Board 8 > I can't wait for Romney to get into office and get this **** overturned

(+) Yeah! (+)

From: User728 | #049

The people in the military signed up for the job. They knowingly chose it.

And they knowingly kill themselves at rapid rates, knowing that they knowingly chose to sign up for this "war"

--
_foolmo_
'but that statement is something only an Aspergers patient would say' - UltimaterializerX

Fair enough, but the wars are still an unequal taxation. Whether or not they bomb a building in the middle east has absolutely no affect on my life, other than forcibly taking money away from me to pay for it.

Well, I guess it does promote Islamic hysteria too, which in turns puts me in even more danger than I already was.

--
Genesis does what Nintendon't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7nsBoqJ6s8

foolmor0n posted...

From: User728 | #049

The people in the military signed up for the job. They knowingly chose it.

And they knowingly kill themselves at rapid rates, knowing that they knowingly chose to sign up for this "war"

this too

--
Genesis does what Nintendon't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7nsBoqJ6s8

From: KingButz | #050
It's immoral.

But I forgot that User is just a troll; I'm not going to waste any more time arguing with him


Says you. And considering how completely subjective morality is, it's best to leave that out of this discussion...especially considering you appear to be implying that a country should allow themselves to be attacked without defending themselves due to it being "immoral" in your eyes. Side note: Nice cop out with the worthless troll comment. It's always nice to use that as a way to run away from a losing argument.

From: foolmor0n | #051
From: User728 | #049

The people in the military signed up for the job. They knowingly chose it.

And they knowingly kill themselves at rapid rates, knowing that they knowingly chose to sign up for this "war"


So your answer is that the military should be designed to sit around and play poker? Cool idea. If that's the case, I'll sign up too!


From: TomNook7 | #052
Fair enough, but the wars are still an unequal taxation. Whether or not they bomb a building in the middle east has absolutely no affect on my life, other than forcibly taking money away from me to pay for it.

Well, I guess it does promote Islamic hysteria too, which in turns puts me in even more danger than I already was.


The War on Terror was designed to prevent future terrorism by eliminating terrorists. It seems that Bush and Obama have done that by sending the troops out there considering we haven't had any attacks since. We may get attacked in the future again...but I'd rather try and prevent it before the crisis actually occurs. Regardless, we aren't fighting terrorists because of bombings in the middle east. The attack on the World Trade Center is what started the war.

From: User728 | #055

So your answer is that the military should be designed to sit around and play poker? Cool idea. If that's the case, I'll sign up too!

More like russian roulette, except the gun is fully loaded, and you're playing alone

--
_foolmo_
'Oh please, if foolmo made that analogy you'd think it was picture perfect' - Biolizard28

I don't really see how your analogy applies, but it must just be because I'm a "troll".

Just how much are you jacking off to what you think you're achieving with this topic.

--
SEP Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid! http://i33.tinypic.com/2v1sq51.jpg

From: StealThisSheen | #058
Just how much are you jacking off to what you think you're achieving with this topic.


I don't know. 4?

Today, you have a better chance of being struck by lightning than be attacked by a terrorist. And that's because we've improved defense and security in our nation, not because we're sinking our economy by spending $1.5 trillion to attack random countries.

You're making this too easy.

I also love how you never responded to me proving that Romney supports Obamacare.

--
Genesis does what Nintendon't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7nsBoqJ6s8

From: User728 | #001
Second, it is a slippery slope down to a dictatorship.

So you admit that that's an invalid logical argument.

--
*Lives in the Future*
http://img.imgcake.com/vaga/0vvvwgifem.gif

From: OInsaneOne | #060
From: User728 | #001
Second, it is a slippery slope down to a dictatorship.
So you admit that it's an invalid logical argument.


Breaking News: The phrase "slippery slope" can be used for something other than in a discussion about fallacies.

But it still implies a highly unlikely and overly dramatized conclusion.

--
*Lives in the Future*
http://img.imgcake.com/vaga/0vvvwgifem.gif

From: User728 | #062

Breaking News: The phrase "slippery slope" can be used for something other than in a discussion about fallacies.

you got trolled

--
_foolmo_
'nice comma splice' - TomNook7

From: TomNook7 | #061
Today, you have a better chance of being struck by lightning than be attacked by a terrorist. And that's because we've improved defense and security in our nation, not because we're sinking our economy by spending $1.5 trillion to attack random countries.

You're making this too easy.

I also love how you never responded to me proving that Romney supports Obamacare.


First off, terrorists could get in here in any way that they'd like if they ever want to. And in all likelihood, they will within the next few years. We don't have some giant dome covering the country. They can and will get in.

Your easy comment was stupid so it's ignored other than this sentence telling you that it's ignored.

I didn't respond to many posts in this topic. As for Obamacare, Romney does not support it as he has said about 1000 times so far. He wants the states and the people to have the power. He doesn't want the central government to have more power. He supports capitalism...especially as a businessman. He will absolutely remove it (likely through waiver) if/when elected. Not only because he doesn't want the federal government to have more power and control more (they suck at running everything other than the military), but also because it will win over every Republican and will make him all the more likely to be re-elected (or to win this first election if he mentions repealing obamacare during campaigns for this election).

From: OInsaneOne | #063
But it still implies a highly unlikely and overly dramatized conclusion.


No it doesn't. It's a phrase in addition to a fallacy. I used the phrase meaning.

From: User728 | #065

Romney does not support it as he has said about 1000 times so far.

He has said that he supports it 2000 times, though

--
_foolmo_
'Oh please, if foolmo made that analogy you'd think it was picture perfect' - Biolizard28

From: foolmor0n | #067
From: User728 | #065

Romney does not support it as he has said about 1000 times so far.

He has said that he supports it 2000 times, though


lol "k"

My bad it was just around 1500 times

sorry for the misinformation

--
_foolmo_
'nice comma splice' - TomNook7

From: foolmor0n | #069
My bad it was just around 1500 times

sorry for the misinformation


Half-way decent joke has officially be killed.

The Great User728 is judging my comedic ability? *so honored*

--
_foolmo_
'but that statement is something only an Aspergers patient would say' - UltimaterializerX

hey guys i havent been around much the past few days anything change

--
http://i.imgur.com/xBFwK.gif

As many times as he said he doesn't support it, he also said he does support it. I guess you didn't watch that video. Or know that the blueprints for Obamacare were copied from Romney's healthcare plan used in Massachusetts.

Romney's only saying he's gonna repel Obamacare to get gullible Republicans like yourself to vote for him. He's infamous for being a flip-flopper; he's not actually gonna do it. You can literally go to Youtube right now and see how two-faced he is. It's like when Obama was going to be the peace-time, pro civil liberties candidate, but did the exact opposite when he got into office. Or when Bush promised a non-aggressive foreign policy when he was campaigning. They're just crooked politicians being crooked politicians.

It's basically come down to "Vote Libertarian" or "Betray the Constitution." I have no doubt you'll gleefully choose the latter.

--
Genesis does what Nintendon't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7nsBoqJ6s8

I still don't think you're entirely understanding how that "slippery slope" saying works...

Yes, it's a saying....that doesn't really carry any weight logically.

Romney winning the 2012 election is a slippery slope to polygamy being legalized is just as valid as what you said.

--
*Lives in the Future*
http://img.imgcake.com/vaga/0vvvwgifem.gif

From: OInsaneOne | #074

Romney winning the 2012 election is a slippery slope to polygamy being legalized

Romney 2012

--
http://img.imgcake.com/nio/bokbokbokpngur.png
Mr Caffeine? He was awesome. - Ayuyu

--
http://i.imgur.com/9PnFY.jpg
http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/CaptainRockman.png

From: OInsaneOne | #074
I still don't think you're entirely understanding how that "slippery slope" saying works...

Yes, it's a saying....that doesn't really carry any weight logically.

Romney winning the 2012 election is a slippery slope to polygamy being legalized is just as valid as what you said.


Again you're confusing 2 entirely separate meanings of the word. The fallacy meaning has absolutely nothing to do with the phrase when it's used in the way I did. Slippery slope can mean a logical fallacy. It can also mean that it's destined to lead to something. I used the latter. This isn't difficult.

From: TomNook7 | #073
As many times as he said he doesn't support it, he also said he does support it. I guess you didn't watch that video. Or know that the blueprints for Obamacare were copied from Romney's healthcare plan used in Massachusetts.

Romney's only saying he's gonna repel Obamacare to get gullible Republicans like yourself to vote for him. He's infamous for being a flip-flopper; he's not actually gonna do it. You can literally go to Youtube right now and see how two-faced he is. It's like when Obama was going to be the peace-time, pro civil liberties candidate, but did the exact opposite when he got into office. Or when Bush promised a non-aggressive foreign policy when he was campaigning. They're just crooked politicians being crooked politicians.

It's basically come down to "Vote Libertarian" or "Betray the Constitution." I have no doubt you'll gleefully choose the latter.


This post just screams "down with corporate america, the government and the corporations are bad liars, let's have a rock/weed/sex concert to fight the man." I'm not dipping into that nonsense...I'm too old for that crap. As for the Obamacare portion, Romney wanted it for the STATES. That's why it's used in Massachusetts. He has said that 100 times already. He doesn't want the federal government to have more power. Obamacare will be gone if/when he's elected. Any Republican would do it (and any smart Democrat).

From: User728 | #078

let's have a rock/weed/sex concert to fight the man

Reminds me of Shirley's horror story in the 3rd halloween episode. User is literally Shirley.

From: ninkendo | #076

Oh god this is almost as amazing as

--
_foolmo_
mobile computer

^^ literally, huh?

--
This is quite a username I have here.

hi I'm gay I like it in the pooper

--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npHDxSvwCE0

User728 posted...

This post just screams "down with corporate america, the government and the corporations are bad liars, let's have a rock/weed/sex concert to fight the man." I'm not dipping into that nonsense...I'm too old for that crap. As for the Obamacare portion, Romney wanted it for the STATES. That's why it's used in Massachusetts. He has said that 100 times already. He doesn't want the federal government to have more power. Obamacare will be gone if/when he's elected. Any Republican would do it (and any smart Democrat).

yeah youve definitely given the impression of old/mature throughout this argument

--
Genesis does what Nintendon't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7nsBoqJ6s8

This topic again.

This user again.

80+ post.


I know you guys won't change but why won't you guys change?

--
http://img.imgcake.com/AlecTrevylan006/darkyounglinkshieldpngyg.png
Sleep? F*** sleep, Toonami is on!!- GenesisSaga

From: TomNook7 | #081
User728 posted...

This post just screams "down with corporate america, the government and the corporations are bad liars, let's have a rock/weed/sex concert to fight the man." I'm not dipping into that nonsense...I'm too old for that crap. As for the Obamacare portion, Romney wanted it for the STATES. That's why it's used in Massachusetts. He has said that 100 times already. He doesn't want the federal government to have more power. Obamacare will be gone if/when he's elected. Any Republican would do it (and any smart Democrat).

yeah youve definitely given the impression of old/mature throughout this argument


Good point. You win the debate.

From: UltimaterializerX | #085

User got through law school

So his dad has money and/or his mom is sleeping with the dean. Big deal, that doesn't say anything about him other than that he might be the bastard son of a law school dean. Too bad intelligence isn't hereditary.

--
_foolmo_
mobile computer

My tuition is 110% paid by the government, actually. Suck it taxpayers.

--
_foolmo_
mobile computer

From: UltimaterializerX | #085
I love all the crybaby Lib8erals who think any conservative is a troll. User got through law school, which means he's doing more with his life than you ever will.

Romney won't overturn this, FYI. The next election might as well be called the Obamney Dictatorship, since both guys support the exact same things and are funded by the exact same banks.


Haha yes. Board 8 is the only Gfaqs board where I'm a flat out troll for being a Republican. As for Romney and Obamacare...I feel as though, if for no other reason, he'd overturn it to score points with the GOP (especially since many feel he isn't conservative enough...this should get him full GOP support). But we'll see. I know that his argument was that state controlled health care is fine but federal control isn't (I'd prefer neither...but would definitely rather give the states more power than to give the federal government yet another power that they shouldn't have and are incapable of handling).


From: foolmor0n | #086
From: UltimaterializerX | #085

User got through law school

So his dad has money and/or his mom is sleeping with the dean. Big deal, that doesn't say anything about him other than that he might be the bastard son of a law school dean. Too bad intelligence isn't hereditary.


Come on. That's just lame. First off, I have $83k in student loans and it's all from law school. My dad didn't pay anything, and I don't exactly have the best relationship with him (though he has been better the last 2-3 weeks so we'll see how things go). The mom thing I don't even need to address since it's just stupid. I worked my ass off during law school, and somehow managed to work even harder while studying for the NY and NJ Bars. It was the toughest thing I ever did in my life but I worked damn hard for it. Your post was filled with unreachable straws and immaturity.

It's not because you're a republican, it's because your logic is awful. No one calls, say, redsox a troll, because he actually backs up his points and doesn't say things like "it's a slippery slope down to a dictatorship"

God I hope you're better at being a lawyer than you are at this.

--
No I'm not a damn furry. Looney Tunes are different. - Guiga

LordoftheMorons posted...

It's not because you're a republican, it's because your logic is awful. No one calls, say, redsox a troll, because he actually backs up his points and doesn't say things like "it's a slippery slope down to a dictatorship"

God I hope you're better at being a lawyer than you are at this.

You are literally explaining to a troll why he is a troll. Do you not see the problem here.

--
XIII_rocks, the cream of XIII fanboyism.

they're only valid if you can show how one thing logically leads to the other, which people using a slippery slope argument don't do the vast majority of the time.

It's like if I were to claim that all positive integers are squares, showed the base case (1=1^2), and then proclaimed victory without proving the (false) inductive step.

--
No I'm not a damn furry. Looney Tunes are different. - Guiga

Ulti, User has openly admitted many times that he's a troll on this board.

--
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
Brace for the G's, and fast heel-toe work.

I'll stick to my policy of avoiding the sports boards here.

--
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
Brace for the G's, and fast heel-toe work.

It's terribly difficult for me to take anyone talking about politics seriously, especially on the internet.

--
http://img.imgcake.com/AlecTrevylan006/darkyounglinkshieldpngyg.png
Sleep? F*** sleep, Toonami is on!!- GenesisSaga

From: UltimaterializerX | #095
I can tell when he's being serious. Lurk the baseball board some time.


Exactly. You and Chris lurk there and can see the difference.


From: ExThaNemesis | #096
I'll stick to my policy of avoiding the sports boards here.


You have a policy against visiting gamefaqs boards that actually don't suck?

BTW, a word to the wise: If someone writes a lot in their post, they probably aren't trolling.

From: foolmor0n | #079
From: User728 | #078

let's have a rock/weed/sex concert to fight the man

Reminds me of Shirley's horror story in the 3rd halloween episode. User is literally Shirley.

From: ninkendo | #076

Oh god this is almost as amazing as
Go, Obamaterasu! Kick Oromneychi's butt!

--
There's always hope for better things in life. But you can't let anything, friend, lover, God himself, be your hope. You have to be your own hope.