to bomb them to submission.

You kill 100 innocent civilians, god knows how many people you will radicalize. Overwhelming firepower and airstrike after airstrike will only prolong the war and lead more once-innocent people to radicalize and join the ranks of ISIS.

Those people were prone to becoming radicals anyways, so who cares. If we had a leader with any balls then on September 12, 2001 we would of finished off the whole region and wouldn't have kept this war going on for all these years spending billions.
---

KillerKhan420 posted...

Ray_Dorset posted...

HashBrownAgain posted...

Fam_Fam posted...

so kill all the women and children in terrorist strongholds to minimize damage?

No, unless they don't surrender. The point is to bomb them to submission.

You kill 100 innocent civilians, god knows how many people you will radicalize. Overwhelming firepower and airstrike after airstrike will only prolong the war and lead more once-innocent people to radicalize and join the ranks of ISIS.

Those people were prone to becoming radicals anyways, so who cares. If we had a leader with any balls then on September 12, 2001 we would of finished off the whole region and wouldn't have kept this war going on for all these years spending billions.

stay classy CE
---

So the one time Proudclad advocated bombing everyone in the Middle East it was deleted almost immediately and he ended up banned.

How the fuck are these still up?
---

Bandit_Keith posted...

I honestly don't know how else we could fight them. They hide smokers the children and the women. Force them to suicide bomb. Put them in harm's way under threat of death but end up getting them killed anyway. And then point to the US as evil for killing the children that ISIL themselves use as human shields. I really don't know what to do. But doing nothing just lets them grow much larger and faster.

That's like saying, how else do terrorists fight the West, who have high security protecting priority targets? Who are sieging their home? They resort to inhumane tactics, such as bombing innocent civilians.

If the US killing innocent people is acceptable, then in their mind, so is them killing innocent people in our country.
---

HashBrownAgain posted...

Bio1590 posted...

Literally any idea is a better idea than "blow up all Muslims".

Yet no one here has came up with even one.

Funny how that works.

Probably because none of us are military figure heads who know what's going on and have access to tech and intelligence.

But I'd say funding the rebels to stop dictators, the rebels who in turn use those weapons against the west, isn't the best course of actions.
---

OEIO999 posted...

That's like saying, how else do terrorists fight the West, who have high security protecting priority targets? Who are sieging their home? They resort to inhumane tactics, such as bombing innocent civilians.

But 90% of the time they do it to their own people.
---

HashBrownAgain posted...

OEIO999 posted...

That's like saying, how else do terrorists fight the West, who have high security protecting priority targets? Who are sieging their home? They resort to inhumane tactics, such as bombing innocent civilians.

But 90% of the time they do it to their own people.

They do, that's why they are the bad guys. That's why every idiot who claims the West are so evil for killing them then go into join those extremists groups to exact 'justice', are Fucking morons. But cases like this, gives them justification.

You have to understand the West has clear technological superiority over extremists group and we have many, many allies. Restoring to this, is unacceptable.
---

OEIO999 posted...

HashBrownAgain posted...

OEIO999 posted...

That's like saying, how else do terrorists fight the West, who have high security protecting priority targets? Who are sieging their home? They resort to inhumane tactics, such as bombing innocent civilians.

But 90% of the time they do it to their own people.

They do, that's why they are the bad guys. That's why every idiot who claims the West are so evil for killing them then go into join those extremists groups to exact 'justice', are Fucking morons. But cases like this, gives them justification.

You have to understand the West has clear technological superiority over extremists group and we have many, many allies. Restoring to this, is unacceptable.

Again, this isn't some random city, it is their last stronghold. The chances of anyone being left that is innocent is very slim.
---

thats a couple hundred pissed off relatives that will surely love killing off some westerners for revenge.

Guess we reap what we sow.
---

This @HashBrownAgain dude literally advocated killing women and children itt

This is why nobody takes any of you conservatives seriously on this site or in this country
---

Samurontai posted...

This @HashBrownAgain dude literally advocated killing women and children itt

It is that or let them kill even more people. Why is that so hard to understand.
There is no happy end solution for you bleeding hearts. It is either bomb their city, or don't and let them kill even more people. But in reality the left doesn't care about the bigger picture, they just want to act like they are morally superior and scream racism.
---

ShiningFetus posted...

Bandit_Keith posted...

I honestly don't know how else we could fight them. They hide smokers the children and the women. Force them to suicide bomb. Put them in harm's way under threat of death but end up getting them killed anyway. And then point to the US as evil for killing the children that ISIL themselves use as human shields. I really don't know what to do. But doing nothing just lets them grow much larger and faster.

It also shows how US sees no value in preserving brown life. If the hostages were America/Euro, would America be so easily trigger happy? Doubt it.

They would if they were European, since Americans generally don't care about European life or any life outside of White American life.
---

So they pushed him into negative karma with like 3 3kls instead of just banning the account.

Sigh.
---

HashBrownAgain posted...

When isis women and children over there regularly strap bombs to themselves and blow up people can they really be called civilians?

---